Forum menu
Single-track's spac...
 

Single-track's space, rockets and astronauts thread

Posts: 9618
Full Member
 

Incredible pictures of re-entry


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:12 pm
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

Wow that plasma, incredible stuff!


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:15 pm
Posts: 9618
Full Member
 

Data gone - no telemetry - could be interference


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:17 pm
Posts: 2304
Full Member
 

First time I've managed to catch it live!

Somehow it's that much more exciting (and I'm hyped up enough as it is!)

My wife watching me in mild amusement/bemusement haha. It's kinda like that time we were out somewhere and a Spitfire overflew the car... I screech to a halt and leap out to watch in wild excitement while my wife wonders what all the fuss is about.


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:25 pm
Posts: 9618
Full Member
 

May have self disassembled. Lost telemetry and video at same time


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:27 pm
Murray and Murray reacted
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

AMAZING STUFF!!


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:32 pm
Posts: 9618
Full Member
 

Saves the sweeping up.


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 3:35 pm
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I had a meeting so had to stop watching just after signal was lost with starship At about T +12.30  did it RUD?  Or was it just a blip in signal?


 
Posted : 14/03/2024 5:18 pm
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

Stabilised video showing the true extent of the rotation... 😲


 
Posted : 15/03/2024 3:40 pm
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ift4, wow!


 
Posted : 06/06/2024 4:18 pm
retrorick and retrorick reacted
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

OMG !

Seeing that flap melt and start to disintegrate, but still somehow managing to work, was incredible. Re entry and land both stages under control was totally amazing to watch.


 
Posted : 06/06/2024 6:05 pm
retrorick and retrorick reacted
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Indeed! How did it still work and how did the ship do a perfect flip,  landing burn and soft splash with 'toast flap'?!


 
Posted : 06/06/2024 8:17 pm
retrorick and retrorick reacted
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Scott Manley has done another excellent analysis, worth watching.

I still can't believe starship seemed to reenter, descend, and then 'land' perfectly with such damage to a flap.

Does anyone know if spacex are recovering the starship (and booster)?  I'm sure they've got lots and lots of data to go through even without it but I'd love to see photos of it's final condition.   In particular did the otherside flap suffer any similar plasma cutting damage?  If it didn't, would that point to a construction or material failure rather than a design failure?

As usual I can't wait to see IFT5 now, I wonder when that might be?  I'd guess as soon as they've got a ship ready and they've crunched IFT4 data enough to construct test aims for 5. Wonder how quickly they may move to test catching the booster?  Although surely they don't need an orbital flight to test that. I guess we will know more fairly soon.


 
Posted : 07/06/2024 10:46 am
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

There’s probably multiple redundancy in the flap hinges maybe? So it looked like the trailing edge area took a lot of damage, but there was enough strength in the rest of the hinges/actuators to maintain enough control - more details will forthcoming.

Will they risk a tower capture landing next time!!?


 
Posted : 07/06/2024 11:14 am
Posts: 14291
Free Member
 

How did it still work and how did the ship do a perfect flip

Well there's 4 flaps and maybe the damaged one had enough surface area left to make a difference.  You would have thought they'd like to see the condition of the others but there again they're probably covered in sensors so maybe no need.

Amazing flight .... Starship looked really stable the whole time.

Can't wait the next one!!

Will they risk a tower capture landing next time!!?

Presumably that might depend on how accurate the landing was this time - presuming it had a landing location specified.  If it was mine I'd like to see it come down at least one more time first before I risked it taking out the tower that took a fair bit of time to construct!


 
Posted : 07/06/2024 12:42 pm
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

They have been working on the chopsticks,  upgrading the actuators, I believe in preparation for booster catch.   They don't need to do a long flight of the booster to catch test,  and the booster has had its own flight test series...   if I were Chief twit I'd try a catch test on a short booster test flight but spacex are more ambitious and seem to go in fairly big steps so who knows what they will do!  Can't wait to see it.


 
Posted : 07/06/2024 1:59 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Musk has posted there will be a catch attempt for flight 5 🤯


 
Posted : 07/06/2024 2:05 pm
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm looking forward to a catch attempt,  I hope it works!  I've not seen a date for IFT5 yet but doubt it'll be far off,  August perhaps?

Elsewhere this isn't so good.  NASA confirms space debris in North Carolina was from SpaceX Crew Dragon reentry

How often does this kind of thing happen?


 
Posted : 26/06/2024 9:24 am
Posts: 2094
Full Member
 

I'm looking forward to the catch. Hopefully successful.

I wonder when space X will use the oil rig that they bought a while back? I've not heard anything about it for a while.


 
Posted : 26/06/2024 9:21 pm
 PJay
Posts: 4999
Free Member
 

I wondered whether anyone else had been reading up on the strange events in Kenya? I saw it a while ago, but it's now on the BBC website.

A large, so hot it was glowing, metal ring fell from the sky. It's been suggested that it could be a separation ring, from an Ariane rocket, whose orbit had decayed.


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 8:58 pm
Posts: 14291
Free Member
 

But I think it's also been reported that the size of the ring doesn't match anymore the Ariane rockets.


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 9:56 pm
Posts: 17290
Full Member
 

Me and Arianne.B0558C3D-26B9-4253-8878-12D629E67DC8


 
Posted : 13/01/2025 10:30 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

Came across as a scam that even he wasn’t buying into – thought he was meant to have at least some charisma?

I thought it was common knowledge that all tech bros have a charisma bypass operation… [img]


 
Posted : 14/01/2025 2:20 am
Posts: 8100
Free Member
 

I gave up on that article when it drifted into the villagers complaining that they were now all ill because of “space radiation”.


 
Posted : 14/01/2025 8:16 am
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

New Glen delayed until Thursday. And Starship 7 is to launch “this week”?


 
Posted : 14/01/2025 9:22 am
Posts: 10960
Full Member
 

Apparently NASA are going to stick a nuclear reactor on the moon, and the joker in their art department has come up with this concept image.

So it's a black monolith, dimensions look like 1:4:9...


 
Posted : 05/08/2025 6:35 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

This is where I work, gives a reasonable insight into part of working life at ESOC

 


 
Posted : 05/08/2025 6:55 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

Posted by: neilnevill

As a child of '73 I'm almost as old as possible without having lived when men walked on the moon, so I'm excited by all this moon and beyond stuff.

I was on holiday in South Devon, staying on a caravan site when the actual moon landing happened, the site had a club for those staying, but the telly was in the bar area and I wasn’t old enough to be allowed in, so I missed seeing it. ☹️


 
Posted : 07/08/2025 3:08 pm
Posts: 5801
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Starship IFT 11 went off very uneventfully early this morning.   The block 2 problems seem to have been overcome.  Next launch is block3 I think,  not sure when.  I want to see an orbital flight and both booster and Starship return for catch and reuse.... these planned landings at sea are almost boring now!


 
Posted : 14/10/2025 10:58 am
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

Just come back to this thread, started at the beginning and watched some of the footage, in particular the bloke who’s talking about the sound, so I put my headphones on, which are wired, and had a listen. He’s certainly right about the sort of sound that happens, but even with ‘phones on, and the volume up a fair bit, it can’t convey the physical feeling that sound of that amplitude creates, where the human body emphasises the fact it’s mostly liquid, and vibrates in sympathy! 
The crackling effect, especially in the closer footage, really does come across through ‘phones, though; whatever Musk’s flaws, and there are a great many, he’s certainly put together a spectacular heavy lift system, and I’d dearly love to witness one in person!


 
Posted : 20/10/2025 12:48 am
Page 5 / 5