WW2 Bombers debate
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] WW2 Bombers debate

43 Posts
26 Users
0 Reactions
446 Views
Posts: 4607
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Or an excuse to post nice pics. Doesn't really matter.

The questions is, sentimentality aside, which is the nicest-looking?

For me, it's got to be the B-17 Flying Fortress

B-17

with the B-25 Mitchell a runner-up.

B-25

My great-uncle was a Lancaster pilot and squadron leader, so it pains me to leave it and the Halifax out of the running, but really... there is just something so mighty-looking about the B-17.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

B17 looks brutally purposeful. B24 is more elegant looking IMO. I prefer the B24 version with the single tail though.

But B29 best looking of the lot.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 1:29 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 1:45 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50459
 

When people were truly owned by a set of bombers.

Wellesy


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 1:47 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

always been fond of the hampden....

IIRC they, optimisticly, gave the pilot a forward facing MG 😀

do love a Blenhen

with all the folly of a "day" bomber, imagine having to hold of the luftwaffe with a single vickers machine gun.

and for looking mean and purposeful the ju88

with the armed to the teeth look going to the invader


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 1:57 pm
Posts: 9156
Full Member
 

I like a B24 - had no idea they did a single tail version. Every day's a school day! 🙂


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 2:06 pm
Posts: 843
Free Member
 

B26 Marauder, once it got over its teething troubles (killing the crews!) it turned out to be one to survive in.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 2:21 pm
Posts: 290
Full Member
 

mossi

as aP above, this is the correct answer


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 2:35 pm
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

Look at the curves on a nice Catalina


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 2:36 pm
Posts: 1330
Free Member
Posts: 43582
Full Member
 

Technically, not the bomber version. Needs the clear nose.

But here, have a cookie.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 3:07 pm
 copa
Posts: 441
Free Member
 

Wonderful images guys.

No need to bring politics into this. Lets just marvel at these majestic killing machines.

They represent everything good in the world.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 3:32 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

death from the skies is blessed by god! ... from a localish church


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 3:44 pm
Posts: 8401
Free Member
 

Not a bomber but another Mosquito.

The Tseste. Automatic 57mm anti tank gun for sinking U Boats.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 5:14 pm
Posts: 45702
Free Member
 

+1 Mosquito

However, define 'nice' when we're discussing weapons of war. This is 'nice' I think..


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 5:46 pm
Posts: 1330
Free Member
 

Hope to see the B-17 at Old Warden one day, they get so nice and close to you there.
Seen the Lancaster more times when there for airshows.

https://flic.kr/p/27ktQPV


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 6:58 pm
Posts: 33553
Full Member
 

Speaking of Lancasters, a sight never to be seen again, sadly.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 9:17 pm
Posts: 1330
Free Member
 

You never know, they might get Just Jane in the air one day.
I went to see them over East Kirkby if I been at the airfield you could have seen 3 at a time as they were taxing Just Jane as they flew over
https://flic.kr/p/oPY4F4


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 9:31 pm
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

The "B24 with a single tail-plane" is a PB4Y-2 Privateer.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 10:22 pm
Posts: 492
Full Member
 

I reckon they used the B24 as inspiration for the Mandolorian space ship. Still go for the Lanc, just for the noise.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 10:30 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Anyone seen a Mossie flying, apart from me? Airshow at Woodford in 1970 something. Bloody awesome, hair standing on end stuff & unforgettable.
B24? Yep, my Dad worked on them during the war when he was with Coastal Command.


 
Posted : 20/09/2020 10:36 pm
Posts: 3355
Full Member
 

234
Mosquito has been done so I’ll go with Arado 234


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 3:59 am
Posts: 2808
Full Member
 

what's that mental one the germans did when they'd run out of bits? Junkers 287 or something


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 4:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I always thought the Halifax looked very muscular, but the twin tail ruins it. I think it would look a lot better with a single tailfin.

An I always liked the look of the Mitsubishi Betty, apart from the tailfin. I think a taller, slimmer tailfin would have made it look really good.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 4:57 am
Posts: 1291
Full Member
 

Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-02, Focke-Wulf Fw 200 C Condor.jpg<br>By Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1978-043-02 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, Link</p>">Focke-Wulf Condor


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 7:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

confused about the betty - why US markings?

edit - wiki has the answer
https://j-aircraft.com/captured/capturedfrom/TAIC/TAICSG4M/mitsubishi_g4m2_betty.htm


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 8:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

confused about the betty – why US markings?

I assume it was captured (probably after the war) and test flown for evaluation purposes. All the combatant countries flew captured aircraft in order to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 8:18 am
Posts: 6901
Full Member
 

All the combatant countries flew captured aircraft in order to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.

The BBC Winkle Brown documentary was on again the other night - he did a ton of evaluating German planes at the end of the war including this

Loads of info here - https://acesflyinghighthesurvivors.wordpress.com/2019/05/15/the-survivors-arado-ar-234-blitz-germanys-jet-bomber/


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 9:25 am
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

This never made it to production, but was the development of Hitler's requirement for the Me262 to be a bomber

Gaijin pls Me 262 A-2a/U2 Sturmvogel glazed nose variant. This aircraft  made 21 successful flights before the end of the war. It would be a very  interesting addition to the game. :


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 9:38 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 9:48 am
Posts: 2580
Full Member
 

I am inclined to agree with Mikkel that the He-111 could look pretty nice, but I couldn't find any pictures that really reflected that.

Instead I will completely ignore the brief and post a picture of the Republic XF-12 Rainbow. It's ever so slightly postwar (first flight 1946, though it was being designed during the war) and it was a reconnaissance aircraft, not a bomber, but look at it:

Republic XF-12 Rainbow


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 10:24 am
Posts: 10474
Free Member
 

Anyone seen a Mossie flying, apart from me? Airshow at Woodford in 1970 something. Bloody awesome, hair standing on end stuff & unforgettable.

I saw several as I used to go to airshows with Dad back in the sixties. the only thing I really remember though is the Vulcan doing a low pass and then standing on its tail. Same for Lightnings.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The OP's question was

The questions is, sentimentality aside, which is the nicest-looking?

Mosquito is nice, but clearly a lot of people have a different concept of "nice looking" to me. That Me262 is ugly as ****, leaving aside it's not really a bomber, just an interceptor with a bomb rack. Lancaster and Stuka are not pleasing to the eye. Catalina is not a bomber.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 11:11 am
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

If we're being picky; your "B24 with a single tail-plane" is a long range ocean patrol aircraft. So just observation with a bomb rack...

These threads always throw up interesting stuff though


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

your “B24 with a single tail-plane” is a heavy bomber adapted as a long range ocean patrol aircraft bomber

FTFY


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 11:50 am
Posts: 2580
Full Member
 

I think that without its turrets and armament the B-17 would look fairly sleek and nice, in an advanced inter-war sort of way. The B-29 looks pretty good too, because it's so "clean" looking. Having looked at the bomber sections of Wikipedia's list of WW2 aircraft I would say the Amiot 354 looks quite nice, from some angles at least.

Amiot-354


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 12:00 pm
Posts: 263
Full Member
 

Catalina is not a bomber

Yes it is, that's what the 'B' in PBY5 stands for. It bombed with bombs, depth charges and rockets.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 12:13 pm
Posts: 1330
Free Member
 

Catalina is another one that is awesome to see at Old Warden.

https://flic.kr/p/2fMLxCh


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 12:45 pm
Posts: 6901
Full Member
 

Catalina also handy for bombing in more recent times.... easy to reload too!!


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 12:54 pm
Posts: 263
Full Member
 

Just to show off a bit, here's a photo of me on top of the wing last week, refuelling at Duxford

Catalina Refuelling Duxford


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That picture link is to a GMail account, not an image.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 1:46 pm
Posts: 263
Full Member
 

Ah balls .....


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 2:16 pm
Posts: 6901
Full Member
 

Amiot 354 is a beaut. Never heard of it before but it looks like it was designed by someone involved in the Schneider Trophy. A sharp point on the front and swept tail - class!

EDIT Wikipedia says they even built a racing version (Amiot 370) for the cancelled NY-Paris air race.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 2:39 pm
Posts: 33553
Full Member
 

Bugger - just posted some photos, only to be told I must be logged in! Which I was, until I pressed submit...😖
Anyway, I went to the Weston-Super-Mare Air Day, weather was ideal, and one of the displays was a Catalina. I’d stood underneath one on static display, which brought home just how big the bloody things are! The display was by ‘Miss Pick Up’, and it was a great display along the sea front.
I’d also forgotten that, aside from being a rescue plane, they were marine bombers.


 
Posted : 21/09/2020 8:09 pm