Supergroups, better...
 

[Closed] Supergroups, better than the sum of the parts?

48 Posts
35 Users
0 Reactions
97 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That Prophets of Rage thread made me wonder if there have ever been any supergroups that produce stuff that's considered better than that of the bands they came from. Any suggestions?


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:07 am
Posts: 13850
Full Member
 

McBusted

<case proven - end of thread>


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:09 am
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

Well alot of band members were in other less known bands before they 'made it' so you could have a pretty long list.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

McBusted

[img] [/img]

Well alot of band members were in other less known bands before they 'made it' so you could have a pretty long list.

We're talking Supergroups though, so people who are already famous from other successful bands getting together to form a new super band...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supergroup_(music)


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:11 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

Early GnR, Black Eyed Peas, Iron Maiden.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:12 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

From that wiki list - This Mortal Coil produced some stuff better than [i]some[/i] of the members' other output (but not all).

Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds. Supergroup, maybe, but more of an entity in their own right than what comes to mind when you think of the word.

Pigface (not the STW member) sounds like they should've been good. But never 'eard 'em!

Moderat are awesome, but I love the members' other stuff too.
Same for The Dead Weather and Atoms for Peace.

Postal Service were ok at the time.

I don't want to hear any of the others!


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, just scanning that list now. It generally doesn't end well!


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:34 am
Posts: 20682
Free Member
 

Early GnR, Black Eyed Peas, Iron Maiden.

Is that an answer to another post in another thread?


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:35 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Acid ]The Acid[/url] are mising from the list. They did some good stuff, not sure if better, but very different.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:36 am
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

[i]We're talking Supergroups though, so people who are already famous from other successful bands getting together to form a new super band...[/i]

How about Brujeria then?


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:49 am
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Humble Pie?


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:52 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]How about Brujeria then?[/i]

Adrian Erlandsson, Billy Gould, Dino Cazares, Emilio Marquez, Eric Boucher, Jeff Walker, Jesse Pintado, John Lepe, Marijuano Machete, Nicholas Barker, Pat Hoed, Pinche Peach, Pititis, Raymond Herrera, Shane Embury, Tony Laureano

Famous? Where, in Norway? 😉


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Traveling Wilberrys seemed okay to me, but that might be be because I hadn't heard a huge amount of their individual stuff.

I've never really liked much of any of the others, it always sounded like the singer from this band, singing along with the guitarist from this band as the drummer from another did his bit - 'Them Crooked Vultures' especially, it's just Queens of the Stoneage punctuated by Led Zeppelin guitar solos.

Saying all that, I'm absolute certain that if I heard a supergroup, and didn't know who they were so I didn't automatically try to pick it all apart, I'd like it more.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 11:58 am
Posts: 79
Free Member
 

I went to a McBusted concert and I am unashamed to admit that it was amazing. The sets were phenomenal, really in your face bright.

The music wasn't awful either, not amazing but by no means awful


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:04 pm
Posts: 371
Free Member
 

Cream
Audioslave
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:10 pm
Posts: 5568
Full Member
 

Super groups, generally a load of the biggest egos getting together to make bland music.

Although them crooked vultures were ok.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:12 pm
Posts: 17882
Full Member
 

We're talking Supergroups though, so people who are already famous from other successful bands getting together to form a new super band...

Or to put it another way "a new band".


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:15 pm
Posts: 34507
Full Member
 

No, supergroups are essentially a vanity/ego project therefore they won't by definition produce decent music. There might be the odd track by happenstance, but that's the best you can hope for


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:20 pm
Posts: 14033
Full Member
 

Audioslave never hit the heights of Soundgarden or Rage but still made some good music. I'm excited about the Prophets - I think the instrumentalists are playing as well and as passionately as they've ever done and the vocalists have plenty to say. Where many supergroups fall down is that the combination of musicians lacks the magic spark of the prior bands and that definitely won't be the case this time - in many other situations this would be considered the same band but with new vocalist(s), not a supergroup.

I don't think many supergroups are vanity projects - they're just something that happens when members of bands which have ended or are on hiatus fancy making some music. That's what happens when you're a musician - you like making music! And you tend to know members of other famous similar bands from touring with them, so they're inevitable.

If Cream does count as a supergroup (I don't know how well known the three were in their previous bands) then it was a bloody brilliant one.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Down's first album NOLA is arguably better than anything done by the members other bands (Pantera, COC, Crowbar)


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:51 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

centralscrutinizer - Member
Cream
Audioslave
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young

Cream was what I came into the thread to say. CSN & Y is a god call

But I'd have to disagree very strongly that Audioslave, decent band though they were, never aproached, let alone surpassed, the work of their former bands.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:57 pm
Posts: 17882
Full Member
 

If Cream does count as a supergroup...

I'm pretty sure at the time they were just a band.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 12:58 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 13615
Full Member
 

Is a band the same as a group?

<confused>


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 1:00 pm
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

If Cream does count as a supergroup

Pretty much the archetype imo. Perhaps differs from the modern version in that it was a proper, committed band rather than a downtime-from-the-day-job "side project" but otherwise..

I suppose the Buckingham Nicks incarnation of Fleetwood Mac kinda counts if "better" uses the definition "of more record sales" - personally I prefer the Peter Green stuff, but the record buying public largely disagrees with me on that one.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 1:05 pm
Posts: 14033
Full Member
 

Buckingham & Nicks were pretty much unknowns working at Sun City when Mick Fleetwood found them.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 1:06 pm
Posts: 371
Free Member
 

Journey
Emerson, Lake and Palmer
Beck, Bogert & Appice
Bad Company
Gorillaz


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 1:13 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young[/i]

I'd take Neil Young's solo stuff any day.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 1:41 pm
Posts: 8850
Free Member
 

Dire Rea

The Chris rea and Dire Straits collaboration

If Cream does count as a supergroup...

They might have meant Blind Faith.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Down's first album NOLA is arguably better than anything done by the members other bands (Pantera, COC, Crowbar)

Was going to say Down - I like the other albums too especially Down II.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 3:55 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Cream
Crosby still nash and young
Mike and the Mechanics 😉
Foo fighters

three tenors?

They tend to not live up to expectations


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 4:02 pm
 colp
Posts: 3323
Full Member
 

The Raconteurs


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 9183
Full Member
 

Buckingham & Nicks [s]were pretty much[/s] [i]should have remained[/i] unknowns working at Sun City when Mick Fleetwood was lucky enough and did the world a favour by not having found them.

FTFY


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 5:26 pm
Posts: 5146
Full Member
 

Depends on whether the supergroup is just a load of people flogging the same horse or if they really have got ideas to create a new thing that wasn't provided from the constituent parts.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 6:40 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Velvet Revolver were pretty good.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 6:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Puscifer,part Primus part Tool, Carina Round,Queens of the Stone age and A Perfect Circle,cannot be more super.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 7:02 pm
Posts: 13618
Free Member
 

Always prefered Broken Bells to the Shins


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 7:28 pm
Posts: 5568
Full Member
 

Wouldn't call Broken Bells a supergroup tho, more a side project...


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Nola is a superb album but there is no way it is better than vulgar display of power.

Rainbow pretty good if they count and Temple of the Dog were good.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 8:35 pm
Posts: 4308
Full Member
 

If you're into your math-rock then Battles are a supergroup from Don Caballero and Helmet. Better than both of those bands by a long stretch.


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 9:55 pm
Posts: 15282
Full Member
 

I couldn't say better than the sum of thier parts, but I love the highway men.


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 7:38 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

Masters of Reality.
especially with some drummer who used to be in Cream.


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 7:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about Brujeria then?

Adrian Erlandsson, Billy Gould, Dino Cazares, Emilio Marquez, Eric Boucher, Jeff Walker, Jesse Pintado, John Lepe, Marijuano Machete, Nicholas Barker, Pat Hoed, Pinche Peach, Pititis, Raymond Herrera, Shane Embury, Tony Laureano

Famous? Where, in Norway?

err no - from Norway


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 7:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nola is a superb album but there is no way it is better than vulgar display of power.

Rainbow pretty good if they count and Temple of the Dog were good.

Do Temple of the Dog count as a supergroup as didn't they record it before the formation of Pearl Jam?


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 8:00 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]If you're into your math-rock then Battles are a supergroup from Don Caballero and Helmet. Better than both of those bands by a long stretch[/i]

Agree with that.
People rate Rainbow? That was the soft metal my parents liked when I was a teenager. By definition I had to hate it 😆


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 8:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not a group at all... but the same concept

8 of cats does countdown

much better than either of the parent programmes


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 9:02 am
Posts: 371
Free Member
 

How about a 'secret' supergroup. The Remain In Light line up of The Talking Heads.
Talking Heads + Half of Parliament Funkadelic + Brian Eno + Adrian Belew = 😀


 
Posted : 25/05/2016 10:50 am
Posts: 1299
Free Member
 

Black Country Communion possibly the best recent proper supergroup I can think of. All giants in their own right. Not sure it surpassed individual efforts but had a pretty good go.


 
Posted : 27/05/2016 10:13 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Abba?


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Atoms for Peace (obviously not betterer than Radiohead but waaaaay better than RHCP)


 
Posted : 28/05/2016 8:18 am