Forum menu
Tripods (camera con...
 

[Closed] Tripods (camera content, not the giant world conquering alien kind)

Posts: 91159
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I got one as an early birthday present cos the one I wanted isn't readily available back home, and I got out to check my new lens's AF calibration. Like a good boy though I've put it away for the next 6 weeks or so 🙂

So what do [i]you[/i] use a tripod for? Macro work? Telephoto wildlife stuff? Extra sharpness on landscapes or still lifes? Studio portraits?


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:09 am
 DrJ
Posts: 13931
Full Member
 

All of the above. The extra sharpness you get from keeping the camera steady is the equivalent of about a thousand quid lens 🙂


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:16 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I use mine to clutter up the office.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:22 am
Posts: 12087
Full Member
 

I use mine to get out of having to record my eldest daughter doing some horrendous Disney song/dance routine, stick her camera on it and tell her to get on with it.

And the above when I remember. Mainly night stuff, though it's been a while since I last did any...


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ditto Dr J

I must have too much money to burn on toyz 🙄 as I've more or less completed my induction in to the world of Arca Swiss camera pron.

Here's a [url= http://www.pbase.com/m1ke_a/camera_equipment ]hotch potch[/url] of some of my kit.

Oh and BTW I don't have the pennies for the big whites so the 300, 400 and 500's I've used have been hired.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:31 am
Posts: 91159
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Right, looking forward to this extra sharpness then 🙂

Need a new ball-head then - the one I use on my monopod was £15 from Jessops and whilst good enough to allow me to angle the pod correctly, it shifts position when locking and unlocking which is annoying. What I could do with is some kind of stiff fluid damper that allows me to move the thing easily but still keeps it steady. My kit is pretty small and light. There was a nice looking Manfrotto friction head thing in the shop but at 109 € it was too much to tack onto the present bill 🙂

This is what I got btw:

http://www.enjoyyourcamera.com/Tripods-Accessories/Tripods-Pro/Cullmann-Magnesit-528Q-Tripod-with-Quickshift::4278.html


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 11:35 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I have a few but virtually never use them - even for night stuff - just can't be bothered with them. IMO Nikkon F2.8 lenses with VR-II make them pretty redundant for most things (although I'm sure plenty will disagree).


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 34471
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ball Heads don't have the precision of a 3 way unit but are more convenient in use and are generally lighter.

Despite having something like £600's worth of ball heads, I'd probably suggest a 3 way unit if you're happy to spend the slightly longer time on set up.

The [url= http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-manfrotto-804rc2-tripod-head/p1012868 ]Manfrotto 804RC2[/url] would be a good starting point.

Oh and a hotshoe 2 or 3 way spirit level is a must have. They're as cheap as chips on Fleabay


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

m1kea - that is a lot of kit!


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I have a few but virtually never use them - even for night stuff - just can't be bothered with them. IMO Nikkon F2.8 lenses with VR-II make them pretty redundant for most things (although I'm sure plenty will disagree).

Yeah, under 'normal' conditions stabilisation will get me pixel-peeping sharp images so a tripod isn't necessary.

Video is the main area I find a tripod is useful under 'normal' conditions.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:08 pm
Posts: 91159
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm.. interesting about the three way head. I do want to minimise faff. To be honest it'll most likely get used for macro shots anyway, when I'll probably get some rails - which I appreciate is even more faff still 🙂


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a 100mm macro lens but don't use it very much. In fact my insect macros [url= http://www.pbase.com/m1ke_a/bees ]attempts[/url] have always been free hand as I wanted the bees in flight.

Never tried any rails but you might want to consider a lens collar so that you can rotate the body between portrait and landscape modes. Flipping the head obviously moves the body to a different axis, which means recomposing the image and tripod position.

Image stabilisation will allow to get away with handholding down to quite slow shutter speeds but not if you're HDR bracketing shots, have shutter speeds heading towards 1 sec or do HQ pano stuff.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I use two tripods to hang a duvet from to make a vocal recording booth.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Video.

I have Manfrotto 055-something as well as a really nasty cheap Jessops thing that has the plus side of weighing naff all.

Proper fluid head coming for the Manfrotto as well as a Glidetrack Shooter.

Don't really take photos of much other than family now. Just bought a new DSLR and it's shot more video than it's taken pictures.


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 12:48 pm
Posts: 91159
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, IS is a good thing. The main issue with hand-holding macro though in my limited experience is keeping things in focus, cos the dof is so narrow. Of course, even if you brought a tripod you can still remove the camera for hand held shots of moving objects 🙂


 
Posted : 25/07/2011 1:20 pm