This 3D thing on ch...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] This 3D thing on channel 4....

10 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
62 Views
Posts: 8
Free Member
Topic starter
 

....anyone noticing much difference with their glasses on? seems a little bit more "contrasty" but not really 3D...Like the people who tell me to put my 3D glasses on though!


 
Posted : 16/11/2009 9:25 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50463
 

Hmm! Oh that forgot all about it.


 
Posted : 16/11/2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 31061
Free Member
 

I watched that shite about the coronation for about ten minutes. What a pile of horseshit! I'm hoping the rest of the stuff this week's a bit better.


 
Posted : 16/11/2009 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Off to the Tower for you!


 
Posted : 16/11/2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

novelty lasted 'bout hmm.. 10 secs. Little longer in the late 80's but I was a child then.


 
Posted : 16/11/2009 10:37 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12684
Full Member
 

it just didn't seem to work that well on my telly.


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 9:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When I was a kid they put a 3D film on the telly but our mum forgot to get the glasses so we taped sweet wrappers (Quality Street IIRC) onto photochromatic sunglasses.

It worked and we got to eat extra sweets too.

🙂


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 10:07 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I take it it is just [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy#Complementary_color_anaglyphs ]anaglyph 3D[/url]?

I guess it might not work so well on your telly if your colours are a bit off.

Or if you don't normally see in stereo anyway (which is why my missus can't see 3D).


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 10:17 am
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

They were messing about with those 3D TV glasses about 20 years ago and it was crap then. Why do they keep on trying to punt this idea of anaglyph 3D? it's rubbish.

Now SmellyVision - that's a concept they should be workiing on.


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 10:21 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Why do they keep on trying to punt this idea of anaglyph 3D? it's rubbish.

Because it's cheap. LCD shutter glasses or polarised displays are much much better - but harder to justify giving away for free at the supermarket.


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 10:39 am
Posts: 34078
Full Member
 

surely 3d was meant for porn, you want things that stick out the screen 😉


 
Posted : 17/11/2009 10:40 am