Forum search & shortcuts

Sh*tstorm - dumping...
 

Sh*tstorm - dumping raw sewage in rivers

Posts: 8424
Free Member
 

Post heavy rain raw sewage contamination along the coast is not uncommon in Scotland. To the point where the advice is heavy rain means stay out of the water.

I was about to take my daughter paddle boarding down the Tawe a few weeks ago, and by chance my wife noticed an announcement on social media warning about a discharge just below where we were planning to launch. The advice was to stay out of the river AND bay - that's about 4-5 miles. There had been rain the night before, but not particularly heavy.

(The Tawe isn't a particularly clean river at the best of times..)


 
Posted : 28/10/2021 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There’s a program on itv at 7.30 this evening about this.

Jon- I think the Tawe issue was a broken sewage pipe so not rainfall related, it was just spilling the whole time. I believe that’s been fixed though.

The issue is in the UK it rains a lot so staying out of the water after rain means never going in!


 
Posted : 28/10/2021 5:27 pm
 csb
Posts: 3288
Free Member
 

The farming industry is absolutely laughing (well, keeping their heads well down) about the furore over sewage and water companies. The stats show that it's agri runoff that is the biggest problem, biodiversity trashed. But poos are emotive I guess.


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 12:42 am
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

The farming industry is absolutely laughing (well, keeping their heads well down) about the furore over sewage and water companies. The stats show that it’s agri runoff that is the biggest problem, biodiversity trashed. But poos are emotive I guess

The EA have been recruiting to start to tackle this. A long way to go.


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes, I’m pretty sure diffuse and other agricultural pollution is also in the bill? A lot of it, things like buffer zones to reduce surface run-off, are also linked to flooding etc. I guess it’s comparatively easy to do compared to re-plumbing the sewer network too!


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 12:22 pm
Posts: 7286
Full Member
 

The boards of these big water companies are probably on performance related bonuses
Big ftse100 companies also set up share options for the board.
The guys at the top would be hit financially if the government took charge, accepted that the system was flawed and mandated change that will cost each compamy say £ 1 billion a year.
Even then it would never get finished


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 1:37 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7218
Full Member
 

The problem with the EA is the funding in the departments keeps getting cut and people are leaving as they can earn more money elsewhere and because the pay is no longer competitive they struggle to get people in and if they do it takes a couple of years to fully train an EM officer and once trained they often move on.


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kuco - exactly. I left the EA last year, pay was abysmal. I wasn’t replaced, I was an Environment Officer.
From speaking to people still there it seems numbers of staff are reducing still.
Takes 18 months to get an EO up to speed and able to take on case files. And once you are there you can never get another pay rise, so despite me being chartered and having a huge amount of experience they won’t do anything to pursuade you to stay. Probably can’t.

I think it’s £29k now for someone fully qualified? Start on £24k as a trainee? Ridiculously low for such a responsible and complex job when there were so many middle managers making no difference to the environment at all.

My new job in a water company pays me a lot more and is a lot easier!!


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 7:38 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

My new job in a water company pays me a lot more and is a lot easier!!

It's now all your fault


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 8:57 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Just a few points
I We were sold privitisation on the basis it would improve matters by allowing much needed infrastructure upgrades. [The Victorians however considered water to be an unsuitable candidate for privitisation.] That's verifiable by checking Hansard.
2 Brexit is a factor since it has made it more difficult/ expensive for the water companies to access certain chemicals.
3 Now that we are no longer in Europe we can forget about having to hold to certain standards, however poor they were, so Brexit again. Brexit has enabled the Severn Barrage to rear it's ugly head for a third time. This utterly failed to comply with European environmental standards the last time round, and it was going to be very very expensive: but in the manner of the rail link fiasco, that won't stop companies looking to cash in on Government projects. Personally, with the amount of sediment the Severn Estuary carries, I wonder how long it would take to silt up. Parts of Herefordshire are said to have about another 100 years of topsoil cover at the present rate of denudation.
Direct Sewage Discharges are not illegal. I got payed to survey one Welsh River for sutability for White Water canoeing. Apart from crossing and recrossing sewage pipes decapitating participants it just happened that the proposed egress site was a CSO [Combined Sewage Outfall]. CSO's are allowed to spew raw sewage during white water conditions.....


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 9:57 pm
Posts: 66122
Full Member
 

Kuco
Full Member

The problem with the EA is the funding in the departments keeps getting cut and people are leaving as they can earn more money elsewhere and because the pay is no longer competitive they struggle to get people in and if they do it takes a couple of years to fully train an EM officer and once trained they often move on.

Yup, and all very intentional of course- one thing modern Tories are amazing at is failing in the direction they want to go. Theresa May's entire time in the home office was full of this, austerity was almost entirely about it, it's the sure and safe way to attack the NHS, and it works great for regulation as well. Hard to convince people to vote for relaxing regulations. Incredibly easy to leave the same regulations in place and just destroy the process that's supposed to enforce it- easier in fact than doing it properly.


 
Posted : 29/10/2021 10:51 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7218
Full Member
 

f230ftw it's still the same, if anything it's getting worse. I'm in a different department and not EM but spoke to someone only last week who is a TL in EM and they are getting fed up. But it's the same across all departments rather sadly.


 
Posted : 30/10/2021 1:13 pm
Posts: 18037
Full Member
 

I warn you – this column contains filth

Stewart Lee's take on it.


 
Posted : 31/10/2021 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

“ Yup, and all very intentional of course- one thing modern Tories are amazing at is failing in the direction they want to go.”

To be fair it’s got nothing to do with what government is in power. The money in the EA does not do a good job of getting to the “coal face”.
As a great example the environmental permits for waste sites were changed recently and he charges were increased to “properly pay for the cost of regulation”. Which is fair enough but that didn’t mean more officers to regulate agains those permits. A TL in our office did the sums after getting some inside info from a very senior manager and we found that the local EM teams were getting less than 20% of the money we were taking in permit fees.

Another issue was the the flooding side was always getting more money and staff with the same expertise in that department as an EO were on the next pay grade up. Really really unfair.

If the EA got the amount of money at the front end they needed it would be very different.


 
Posted : 31/10/2021 6:48 pm
Posts: 834
Free Member
 

I have a friend who’s a lawyer for NRW (essentially the EA in Wales) and after the recent Panarama episode about water companies and sewage I asked why wasn’t anyone prosecuted in Dwr Cymru when their releases into rivers were breaking the law. He said that the powers that be in government stop them doing it.
What’s the point eh?
Just another corrupt joke. Like HMRC tax lawyers targeting lowly individuals and leaving the big players alone.
What chance has the environment/COP26 got when we can’t/won’t even effectively target sewerage and tax.


 
Posted : 31/10/2021 6:57 pm
Posts: 8841
Full Member
 

Eliminating storm spills will be very difficult and costly.

Not just on the water companies, this one - increasing suburbanisation and e.g. tarmacking of front gardens to make driveways aren’t helping with run-off. Surely needs to be a big effort on reducing this and upstream slowing the flow, as well as improving sewerage?


 
Posted : 31/10/2021 9:13 pm
Posts: 31127
Full Member
Posts: 23340
Free Member
 

Eliminating storm spills will be very difficult and costly.

if only it were just storm spills.

they are doing it all the time and the government just gave them mandate to keep doing it.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 10:22 am
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

He said that the powers that be in government stop them doing it.

Devolution politics for you, nobody wants to be prosecuting their sacred cows as it will make them look bad.

You would have thought someone would whistle blow on it though


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 11:33 am
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

All those beaches in the South West getting the brown flag and yet they always return Tory MPs. Must be something in the water.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 11:38 am
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

All those beaches in the South West getting the brown flag and yet they always return Tory MPs. Must be something in the water.

SW used to be even worse with no treatment and not very long outfalls.

Reminds me of visiting a Scottish castle which was lochside watching the toilet paper float away after hearing the flush of the visitor toilets

Ultimately it's a failure of regulation, the companies have been claiming returns based on maintaining assets, they haven't been maintaining them anywhere near enough and should take the pain to fix rather than loading customer bills. If they want to hand back to the state for free that's always open to them and then former directors can be criminally charged once the decisions are brought into the open.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 11:55 am
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

I remember when SW Water had to cough up a £1m compo to Croyde Bay Holidays (1990?), surfing there meant you got the squits. Now it's back to where it was. Sold my longboard just before all this bubbled up, can't imagine demand would have been great now.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 12:27 pm
Posts: 23340
Free Member
 

All those beaches in the South West getting the brown flag and yet they always return Tory MPs. Must be something in the water.

tories dont surf.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 12:31 pm
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

Maybe so but they own holiday lets, hotels, shops and pubs.


 
Posted : 09/11/2021 12:36 pm
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

Water companies apologise:

Ruth Kelly, the chair of Water UK, said: “The message from the water and sewage industry today is clear: we are sorry. More should have been done to address the issue of spillages sooner and the public is right to be upset about the current quality of our rivers and beaches.

Although some people will be pleased with how they performed:

Privatised water and sewage companies in the UK paid £1.4bn in dividends in 2022, up from £540m the previous year. Annual bonuses paid to water company executives rose by 20% in 2021, as water bosses paid themselves £24.8m

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/18/uk-water-companies-offer-apology-and-10bn-investment-for-sewage-spills

Customers however might not be so pleased:

A £10bn investment from water companies to stop sewage spills will be paid for by customers through "modest increases to their bills".

https://news.sky.com/story/water-customers-will-see-modest-increase-in-bills-to-pay-for-10bn-investment-says-industry-chief-12883494

Another case of common ownership of the loses and private ownership of the profits.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 2:07 pm
Posts: 57416
Full Member
 

I wonder what percentage on that 1.4 billion they creamed off was paid to Tory MPs to vote through the deregulation required for them to just pump shit into anywhere they like, with no consequences?

I’m saying 0.00000000000001% as this lot can be payed off for next to nothing

As investments go, that’s quite some return


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 2:13 pm
Posts: 17294
Full Member
 

Foreign companies defiling our great British rivers and charging us for the honour.
Why these people aren't top of bravermans hit list I don't know.
We need to send the water companies boxes of shit or just go and smear it over their door handles and windows.
We could of course apologise afterwards and promise that we will spend £5 and not do it again.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 2:15 pm
Posts: 14131
Full Member
 

Could a ban be be put in place on profit, bonus's and dividend payouts until they have sorted the issues?

Pay the money into a holding account - and once they've literally sorted their shit out the money then gets released.

All I can see from this latest announcement is them taking more money off us and they'll still be kicking the sewage problem down the road for the next twenty years 'due to logistically issues and increased costs'.

Withhold the money until the problems are sorted.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 2:21 pm
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

From the BEEB:-

English water companies have handed more than £2bn a year on average to shareholders since they were privatised three decades ago

The concept that this it acceptable to generate and pass on that level of "profit" and yet not acknowledge that had even 50% of that been reinvested it would not have had a profound impact on is shit - literal shit- is beyond scandalous.

I'm a realist - our Victorian systems were designed to treat a fraction of what we now generate to a standard we now consider unacceptable - a massive level of investment is required. And that will require us collectively digging in our pockets I'm sure. But if dividends remain as they are whilst we are doing it heads need to roll.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 2:52 pm
Posts: 8841
Full Member
 

A £10bn investment from water companies to stop sewage spills will be paid for by customers through “modest increases to their bills”.

This seems grossly wrong.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 3:01 pm
Posts: 5739
Full Member
 

Glad they're doing something about it - but it should come from their profits - they can clearly afford it. It's disgusting.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 3:24 pm
Posts: 46125
Full Member
 

Water companies apologise:

"Sorry we have been caught out" more like.

And I agree that the £10bn of dividends coming before investment and an environmental disaster is appalling.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 4:44 pm
Posts: 4100
Full Member
 

Edit....

We need to send the water companies boxes of shit or just go and smear it over their door handles and windows.
We could of course apologise afterwards and promise that we will spend charge them £5 and not do it again.


 
Posted : 18/05/2023 6:50 pm
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

cheery toffees (anag)


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 8:40 am
Posts: 46125
Full Member
 

My other question: seeing as the water companies, government and watchdog have let this happen, what needs to change to prevent it in future?
Clearly the private companies will ignore the 'planet and people before profit'.
The government couldn't give a floating jobby.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:07 am
Posts: 418
Free Member
 

Coffey blames wild birds.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:12 am
Posts: 7286
Full Member
 

Make Directors personally responsible for sewage dischage. With fines, combined with community service, as a deterrent.
If they had to spend 40 hours picking tampons, cotton earbuds and wet wipes off a beach it might make them think abit harder about profit distribution.
Even down here the fines, althougj millions, are a small percentage of the annual profits, and again a small percentage of building capacity at the existing treatment plant. So its cheaper to dischage macerated turds than fix the problem.
But bring in criminal negligence charges, fines, community service that impacts the board and you will see improvement


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:19 am
steveb, convert, gallowayboy and 1 people reacted
Posts: 7367
Free Member
 

This.

I couldn't agree more. It is criminal negligence.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:21 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

Well water industry bosses have "voluntarily" decided to give up their bonuses this year, which presumably means that they have met all their targets. I don't think that you get a bonus if you fail to reach your target do you?

I have no idea what their basic pay is but if they haven't spunked all the more than half a £million they each received on average in bonuses last year a trip to the food bank might not be necessary.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/water-firm-bosses-pay-soars-27777154


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:48 am
Posts: 23340
Free Member
 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65615711

Water pollution: Tory MP says he swam in sewage as a child

well that's ok, we are all just being snowflakes..

although, part of me thinks they've always pumped this much shit into the rivers and sea, its just the reporting of it is better than it used to be.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 9:53 am
Posts: 41877
Free Member
 

although, part of me thinks they’ve always pumped this much shit into the rivers and sea, its just the reporting of it is better than it used to be.

+1

I used to live in Saltburn, which is that really picturesque beach in North Yorkshire / Teesside that always seems to be the background for the weather forecast (it's the one with the funicular railway or the distinctive shaped cliff depending on which picture they're using).

For the entire time I lived there, there was a very small notice at the bottom of the noticeboard in the car park saying not to go in the water which was either unseen or ignored by thousands of people.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 10:08 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Water companies have been promising the biggest infrastructure investment since Victorian times for years now, while they hand over billions to shareholders year on year.

Although Labour have apparently rowed back on re-nationalisation, there is still a lot of appetite for it in the party just under the surface, it could easily re-emerge if water quality turns into a leading election issue, and this performative bullshit apology is just a manoeuvre to try to reduce the risk to their shareholders.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 10:10 am
Posts: 9627
Full Member
 

Blaming wild birds, honestly I've heard and seen some written excuses in my time, but this really is the kind of rubbish that 'some' people might actually believe. I'm lost for words.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 10:18 am
Posts: 7286
Full Member
 

It is bonkers though. If I personally get caught polluting a waterway i would expect a fine and possibly criminal charges.
These water companies do it on, quite literally, an industrial scale. The bosses and shareholders then get paid for doing it.
All wrong.
Although the local sewage vo refused to hook up a new build of 20 houses to the maims as it is already overcapacity.
So the tin pot local council gave them planning permission. So now we have a procession of 20t toad tankers hauling the grey water awsy to the sewage works, where they macerate it and pump it out into a tidal estaury, where the ebb tide takes it the 5 miles back to where it came from. Fo real.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 10:22 am
Posts: 18037
Full Member
 

My other question: seeing as the water companies, government and watchdog have let this happen, what needs to change to prevent it in future?

Nationalisation. IMO there are certain essential services which should not be run for the financial benefit of shareholders.


 
Posted : 19/05/2023 10:23 am
Del, convert, pondo and 2 people reacted
Page 3 / 4