Ukraine

Posts: 7267
Full Member
 

Put a brick on the accelerater and aim it roughly where you want to go
It will clear any landmines for you, or if the Russian army have any AT rocket left, let them shoot up an empty, decrepit piece of history using up their ammo and revealling their position
Looking at the workplace and workforce, most of whom appears to be as old as the tanks, they wont even make it to the front lines this year


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 6:13 am
Posts: 8738
Full Member
 

This is great news - I had no idea so many were being trained (more waves of 10k to follow)  https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1580244637284900864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 8:12 am
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

that's a big number, way more than has been reported before.


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 8:20 am
Posts: 45989
Free Member
 

Indeed let us hope that such a number of freshly trained, equipped and warmly dressed fighters can really, really make a difference. 🤞

Once again we await the clever logistics and strategy from the Ukrainian side. 👍


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 8:27 am
Posts: 2617
Full Member
 

kimbers Full Member
On the plus side for the Russians, the T62s don’t have autoloaders that lead to the explosive turret launch seen on the newer T72, 80s etc

Once again on the negative side, the T-62 requires an additional crew member to load the gun, increasing manpower requirements and also adding an additional problem that because they've been using tanks with autoloaders for several decades, the Russian Army doesn't actually train tank soldiers in how to load MBT guns.


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 1:17 pm
Posts: 105
Free Member
 

I don't think Putin is going to nuke anything. He'd lose the little support he has from other countries and it'd make a coup more likely.
Nukes are the ultimate bluff. If you actually use them then you're ****ed. They know what NATO's response will be and it just doesn't benefit them.
Judging by the latest comments about how the special military operation can be achieved with talks, it sounds like Putin's going to try and keep the Ukrainian land Russian troops currently occupy. I doubt Zelensky is going to go for it. Ukraine can drive them all out so why wouldn't he.

The freshly trained 10k Ukraine troops are going to be upsetting for the Russians. Imagine being chucked in a field with your clothes and a sleeping bag knowing you're up against a bunch of guys that have actually been trained, have better equipment than you and have had decent hot meals and warm rooms for the last x months. I'd be surrendering the first opportunity I got.

Turkey's leader seems to be playing both sides to his profit which isn't very nice.

Something to keep in mind is that this is kind of a proxy war between the US and Russia. They're backing up Ukraine for the right reasons but also a weakened Russian is in their best interests. They've thrown a lot of money at this and American soldiers don't even have to die to get what they want.


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 9:00 pm
Posts: 2111
Full Member
 

Starting to heat up again. Notwithstanding further advances in Kherson - and the Russkies pretty much admitting the game is up on the right bank of the Dnipro with the imminent 'evacuation' of the city - on the Eastern front (remember that, Izyum, Kupyansk and Lyman et al) it looks like the UA is closing in on Svatova.

This is significant for two reasons. First it controls the one remaining route that the Russians can use for logistics into that part of Luhansk, particularly for Kreminna and Severodonetsk.

Secondly it is a significant strategic base in Luhansk. Taking it would open up significant chunks of Luhansk to the UA.  Militarily very bad, politically disastrous as the Donbas is the non-negotiable for the Russian Nazis..


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 10:06 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

At what point does the maintenance of internal security and the Russia's far flung borders become unsustainable?


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 11:05 pm
Posts: 2617
Full Member
 

catdras Free Member
I don’t think Putin is going to nuke anything. He’d lose the little support he has from other countries and it’d make a coup more likely.
Nukes are the ultimate bluff. If you actually use them then you’re ****. They know what NATO’s response will be and it just doesn’t benefit them.

It might depend on how desparate Putin is and how few steps ahead that has led to him thinking. We've seen before that he wants to frame this war as Russia vs NATO. Use of nuclear weapons will trigger a NATO response and Putin could use that to rally domestic support behind him by portraying himself as standing up for Russia against NATO/Western aggression. That makes everything worse for everyone but for Putin it may look like it'd buy him some time to hang on and come up with some other awful plan that will keep him in power.

Hopefully it doesn't come to that and Putin is not so short sighted and cynical.


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 11:07 pm
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

Imagine being chucked in a field with your clothes and a sleeping bag

I think a lot of the Russians are imagining how nice it would be to have a sleeping bag. Russian war veteran reunions are gonna pretty much run to the Four Yorkshiremen script.


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 11:33 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

We’ve seen before that he wants to frame this war as Russia vs NATO.

Framing is rather academic at the moment. People that I know see it as Russia Vs NATO but more specifically Russia vs NATO (America pulling the NATO string).


 
Posted : 13/10/2022 11:48 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Framing is rather academic at the moment. People that I know see it as Russia Vs NATO but more specifically Russia vs NATO (America pulling the NATO string).

1) Russia invaded Ukraine.
2) NATO is providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Individual countries are providing military aid to Ukraine.

Also, Russia launches an invasion against another sovereign nation and has threatened the same to two more. The NATO excuse is as flimsy a premise as any you continue to present.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 12:29 am
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

Framing is rather academic at the moment.

Not for Putin it isn't. His first priority is the survival of his regime, everything else is done in pursuit of that. He frames it as NATO vs Russia because that distracts from his disastrous stupidity in starting this war and how it has been carried out. That's why it's important to not accept Putin's counter-factual framing - it's just buying into the propaganda of a murderous tyrant.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 12:41 am
Posts: 6572
Free Member
 

I don’t think Putin is going to nuke anything. He’d lose the little support he has from other countries and it’d make a coup more likely

TLDR: It relies on the US and China because the UN holds votes but no concerted will

The UN voted on Russia's "attempted illegal annexation". The vote was 143 - illegal, 5 - legal and 35 abstentions. Russia wanted the vote to be secret, but this was rejected by the UN in another vote.
The only overt support that Russia has in the UN these days is from Belarus, N.Korea, Nicaragua and Syria, countries that would probably be in rebellion without Russian support.
China, India and African nations tend to abstain and all have their roots in greater links to Russia, its energy and food.
Russia is sending "negotiate, please" signals off to anyone who will listen; energy, mobilisation and now withdrawing from the UN agreement to supply grain are about increasing pressure to negotiate, as well as playing well on the domestic front.
The problem is the domestic front in both China and the US. Both Presidents are up for important domestic votes in the next few weeks, which has led to a certain amount of playing to the home crowd. The US is curbing sales of chips to China and the US FCC is banning all new Huawei and ZTE products.
China is sitting back, abstaining in the UN, and watching the US spaff billions on weapons and having a row with OPEC+
I'd like to think that winter and the end of elections will bring perfect sunshine; Russian troops will feel the effects of winter, the US will calm its rhetoric and China will be happier to rein Russia in


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:12 am
Posts: 6572
Free Member
 

Russia is holding its regular annual exercises with nuclear weapon drills, which usually include a launch or two, soon. Get ready for another round of media doing what media does 🙂


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:19 am
Posts: 45989
Free Member
 

Russia is sending “negotiate, please” signals off to anyone who will listen;

I read this more as the classroom bully situation - looking like your the innocent peace making one despite continuing to give someone a kicking. It plays well to his home audience.
The problem is that no-one will negotiate for two reasons - it's unacceptable to allow any ground to be given to Russia now for fear of encouraging future land grabs and Russia can't be trusted on anything.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:39 am
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

Russia is sending “negotiate, please” signals off to anyone who will listen;

Not really, they are losing and are desperately trying to avoid being completely routed.

https://twitter.com/mhmck/status/1580413345341276161


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 8:17 am
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Musk really seems to have swallowed the Moscow line - new rumours he is threatening to shut down starlink in Ukraine.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 8:48 am
Posts: 3332
Full Member
 

Or they've shown him footage of vidoes they've taken similar to Trump's watersports in Moscow


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 9:04 am
Posts: 34450
Full Member
 

People that I know see it as Russia Vs NATO but more specifically Russia vs NATO (America pulling the NATO string).

Posted 9 hours ago

They are either daft or swallowing Russian propaganda

Before Putin's invasion there was 0 chance of Ukraine joining NATO, now it's an option
And NATO & the West countries refused to supply Ukraine with the number & weapons that they'd been asking for for years, but always been denied

If it is Russia be NATO, that's because Putin chose to invade


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 9:10 am
Posts: 3332
Full Member
 

Not forgetting his decision to invade prompted Sweden & Finland to apply to join NATO, so from not wanting Ukraine being in NATO & bordering Russia, he'll have a border to NATO in the north.

His NATO/US narrative is purely for his home market.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 9:28 am
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

His NATO/US narrative is purely for his home market.

There are plenty of useful idiots on both the left and right in Western countries that buy into it.

https://twitter.com/CathyYoung63/status/1580783939530420229


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 11:16 am
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

I'm just guessing here, but my feeling is that 50,000 well-fed, well-equipped, well-trained troops would be better than 250,000 starving, badly equipped conscripts.

https://twitter.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1580838265774829568


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 11:26 am
Posts: 812
Free Member
 

1/ What's life like for newly-mobilised Russian troops in their barracks and temporary accomodation? Terrible, from all accounts, with no heating, no food, no sleeping bags, no hot water, no toilets, freezing tents, bedbug-infested mattresses and no training. 🧵 follows. pic.twitter.com/7KCOmWHsHQ

— ChrisO (@ChrisO_wiki) October 14, 2022

Peace! Land! Bread!


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 11:45 am
Posts: 3332
Full Member
 

Maybe it's a ploy by Putin- conscript '000s, then at the first sign of fighting they surrender clogging up the Ukranian network.

Also all those that "escaped" the draft to neighbouring countries? Good way to get plenty of sleeper agents into neighbouring states!


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 11:49 am
Posts: 6572
Free Member
 

Not really, they are losing and are desperately trying to avoid being completely routed

They are mutually compatible. President Putin sees that negotiation will give him a withdrawal option that can be spun at home to "we didn't lose".

The problem is that no-one will negotiate for two reasons – it’s unacceptable to allow any ground to be given to Russia now for fear of encouraging future land grabs and Russia can’t be trusted on anything

Which is where China needs to step up to rein Russia in, but the current US tech market restrictions don't promote the necessary east-west mutual trust


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 1:16 pm
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

Which is where China needs to step up to rein Russia in

The idea that one country can rein another country in ignores that those countries have agency. China cannot rein in Russia and the U.S. cannot rein in Ukraine.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:08 pm
Posts: 91157
Free Member
 

What a ****ing joke. Everyone's losing - Russians and Ukranians alike. Just for one man's stupidity.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:14 pm
Posts: 2909
Free Member
 

Ukraine has the upper hand, dictating where operations take place, steadily shaping the battlefield to its advantage. Putin won’t give them what they want, all their land back, so negotiations won’t be happening 🤷‍♂️


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:20 pm
Posts: 812
Free Member
 

The idea that one country can rein another country in ignores that those countries have agency. China cannot rein in Russia and the U.S. cannot rein in Ukraine.

A lot to agree in that but the US made it's thoughts very definitely "felt" over the Suez invasion crisis.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:25 pm
Posts: 3332
Full Member
 

US made it’s thoughts very definitely “felt” over the Suez invasion crisis

I think the relative size of the US to UK had an impact.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:35 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Putin in his speech today blaming the grain ships for bringing in explosives for the Kerch Bridge attack.

More blackmail for the world and a stick to beat African nations that voted agains5 him at the UN.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:44 pm
Posts: 45989
Free Member
 

What a **** joke. Everyone’s losing – Russians and Ukranians alike. Just for one man’s stupidity.

Very true.
No-one wins here, least of all Ukraine with decades of poverty, rebuilding and worry about their neighbour, huge physical and mental health issue, pulluted, mined and damaged land and buildings across a huge swathe of countryside.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 2:46 pm
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

Interesting perspective on the function of the U.N.
https://twitter.com/charlicarpenter/status/1580925598331203585


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 3:46 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
 

I think the relative size of the US to UK had an impact.

It sure did, but I think there’s more to it than that. The disparity in GDP (I think) is greater for Russia/China today than the U.K./US in 1956. Same for population size as well.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 5:38 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
Posts: 6572
Free Member
 

The idea that one country can rein another country in ignores that those countries have agency. China cannot rein in Russia...

We'll have to see what happens after China's 20th Communist Party Congress, which starts this weekend. If President Xi retains his post then he'll be China's most powerful leader since Chairman Mao Zedong, who founded the People's Republic of China.
China, Russia and three "'stans" are founder-members of the "Shanghai Five", which has expanded into the nine-member Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which together holds 30% of world GDP.
The SCO has another twelve partner and observer countries, including Saudi Arabia and Turkey. We're already aware of the influence that these two countries have had on Russia by negotiating to secure grain shipments and PoW swaps, which isn't bad going for countries that aren't even SCO members, just dialogue partners. China would have massive influence, if it chooses to use it, and has already told Russia to reduce its nuclear threat rhetoric.

...and the U.S. cannot rein in Ukraine

It's not about anyone reining Ukraine in, it's about the US giving China and Saudi Arabia a reason and encouragement to work some diplomatic magic, end this war and if necessary offer a safe existence to those who need it in their choice of 21 SCO countries.
The US is heading towards important elections of its own next month and its tough stance with US tech market restrictions towards China and threats of consequences for Saudi Arabia after OPEC+ cut oil production don’t promote the necessary east-west mutual trust.
Why would China, Saudi Arabia and the rest of the SCO exert influence that might end the war when they are getting nothing in return? They'd rather watch the west spend billions and damage its economies


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:02 pm
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

work some diplomatic magic

Magic won't end this war. It will end when Ukraine have expelled Russian troops from Ukraine.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:15 pm
Posts: 1500
Full Member
 

What a strange post?


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:27 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
 

Guess it was going back to basics for trolling


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:30 pm
Posts: 12347
Full Member
 

What a strange post?

Does anyone have any idea WTF chewkw's talking about?


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:35 pm
 pk13
Posts: 2733
Full Member
 

Never have tbf


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:37 pm
Posts: 5704
Full Member
 

Does anyone have any idea WTF chewkw’s talking about?

Wishing for a nuclear exchange by the sounds of it....


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:38 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

What a strange post?

Well, not really if you read the "alternative" news and disappointed by them.

Guess it was going back to basics for trolling

Unless you consider the "DailyFact" (the newspaper with title Dailysomething) unreal and I made up the story. I am merely reiterating the disappointment in what they have written.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:39 pm
Posts: 17261
Full Member
 

I miss Zombie Maggots.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:39 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

I miss Zombie Maggots.

"ZM" is still around but just have to tone down a bit otherwise feeling get a bit sensitive as handbags are getting too expensive nowadays to hurl around. Not good for conversation etc.

Does anyone have any idea WTF chewkw’s talking about?

This is my "reference". (mod please delete the link if it is unacceptable to have this link)
https://www.****/news/article-11315939/Putin-says-Russias-mobilisation-Ukraine-war-two-weeks.html


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:44 pm
Posts: 5704
Full Member
 

Well, not really if you read the “alternative” news and disappointed by them.

.

Unless you consider the “DailyFact” (the newspaper with title Dailysomething) unreal and I made up the story. I am merely reiterating the disappointment in what they have written.

Nope, still no clue whatsoever what this means


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:44 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Nope, still no clue whatsoever what this means

See "news" link above.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:48 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
 

If turds are on the table, this rumour is currently doing the rounds

https://twitter.com/tarasmi/status/1580962205079437318?s=20

Could be push back for the increasing criticism


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:51 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Two points:

1. Stop the war fast so everyone can rebuild, or
2. Drag on forever where there is no chance for peace.

No 1 will require massive realisation (probably nuke) that all will end in tears to start being humble again. Want to avoid this then just let Ukraine be under Russia domain or ...

No 2 stick with Western worldview that only the West/NATO can dictate terms to others and fight to the end.

I choose No 1 even if it means half the world will be in ashes. Humanity needs to be taught a very hard lesson.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:54 pm
Posts: 6572
Free Member
 

Magic won’t end this war.

You're missing the point. It's not magic, it's diplomatic pressure

It will end when Ukraine have expelled Russian troops from Ukraine

That isn't true, you need to change the invader's aims.
In 1974 Israel comprehensively beat the Arab states during the Yom Kippur war, but Egypt got the Sinai Peninsular back because they were still able to cross the Suez Canal. Egypt holds the Sinai to this day


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 6:59 pm
Posts: 2039
Free Member
 

What a lunatic


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:00 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

What a lunatic

I bet those fighting the war on both sides will probably agree with you.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:05 pm
Posts: 2182
Free Member
 

A 'block' feature on the forum is overdue


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:07 pm
Posts: 5704
Full Member
 

I choose No 1 even if it means half the world will be in ashes. Humanity needs to be taught a very hard lesson.

Wow.  Just wow.  You actually do wish for nuclear war don't you?  That is just a little bit unhinged and sick IMO.  I have given your non western, alternative take a little consideration on this thread at times, but honestly, that is just beyond the pale.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:07 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Wow. Just wow. You actually do wish for nuclear war don’t you? That is just a little bit unhinged and sick IMO. I have given your non western, alternative take a little consideration on this thread at times, but honestly, that is just beyond the pale.

Do you have an alternative solution?

America dropped two atomic bombs at Japanese civilian zones during WWII to stop the war in the name of peace. There were majority normal civilians going about their daily routines with no defense whatsoever as Japan was already on the way to be defeated.

You now try to argue another view? You have no leg to stand on.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:10 pm
 pk13
Posts: 2733
Full Member
 

So Russia get to even the score???


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:13 pm
Posts: 5704
Full Member
 

Do you have an alternative solution?

Ukraine is winning.  Russia has made a massive mistake and they know it.  The solution is to give Ukraine whatever they need to empty their land of rapist, torturing war criminals.  Putin wont use Nukes because they will give him no military advantage and will only serve to hasten his demise.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:14 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

So Russia get to even the score???

Nobody knows the outcome other than tears.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:15 pm
Posts: 2909
Free Member
 

And yet you guys keep feeding the troll 🤷‍♂️


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:16 pm
Posts: 1634
Full Member
 

America dropped two atomic bombs at Japanese civilian zones during WWII to stop the war in the name of peace.

And since that time the world has done it's utmost to avoid having to repeat that!


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:17 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
 

Stop feeding the troll, its only here to derail the thread


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:19 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Ukraine is winning. Russia has made a massive mistake and they know it. The solution is to give Ukraine whatever they need to empty their land of rapist, torturing war criminals. Putin wont use Nukes because they will give him no military advantage and will only serve to hasten his demise.

You are justifying option number 2, which is fine if you wish to drag on a long war but it will be a long war.

I choose option 1 for the reasons above. Nothing weird about that as past precedent was set.

And since that time the world has done it’s utmost to avoid having to repeat that!

Really? Why are they stockpiling the nuclear arms then? Even after WWII they never stopped developing much more powerful weapons. This is really weapon of mass destruction but yet they all consider it as a deterrent.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:19 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Boohooo! Boo! Boo! Boo! … no nuke!? What a disappointment! I thought things were just about to get more interesting...

Not cool Chewk, not cool. Perhaps you need to take some time out for a while.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:23 pm
 wbo
Posts: 1756
Free Member
 

China has a VERY good reason to rein China in as a global recession is an existential threat to it's government and stability.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:25 pm
Posts: 3541
Full Member
 

As abhorrent as I find his posts, at Least he's open about being a war ghoul, unlike many of you.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:27 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Not cool Chewk, not cool. Perhaps you need to take some time out for a while.

Yes, I know it is not cool.

Take time out now ... won't be back for another few days.

As abhorrent as I find his posts, at Least he’s open about being a war ghoul, unlike many of you.

I prefer the term ZM ... LOL! Ghoul is weak. ZM is better.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:29 pm
Posts: 5704
Full Member
 

You are justifying option number 2, which is fine if you wish to drag on a long war but it will be a long war.

I think you are wrong.  Ukraine has huge momentum and Russian forces have proved to be poorly led, unmotivated,  ill equipped, and strategically inept. Their logistics are in tatters and they are sending the scum of their prison system and untrained kids into the fight in desperation. It will (IMO) be over by the end of next year.  But even if it took ten years that would be better than the Armageddon you clearly get off on.

Nothing weird about that

I humbly beg to differ!


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:32 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Take time out now … won’t be back for another few days.

Don't hurry back.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:34 pm
Posts: 512
Full Member
 

Don’t hurry back.

Ditto


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:42 pm
Posts: 14451
Free Member
 

unlike many of you.

Oof, felt that one.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 7:43 pm
Posts: 4209
Free Member
 

The BBC reports that Putin has said there's no need for any more massive strikes on Ukraine. Does that mean he's run out of missiles?


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 9:34 pm
Posts: 15554
Full Member
 

It sounds like Putin has run out of tanks and artillery, or at least running low.

Nevermind re-supply logistics for ammunition, food, medical supplies and clothing (for soldiers)to operate. Winter is coming.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 9:41 pm
Posts: 34450
Full Member
 

Does that mean he’s run out of missiles?

I think it means that the west has donated the air defence Ukraine wanted

https://twitter.com/JackDetsch/status/1580948754735431680?t=D6eD_nEyKOpJMFO2piHoSg&s=19

This is a interesting

https://twitter.com/bigtomsky/status/1580951777716731905?t=efhZAUQDHLKfv9Gmnoi9mg&s=19

At this point I think putin just might be realising the game is up, he'll negotiate to keep as much as he can, and hope to rebuild his broken army , I'm not sure Ukraine will let him, whatever musk says


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:24 pm
Posts: 14525
Free Member
 

Take time out now … won’t be back for another few days.

From this thread or the forum?


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:39 pm
Posts: 15554
Full Member
 

It's a busted flush, Putin gambled wrong.

This won't stop until Russia go home and Ukraine get Crimea back. Simple as that.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:44 pm
Posts: 34450
Full Member
 

This won’t stop until Russia go home and Ukraine get Crimea back. Simple as that.

Not sure retaking Crimea will be that easy
But don't see how pumping untrained & ill equipped troops to fight through the winter ends up in nothing but defeat for Russia in large parts of the south and east


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:52 pm
Posts: 6968
Full Member
 

Very early on in this thread I criticised our troll and got a chastisement from some of the pompous know-alls this forum attracts. By all means Chewy let's hear your views but try and read the room.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:52 pm
Posts: 15554
Full Member
 

Not sure retaking Crimea will be that easy

The bridge is already almost knocked out. It can be knocked out harder soon, but Ukraine will let it get almost repaired (attrition) before hitting it again... read the room.


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 10:59 pm
Posts: 34450
Full Member
 

As for chewk, he often has some insight and offers a different perspective that is shared by a big chunk of the world, including asia (it's bollox mind, but he's not alone)

I think for many that bought into the tough guy Putin propoganda, he was a last bastion of the oldskool strongman type against the woke & decadent west, and for plenty of right wingers here in Europe & America , Putin's humiliation is tough for them to take


 
Posted : 14/10/2022 11:00 pm
Page 158 / 277