Forum search & shortcuts

Why should we save ...
 

[Closed] Why should we save the NHS?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Junky:

The question was posed

"Should we pay more tax in order to properly fund the NHS - yes/no"

So, At what point is the NHS properly funded?

somewhatslightlydazed - Member

Simple answer - At the point it is able to deliver the sort of service you expect.

Right, but we've accepted above that 'the sort of service you expect' does not necessarily have anything to do with money, because its often down to other things, like the pursuit of "outcomes" at the expense of care, or like people being shit at their jobs. cf. Stafford.

We could spend ten times as much as we do now and still be unable to deliver the 'sort of service you expect' !


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:13 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

yes ninfan everyone knows there is no relationship between what you spend and what you get - look at private schools all that money and yet no better outcomes - same goes with private healthcare

An excellent point and well made

Could you at least make sense or a point in your musings as I am reaching my boredom threshold.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, just as soon as you tell me what you think 'properly funded' means?


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

accepted above that 'the sort of service you expect' does not necessarily have anything to do with money,

But I don't accept that. I believe it has quite a lot to do with money, amongst other things.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:34 am
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

I am reaching my boredom threshold.

Is this a first?


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:36 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Its not a phrase I used I said i would pay more money for a better service

PS if it was me I would have denied the claim I was not making sense 😉
Exits thread


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:40 am
Posts: 26900
Full Member
 

Right, but we've accepted above that 'the sort of service you expect' does not necessarily have anything to do with money, because its often down to other things, like the pursuit of "outcomes" at the expense of care, or like people being shit at their jobs. cf. Stafford.

Problem is it does necessarily have something to do with funding, other variables are involved of course.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 10:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Health is the only thing that matters. Without we are dead.

So how do we prioritise our resources? £2k on a season ticket to wendyball, £xxx on Murdoch TV, £3 for a cup of hot brown refreshment with some sickly syrup in it - no problem.

A small contribution to health care. What? Are you serious? £10 to check the things we see with are ok. That's a scandal, that's 3 cups of coffee or 1/9th of a replica shirt....


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 11:13 am
Posts: 17336
Full Member
 

You have that option - private insurance, in the UK?

Indeed (for some), but if you want to know how it should be done...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_the_Netherlands

As I said, I think we get what we pay for, possibly a little more due to some economies of scale, but we don't pay enough as a nation.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good [url= https://www.opendemocracy.net/ournhs/john-lister/first-privatised-nhs-hospital-success-or-smoke-and-mirrors ]article on Circle's franchise at Hinchingbrooke[/url].

As he says, smoke and mirrors.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 2:48 pm
Page 4 / 4