If ever a thread illustrated to the OP the value of a quick google, this is it. Really interesting stuff mind, just don't understand why sometimes people don't do a bit of basic research before posting on here
But STW is Google and Wikipedia rolled into one.
Shouldn't they try helium fusion bombs?
Yeah good luck with that. Maybe they'll go that when they're finished with a Starkiller.
Not sure what the relevance is here unless you're worried about someone breaking one open?
Ah, the original question related to yields from Trident missiles, but I went a little O/T after digging around and discovering that we have a lot of decommissioned subs lying around.
Yes, I am very worried about a decommissioned nuclear sub being damaged. There is already precedent for this as the Russians have had to scuttle a sub en route to the breakers yard. The reactor, even when defueled is still radioactive enough to be a hazard if not disposed of carefully. Given that our ex-subs are stored close to populated areas, I'm very concerned indeed.
The fact that no-one seems to have given much thought to what we do with our ex-attack subs and boomers once they've reached the end of their useful lives gives me grey hair. I would go so far as to say that the subs represent more of a danger to Britain in their decommissioned state than our Trident missiles do to an enemy in event of a conventional conflict.
PJM1974 - Member
...I am very worried about a decommissioned nuclear sub being damaged. There is already precedent for this as the Russians have had to scuttle a sub en route to the breakers yard. The reactor, even when defueled is still radioactive enough to be a hazard if not disposed of carefully. Given that our ex-subs are stored close to populated areas, I'm very concerned indeed....
Don't worry, they're perfectly safe.
And they'll all be coming down to England in a few years time - preferably to be moored outside Westminster seeing as they are so safe. 🙂
As squirrelking points out Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion. Bearing in mind its almost the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident though it's worth a read of a couple of wikipedia articles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_involvement_in_the_Chernobyl_disaster
Chernobyl and Fukashima exploded due to a build up of pressure from a secondary fire, not by the fissile material reaching critical mass. The graphite used to moderate the reaction become too hot, caught fire and the resulting explosion blew out radioactive material.
It's worth reading about the Windscale fire in 1957...the air cooled (air cooled!) reactor became so hot that any water used to cool the reactor fire would release free hydrogen molecules, which would accumulate at the top of the reactor, right above flammable material and fed by a steady supply of cooling air 😯
Whoops, double post.
I've got a mate who named his dog Tsar Bomba.
Chernobyl and Fukashima exploded due to a build up of pressure from a secondary fire, not by the fissile material reaching critical mass.
A fire from reaching critical mass would be very unfortunate since you require it to be supercritical to increase power output 😉
Sub reactors are tricky buggers only by virtue of the fact they were built without any consideration given towards removal, Vanguard class (and newer) subs are designed to have the reactors easily removed at the end of life (in fact at least one has had its reactor replaced IIRC). Really you probably need nothing more than a dry dock to accomodate the sub and the necessary equipment to cut the area of the reactor out and enclose it (decommissioning is not my area of expertise so this is entirely speculation) before taking it away for disposal. Where it is disposed? Good question, only Finland so far have had the gumption to build a long term dry store, people here just like to stick their fingers in their ears about the whole thing.
Well it's obvious this was not a full H bomb. Cafe Nero have just opened a branch in Pyongyang, and Kim Jong Un ordered a pasta bowl and asked them to heat it up *a bit*. The resulting fusion reaction was short lived as the plasma bolognaise was not well enough contained.
Oh and if you're really worried about contamination from nuclear reactors don't look at the maps of the south coast after the Brittany coast reactors get nuked in an engagement.
Again, look on Wikipedia for military nuclear accidents, the one where a cooling rod flashes over and blows out the top of the reactor impaling a bloke to the ceiling is particular chilling. Also look up Demon Core and tickling the dragons tail.
That SR-1 incident is almost like for like with Chernobyl (in principle). Shame there was no info sharing in those days.
There's a great coffee table book about nuclear testing called 100 sun's. Some amazing pictures of the tests. They had no idea what some of the bombs would yeil. I tested the eyes of a guy who served on a ship during the tests, he couldn't put into words the sight of a few mega tons expldoing from close range. Didn't enjoy the skin cancer though in his old age!
