Forum menu
I know legally as an English resident I could still go but doesn’t quite seem right when Welsh folk can’t move about.
That can't be right. Surely you have to abide by the law of the country you are visiting?
That can’t be right. Surely you have to abide by the law of the country you are visiting?
This seems to be the suggestion from Welsh MPs on Twitter (due to a lack of an official advice on their website yet), but it does seem very odd I agree.
And Wales also just set the precedent for restricted travel again.
Good job all those army of ‘Covid Marshall’s’ are in place to enforce the new restrictions.
What? It was just a meaningless sound bite, spaffed into the ether on the hoof?
Surely not?
Well, Operation Moonunit will mean these restrictions won’t be needed for long
10 million tests a day by next week, right?
Doubling time for admissions in England since Sept 1 is 9.4 days (95% CI 8.3, 11.0). Based on today's data. Sorry.
Testing is noise to detract from the predicament. Testing for protection of the vulnerable is where the debate should be.
I am angry watching that tit who just came on telly and blamed us for his mess. I remember a commons question a few months back when he replied his govt took responsibility for the outcome of their strategy. Now is the time to fess up, not blame the transgressions of a minority which should always have been factored in. Tories gotta Tory.
could someone remind me which incompetent fools is in charge of the track and trace system.. Let them come out and explain how this gold standard world beating app is doing. Oh wait didn't this incompetent fool just get a promotion?less gold standard more dusty bin
I’m struggling with the ‘essential travel’ regs in Wales.
What scale is he talking? I mean pubs can stay open until 10, but is walking a mile to get there ever essential?
We do at least in Wales get some clarification on these things a few hours later. But at the moment I’ve got a table booked for the pub Saturday evening just me and the wife, it’s a 10 min drive (my turn). Is that travel, or just ‘popping out’. If it’s non-essential travel, then why are we expecting the pub to stay open and fend for itself without financial support when no one is really allowed to go there?
On another tack, I can go out tomorrow, 11 days after first symptoms. The testing system worked fine for me, glad to say. I’m going for a very long bike ride.
P-Jay - I'd take it to staying in your local area ie your county as that's the rules for Caerphilly etc. If they didn't want you going to the pub to spend your money they'd shut them all.
I'm growing increasingly seceptical about the usefulness of testing in slowing the spread.
A lot of people are getting little if any symptoms and the escape the system completely, but they are still infected and if asymptomatic people swab positive surely they're infectious.
People who realise they have the virus have been infectious for a few days. So testing might get them back to work if the result is negaitive but if it's positive they've already been spreading for a few days.
The tests are unreliable, there are well documented cases of people with bad symptoms testing negative a couple of times before finally getting positive test - maybe.
The window for testing positive is quite narrow, you might be a contact who is told to test but go a bit early or late and come up negative.
Pepople's attitude is a bit like junior's geneneration's attitude to AIDS tests. They get tested now and then but do little to protect themselves. Casual unprotected sex and test now and then, Barmy. Regular testing is seen as a substitute for taking measures not to get the disease. With Covid it's down the pub, into work send the kids to school and get a test if anyone gets a snivel - by which time the virus is into a load more households.
I don't have an answer, people don't seem to be worried enough about gettng the virus to adapt their behaviour. As I posted a fesw pages back, the fear has gone, and testing can't replace it.
I don’t have an answer, people don’t seem to be worried enough about gettng the virus to adapt their behaviour.
Not true of a single person I have had dealings with in recent weeks. Appreciate it may be quite different where you are. And the ‘worry’ is about spreading it, not about getting it, in most cases.
Testing is for the identification of those who spread most and the protection of those most at risk. It has little effect above and beyond basic symptomatology for those who can self-isolate. It is not a get out of isolation faster ticket. There I’ve said it. When NHSTT prioritise this path, which was what they projected their testing need would be, then it will have the desired impact.
It is not a get out of isolation faster ticket.
How does that fit in with keeping schools open full time for all pupils?
You test the teachers regularly and the pupils by pooled testing. You then isolate a class on a single positive. You don’t isolate Individuals on symptoms.
Children are the spreaders and teachers the at risk. Same for healthcare workers and patients/residents.
Children are the spreaders, and the whole community they are part of are the at risk. Stopping spreading via schools is not to protect teachers, it is to protect everyone.
Agree with what you say about testing as regards schools… without it you will have all staff isolating for many weeks this term, and schools will struggle to have the adults needed for kids being at school to make any sense. Testing is the only way to avoid all those teachers isolating for long and/or multiple periods. It is needed as a “get out of isolation faster” tool here, just as it is for health staff.
The testing system is not fit for purpose; there is a major disconnect between drive through test availability as per the Deloitte system and the reality at sites.
There is a clear refusal by johnson and his acolytes to acknowledge the failings and then rapidly develop and clearly communicate a remedial action plan.
I'm still waiting for johnson to clearly state the gov's objective(s); whatever it is/they are and, more importantly, their plan on how to deliver.
The UK has an under-resourced police force which was over-stretched pre-Covid so they won't cope with the additional responsibilities johnson has dumped on them.
Increasing the fines for individuals to a starting point of £1,000 would cause some to, possibly, think twice.
We're now at a point where, I believe, it would be appropriate to broadcast ads showing a (staged) Covid death.
I think we're past the point where nudge theory has any place in managing this.
I rarely agree with Edukator but...
the fear has gone, and testing can’t replace it.
is undeniably true.
As for johnson's national address - he needs a speechwriter to provide clear focus and he most definitely needs a voice coach; he's not auditioning so the verbal flourishes and odd inflections are unnecessary and distract from the message.
Cut out the verbiage; KISS; deepen your voice - think Thatcher.
Learn from Sturgeon's presentational style - and her willingness to be interviewed.
Can people living in England go to North Wales for the weekend if they are camping (in a self contained unit)?
And I would use prospective weekly testing in schools, healthcare facilities and the workplaces most at risk. Not simply a symptom scattergun. You go systematic, organised, prospective and pooled in groups who will be affected. You can add mobile test sites for the general population, but this will achieve relatively little for control.
The media really need to do better… the balance hunt on Newsnight tonight was to have a businessman repeat the line, several times, that COVID deaths are only 1% of all deaths in the UK this year. Matlis doesn’t try and correct him once, and there wasn’t a guest to put the ‘opposite opinion’ that the 1% figure is utter bobbins.
Agree with that completely TiRed… so you meant that testing isn’t a tool to reduce the use of or shorten the length of isolation periods for the general public, and that it should be used in just that way in schools (as it already is in hospitals etc), yes?
No, it IS 1% (15/1500 per day). But he seems to have forgotten that it was 40% six months ago. Hmmm thats 2^(5 or 6) or about two months time in old money.
He was talking about this year, not this week. For the year so far it is 10%… and he was arguing against using social distancing measures to control the spread… he was arguing for not restricting the spread, just letting it rip if you like.
And yes, testing is a tool for control of spread for those most likely to cause spread and those most likely to be affected by spread. It’s not for the general public. Sorry, isolation based on symptom tracking is the means to that end and shown to be effective. The KC app is good for that.
That should have been the message.
Apologies, I checked on iPlayer and he said ‘currently 1%’, so he was correct, just selective.
Agree with you completely on testing, now I understand what you’re saying. And that is how the government portrayed the testing would be used for the return to schools. They shifted that messaging to ‘anyone with symptoms’ before they had proven they could make school opening work though, and now (surprise surprise) it’s a mess. I think that they took their eye off what they had promised for schools, because they got over excited about reassuring all those parents to get back to their offices by offering them the testing that should have been focused on schools (as well as care homes and hospitals etc). Or perhaps their believed their own spin about “Testing Capacity” so thought that they could do it all…
Scroll down to The Daily Star's front page; a continuation of johnson being portrayed as Coco the Clown.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-54259256
Just reading the news from the UK..... and.... well.... whut?
He's gaslighting the entire nation
In Stafford - King Eddies - 1 Year9 pupil tested+, whole Year9 'bubble' sent home to isolate for 14days.
10 teachers in contact with pupil also sent home.
Headteacher with huge problem.
Headteacher with huge problem.
Wont be the only one and in a week or two it will get worse.
Learn from Sturgeon’s presentational style – and her willingness to be interviewed.
somewhat difficult to do as IMO Sturgeon actually understands and listens to the science, spends time getting on top of what is happening and her "style" is based on understanding what the person in the street is feeling and her confidence she is doing the right thing for the right reasons. she is also far smarter than Johnson
You then isolate a class on a single positive.
That stopped last week here in primary schools, now only the infected kid is sent home. On the way to school kids stop at least 50m before the school, have a chat, put their masks on then continue their way in. In school the kids play the game, Madame says non have taken their masks off when they shouldn't, but they eat lunch in the canteen masks off. It's good humoured people play the game whilst finding the contradictions comic. They know they're playing lip service to measures that aren't working and won't work unless you put a gendarme behind every citizen 24/7.
People were really cautious here through the first wave, I think they've become fatalistic now, in fact I know my social bubble has. We know a vaccine is a very long way off, herd immunity even further off and there's a real possibility neither will ever completely happen as the virus may mutate like the flu. We meet up as usual, no more bises or handshakes, coffee is drunk outside, or windows and doors open inside if it's wet, then off we go on our merry way.
People understand our government's dilema and are increasingly in favour of the get on with life approach even if it means more cases.
To stop spread you'd have to treat everyone around you as if they have the virus, in the countries most succesful in limititing contamination that's more or less what's happening, but no longer here. And the numbers say it's not happening in many places around the world.
forgotten that it was 40% six months ago
Er based on what?
Are you basing that on positive tests vs deaths at the time? Because if so you should know that's a rather flawed calculation and scare mongering at its greatest considering we had absolutely no view of the true extent of infection 6 months ago and we probably still don't know considering the level of asymptomatic.
Percentage of all deaths due to Covid, for example in April it was 36% according to ONS. So 40% at peak is accurate.
The 40% is simply based on the ratio of all-cause mortality to baseline, coupled to the number reported Covid positive. It’s not scaremongering, it really was appalling.
Baseline deaths (typically 1500/day) plus about 1000/day reported at peak from Covid makes 40%.
If you are aged over 45, then your risk of dying was double it’s normal baseline rate in April. Yes double.
As for johnson’s national address – he needs a speechwriter to provide clear focus and he most definitely needs a voice coach; he’s not auditioning so the verbal flourishes and odd inflections are unnecessary and distract from the message.
I was pleasantly surprised to see him achieve mildly coherent. He does seem to be transferring his own character flaws onto the wider public.
It’s not for the general public.
Testing is the new it's ok we will be returning to the old ways soon for the government. As the old adage goes - you don't fatten a pig by weighing it.
How do you tell if the pig is getting fatter though? Or more scientifically, which food is having the most effect?
No luck on testing jnr over 24hrs here. Always busy, I’ve got through once to “11 available slots” 9 miles away to then be told it was an over 18 site, no go. Not sure whether that’s because they need paediatric staff or because he’s 11 and they don’t consider him an issue.
Two more days and he’ll be beyond the 5 anyway so it’s not looking as though he’ll get a test.
On the plus side i think Edukators thread is the first real synopsis of “new normal”, in that we’ll bounce around being told what to do like this for a year or so until C19 is as accepted and reaches the same ambivalence as Flu. In the interim some of us will do our best, others will shrug thier shoulders and let others fall to the wayside with the burden, such is life. Please be the former.
If you just weigh the pig and make no changes - that's not necessarily going to fatten it. Or fatten it effectively.
Agreed - test and trace won't cure the disease, but it's a vital part of the response to it. We can't wait to measure the effects of the the measures being taken by seeing how big the death rate gets in the same way as you wouldn't wait for the pig to starve before concluding that feeding it dust isn't any good. (OK, you'd see the pig wasting away first but that's still crude measurement)
And T&T is (if we could only do it properly) not just a measure, it's an action too. By following the spread accurately (by person is possible given the right infrastructure) it is possible to have extremely local lockdown - you, you and you, but not you - which enables life of a sort to go on.
I don't have a problem with T&T being pushed as a significant tool in the armoury, we need it desperately. I do have a problem with the incompetence of the implementation, with the cronyism of the people being asked to set it up and run it, and through to the mistrust that comes from even a hint of the likes of CA, Palantir, etc. that severely limits people's trust and uptake.
Are things really as bad in France as Ed suggests? Depressing. Kids locally aren’t just “playing the game”, they are trying their best to keep their friends and families safe.
reported at peak from Covid makes 40%
And that’s using the “reported as Covid19” figures. Excess death rate was above 2 for two weeks at the peak… so that’s above 50%. And we kept the peak that “low” through the measures we put in place… it wasn’t a natural plateau. Left unchecked this virus would have ended up killing far more people. That’s why the “currently 1% of deaths” line is so misleading when arguing that we should not use social distancing measures from now on… currently it is the best tool to stop excess deaths climbing up to horrific levels.
Cut out the verbiage; KISS; deepen your voice – think Thatcher.
wow, never thought I would hear someone say that. Thats the bar we are aiming for these days what a sad state our "leader" is in.
Learn from Sturgeon’s presentational style – and her willingness to be interviewed.
I mean I 100% agree here but that assumes Johnson actually cares what the public think. He hates talking to the press because he's incapable of any compassion or relating to normal people. Hes just a rich kid whos idea of a struggle is only being able to afford one nanny.
Agreed – test and trace won’t cure the disease, but it’s a vital part of the response to it.
What I'm wondering is how many rapid tests would we need for the Team Boris test and go on plan. Starting with a wild assumption one test per year per person that's 67million tests - 1.28 million tests a week. It feels like a massive over estimate in numbers but nice little earner if you're Dido Harding. If it is going to be a source of income I'd rather it was applied like an NHS prescription charge and the money went to the NHS. Although if people have to pay there will probably be a nice little market develops in fake negatives for those who don't want to pay.
Anecdote: pal who works at the university down the road was telling me of his boss, mid 40s and very proper and systematic, had his two kids come home from school with runny noses. Dad catches runny nose and checks symptoms list, not there, not a problem. He goes in for a bit of elective surgery in a private clinic and is tested, positive, and sent home to isolate. He had no other symptoms. How many more like this who, quite reasonably, go untested (for whatever reason) and carry on as per usual? It does underline the importance of masking up.
Two more days and he’ll be beyond the 5 anyway so it’s not looking as though he’ll get a test.
Thats going to make things tricky for you, do you isolate or not. The current rules are based on available testing.
I'd keep trying I think
And T&T is (if we could only do it properly) not just a measure, it’s an action too.
This is a UK government communication failure. I have always referred to it in the way more successful countries do… it is TRACK/TRACE/ISOLATE. When politicians move the focus to “testing” rather than “isolating” here in the UK, I fear it is because they are too slack to properly deal with the effects of people needing to isolate, whether it is replacing lost income for those isolating, or making sure schools have the resources and support needed to keep education ongoing when pupils/teachers are isolating.
He goes in for a bit of elective surgery in a private clinic and is tested, positive, and sent home to isolate. He had no other symptoms. How many more like this who, quite reasonably, go untested
This is whats worrying me. Son came home from school with a cold, week later wife got bad head cold, no coughing, no fever a few days later wifes sense of smell went, tested came back positive. I caught the same cold, headache, felt rough but no specific symptoms so have not had a test. 100% convinced I've had what wife had.
Scroll down to The Daily Star’s front page; a continuation of johnson being portrayed as Coco the Clown.
And the Daily Heil must have been absolutely creaming themselves at the opportunity to put a British soldier on the cover. He's got a big gun and everything! Big guns are well known for their use in combating viruses.
The only thing that's better is a Spitfire. We should have had a picture of a Spitfire. They missed a trick there
Something I noticed when we did manage to get a test for my son (which came back as negative) is that the test booking website pushes other household members to get a test if you are booking a test for someone in the household, even if you aren't showing symptoms.
This contradicts the NHS advice which is that only the person showing symptoms needs to get a test and if that comes back negative the household is fine.
This will be using up a lot of tests as whole households are getting tested when only one person has the symptoms.
Thats the bar we are aiming for these days what a sad state our “leader” is in.
One does not have to agree with an ideology to know what leadership looks like. I don't agree with Sturgeon or Thatcher, but I don't have any qualms about them being leaders.
What I’m wondering is how many rapid tests would we need for the Team Boris test and go on plan
I think you know the answer to that already - see toilet roll. About 67 million/day 😉 .
And the Daily Heil must have been absolutely creaming themselves at the opportunity to put a British soldier on the cover. He’s got a big gun and everything! Big guns are well known for their use in combating viruses
None of the media are doing a great job of this to be honest. I looked at the headlines this morning and they were pretty atrocious. No wonder people go out and panic buy. I assume the government have told them to scare people so it isn't the governments fault when no one goes out anymore and restaurants shut down!
I had a chat with the boss of local old people's home recently. He's lucid, caring and wants the best for the old people. They aren't panicking or even particuarly worried. They are unhappy with the restrictions around family visits and physical contact and quite happy to take the risk. In some cases dying of Covid is relatively quick and painless compared with what they expect otherwise. Should we be protecting people who don't want to be protected? What's morally the right thing to do? It's a debate for society and how we view the elderly, their hopes, needs and expectations.
I’d keep trying I think
Yep, I am. As per BillMc, this comes of the back of his sister coming home the week before with a cold, me having some mild symptoms of a cold, but Mrs K who has Lupus has has nothing. What are we supposed to think/do?
website pushes other household members to get a test if you are booking a test for someone in the household
Indeed, when I thought I got through thats what it said, and we certainly thought - "should we all go?" I said no as its a waste of tests, at least I think it is!
It's why I wrote what I wrote earlier, for me now its a case of what can you do in the face of such bollocks, just batten down the hatches for winter, follow the mask & distancing rules and enjoy/make the most of being at home. Unlimited coffee and beer with a Turbo trainer/bike rides to work it all off, win win. I can't even moan about Boris any more it just depresses me, so for the sake of mental health I'm off to live in the Matrix - ignorance (to a point) is bliss.
Educator my mum died in a care home last month after a long battle with cancer. Luckily the staff were fantastic with us as mum neared end of life and we saw her daily. She was in the don’t want to be protected camp. As she said “Bring it on”. Serious thought needs to be given to end of life patients and their families with different practise and restrictions. Nobody should have to leave this earth surrounded by only one of their family wrapped in plastic.
Something I noticed when we did manage to get a test for my son (which came back as negative) is that the test booking website pushes other household members to get a test if you are booking a test for someone in the household
Yeah it says, from memory, you can book up to 4 test for other household members, not sure it says anything about symptoms at this stage but it is poorly worded and thought through.
Ed, that is bleak. Care home rules are to prevent the virus ripping through the place… not protect an individual. Some homes here lost half the people they cared for in just a few short weeks earlier this year. Rules will need to be stuck to if more homes aren’t going to experience that horror this winter. How we staff them (and pay for staff) should really change as well.
@edukator - timely article in The Guardian
TLDR - risk of COVID may go down by banning visits but premature death from giving up goes up
No, I'm not trolling, Kelvin, but you are being insulting again by suggesting that I am.
Thanks for posting, DavidB.
Edit: I see you've edited out your accusation of trolling, Kelvin, thank you.
I've just seen Raab repeating the "stitch in time saves nine" line. Is that the official new slogan now!?
What's going to be next, "you can't have your cake and eat it?" "A nods as good as a wink!?"
🙄
'Careless talk costs lives'
How many more like this who, quite reasonably, go untested (for whatever reason) and carry on as per usual? It does underline the importance of masking up.
Without trying to sound like a dick, this is pretty 'old news' and is probably the most dangerous thing about Covid19. More than 80% of people who have it, don't even know they have it - it's not as case of thinking it's just a but of a runny nose, most people have no symptoms at all.
To give an example. my Father in Law was a very sick man. 65, he had COPD, smoked despite knowing it would massively reduce what time he had left and heart failure. To the best of our knowledge he picked up Covid from a Hospital appointment mid-march. My wife was caring for him 2 or 3 times a day at home. He coughed continually, he had done for years so it was no cause for alarm. His cough would come on so suddenly he'd sometimes all but cough in your face. About 2 weeks after his hospital appointment, he sats were falling and he was getting ill again, called the GP and they asked my wife to take him to A&E. My wife had been taking his temp daily and it never recorded anything over 36c.
When they arrived at A&E his temp was taken, I forget the number but it was .2c over the threshold, my Wife, a Nurse in Uniform, explained he'd been sat in a hot car whilst she walked down to get a chair for him and it was likely just that, but they took him down the Covid route, for 5 days until the test came back we assumed it was a mistake, it was only 0.2c, but no he was positive for Covid19, he died about 10 days later.
Sadly there weren't tests available at the time, so we just had to isolate. The Dr on the Covid ward explained there was almost zero chance my wife hadn't been exposed to the Virus and by extension us. This was thankfully peak lock down so we hadn't been out and about more than for essential stuff.
The point being, my FIL who was pretty much as Death's door for most of 2019 and until he died in 2020 showed no extra symptoms for days, and even then they could have easily been missed if they'd taken his temp 30 mins before when my wife did. He didn't cough any more than he did normally. My wife spent hours in close proximity to him, changing dressings on this chest, helping him in and out of the chair with the 'next to sod all' PPE we had at the time, basically gloves and an apron, no mask or visor. She never showed any symptoms, we took our temps daily. My Son had a mild cold which could have easily been hayfever, in normal times there no way it would have stopped him going to school or out with his mates, my daughter recorded a temp of 37.4 for a few hours and my Wife and I showed none at all.
I can imagine that a few weeks ago, when things all felt very normal to most people, most of the time it would have been pretty easy for the virus to spread from person to person and certainly how it's managed to spread to every corner of the globe so quickly.
P-Jay, that's a sobering tale, thanks for sharing it.
The assertion that over 80% of people will have it without even realising is quite startling, is that an actual fact, or do we not have the absolute proof yet...?
Please forgive the naïve question...
This is whats worrying me. Son came home from school with a cold, week later wife got bad head cold, no coughing, no fever a few days later wifes sense of smell went, tested came back positive. I caught the same cold, headache, felt rough but no specific symptoms so have not had a test. 100% convinced I’ve had what wife had.
AA - Sounds like you most likely have Covid if your wife has tested positive and you have symptoms. Surely you should get a test so your contacts can be notified and to help PHE monitor the spread of the disease. I think this is especially important given you work in a school.
I think I had a brain wave whilst reading they are still not ruling out another full lockdown if things worsen; This current round of UK measures is only to get us to half term. Admissions will likely rise between now and then, and they'll lockdown over HT anyway as the "Circuit Breaker", repeat and go to Christmas, and to Easter if needed. Obvious easy breakpoints that coincide with Holidays and school break to reduce impact on schools and economy.
I was assuming the same Kryton, but they’ll need to introduce more measures soon to get to half term… presumably they’ll be going for some of the local measures applying to more areas, where school cases show to the public that they are needed.
Ed, yeah sorry, the bleakness of your post elicited a poor response from me, I edited it straight after posting. Sorry again.
Surely you should get a test so your contacts can be notified and to help PHE monitor the spread of the disease
I have been told by track and trace to only get a test if I get a cough, a fever or changes in taste or smell. I dont have any of these.
I have been told by track and trace to only get a test if I get a cough, a fever or changes in taste or smell. I dont have any of these.
They have to put a framework of basic rules in place because a lot of the general population (no doubt including some of the call center track and tracers) aren’t the sharpest tools in the box.
It’s obvious the fact your misses has tested positive that the strict rules on the 3 symptoms should go out of the window. You should exercise your common sense and get a test ASAP.
You should exercise your common sense and get a test ASAP.
Waste of a test frankly. And it's not going to change anything whether positive or negative in terms of behaviour. However there's a problem with the trace system if A-A isn't considered as positive for 10 days from two days before he was ill and contacts in that period traced. However, I doubt they will. Keep us informed A-A, you're our invesitgative journalist.
Is it possible to share all the bodily fluids happily married people do and not transfer to your partner?
It’s obvious the fact your misses has tested positive that the strict rules on the 3 symptoms should go out of the window. You should exercise your common sense and get a test ASAP.
The only way to get one is to tick the box saying you have one of the symptoms or you have been asked to get a test by track and trace or the local council. These are not the case so I'm not getting a test, this frees up tests for those that need them, I dont I'm in isolation anyway and the only contacts I've been with 1-2m of for more than 15mins are in the house with me anyone less than a metre for more than a min are the same. So I am not getting a test, my illness started on sunday so a test doesnt get me out of the house any earlier.
Waste of a test frankly.
No. A teacher getting a test could mean either one more teacher in school keeping that school open, or, more importantly, a teacher not taking the virus into a school. So not a waste. Different for an office worker who can crack on working from home for two weeks "just in case", or a retiree who can stay in and watch the cricket.
The WFH statement seems pointless unless it’s enforced. You can only work from home if your employer allows you to…
My employer has spent thousands on ‘covid-safing’ the offices in order to bring people back in to the office. Letting them stay at home would have been cheaper and safer
UK Health and Safety law as good as makes it mandatory. The official guidance is now work at home unless essential. So if folk got CV19 at work, the employer would need to demonstrate that they had applied relevant guidance or if not demonstrated their arrangements were just as robust.
The guidance as it is now will let decent business sort it out and get the right balance. Obviously shoddy business will continue to be shoddy but at the risk of getting sued. The next load of ambulance chasing will be "Did YOU get CV at work? Call Personal Injury R Us...".
He's self isolating anyhow and a test won't change that, Kelvin. And I really fail to see the difference between a teacher and an office worker. Both businesses and schools want enough staff to stay open and neither want anyone taking the virus in.
A teacher getting a test could mean either one more teacher in school keeping that school open, or, more importantly, a teacher not taking the virus into a school.
A positive or negative test wont change my situation or the situation of anyone else so what would be the point?
A positive or negative test wont change my situation or the situation of anyone else so what would be the point?
It definitely will.
There are a lot of coughs and colds going around the schools at the moment and due to the shortage of tests a lot of parents are just assuming their child doesn’t have Covid, especially where a classmate has a negative test result. If a teacher/child in the school gets a positive then this should massively increase the index of suspicion for Covid and encourage everyone to get a test who has symptoms.
A positive or negative test wont change my situation or the situation of anyone else so what would be the point?
Well, if your school knew (to a reasonable level of error) that you didn't have it before you started isolating, then they can act as if you didn't have it while on school premises. You might have to now act as if you have it come what may... but the actions of the school should be different based on when/if you tested positive.
And I really fail to see the difference between a teacher and an office worker.
I'm out.
How out of touch with reality the government really is has just been underlined on Five Live
A Tory MP has just asserted that the pubs are being shut at 10pm because then everybody will just go home. When it was pointed out that maybe they wouldn't go home, but pile round to each others houses instead so they could carry on drinking, her reaction showed that that eventuality had never even entered her head.
****ing clueless!
the actions of the school should be different based on when/if you tested positive.
How would the school act differently? The head is aware of the situation and I asked if they wanted me to try and get tested.
I understand your point of view and in an ideal situation contacts should be tested regardless but they are not. Thems the rules, I dont like them but thats it. Anyway I'm off out on the turbo, speak later!
Contacts shouldn’t be tested ‘regardless’… but school staff, just like care home staff and hospital staff, should be, when they have been in contact with people outside that have tested positive. Schools need to have some idea whether the virus has been brought on site by the close contact of a positively tested person.
This is no criticism of you AA, it is simply repeating what the government said about using testing to help keep schools ‘COVID safe’ when everyone was back to being onsite. They need to target the testing available to deliver what they promised, or schools will struggle more than necessary to stay open.
And I really fail to see the difference between a teacher and an office worker.
Oh my god.
Teachers are in small rooms with up to 30 kids who are not socially distancing.
I teach 80 students a week. In the corridors alone, I am in close proximity to 100's of kids who don't wear masks.
binners, that was Dr Caroline Johnson - my MP; a hospital consultant. I hope she's a better consultant than she is an MP.
I have emailed her regarding the CV19 testing farce asking her to respond in either her capacity as my elected representative or as a public heath professional.
Predictably, no response.
If a response does drop into my inbox, I'll post it here.