Forum menu
When did football h...
 

[Closed] When did football hooliganism become policing?

Posts: 254
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3376637]

I'd be interested in someone who actually works for the police's view on the many videos popping up of the protests. Undercover police trying to incite riots, snatching people, etc.

Videos such as this one:

You know its a crock of shit when someone says "I'm just doing my job". The classic final moral defence that means sweet **** all.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i think it all started when the requirement to become a met copper changed from being an upstanding member of society to being a big angry man with a very small penis.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I couldn't watch it - I was put off by the commentary.

[i]"pack of wolves attacking our babies"[/i] ffs.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 254
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah, that really put me off, let the police do what they want! I'm sick of mothers being worried about their kids. I also really object to people protesting about how the country is run. I think we should give them all a good hiding for being so disobedient.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Videos like this merely confirm what I've witnessed myself, on a number of occasions.

It's common practise to use agents provocateurs. That such things are now being caught on film just means that the credibility of the police in such situations is eroded even further. There's no justification for such actions whatsoever.

What it means, is that if the police are known to use illegal tactics to suit their own ends, then the use of violence against the police is no longer an act against society, but the right of free citizens against the illegal actions of the police.

I for one will not have any sympathy against the police if they choose to act in such a manner next week. In fact, if they choose to break the law against British citizens exercising their democratic right to protest, then I hope they get a good pasting.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, that really put me off, let the police do what they want!

Or you could try not treating people like they're idiots.

If you've got a good case there's no need for emotive and absurd metaphors.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:06 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I endured the cringeworthy metaphors for a few short minutes. Pretty damning footage. Thankfully there was no political correctness to go along with it. ๐Ÿ˜


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:11 pm
Posts: 139
Free Member
 

There will always be a need for plain clothes police but too many seem to think they are part of Vic Mackeys strike team.


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:18 pm
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

They could really do with taking all that footage, and getting someone else entirely to re-edit it, ideally someone who's not a ****er. Talk about missing an open goal.

The footage still stands watching though- not at all shocked, since i've seen it in person but it's something more people could stand to see. Especially since the attempts to incite trouble failed so badly, to the protestors' credit. (course, "Students protest; don't riot" didn't gain many headlines)


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

These are the exact same tactics used to instigate a certain riot from not that long ago!

Only this time they were caught on camera, any one wondering how the riots got so out of hand so quickly, they had help ๐Ÿ˜€

I thought this thread was about those riots at first, serves me right for being tired and not keeping upto date with the ratrace and it's goings on!

In my own defence, the ratrace is shite!


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 21/11/2011 11:28 pm
Posts: 254
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Or you could try not treating people like they're idiots.

If you've got a good case there's no need for emotive and absurd metaphors.

The commentary is neither here nor there, the footage is plain as day.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 12:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No the commentary was definitely there. I actually did a few things first so that I could settle down a watch it properly. But then I got to the bit about a pack of wolves attacking our babies and I thought, "that's it, I've had enough".

I like to make my own mind up, not have an idiot try and help me with a load of emotive childish bollox.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 12:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They could really do with taking all that footage, and getting someone else entirely to re-edit it, ideally someone who's not a ****. Talk about missing an open goal.

This + a lot. A load of emotive waffle, set to music (wtf?), that does nothing to [u]effectively [/u] publise the point, on which I have a lot of sympathy.

I agree that

the footage is plain as day.
Why not just broadcast that?


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 1:15 am
Posts: 254
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If I had made the video I would have, but I didn't.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 2:07 am
 loum
Posts: 3624
Free Member
 

Worth a watch all the way through, but the tacky "Daily Mail" style commentry will cause many people to switch off before the end.
It's a shame that the poor edit detracts from some pretty powerful footage.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 10:14 am