The end of the Simp...
 

[Closed] The end of the Simpsons?

25 Posts
22 Users
0 Reactions
98 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Should they stay, or should they go?
[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15179431 ]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15179431[/url]


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Silly money per episode! Something like 400K each?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:29 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

Go, it's more than run it's course


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Go, it's more than run it's course

Or you've got older and changed?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it's run it's course 3 or 4 times over. Should have jacked it in a while back when the writing dried up.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'm amazed its lasted this long


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

d_s - no, i don't think so, it's the same stuff rehashed. In any situation, there's a limited amount of material, then it starts getting recycled, and that's the originality gone.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:39 pm
Posts: 4607
Free Member
 

The Simpsons are so-o-o-o-o-o in need of retirement, and have been since 2000.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep - it's a sad shadow of it's former self. I can't really bare to watch the newer episodes

Series 3/4/5 was some of the greatest tv ever made though


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

BBSB- I kind of agree with you, but in equal measure that there is a new generation coming through of new viewers and that some of the more topical storylines can seem dated whereas there is newer material to reflect modern times.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It got too zany when Family Guy came out and tried too hard copying it. Futurama was a million times better.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The newer ones are a return to form IMO - it was the episodes written around the time the film came out that dipped badly.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

An interesting situation; will the voice artists accept dramatic pay cuts or refuse and lose the lot? Can't they just be replaced with cheaper voice actors? Perhaps they listen too much to Bob Crow?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

This is just brinkmanship from Fox.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 41711
Free Member
 

Silly money per episode! Something like 400K each?

$200k IIRC, so a third, but lets not let the facts get in the way of a witchunt.

Compare that to 'proper' actors in other series? Hugh Laurie in House is on millions, Friends towards then end was $1million/episode, being a TV actor in America pays big money as the audiances are huge, and the potential to sell series abroad is big.

The Simpsons is still hugely popular, so they comand big salaries, however I guess the difference is FOX can sack them and employ anyone to do the voices, could probably find impressionists who could do the entire cast!


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Well $8m a series so how many episodes?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 77725
Free Member
 

I'm struggling to envision a situation where I'd rather lose my job than take a pay cut on a £5.6m salary.

"Sorry mate, I can only afford to pay you three million this year."

"Balls to that, I'm off to stack shelves at Wal-Mart."


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

It does seem to be rather well paid for doing voiceovers.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scrap the series and do a farewell film and concentrate on Futurama 🙂


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 4:45 pm
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

It may not be what it once was (or we aren't) but imho very few new sit come come along that measure up. Family Guy? I have watched but got bored, Frankie Boyle humour, get as near the knuckle as possible or even go further. Soon gets old for me. I'm sure we can all moan about the casts ridiculous salaries but how much have/do Fox actually make from the show? They aren't so willing to publish those figures,are they?

BTW when I typed Boyle the predictive inserted Hitler! Now that's comedy!


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 5:21 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

GlitterGary - Member
It got too zany when Family Guy came out and tried too hard copying it. Futurama was a million times better.

Different target audience, Simpson is family viewing Family guy is more of an adult cartoon.

The Simpsons still do some good episodes when they pick a good political point they want to make.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 1875
Free Member
 

Should have packed it in years ago. Old episodes are some of the best TV ever, the new ones are possibly the worst. Utterly shit.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 7:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

But then it acknowledges this on a regular basis, so it must be OK?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 10:16 pm
Posts: 66012
Full Member
 

Cougar - Member

I'm struggling to envision a situation where I'd rather lose my job than take a pay cut on a £5.6m salary.

Perhaps, after several years on a 5.6m salary you'd not be in too much of a rush to get a job in walmart to pay the bills.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

never really liked it 😕 to be honest, what would fill it though? an extra half an hour of hollyoaks or cr*p like that?


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 10:39 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

I only download all my TV. It's on par with American Dad and Family Guy. I watch them because they fill time and aren't unenjoyable, the odd one is good.


 
Posted : 05/10/2011 10:56 pm