Forum menu
ok so the four parties in my original post was exaggeration.. which to me was obvious.. but much of the rest of the post.. although not perhaps legally accurate was also neither very far from the truth..
You implied that all agencies lie, etc, that is why as an agency owner I reacted defensively, I do not take you for a fool, I can't possibly know what you are or what you are like, my response is made purely on your post.
Michael.. listen..
raped for wages.. it has been backed up in this thread by someone else already.. expect up to a 40% lower wage
lies and amount of work.. also backed up by an independant contributor to the thread..
taken on after a while sounding fishy.. also backed up by an independant contributor
all of my assertions have been backed up by people [i]on this thread alone[/i] who have had direct experience of the incidents that I outlined..
so where you get off telling me that I'm full of merde is a mystery..
have a quiet word with yourself old chap.. you're being a wally.. i've admitted my foolishness regarding accuracy.. please admit yours regarding pigheadedness
Jeez, more (lame) name calling, I'll leave you to it.
ok.. I guess that proves at least one of the points made about your people skills..
I'm guessing your next response may have been something as useful or enlightening as 'I know you are you said you are but what am I'
a bientot.. I'm out.. I will readily agree with you that this is silly.. I'm off to the boozer with yunki junior.. let us rejoice that today is a blue day!