If you could be one of the royal prince's would you rather be bald or the ginger!?
Jake Humphrey is a lucky get - hitching a ride in the Lancaster
That was lovely. 
She's gorgeous, he's a troll. LOL
Is this the Pippa you're all getting sweaty about?
[img] 
[/img]
ooof, well she scrubs up well
One of the lamest things about the internet is those people who trawl Google Images desperately hunting for one picture that shows a very attractive woman not looking her best, then posting it in order to 'win'.
You massive massive massive winner!
in fairness to ditch_jockey, that's the 3rd photo of her to appear - and there aren't many that flatter her (in the name of not missing out i had to have a look)
the wedding, she looked lovely ,he looked smart ,they both looked genuinely happy. Good luck to them both.
Been on my bike, lovely 3 hours round Cannock. Did they say 'for richer for poorer'??
Did they say 'for richer for poorer
I very much doubt it...
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
she looks fairly plain IMHO
'bottom' picture is her best angle.
Agree with iDave.
to the haters and plain janes commentators, please post pics of your wives
Why do want a pic of my righthand ? 😉
they did say 'for richer for poorer'
fair play to William though.. he s****ed a little bit as he said it.. so I guess that shows some sort of honesty..
I like him.. surprisingly.. as I've always been a bit too dog on a string special brew and dreadlocks with B.O. tattoos and swearing to notice the royals..
It looked like harry did a comedy 'phew!' with brow wipe when she said 'I do' as well.. good on them..
the happy couple seem to be up for a laugh too..
good on them..
I concur, Yunki. I'm certainly no Royalist - though I have a fair bit of respect for the ol' gal (and I understand why HM Forces would much rather swear their allegiance to her than some odious politico).
Besides, Kate looked stunning walking up the aisle, with Parry kicking in at suitably splendid volume. Good luck to 'em, says I.
to the haters and plain janes commentators, please post pics of your wives
To be honest, I'd rather disappoint you and stay married 🙂
Granted Pippa looks a lot better in the wedding photo, but I still don't think she looks stunning (but may well be one of those people who never photograph well and look much better in real life) - I have a picture of my missus in her wedding finery on my desk here at work, and I think she looks better, although you're just going to have to take my word for it...
Wow! Is what I said.
I thought Kate looked fabulous, and her and William were great.
The whole thing was just amazing. What a spectacle. Brilliant.
I wish them well.
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
Tut Tut, No Seatbelts!
You'd really think that the Wales's would have learned their lesson by now wouldn't you?
Would that old banger have seat belts? Just lap belts maybe?
I just wondered if that was the blue suede shoe Elvis once sang about, mounted on Tamara Palmer Tomkinson's forehead? 🙂
I wonder if William was over the limit when he took the Aston for a spin....
Speaking of Middleton pics, found a nice one of Kate earlier. 😛
[url= 
]Kate[/url]
The Queen doesn't sing, "God save the Queen".
Fair Enough
Maybe she ought to say thanks though, a little nod? or a thumbs up?
Derek, it's a private road, so no problem there!
Kate looked great, and not surprised Will did not wear the RAF getup - very drab.
I was off round cannock off piste for 3 hrs - probebly passed idave, as there was very few about!
Well no shouting but me and my Mum were talking about David Beckham's hairpiece. Mum was telling me how the man who supplies him was selling the same pieces on one of the shopping channels, and I would have thought he would have signed a non-disclosure form preventing him from telling his potential customers that Beckham wears a wig. Funny old day today.
CFH - private road indeed, but regardless, I wouldn't have wanted to be the one who tried to flag him down for a breath test!
[img] 
[/img]
Just been channel surfing and hit BBC1 just as they went to an anti royal party report. What was prett much the first image? A bloke in an On One T-shirt!
5thElefant - MemberWould that old banger have seat belts? Just lap belts maybe?
If your vehicle was first used before 1st April 1967, then there is no need for any seat belts. If used after that date during 1967, then you can have a belt which restrains the upper part of the body (but need not include a lap belt) for each of the driver's and "Specified front passenger's seat". So a lap belt alone is not allowed if your vehicle was first used on or after 1st April 1967. - MOT
The reg is EBY 776J
J = 1 August 1970 – 31 July 1971 So it should have belts!
Ah... it's good to be king (almost).
[img] 
?psid=1[/img]
insert caption here............
The Queen doesn't sing, "God save the Queen".
Well, she was hardly going to sit there like a 4 year old at their own birthday party, excitedly singing Happy Birthday To MEEEEE!
Derek, it's a private road, so no problem there!
Public place though. Tesco car park is private, you can't drink drive there.