So glad they've finally offered a twin turbo V8. The tax on the V12 just made it a little too expensive.
Well, it's very pretty, not something I say often about Ferrari, since the 250GTO...
There are [s]shooting brakes[/s]hatchbacks....and then there's the GTC4 Lusso
FTFY
gobuchul - Member
There are [s]shooting brakes[/s] hatchbacks....and then there's the GTC4 Lusso
FTFY
Its a 3 door estate surely?
[quote=jimjam ]So glad they've finally offered a twin turbo V8. The tax on the V12 just made it a little too expensive.
In the market aye?
There was a bright blue one of those parked in a disabled space at our local Sainsburys last month.
I didn't have a clue what it was apart from a Ferrari so had to look it up once I was home!
yourguitarheroIn the market aye?
I definitely need a new vehicle. Has to be able to carry two kids in the back, space for a bike and be suitable for moderate off roading and be able to haul logs. I think the GTC4 Lusso should be perfect. I haven't bothered to check the price but it can't be [i]that[/i] expensive.
Looks ideal for your needs, jimjam. Spot of caravanning should be no bother either.
Picking a pair of sunglasses to go with that would be a nightmare......I'm out
It's a bit of a looker, isn't it?
Nicest Ferrari for ages, but then again, I love the 365 GT4, probably the ugliest car they've built.
It's ok but it's no new MX-5 that ticks all my boxes for beauty.
Wooooo! 😯
Picking a pair of sunglasses to go with that would be a nightmare......I'm out
Rayban Aviators with mirrored lenses, medallion choice would be the sticking point.
The 812 looks like a bad kit car, way too fussy.
Says the man with the Doblo. 🙂
Reminds me a bit of the TR7 -
"Oh my God! They’ve done it to the other side as well!"
The XJS is lovely.
Always had a soft spot for the H50 concept:
[img] http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/01-1987-porsche-928-h50-concept.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/08/01-1987-porsche-928-h50-concept.jp g"/> [/img]
Now that's what a practical Porsche should look like.
[quote=Rusty Spanner ]Always had a soft spot for the H50 concept:
Seriously? 😆 as gopping as every other Porsche attempt at a practical car - was just thinking with the OP that Ferrari have shown the Germans how to do it.
That H50 is more gopping than a Panamera
They all look like posh hearses for pets.
Very 480 es esque.
Interesting, the first 3 of CFHs' suggestions just look fugly to me, they are (understandably) cars bodged from their coupe counterparts, and the Scimitar looks way better.
Shows the power of the brand/pricetag/uniqueness to some.
Most practical Porsches end up looking like an Austin Princess, at least the attempt to make the Panamera into an estate improves it's looks.
[quote=jimjam ]Disagree.
Thanks for proving the point 😆
Anyone going to post the Lotus Elanbulence? Luckily only 2 ever made.
Hang on - they've named a car 'Superfast', and you guys seem OK with that!? Huh? What next, the Aston Martin 'TotesAmazeballs'?
No roof bars - I'm out! 😆
Seems to have plenty of torque for towing though.
Now that, is properly lovely.
Edit: the Alfa.
@countzero
That's a cracking collection of Ferraris- I recognise the F40 as the one owned by Nick Mason. Thanks for posting those pics.
A friend has a FF, nice car known to his mates as "the fiat".
I'd have a 599 over the FF. Although you can get a 29er in the back of the FF as Chris Harris did when he was running his.









.jpg)


