MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch
I'd love a new tele to replace my aging plasma (10 yes plus) and the OLED sets are stunning but way too big at 55" minimum.
Will there ever be 40" OLED sets? And why aren't there any yet
Not interested in Samsung Q LED.
OLED is still an expensive technology so will trickle down to the smaller sets ...
Still pine for a new Plasma!!
There are plenty of 40-42" OLED ones about.
You still won't see any change from £2k though
My Viera Plasma is still perfect(although sat in the spare room) and has far better tones than the one that replaced it.
"There are plenty of 40-42" OLED ones about"
Ooh show me!! Its black Friday soon!!
There are plenty of 40-42" OLED ones about.
No there aren't!
One reason is because 50" is now seen as a standard size (like 40" was a few years ago). 40" is now regarded as a 'small screen' believe it or not.
OP is wrong to disregard Samsung QLED which are excellent imho.
I suspect it is because they're still trying to establish OLED in the market and there are probably little benefit/advantage at OLED over conventional LED LCD sets at smaller screen sizes but a significant cost increase, so they're probably focusing on the larger panels where they can charge the higher prices and OLED solves the problems and short comings of LED LCD at those larger panel sizes.
I don't think they ever made small Plasma sets either for a similar reason. It's about deploying the right technology for the specific application.
Yep, generally speaking the bigger the screen, the more noticeable the difference in quality.
40" a medium TV?!?
Our main tv is 22", 12 years old and is perfectly fine for us.
Must be behind the times on the technology front ( again)
Stood in Media World in Rome last week in the middle of dozens of OLED's!
OK - the Sony 88" at €19999 was a little excessive [b]BUT[/b] I've never seen anything like it!
Right next to it was an LG 42" OLED, there were several Sony's in that size range too, Samsung, etc.
MInd the LG was still the best part of €4k so that might be why you aren't finding any in the uk as yet.
OLED is inherently a pricey technology (at the moment) - it might be that, given minimal savings possible in downsizing, most people would just pick the larger set anyway. >£1500 for a 40" tv is hard to stomach
I saw [url= https://gizmodo.com/sonys-new-oled-tv-is-both-the-screen-and-the-speaker-1790781595 ]one of these[/url] in John Lewis yesterday - the screen is the speaker!!! OMFG!!!
Our main tv is 22", 12 years old and is perfectly fine for us.
I wonder if anyone else in the family thinks this??
Do you all sit huddled up on a single sofa in front of it then, shoulder to shoulder and a few feet away from the set ?
Movies must be an immersive experience !
They made plenty of 42 inch plasmas.
johndoh - thats the one that was in MediaWorld - have a video of it on my phone - the demo running is of some japanese guy blowing glass.
Literally an inch away from it and there is zero - and I mean ZERO pixelation of any kind. Its like being right in front of it lappening.
Even the test card simulation it opens with is seamless.
They made plenty of 42 inch plasmas.
Ours is 37"
Literally an inch away from it and there is zero - and I mean ZERO pixelation of any kind. Its like being right in front of it lappening.
Even the test card simulation it opens with is seamless.
Problem is, the bandwidth 4k that will be broadcast would actually deliver a better HD video than it will 4k. It'll be better than the HD they broadcast at the moment but don't expect SkySports to look anywhere near as good as the demo.
Yes, there is a massive difference between watching Sky Cinema 'HD' and a good bluray, but they are using the same number of pixels...
Stupid public don't care though, as long as the specs are right they will buy it.
a 40" plasma from 10 years ago is probably bigger than a new 50" TV
