Forum search & shortcuts

The curse of a subl...
 

[Closed] The curse of a sublime first album release..

Posts: 3877
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#10179243]

The Stone Roses, Badly Drawn Boy and The Killers, everything after the inaugural release, forgettable.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:07 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Gomez, subsequent albums weren’t bad just nowhere near as good as the first.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:12 pm
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

Guns 'n' Roses.

It was all downhill after Appetite for Destruction


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:13 pm
Posts: 6136
Full Member
 

Alabama Three. RJD2, DJ Format, DJ Shadow.

As above - their follow-ups weren't bad, just overshadowed by the perfection of their first albums.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:17 pm
Posts: 23617
Full Member
 

Not that I'd often want to quote/paraphrase Adele... but she did make an interesting point that musicians have their whole life (to date) to come up with their first album but only 6 months to come up with the next one.

Writing a properly good song is really difficult. Seems like it should be easy when you see one written down - but you'd be lucky to write more than a handful of good songs in a lifetime even if thats you're only job.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:22 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Not that I’d often want to quote/paraphrase Adele… but she did make an interesting point that musicians have their whole life (to date) to come up with their first album but only 6 months to come up with the next one.

And that six months consists of touring!


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:26 pm
Posts: 6136
Full Member
 

Really good point, that. I'd give a thumbs up if I knew how to do it in this forum...


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:27 pm
Posts: 214
Free Member
 

Lo fidelity all stars

RATM

Metallica

Pearl jam

Portishead

Van Halen


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:30 pm
Posts: 13529
Full Member
 

Arcic Monkey's too.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:35 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

RATM and Pearl Jam I just can’t see. Pearl Jam got more interesting after Ten and RATM’s two follow ups were great. Opinions and all that though.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I was going to say van Halen too, but thier second was just as good.

Led Zeppelin? They didn’t warm up until Zep3 IMO.

Motorhead?

Jason Mraz ?

I dunno, but there are some artists that just mature better after the first album release..


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:43 pm
Posts: 14131
Full Member
 

Suck it and See is my favourite Arctic Monkeys album. Current one is a crock of...


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

From that era (and off the top of  my head):

Jamiroquai

Shootyz Groove

311 peaked with Grassroots

RATM

Metallica

Pearl jam

Yeah, I disagree there too. RATM is the 'cleanest' from a production PoV and also arguably the most accessible, but Evil Empire is awesome. The first four of Metallica's albums are all great in their own particular way. As for Pearl Jam – maybe; Ten is the most accessible, but I have a real soft spot for Vs.

But hey - opinions! 🙂


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:45 pm
Posts: 13192
Free Member
 

Kylie Minogue.

I should be so lucky couldn't be beaten.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:46 pm
Posts: 3608
Free Member
 

Jurassic 5

Daughter

Bon Iver (/controversial)

Ben Howard

The Maccabees

Of Monsters And Men

The XX (although the latest is a corker)


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kylie Minogue

Fair one.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:48 pm
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

I should be so lucky couldn’t be beaten.

Pretty sure it was beaten to.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You’re all right, of course. Most bands have great debut albums then gets dross...shouldn’t the question be which band has produced a sublime subsequent album?


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 5:56 pm
Posts: 2011
Free Member
 

Kylie Minogue

Fair one.
IMPOSSIBLE PRINCESS (Full Album 1997)

Not a chance  the above was here finest work :)( apart from those shorts !!


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 6:14 pm
Posts: 23617
Full Member
 

shouldn’t the question be which band has produced a sublime subsequent album?

Paul's Boutique


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

shouldn’t the question be which band has produced a sublime subsequent album?

Metallica. See above comment.

The Prodigy.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 6:28 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Ben Howard

Whereas I think that his first is his weakest. Just pop music like Sheeran or Ezra. The guitar playing and song structure on his last two puts the first to shame and separates him from the current crop of singer / songwriters Opinions again 😀


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 6:38 pm
Posts: 14131
Full Member
 

…shouldn’t the question be which band has produced a sublime subsequent album?

Radiohead - OK Computer

Black Crowes - The Southern Harmony and Musical Companion


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 6:43 pm
Posts: 16220
Free Member
 

Radiohead – OK Computer

The Bends was their second (and best) album.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:04 pm
Posts: 24441
Full Member
 

Is it the case that the well known saying mostly applies...you have your whole life to come up with the first album but only 12 months approx for the second.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:11 pm
Posts: 26895
Full Member
 

Ben Harper Welcome to The Cruel World


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:13 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

NOW That’s What I Call Music.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:15 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

I think that it is more than just the *life to come up with the first album, and 12 months for the second" Once a band makes it big, their life experience changes, they frequently lose that connection to reality that drove their creativity.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:16 pm
Posts: 794
Free Member
 

shouldn’t the question be which band has produced a sublime subsequent album?

There's loads of bands that got better over the first few albums.

Very few didn't eventually get shit though. Unless they're either still going or dead. I can think of a few exceptions, but it's definitely not that common to end it on a high.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 7:53 pm
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

The Stone Roses  -  I preferred Second coming

The Prodigy - I preferred Music for the jilted generation

Portishead - I like Portishead as much as Dummy


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:20 pm
Posts: 18040
Full Member
 

Writing a properly good song is really difficult.

I reckon anyone who writes one properly good one is a hero.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Metallica? Kill em all was good but not on the same planet as Master of puppets.

Royal Blood, Alice in chains


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Klaxons

CSS

elastica


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Agreed, Master of Puppets was peak Metallica, and AIC’s best was also their third (studio) album, self-titled ( or tripod).

RATM never came close to eclipsing their first album.

imo, of course.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:52 pm
Posts: 4418
Full Member
 

Another factor (for me anyway) is as some artists get more success they can afford more time in the studio and/or more expensive production. AN overworked piece of music can often lose a lot of what makes it good. From the list up there DJ Shadow and RATM spring to mind in that sense.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 8:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan, containing:

Blowin' in the Wind;
Girl from the North Country;
Masters of War;
A Hard Rain's a-Gonna Fall;
Don't Think Twice, It's Alright; etc.

His first album was largely trad folkie covers, so Freewheelin' was the first real album full of his own songs. Any one of those tracks could have been the songwriting highlight of anyone else's career (and are admittedly still among some of Bob's best, although various other sporadic albums throughout his career have also been blinders).


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 9:09 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
 

Writing a properly good song is really difficult. Seems like it should be easy when you see one written down – but you’d be lucky to write more than a handful of good songs in a lifetime even if thats you’re only job.

Which is is why I would honestly never criticise a one-hit wonder. I mean, they managed to write a song that resonated so much with people it became a hit. That in itself is pretty special, and not something I’ve ever done!


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Clutch always spring to mind when it comes to bands who are good all the time. A consistently brilliant  band that continually put out great albums in my opinion. I put it down to the fact they pretty much tour all the time and are so tight as a band. Their latest track, Hot Bottom Feeder, is literally a recipie for crab cakes and is a brilliant blues rock tune.

Regarding RATM, the second album is a huge departure from the first and is more hip-hop than rock. A great thing for me, but those who only listen to (or prefer rock) seem to dismiss it. It’s like an angry The Roots album.

Writing a properly good song is really difficult. Seems like it should be easy when you see one written down – but you’d be lucky to write more than a handful of good songs in a lifetime even if thats you’re only job.

I think it depends to be honest. A lot of Motown and Stax songs were churned out like a musical production line. Kung Fu Fighting was a B side that took five minutes to write.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 9:38 pm
Posts: 33983
Full Member
 

Writing a properly good song is really difficult. Seems like it should be easy when you see one written down – but you’d be lucky to write more than a handful of good songs in a lifetime even if thats you’re only job.

I think it depends to be honest. A lot of Motown and Stax songs were churned out like a musical production line. Kung Fu Fighting was a B side that took five minutes to write.

Also look at the Brill Building, a songwriting factory, Goffin and King worked there, and the list of songs Carole King wrote for others before she ever recorded any herself is amazing, then there was Baccarat and David, Holland, Dozier Holland...

For some people, writing songs is fairly easy, writing a really successful song is more difficult, and relies almost as much on luck, as anything else, it’s tricky to judge what the public will really go for. Plus a song can work for one artist and not for another, just because a particular arrangement of a song might be more ear-catching. It’s where the term ‘the old grey whistle test’ comes from.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 10:28 pm
Posts: 23617
Full Member
 

Which is is why I would honestly never criticise a one-hit wonder. I mean, they managed to write a song that resonated so much with people it became a hit. That in itself is pretty special, and not something I’ve ever done!

I think it depends to be honest. A lot of Motown and Stax songs were churned out like a musical production line.

You get into a question of what a good song is. We tend to confuse songs and performances. A good song is a good song no matter who sings it. A good performer can make a good performance out of a pretty mediocre song. This interview with Jon Brion covers it nicely - making interesting comparisons between Zeppelin and Gerswin - if you played Gerswin like Zeppelin would play it - it would still sound great - if you tried to play Zeppelin like Gershwin... theres not really a song there to play. You can't really cover a Zeppelin song, you just have to try and impersonate them instead otherwise its shite.

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/episode-56-frozen-music/

(jump to about 3 mins)

With that in mind... 'Happy Birthday to You' is probably the best song ever written. Anyone, anywhere in the world, can sing it, as well or as badly as they like and it still works -  and it hasn't be superseded in that respect for 125 years.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 11:22 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

This first album thing, it's just a left-over bit of bollocks from music paper days really. I mean, look at any band/artist with any sort of life-span (even one's you don't particularly like) and say it was all rubbish after the first album:

U2, Blur, The Cure, Siouxsie & the Banshees, Underworld, Iggy Pop, The Jam, Chemical Brothers, Orbital, Radiohead, Queen, Iron Maiden, Kanye West, The Doors.... the list goes on & on.

Only band I can tjink of who actually never bettered their debut is the Sex Pistols. Cos they didn't make any more!


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 11:29 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Second album - songs not good enough for the first album plus that one the drummer wrote.

Third album - either genius or tedious shite about how you all hate each other, plus the one the singer's new girlfriend wrote. And pass the coke.


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 11:42 pm
Posts: 2652
Free Member
 

The Verve  , Bittersweet symphony was a great album that they never managed to get close to reproducing .


 
Posted : 20/08/2018 11:50 pm
Posts: 3877
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The college dropout is a great shout, how the mighty have fallen. So much promise disappeard up his own arsehole.

https://giphy.com/gifs/kanye-west-IqM5af3DeppS g" alt="" />


 
Posted : 21/08/2018 12:03 am
Posts: 8008
Full Member
 

Florence and the Machine. Lungs is a mighty, quirky beast of a thing. She's got more polished and has the odd gem of a song (What Kind Of Man springs to mind), but no album since as been so consistently Florenceish for me.

More than that, has she ever bettered Rabbit Heart as a single song? Often think the same thing about The Killers and These Things That I Have Done.


 
Posted : 21/08/2018 12:07 am
Page 1 / 2