Forum search & shortcuts

So, £168,000 to get...
 

[Closed] So, £168,000 to get my kids through college. What to do?

Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

What ahwiles said +1


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

Because having an educated workforce is good for the wider economy?

Argh but so is a solid manufaturing base, you need indians and chiefs, and probably more indians, no?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:52 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So those who are not educated are worth less?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Joemarshall speaks alot of truth.

Being privy to some of the funding discussions around this issue at my local University, the price for lower fees will be more overseas students prepared to pay A LOT more, making up a larger proportion of the UK higher education population and lower student numbers overall.

The current government policy seems determined to run Universities more as commerical enterprises, rather than support them as essential national assets so market forces will drive them.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tiger6791 - Member
"Because having an educated workforce is good for the wider economy?"

Argh but so is a solid manufaturing base, you need indians and chiefs, and probably more indians, no?

manufacturing, that'll need engineers then? - where do they train?

there's no money to be made for this country by the mass-production of widgets and nails.

we could never compete with china, india, africa, etc.

we need degree qualified engineers and scientists to do the clever stuff - that's where the money is.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:56 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Argh but so is a solid manufaturing base, you need indians and chiefs, and probably more indians, no?

Not when your Indians are not cost effective and their jobs are being done in.. well.. India.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sweet 🙂 yep definitely the wrong end of the stick, my fault.

back to the thread:

OH left uni with 22k owed to student loans company, currently earning so paying back, but paying back between 20-50pounds a month, which is less than the interest each month, so her student debt is increasing now she's left uni.

they started charging interest after she recieved her first payment in the first year of uni...3 years before starting to pay back!

she will never be able to pay it back unless she leaves her chosen line of work (helping people).

if it helps stop the instantly critical minds of STW judging her she worked every summer full time, evening jobs for the 2nd and 3rd year, managed to get out of her overdraft every summer and managed to run a car the whole time. never asked or was given money by her parents once towards uni or living costs.

most will never be able to clear the debt - just like me.
.... i cant imagine being in that situation and i dont know how my OH handles it.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

manufacturing, that'll need engineers then? - where do they train?

You can train technicians through apprenticeships - the skills shortage is a real and present issue. Not everyone ont he shop floor doing the graft needs an MEng. However, there is also a shortage of qualified engineers coming out of univerisites.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

manufacturing, that'll need engineers then? - where do they train?

at the gym?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

So those who are not educated are worth less?

Depends how you measure it.

Are they worth less as people? No.
Is what they are doing less worthy? No.
Will they, on average, generate as much wealth as, on average, a graduate? No.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:59 pm
Posts: 41877
Free Member
 

In wouldn't worry too much, assuming the current rate of repayment stays the same the debt gets written off well before its paid off, you have to earn over about £33k to actualy pay it off before the cut off at arround 25 years if you have arround £18k with the SLC!

It just comes off my pay as another line, about the same as my pension. If it wasn't that it would be the same ammount in extra tax I suppose.

Spoon - 2008 grad with a masters and 4 years of £3.5k loans earning an above average wage and not sweating it.

Unless they massively ramp up the repayment rate this is all just a load of hot air and puts off paying for universities for 25 years when the current Grads en-mass 'default' on their loans.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 3:59 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Typcal Engineer pay? £30k?
Tyical shop floor workers pay? - £16k?

£14k a year extra over a career spanning 40 years? £560k more!

Think paying for that further education is feasible!!!


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

if it helps stop the instantly critical minds of STW judging her she worked every summer full time, evening jobs for the 2nd and 3rd year, managed to get out of her overdraft every summer and managed to run a car the whole time. never asked or was given money by her parents once towards uni or living costs.

She shouldn't have worked and she should have borrowed more student loans. She'd be no worse off financially.

😉


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

It doesn't cost £6k a year though.

Its close to that actually - once full econimic costing is covered. I.e. cost of staff (not just lecturers but admin etc. etc.) buildings, IT etc. So the £6k would reflect the economic cost of putting a student through a course. Because education has been cheap for years it just seems like a lot now the full cost is exposed. In reality that is not a lot of money for an education that will serve you for the rest of your career as well as a life experience that will develop potential in other ways. Maybe students will also be inclined to work harder on their degree if they are having to pay more - at the moment we see a lot of srudents here being bone idol. A bit of money stress might focus the mind...


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I seem to remember Clegg promised to abolish fees when they were elected. They weren't, were they?


So he isan MP, in the government , in the cabinet, the deputy PM but he has not been elected.
I se eyour point but clearlyhe has sold out
I believe tuition fees are wrong, I believe they need to be abolished, I want to do it as soon as possible,
he said this at this years conference after the election but said they needed to be realistic and then said they would have the fairest package at the next election for students 😯 Presumably so they can ignore that again.
I did not think you were insulting me you seem polite for here FWIW. Just annoys me , which encourages some. Cheers


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 8396
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I fully expect nearly every uni to charge £9k, we were told before that £3k would be the exception and how did that turn out?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
 

So those who are not educated are worth less?

If I am hiring someone for a £40 - £50k position on my team. I will rarely interview unless they have a degree. There is a lot of choice on the job market.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]£560k more![/i]

well, they'd pay an additional £120k in taxes over the same period so one might agrue that they are paying more back to society and justifying society paying for their education already without the additional cost of repaying fees?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

philconsequence - Member

"most will never be able to clear the debt - just like me"

.... i cant imagine being in that situation and i dont know how my OH handles it.

s'easy really, i basically pay a bit more tax than a non-graduate.

if i'm honest, i don't really mind...

s'why i really don't see the problem with the new Uni-Fees thing.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:04 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I fully expect nearly every uni to charge £9k

Cynical but I agree.

If you have XXX amount of prospective students chasing x courses then its good ol supply and demand.

Any courses that people aren't falling overthemselves to suscribe to and you'll lower your prices slightly..


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LHS - Member

Typcal Engineer pay? £30k?
Tyical shop floor workers pay? - £16k?

£14k a year extra over a career spanning 40 years? £560k more!

Think paying for that further education is feasible!!!

bloody hell! - £30k typical - my hairy ar53. who do i have to kill to get that much?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

What about this:

Key worker degrees: Teaching, Doctors, Nurses, etc - 100% subsidy if you pass and enter that job

Key economy degrees: Software Eng, Civil Eng, Vet, Architect, Law you know vocational stuff - Current System

Lifestyle Degrees: Journalism, Surfing science, Film Studies, English Lit: New ConLeb System

Pointless Degrees: Sociology - 20k Per year paid up front
🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you have XXX amount of prospective students chasing x courses then its good ol supply and demand.

Any courses that people aren't falling overthemselves to suscribe to and you'll lower your prices slightly

The canny universities will specialise - fill the course with students each year at top-whack rates. Those that maintain a 'universal' approach, trying to make popular faculties subsidise under-subscribed ones, will be the ones in trouble.......


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:08 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bloody hell! - £30k typical - my hairy ar53. who do i have to kill to get that much?

I was actually under-selling that too!


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:08 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I se eyour point but clearlyhe has sold out

See earlier about compromises. Sometimes it's necessary.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

er, i AM an engineer - wiv a dergree an everthing.

earning nowhere near £30k...

nor are most of my better paid colleagues...


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LHS/Ahwiles - with a bit of experience maybe - starting salary with a good degree and CV is mid-20's these days. With 10 years on the clock add about 10K that's the experience of me and the guys I graduated with.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup, you could be right midlifecrashes.
It will depend largely on how much the government cuts uni funding. It costs around 7K a year across the whole uni cohort, so I'd expect the figure to rise to at least that.
At least the stupid levy thing has been dropped. That would have meant charging 8K to a student so that the uni could get 7K in income, and the student paying 1K to the government for the privilege.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

er, i AM an engineer - wiv a dergree an everthing.

earning nowhere near £30k...

nor are most of my better paid colleagues..

Really? How long ago did you get chartered?


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bristolbiker - Member

LHS/Ahwiles - with a bit of experience maybe - starting salary with a good degree and CV is mid-20's these days. With 10 years on the clock add about 10K.

not round here it's not.

(starting salary 7 years ago = £17,000. less than i was earning as a draughtsman [i]before[/i] uni)


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:12 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmm, ok, I have a lot of engineers with degrees who have worked for me over the years and the salaries were well over £30k. Anyway, the example still stands, just the figures might change slightly.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not round here it's not

You're in the wrong place then!!


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]
Pointless Degrees: Sociology - 20k Per year paid up front[/i]

I take it social workers aren't one of your protected key workers then? 🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

See earlier about compromises. Sometimes it's necessary

I agree the coalition requires some degrees of freedom for coopperation/compromise etc but this is capitulation and a reversal of their stated position NOT a compromise ? What use is a politician if their word is meaningless and they may do the reversal of what they said and stood for? We have done this debate before.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

IanMunro - Member

Pointless Degrees: Sociology - 20k Per year paid up front

I take it social workers aren't one of your protected key workers then?

To become a social worker you will need a university degree in social work. (not Sociology)


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CharlieMungus - Member

Really? How long ago did you get chartered?

not chartered, i've never had an employer with an MPDS scheme that worked.

plenty have [i]claimed[/i] to have a scheme, but always 'starting next year' - and still asked my to pay for it.

my current employer doesn't even acknowledge the status of 'chartered engineer'...

ho-hum.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 4892
Free Member
 

ahwiles - Member

not chartered, i've never had an employer with an MPDS scheme that worked.

plenty have claimed to have a scheme, but always 'starting next year' - and still asked my to pay for it.

You are a Window Visibility Maintenance Engineer? and I claim my £5


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

currently i'm 'measurement geek - joint second in command' - in a team of 3

🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:26 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

To become a social worker you will need a university degree in social work. (not Sociology
you can convert with a post grad course that is funded with a bursary so not strictly true.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:26 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If its a standard subject-degree and I was 17/18 faced with THAT much debt TBH I think I'd have a really good years travelling then start working my way up in a company instead.

I know people still paying off their student loans now in their late 30's. Yeah Degrees really are a magic bullit.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not chartered, i've never had an employer with an MPDS scheme that worked.

Ok, then not being funny and perhaps being overly pedantic, but you're not really an engineer then. In the way that most of those engineers earning over £30 are.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's a whole other thread about the 'merits' of 'Chartered Engineer' status, but that really is going off-topic here.... 😉

^^^ Charlie - not chartered either, have no intention of it, for various reasons and doing very nicely without it.....


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP- You're confused about you're role as a parent, you do the best for your kids with the money you have, if you cant afford to pay there way through uni don't, they'll have to do it off there own back. If they don't want to go 'cos daddy ain't paying they probably don't deserve to be there anyway.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's a whole other thread about the 'merits' of 'Chartered Engineer' status, but that really is going off-topic her

Yes, i agree on that, especially in terms of merit. But there is the recognition / accreditation aspect of that title. Many people call themselves engineers, but may only be fitters. There needs to be some way to differentiate.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:33 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

that is the issue though the rich will be able to afford it that is the rich not the best or most able but the rich so that their kids can also be rich. Surely it should be an equal opportunity to education rather than based on ability to pay?
Without parental support most students would not be able to do [ or an apprenticeship] it as the costs are too high. Seriously we will give people on benefits money [rightly] and yet we wont support students who will better themsleves and [ in the broadest sense] better society. Need to take a long hard look at themselves do the degree educated people making this decison...guess they know their kids will be ok as daddy is rich.


 
Posted : 03/11/2010 4:34 pm
Page 2 / 5