Forum menu
'Wild places&#...
 

[Closed] 'Wild places' for wind farms

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

re the horizon. Assuming it's flat. which Scotland most certainly isn't. Most wind farms you don't notice until you are pretty close to them.

For an observer on the ground with eye level at h = 5 ft 7 in (1.70 m), the horizon is at a distance of 2.9 miles (4.7 km). For an observer standing on a hill or tower 100 feet (30 m) in height, the horizon is at a distance of 12.2 miles (19.6 km).

Plus I still have trouble seeing them as a blight on the landscape. I like their form, we bit of variety and creativity wouldn't go a miss, but generally they are reasonable pleasing to the eye.


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 12956
Free Member
 

I can probably get that information tomorrow seosamh

I'lll see what data sets we have at work.

Edit: correct size areas i mean.


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 9:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

WGAF

Surely the only important question is whether the Inn is still worth the trek to get there ๐Ÿ˜‰ ?


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cool, cheers josh! Don't go out your way though, I'm just a curious onlooker!


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

teamhurtmore - Member
WGAF

Surely the only important question is whether the Inn is still worth the trek to get there ?

Too true! ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

You can see objects above sea level much further away, hence why you can see mountains, wind turbines etc that are much further away than 5km. In visual impact assessment you will calculate visibility of the turbines from maybe 20 to 30 km typically. Turbine tips can be over 100m above ground and are often on high ground too, several hundred metres up even. The software we use takes account of earth curvature and light diffraction etc.

I don't think there is a go to source of all wind turbine locations, typically when you are assessing cumulative assessment of all wind farms around a proposed development you would have to approach councils and site developers themselves for the information, it can be very time consuming. SNH do publish a spatial dataset of many wind farm sites as do BWEA but neither are complete to my knowledge.


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Seems SNH have stopped updating the dataset,, unsurprisingly as it would be nearly impossible to keep on top of.

These maps will give you an idea of the footprints of probably a majority of wind farms as it was a few years back anyway

http://www.snh.gov.uk/planning-and-development/renewable-energy/research-data-and-trends/trendsandstats/windfarm-footprint-maps/


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 11:08 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

This is a fairly decent source of offshore site boundaries

http://www.4coffshore.com/offshorewind/


 
Posted : 18/10/2016 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The local communities will benefit to some degree from these wind farms, however, the benefit is not huge. The construction phase is performed by contractors from outside the local areas. These contractors will stay locally so B&Bs etc will benefit during the construction phase.

Once the wind farms are established, there is only the maintenance work, which is also performed by contractors, again not local. The maintenance work is not ongoing, it is not only seasonal work, but carried out over a very short period.

The other way that the local communities benefit is through a fund that the wind farm operators set up. Some see these 'funds' as a bribe, others as a way to help the local communities. The funds however, are not huge amounts of money.

Although the turbines have a life span of 30yrs, the concrete bases and access roads are permanent structures. So, it is fairly obvious that these locations will be used again with new turbines.

There are also larger turbines being used now, so it is also quite possible that the replacements could be larger and visible from a greater distance.


 
Posted : 19/10/2016 7:56 am
Posts: 12956
Free Member
 

Or the sme size but more efficient.

Unlikely to be much larger of the foundations would need rebuilt.


 
Posted : 19/10/2016 7:58 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The funds however, are not huge amounts of money.

Actually they can be significant and local communities sometimes fight hard for them.


 
Posted : 19/10/2016 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Question, how much does 1 turbine power and much does it cost to run? (After the initial build, ongoing maintenance).

And how much of Scotland's power comes from wind? (And other re-newables?)

Re that map above, cheers, just noticed it. It looks largely that the plan is open moor and farmland, it's not really impacting on the more scenic parts of Scotland. It is encroaching though. So some concern warranted, I guess.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 6:44 pm
 LD
Posts: 582
Free Member
 

Let's just burn more hydrocarbons cause they make much prettier views [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/its-only-a-chemical-plant-nothing-to-see-here ]see here[/url] ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Question, how much does 1 turbine power and much does it cost to run? (After the initial build, ongoing maintenance).
And how much of Scotland's power comes from wind? (And other re-newables?)

No simple answer, depends on size of turbine and capacity factor of the site, which varies greatly from places like Orkney where it can be hard to find a turbine manufacturer who will warranty with the amount of wind their turbine will have to deal with, to lowland sites which are borderline worthwhile.

It should be possible to find decent info online but I'm not aware of anything off the top of my head, just beware of nimby anti renewables sites like euanmearns etc which are full of nonsense.

Cost varies with turbine and site too, a farmer friend has a little 1mw turbine and I think that cost a million or something, he's got a very windy site and as well as powering the farm it will pay itself off after a few years and then he will have a nice income.

In Scotland we have a lot of hydro so have exceeded our requirements by renewables alone quite often.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 8:22 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I'm a maintenance tech on the Ormonde offshore farm in Barrow, and the construction mulitplyer bandied around when it was build was about 6 times the onshore turbine cost. However, offshore models tend to be larger in the UK, as you would notice if you've even been through northern Germany where they are less sensitive to large onshore turbines, allowing the use of monumental tower heights of 120m+

Onshore turbines are way cheaper to build and maintain, purely because of ease of access. I think our boat burns about 600l of diesel every trip! Bit more than a Transit doing the same job onshore...


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 9:10 pm
Posts: 44784
Full Member
 

Scotland produced IIRC 60% of its electricity from renewbles last year. Here is a load of data to wade through. One day this summer all scotlands electricity - domestic and industrial came from renewables.

However I think we have enough wind farms now. You need a mix. Of the alternatives the largest part is wind. I'd like more small scale hydro and investment in tidal flow turbines. there is a small commercial farm of them just been installed. Dunno if it will still be there after the winter tho ๐Ÿ˜‰

Loads of data here


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Dunno if it will still be there after the winter tho

Does the tide flow faster in the winter?


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 11:43 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

bigjim - Member

it would be nearly impossible to keep on top of.

Yeah, because they keep spinning


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 11:49 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Our local onshore offshore test facility is seemingly generating infrasound which is giving people dizzy spells and has even maybe possibly killed someone. Nothing to do with the fact the community council object to literally everything even when it's nothing to do with them.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 3:17 am
Page 2 / 2