Forum menu
things that may imp...
 

[Closed] things that may improve my car.

Posts: 0
 

People keep saying this, but surely that's exactly what a turbocharger is?

But given the choice of 1 litre or 2 litre turbocharged assuming everything else is in equal ratios between them which would you want?


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 10:26 pm
Posts: 351
Free Member
Topic starter
 

A clean might make it a bit faster.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 10:34 pm
Posts: 39732
Free Member
 

Cone filter up there has no place on a road car. Kill it with fire.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 10:51 pm
Posts: 1879
Free Member
 

If it's a 2.0 litre turbo it should be the Saab unit from the 93. Very tuneable and the chassis is half decent. Ignore the naysayers it's probably the best Vectra they made. Make sure the exhaust gas sump breather systems are fully working any Saab specialist keeps these in stock. Take the sump off and fully clean it and replace the oil pick up pipe. More important to do this than any tuning at this stage.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 10:57 pm
Posts: 91165
Free Member
 

But given the choice of 1 litre or 2 litre turbocharged assuming everything else is in equal ratios between them which would you want?

That's not the same question.

You could take a 1l engine and turbocharge it to get the same power as a 2l. Therefore the extra 1l displacement has been 'replaced' by a turbocharger. Therefore, there IS a replacement for displacement!

Bigger cylinders are there to allow more air in to burn more fuel. Exactly the same thing as a turbo does.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

molgrips, you seem to have just stolen the fun from the thread. Give it back


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

See your car go up in value overnight


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's not a terrible car, just not worth spending anything on it other than keeping it running nicely.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:24 pm
Posts: 351
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It is the Saab engine. How much of it is different to the normal Vectra?


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:28 pm
Posts: 6317
Full Member
 

Cone filter up there has no place on a road car. Kill it with fire.

I'll bite. Why not? I'd agree with the sentiment if it was confined to n/a engines, but a turbo?


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'll answer. Heatsoak. Might lose you power as opposed to gaining it.


 
Posted : 22/02/2016 11:52 pm
Posts: 6317
Full Member
 

Hmmm, I suppose, but isn't that what the intercooler is supposed to help with?


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 12:08 am
Posts: 4337
Full Member
 

It's a Vectra .

Having owned my advice is

Kill it with fire .

Kill it with fire now .


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 12:11 am
Posts: 8037
Full Member
 

Stevemuzzy plus one. If they aren't gulping in air with a good cooling motion based breeze they are not that helpfuls for performance improvement. My 306 gti had a cone filter, better breathing on track and fast a roads quite possibly but in traffic going through town or slower moving stuff the car felt wretched vs the original airbox.

The intercooler is there to reduce the temperature of the compressed (if I can call it that) air post turbo. If your getting poor airflow in to the turbo due to heat issues then you are still blunting the performance.

Motor engineers / car nerds have I summed that up right?


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 12:15 am
Posts: 6317
Full Member
 

Every day's a school day. That sounds sensible. I never thought about it that way, despite having a fan mounted on my intercooler plus 2 fans pulling hot air out of the engine bay...

I guess one of those plastic/carbon fibre box shield things around the induction pipework would help reduce air intake temps if sat in traffic?


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 12:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Remove all unnecessary crap- basically everything except driver's seat and steering wheel.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 1:33 am
Posts: 0
 

You could take a 1l engine and turbocharge it to get the same power as a 2l. Therefore the extra 1l displacement has been 'replaced' by a turbocharger. Therefore, there IS a replacement for displacement!

Agree, but if you have space in the bay for the 2 litre turbocharged engine, that's still going to be better than the smaller engine turbocharged.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 8:38 am
Posts: 11468
Full Member
 

How do you want it to 'improve'? Faster? More flexible? Better handling? Better fuel economy? Better braking? More noise?

Despite all the people saying that basic stuff won't make a difference, if you have worn plugs, knackered ignition leads etc, changing them will make a difference - see the video I posted earlier. More so if things are actively broken.

I'd sort all those before bolting on a turbo the side of a wind turbine. I'd also look to a good owners' forum for specialist knowledge about your particular car rather than a forum where the fast road weapon of choice is a nondescript VAG turbo diesel estate... 🙂


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 9:12 am
Posts: 17393
Full Member
 

No point in making it faster. It can already exceed any limits that will lose you your licence.

Put your money into the handling and stopping (brakes, suspension, tyres) so you can safely up your average speed within those limits.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 9:36 am
Posts: 4136
Full Member
 

Fold the back seats forward, will improve the front weight bias for 0-60 traction.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 9:41 am
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

unovolo - Member
Hit it with the lowering stick ,put some nice alloys on and call it quits.

Strange way to illustrate your point - with some povvo spec Wolfrace shite. Dunno whats worse really, the car or the wheels (which are under hanging the arches, aren't tucked in any way shape or form and appear to have zero camber). Worst "stance" ever, 1/10.

Op -its a vectra, I suggest a handy pile of paper bags for you and your passengers to wear and copious drugs for when it bores you to the point of suicide.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

benji
Agree, but if you have space in the bay for the 2 litre turbocharged engine, that's still going to be better than the smaller engine turbocharged.

That's over simplifying things. The bigger engine will carry a significant weight penalty and due to it's larger size will need to be positioned further forward in the engine bay compromising handling.

It's totally moot though since the phrase "no replacement for displacement" means, in it's current usage at least, that a big naturally aspirated engine is better than a small turbo charged one.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Great thread!! 😆

Theres abloke down the road from me who does up those "estate" Vectras.. Nope I'm not kidding. Honestly he's had his car in bits all over his garage and driveway so often it's comical. You know what? It looks the bloody same as it did when he started playing with it 5 years ago. And, wait for it.. he's got a mate who does the same thing to the same type of car!

I should ask him why shouldn't I? And I'd imagine underneath it's not the same vehicle..

But it still looks like a Vectra "estate", which is hilarious.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:00 am
Posts: 91165
Free Member
 

I dunno, the turbo petrols I've been in seem to have a lovely flat torque curve and loads of low end shove, presumably due to the way the turbo is set up.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:02 am
Posts: 39732
Free Member
 

the cut point of even k n N filters is horrendous - thats how they breath better.....

they breath in all the dust and shite of the day which gets forced through your pipework/manifold and into your engine at high speed...

if your engine was designed for that it would have had a k n n or similar from the factory.

Ive seen what sand fines (dust) does to pipework in the day job.... ill stick to my regularly changed paper filter thanks

Sounds good though and thats barry enough.

Race/rally car where the engines getting regularly rebuilt and performance is key then yes... road car why bother doing something that will shorten its life span.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bikebouy - Member

Great thread!!

Theres abloke down the road from me who does up those "estate" Vectras.. Nope I'm not kidding. Honestly he's had his car in bits all over his garage and driveway so often it's comical. You know what? It looks the bloody same as it did when he started playing with it 5 years ago. And, wait for it.. he's got a mate who does the same thing to the same type of car!

I should ask him why shouldn't I? And I'd imagine underneath it's not the same vehicle..

But it still looks like a Vectra "estate", which is hilarious.

What's hilarious about that? Should he try and make it look like a Vectra based homage to the Batmobile? Would that be more to your liking. Sleeper spec ftw. Anyone who wastes time and money on modifying the way a car looks is wasting time and money.

Much better to have something that looks like shit but goes a rocket than have something that looks fast but isn't. Case in point, people who put "RS4" badges on their TDI Audis. What the under ****.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:06 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Nope, I just think it's a waste of time, but hey.. it's his time and money.

And I think it's hilarious.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:10 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
 

The guy is obviously enjoying him self, live and let live.

He probably things that spending silly money on a push bike just to spend your weekends pricking about the local woods is a bit daft too. (not a dig, I'm sure many of us do exactly that!)

OP - if your car is in fine fettle a set of good tyres (I'd recommend Goodyear Eagle F1 AS2s) and a map is probably all that is worth bothering with.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:25 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

One thing that may improve your car...buy a new one. 🙂


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:43 am
Posts: 3314
Free Member
 

road car why bother doing something that will shorten its life span.

Because it's a vectra.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 10:51 am
Posts: 39732
Free Member
 

"road car why bother doing something that will shorten its life span.
Because it's a vectra."

good point - well made.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 11:02 am
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

I won't join the baying hordes - Vauxhalls generally have good engines, especially their 2.0 16v ones, given yours is a turbo it's probably have enough 'go' for the rest of it.

Suspension really helps, especially as it's getting on a bit - I wouldn't spend a fortune on some shiny cheap coil-over crap or something that'll make it drag its arse down the road - Eibach sell really good progressively wound spring kits for not a huge amount - £150 or so they might drop it 30mm or so but it doesn't make it ride like a shopping trolley - mate them with some cheapish Bilstein gas shocks and a bush kit and it's probably transform it without ruining it.

Also the Bilsteins aren’t sold as ‘go faster’ kit, just OEM so whilst they’re usually much better than OE stuff, you don’t have to declare them to your insurance – the Eibach stuff is, but they’re not heavily branded – so I’ll leave that up to you.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

P-Jay

Also the Bilsteins aren’t sold as ‘go faster’ kit, just OEM so whilst they’re usually much better than OE stuff, you don’t have to declare them to your insurance – the Eibach stuff is, but they’re not heavily branded – so I’ll leave that up to you.

+1 for Bilsteins, but really I think without new brakes and tyres all it'll do is highlight other inadequacies. New tyres and some good pads should be the first port of call. Bridgestone Potenzas are a good tyre for the money and Mintex m1144s take care of the stopping.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 1:14 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

if your car is in fine fettle a set of good tyres (I'd recommend Goodyear Eagle F1 AS2s) and a map is probably all that is worth bothering with.

But the OP said something less than a re-map, despite all the subsequent posts about new alloys (though apparently "poverty spec") and "slamming" things.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 1879
Free Member
 

£ for £ the best value for money upgrade for performance is to map it but it's already powerful enough for the chassis which was designed to be nice and safe with loads of understeer. Good quality tyres and brakes replace the suspension bushes with new ones and leave it at that.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Strange way to illustrate your point - with some povvo spec Wolfrace shite

'Welcome to STW home of the wheel snob',sorry if they offend you so much.
Next time I'll make sure I only post pictures of Graphene impregnated diamond encrusted BBS that have been hand cleaned with Unicorn tears.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 7:26 pm
Posts: 351
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I love this place.


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 11:09 pm
Posts: 1413
Free Member
 

But the OP said something less than a re-map, despite all the subsequent posts about new alloys (though apparently "poverty spec") and "slamming" things.

True but a map is the only thing that is going to make any noticeable difference, especially on a turbo charged car.

Welcome to STW home of the wheel snob

You're thinking of Edition 38 😉


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 11:34 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Have you thought about washing it?


 
Posted : 23/02/2016 11:52 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 2.0 Vectra Turbo is basically a Vectra with a slightly detuned SAAB B207 engine.

The shopping list is:
The correct NGK plugs. PFR6T-10G is the SAAB specification. Don't take equivalents from anyone else, you need NGKs. The car uses the plugs to monitor combustion and needs to have the ones it was designed for.
Decent oil. GM Dexos 2 or Mobil 1.
Check the thing is boosting right - bypass valve diaphragms can split, and on the high boost SAAB engines the intercooler can balloon a bit. From memory Evo 7 ones fit fairly easily if you want to upgrade.
Shell v-power, or 5l of gun wash thinners in the tank if you're feeling tight. The engine management system monitors knock and can take advantage of high octane fuel.
Lastly, Noobtune can usually find an extra 40 or 50 horses for not much cash.

Beyond that the modifications get spendy - the downpipe and cat become limiting factors.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:00 am
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh and don't mess about with tuning boxes, resistors or valves to stop the sensors seeing the real boost levels. Noobtune isn't much dearer for a remap.
And the B207 engines don't have sludge issues, the B2x4 engines in the 9-5 did.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:11 am
Posts: 1205
Free Member
 

1x11 and a dropper?


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Punt it. You're wasting your time thinking it can be meaningfully improved, it's a bog standard family 4 with no outstanding features.

Sorry but there it is.

Get a 95 Aero or something if you fancy a fast GM ish car.


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 12:27 am
Posts: 2610
Free Member
 

a) As the yanks do, you could recycle the top layer of your old kitchen work tops and glue them to the sides of your car for that authentic US of A 'station-wagon' look.
Surprised that it hasn't caught on here in the UK.

b) this chap sounds interesting

http://www.somender-singh.com/index.html


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 3:07 am
Posts: 2610
Free Member
 

afaik, you have to run any any mods done to your car past your insurer.

Apparently, even something as trivial as a bumper sticker can invalidate your cover. Stay safe 8)


 
Posted : 24/02/2016 3:33 am
Page 2 / 3