Forum menu
For the first time in eight years I've reported a post on STW
Well done. Though you may want to check the wording of this Forum Rule before you go reporting posts Edukator:
No posts which, in the Moderators opinion, are likely to cause offence to either an individual, or group, whatever their gender, sexual inclination or ethnicity.
I have to say that if I'd posted some of the xenophobic nonsense that Eduakator has in the past I'd maybe be asking for all of my posting history to be deleted.....
I believe he did, not so long ago...
I'm a male, caucasian, heterosexual Graham S. Calling me a "supercilious fool", "moron" and "xznophobic bigot" seems pretty offensive.
Seems pretty accurate to me.
"xznophobic bigot"
There appears to be general consensus on this one given your posts here, and your history
"supercilious fool"
Accurately described your mentality when you had the brainfart about running rings
"moron"
Wasn't actually me. It was quite funny though...
edukator, I want to be able to side with you, as it's clear that you are well meaning..
you wish to help empower oppressed women, and to protect their human rights, an admirable thing..
But you are simply regurgitating Liberal targeted propaganda campaigns, and right-wing doctrine, empowering nobody and fuelling religious hatred..
Your studenty pseudo-intellectual idealism makes you the perfect target for those wishing to legitimise western military campaigns in the middle east.. to desensitise the west to the deaths of these 'savage' people.. and your limited understanding actually makes you their tool..
and you're in France I believe, where intolerance is more of an everyday political point scorer.. it must be very confusing for you..
Here today though, your skewed arguments have fallen flat, and you've not even enough intellect to admit your mistake and attempt to work out a better take on the situation..
I know that you didn't do well at uni, and that you're trying to fit in where you are with some seriously right-on edgy politicising, but there has to come a point when you need to ask whether due to your inadequacies, you are actually becoming a part of the problem instead part of the solution..
ouch
2 points to Gryffindor, Master Yunki.
I'm still curious about the misquoting, that's the sort of thing that would be very easy to prove, [i]if[/i] it were true.
I scored 142 in the last IQ test I did, "moron" is highly inaccurate.
It's the playground-ganging-up-and-silly-insults syndrome that is the bain of forums and UK based bike forums in particular. Is it acceptable or isn't it?
[quote=Edukator ]I scored 142 in the last IQ test I did, "moron" is highly inaccurate.
It's the playground-ganging-up-and-silly-insults syndrome that is the bain of forums and UK based bike forums in particular. Is it acceptable or isn't it?
Do you find you get "ganged-up on" all all the forums you visit then?
I know that you didn't do well at uni
A 2:1 back when it meant something, Yunki. More insult and character assassination but still no justification for people being able to cover their faces in public or indeed walk around naked.
I know that you didn't do well at uni, and that you're trying to fit in where you are with some seriously right-on edgy politicising, but there has to come a point when you need to ask whether due to your inadequacies, you are actually becoming a part of the problem instead part of the solution..
Sorry, but that is actually bloody rude,and more than a little nasty.
stealth edit. can't be bothered with this idiot. (not you duckman)
I scored 142 in the last IQ test I did, "moron" is highly inaccurate.
I said it was funny. Plenty of others agreed.
The remainder do unfortunately appear to be somewhat more factual when applied to the character you portray on here. That you're now alluding to having these issues on other forums does appear to highlight the common link. You.
christ on a bike..
see.. I told you.. I should have listened to my own advice
Sorry, but that is actually bloody rude,and more than a little nasty.
maybe so duckman, it depends very much on your sensibilities though.. I'm not actually a particularly nice person all of the time if I'm honest..
Perhaps I was too direct, it wouldn't be the first time.. I was just trying a little tough love
laters all.. 🙄
still no justification for people being able to cover their faces
Actually there was loads - you just chose to ignore it completely.
ganging-up
You have a strong viewpoint that the majority of posters on this thread disagree with. We're not "ganging-up", you just have unpopular views.
silly-insults
I think most of them have been quite restrained. Not sure I condone "moron" or "fool", but your views could certainly be described as xenophobic, supercilious and bigoted. That's not really an insult, it's just a subjective description of how your views are interpreted.
Perhaps less offensive views would generate less offence? Have you tried covering them with a metaphorical loin cloth? 😀
Anyway, I'm sure the mods are watching this thread with interest, so I'd suggest everyone reigning it in a little before the banhammer swings.
but still no justification for people being able to cover their faces in public or indeed walk around naked.
Moreover on the former, no non-racially motivated reasons from you as to why it needs justifying. And no reasons at all for the latter.
Just a pity that IQ apparently has no bearing on one's self awareness or common sense.
Not often, Druihd, I've pointed out that it's happening when others have been victims and sometimes been on the receiving end. I was under the impression the mods were trying to apply a "play nice" policy on here so I'm intrigued to see what they do (if anything).
Is there room for civil discussion on STW or is it OK for someone to get character assasinated becasue he/she has a slightly different point of view (it's not as if I'm saying anything different to what is written into British (loin cloth) or French (le voile) law here.
Just a pity that IQ apparently has no bearing on one's self awareness or common sense.
Your posts just continue to be a series of insults, Zokes, just as you and Z-11 used to do with TJ. I'm showing a great deal of awareness, pointing out the tactics you're using. It's common sense to pull out of the discussion and look at the tactics being used when the discussion has degenerated into a series of insults.
Not sure I condone "moron" or "fool"
In the gamut of possible insults one could take offence at, are these really such major players?
I'm in no way condoning ad hominem either, it's pointless, lazy debating, but if I got offended every time someone called me a fool I'd never get out of bed of a morning.
You're a fool for getting out of bed of a morning.
Is there room for civil discussion on STW
That depends a lot on what's being discussed. When multiple posters agree that a user is being supercilious, appears to express xenophobic views, and comes across as very bigoted towards a minority group, perhaps that just becomes a character description, even if it does appear to be unfortunately truthful.
It's a very long time since I've seen anyone dropping their IQ into an internet argument, that's proper old school...
Though, you might think that a genius would be able to provide evidence of the misquoting he claims he's been subjected to.