Talk to me about dr...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Talk to me about driveways - options to tarmac/pave it

7 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
53 Views
Posts: 3546
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Currently we can park both cars on the drive side by side, just, with no space to really get through and car A can't be moved without reversing car B off the drive, so often one just get left on the road.

We need the front wall rebuilt as it's crumbling away so was considering building it shorter in width and chopping about 2 feet off the width of the lawn so I'd have more space to fit both cars in.

Without the STW discussion about the pros and cons of having two cars, blah blah blah...

The current drive is tarmac'd but probably needs redoing as well. I have a vague recollection building regs say something about drives being porous now to stop water flooding straight off it - is that right, or am I just making it up.

And short of chucking a tonne of gravel on the new bit, is tarmac still the cheapest option to redoing a drive, much as I'd love to put quaint cobbles down I'm suspecting £6k plus for that option. The half tarmac, half gravel look won't wash it with the missus and I'm trying to avoid any more easily obtainable ammo for little Breatheeasy to throw as well 🙂

Any thoughts?


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 827
Free Member
 

Looks like you'll need to be porous or drain into a soakaway, or apply for planning permission [url= http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/permission/commonprojects/pavingfrontgarden/ ]http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/permission/commonprojects/pavingfrontgarden/[/url].


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I wouldn't worry about an extra 2' of tarmac. I doubt very much your local council would either. You could always ask them if you want assurance or speak to a local contractor.


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 2:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure on rules, but if I was looking for a new drive it would be imprinted concrete, I dont know the cost but it looks great & no gaps for weeds to grow in.


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 39499
Free Member
 

if it was tar before it can be tar after

its new drives that must be porous.


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 3:08 pm
Posts: 13763
Full Member
 

Not sure on rules, but if I was looking for a new drive it would be imprinted concrete, I dont know the cost but it looks great & no gaps for weeds to grow in.

slippy as **** when frosty tho, mibbe not such an issue dooon soooth.


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 3:09 pm
Posts: 10849
Full Member
 

Not sure on rules, but if I was looking for a new drive it would be imprinted concrete, I dont know the cost but it looks great & no gaps for weeds to grow in.

No gaps until it cracks because it's not been laid correctly and then all sorts of hell breaks loose. And 'looks great' is a matter of opinion, and mine differs considerably from yours...

Anyhow, for the OP - planning rules apply if you are laying more than 5m2 of hard surfacing, and that includes replacing any existing areas so even if it's just 2' more than it was you could still need to let your LA know. There's still a massive difference in the interpretation of the rules between LAs (eg some may adhere to trail_rat's reasoning above even though that's not the letter of the law), and still a lot of contractors who don't give a stuff about them anyway. You can also drain it to lawn or planting beds too, but obviously the viability of that depends on the site.


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 5:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This stuff is brilliant and perfect for this

http://www.kbieurope.com/index.php


 
Posted : 06/09/2012 5:19 pm