That is only for us to decide.
It's the picture we're discussing, not the subject matter as such; or at least that’s the direction the post has evolved.
There's nothing clever per se with the above image either technically nor graphically, but it does have some redeeming features, and on balance I personally think it probably satisfies the advertiser’s / art director's / photographer's brief.
It's effectiveness , or otherwise, and has provided more comment than many threads here, some josh about the subjects, some debate the technical merits of the picture.
The symmetry of both the physical image and the suggested reference and symmetry to Karate are not lost on us.
Perhaps you would be kind enough to allow us to decide if your posterior is, as you claim, not too small and not too large, whether the photograph alluded to does has artistic merit and if it does, as you suggest, pass muster as a "clever photo" 'cause I really don't think this is for you to decide for us.
I very much look forward to seeing (a picture) of your bottom – and you can be sure, of this I promise, I've never uttered those words before to another man, nor will again. 🙂