Guy Martin? Jay Kay? No.
Chris Evans? Possibly....
Would he want to though beyond being a guest presenter? Its an old format. Some already say its gone on too long.
martinhutch - MemberThe executive producer is Clarkson's best chum, as are the two other presenters.
Chris Evans on R2 this morning, was pondering why they couldn't just run the remaining shows with the other two given that it's only Clarkson that got suspended. But the way he was saying it, was like he was hinting at something; "hmmmm, why would it be that they couldn't just fall back on Hammond & May.....? Hmmmmmm" What possible reasons could there be....?" That kind of thing.
I wonder if Hammond & May said something along the lines of 'well, if he's not doing it, neither are we....'??
I quite like the idea of a refresh. Out with the old, in with the new.
The executive producer is Clarkson's best chum...
He presented too for a bit, and he was shite. Proper talent vacuum there, but it's not what you know...
Maybe Chris Evans was alluding to Alonso? Or May and Hammond were being told no pudding for the remaining shows for showing Clarkson support?
hora - MemberMaybe Chris Evans was alluding to Alonso? Or May and Hammond were being told no pudding for the remaining shows for showing Clarkson support?
Perhaps. Or perhaps Clarkson has a long distance (70km or so) sportive to do this weekend and didn't want to tire himself out in advance recording the show?! 😀
I quite like the idea of a refresh. Out with the old, in with the new.
I agree with this. It has been pretty tired for a few seasons now.
TBH there will be nothing left of the 'brand' by the time this is over. Might as well bin it and start over in a couple of years.
Chris Evans has ruled out doing it, apparently. And I don't think he's a 'good fit' for it, anyway. I can't see anyone being able to slot into the show as it stands.
I reckon a brilliant outlet for Colin Furze (look him up on youtube if you don't know who he is.
Certainly would be a bit of a 'marmite' presenter, but the lunacy would be ace. Not sure the beeb's health and saftey people would cope though!
That's the thing, though - they've done lunacy for twelve years now, and I'm bored of it.
[quote=Northwind ]Guy Martin could be a great feature presenter but not a host I think.
Why does it have to be the same? I'm not necessarily advocating him, but some people are falling into the trap of looking for a like-for-like replacement - and Guy quite clearly is capable of doing a presenting job. Lots of agreement that the format is stale and needed a revamp anyway - plenty of stuff they could do which isn't boring, but is different to what they did before. IMHO the best stuff was despite the obnoxious blokey banter rather than because of it - and they have done some great stuff in the past.
I DONT KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT
Sabine "I could do that in a van" Schmitz ftw, with VBH and Rachel Riley completing the Holy Trinity.
There you go, Rebooted.
I DONT KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT
Apparently Clarkson killed a man with a trident.
you couldn't just replace Clarkson, wouldn't work. You'd have to junk the entire show and start again.
Unless of course someone scoops up Clarkson, Hammond and May and we have SuperGear on ITV or sommat.
Sabine "I could do that in a van" Schmitz ftw, with VBH and Rachel Riley completing the Holy Trinity.There you go, Rebooted
Can we choose the boots?
Is Michael Winner dead? He'd about fit. Or Piers Morgan. Marco Pierre White looks the same, sounds the same, is an anus? Maybe they could dig up Jimmy Saville?
[i]You'd have to junk the entire show[s] and start again.[/s][/i]
we could have constant re-runs of Downton, and Call the midwife....it'd be lushly
I reckon a brilliant outlet for Colin Furze (look him up on youtube if you don't know who he is.
Please God no. A 2 minute YouTube clip is more than enough for anyone.
"Woooooooo I'm crackers me!!!.... Wooohoooo really mad stuff ..... Watch thiiiiiss, I'm crackers me .... Etc"
aracer - MemberWhy does it have to be the same? I'm not necessarily advocating him, but some people are falling into the trap of looking for a like-for-like replacement - and Guy quite clearly is capable of doing a presenting job
Not a like-for-like replacement but it'd need some massive changes in format before he became a good choice IMO, enough to mean it wouldn't really be recognisable. Which wouldn't bother me but that won't be what the BBC want.
Please God no. A 2 minute YouTube clip is more than enough for anyone.
Agreed - what a bell end
Al Murray, that tall model that likes fast cars - Jodie Kidd and Ben Collins.
Or scrap Al - Robson Green
Bring back William Woolard & Michal Rodd
Not a like-for-like replacement but it'd need some massive changes in format before he became a good choice IMO, enough to mean it wouldn't really be recognisable. Which wouldn't bother me but that won't be what the BBC want.
That was my point. You'll never replace Clarkson, so you'd have to competely change the show to make a new programme work. Ben Collins, Jay Kay etc are all just car people. TG hasn't really been about cars since they relaunched it. That's why it's so much more popular than 5th Gear!
Valentino Rossi or Guy Martin when they retire, make it about motorbikes and cars to widen the appeal and increase the lifespan of the show.
Then mix some of the idiocy in with some motorsports news.
IMO the perfect person to replace Clarkson would be Rob Warner....but he's a cyclist/motocrosser. 😆
Moron signing back in..
Why not have the BBC Exec board (because it will have been 19 mid managers protecting their jobs) front the show.
It would certainly be different then.
Possibly as lame as it is now, possibly not. Lots of copies of the Gridion and Woolen Jumper lying around on the set and such.
Maybe Merry Berry and that twunt she presents the Bake Off twaddle with, perhaps they could do it.. Seems like the BBC is heading that way with programming..
Moron signing off.
Edit: 450k have signed the petition already..
Assuming it is over, it'll be interesting to see how it pans out. BBC will presumably own the Top Gear brand, but if Clarkson, May and Hamshit defect to ITV or Sky they'll have the face of Top Gear at least.
Personally I think the BBC would most likely shake things up and go for an overhaul with a similar if not identical format.
I could see Clarkson, May and Hammond launching a big show on another network but wouldn't be surprised if it died on it's ass in a big way. I think Top Gear's preinstalled audience and familiarity count massively towards it's ongoing success. People who watch it, just because it's Top Gear. Without that and with any new venture likely to be placed under intense scrutiny, the genie could be well and truly out of the bottle.
njee20TG hasn't really been about cars since they relaunched it. That's why it's so much more popular than 5th Gear!
It was actually. For about 5 or 6 series, it was much more car centric. The big set pieces generally revolved around cars racing something. Somewhere along the way the "crazy challenges" which were more like vignettes or asides became the show.
Edit: 450k have signed the petition already..
Titanic made £2.2 billion and won 11 oscars.
Foggy, Jamie Whitham & Guy Martin would make a great team for a bike show.
🙂
How about The Great British Top Gear Lap Challenge.
A cross section of society practice driving ,go on a journey, grow as people ,cry a lot and are then crowned fastest around the track.
Then we could have a shit programme hosted by someone really annoying who interviews the person who sadly couldn't go through to the next round.
Fair point njee but I think the BBC will see that as commercial suicide- if they lose Clarkson, that's a big upset for fans, changing the format drastically on top of that would be a huge risk (and let's be honest, there's a fair chance that if you want a different format, you still won't tune in because you're used to top gear being how it is now).
Can't we just import [url= http://gfycat.com/AbsoluteHollowAsiaticwildass ]Top Gear Korea[/url]?
njee20 - Member
you couldn't just replace Clarkson, wouldn't work. You'd have to junk the entire show and start again.
Exactly. You would be a bit sweaty if you are James May right now!
Exactly. You would be a bit sweaty if you are James May right now!
Neither May or Hammond seem short of work, so I doubt they are too concerned.
I don't understand why people are essentially saying that the format is dead already anyway. There's just far too many people watching it for that to be the case. Just because you've tired of something, doesn't mean that everybody else thinks the same. I find Dragons Den tediously boring, but I accept that many people still enjoy it. I just don't feel the need to rant on about it every week. I simply watch or do something else at 9pm on a Sunday.
According to the BBC website, 'Red Arrows, Inside the Bubble' will be shown instead. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04cg6pd
FFS! Two blokes having a hang bag time what's the big deal?
🙄
If the rumours are correct anf he hit someone I cant believe no none took the opportunity of a free hit at the ****
FFS! Two blokes having a hang bag time what's the big deal?
It's not really a big deal.
However, it's useful ammunition if you have an axe to grind.
A police investigation and DPP opinion could be amusing.
piemonster - Member
FFS! Two blokes having a hang bag time what's the big deal?It's not really a big deal.
However, it's useful ammunition if you have an axe to grind.
Ahhh .... I see. I bet the backstabbers are the PC ZMs.
thejesmonddingo - MemberA police investigation and DPP opinion could be amusing.
What! 😯 More people are involved now? Don't they have more important things to do rather than trying to investigate hang bags? 😡 Are we paying our tax or TV license (the common approach to justify an argument 😆 ) to feed this bunch of idle PC ZMs?
anagallis_arvensis - MemberIf the rumours are correct anf he hit someone I cant believe no none took the opportunity of a free hit at the ****
Not when the person trying to hit is a short arse with short reach. 🙄
Clarkson and Wilman own the production company that produce TopGear. I don't think it's cut and dried who owns what and who has the rights to what. It would be very easy to transfer the format to any other channel and let the BBC keep the name. Like it or not Clarkson has made TG his own. My 12 yr old is very miffed it's not on on Sunday. After all that is the target audience. One of lifes pleasures settling down on a Sunday night with the boy to watch it and hear him cackle and laugh out loud at their merry japes!
Fair point njee but I think the BBC will see that as commercial suicide- if they lose Clarkson, that's a big upset for fans, changing the format drastically on top of that would be a huge risk (and let's be honest, there's a fair chance that if you want a different format, you still won't tune in because you're used to top gear being how it is now).
And that's the BBCs dilemma. If they get rid of Clarkson they lose one of their three biggest programmes basically.
Jimjam - it's never [i]really[/i] been about cars. They've always done features on cars, still do, but it's an entertainment programme. I can't help but think folk suggesting it needs Guy Martin or Valentino Rossi at the helm to broaden its appeal have misunderstood what it is they're watching!
Over half a million names on the online petition now 😆
thejesmonddingo
A police investigation and DPP opinion could be amusing.
Of course, wasting several hundred thousands pounds of tax payers monies on why some fat angry old bloke hit or didn't hit some other not so fat, old or angry block, is of critical importance right now.........
I also think people probably underestimate JC as a host. Look at the SIARPC guests he's interviewed, generally with good humor and a good on screen bonhomie. I mean, not many people could face up to Tom Cruise & Cameron Diaz in such a short interview and make it work imo. (Chris Evans being one probably)
wasting several hundred thousands pounds of tax payers monies
two points.
1. Not sure how many officers you think will be involved in asking a few folk if he hit one of them and them going yes or no then someone else deciding what to do with the evidence. Ie it will cost nothing like that
2. What other crimes should we ignore to save money ?


