This makes me smile...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] This makes me smile, not angry and nothing to do with dogs.

15 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
90 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Been on already?


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

I don't think that you can call the activists scum just because they dressed up nicely.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wow, the STW mods are really polishing hard at the moment.

I apologise for lowering the tone. Oh the ironing.

Also STW mod title changerer This doesn't make me very angry. More mildly entertained and heartened that this kind of thing can happen.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:28 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

angry that the rich get away with it? or angry that the people were a bit in his face?
Angry by the toffs attitude re scum and his other words?

The fact they avoid tax makes me angry


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

These were civil servants weren't they? Not "rich" AFAIK.
Looked like some old chaps retirement dooo.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As I understand from the comments under the vid, the bloke calling them scum and sat next to the retiring HMRC boss runs a chambers specializing in tax avoidance.
Lovely..


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah better mods but they do talk of setting dogs on them so...


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 31059
Free Member
 

At what is the OP angry?


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Haha, this is cool. STW Butan style.

I didn't call the topic that. I named it something else but it would appear that using the word that the verrrr well to do chappie in the video used warrants not only a title change but a post edit too.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

when you have finished getting upset by censorship*perhaps you would like to answer the question, asked a few times, as to what it is exactly you think

Why you are complaining about censorship when no one knows what aspect of this you are angry about , because you have chosen to not say or answer , is rather funny.

* the thread URL lets us know what you used originally BTW


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

dd I'm not angry. That's the mods interpretation. They wrote it and a bit of my first post.

What's happened to this place?!


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:41 pm
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

*shakes tiny fists at mods*

Stop that - it means that my reply makes no sense whatsoever.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:43 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]What's happened to this place?! [/i]

Wonders if this is the mods or billysugger asking?

*head explodes*


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't think that the OP likes the way the "toffs" called the nice activists (who gatecrashed a civil servants retirement dinner) "scum" and threatened to "set the dogs" on them, even though it was quite obvious there were no dogs. I thought the party showed considerable restraint.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That was me 🙂

Mod altering of post and topic titles which could only possibly offend a person of the type to be constantly on the look out for offence make me sad.

My internet is dying.

wrecker - I'd put my opinion but I fear although completely unoffensive it may be altered. Sad really.


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Here goes...

IMO the overall point of the video is a legitimate one. The video finishes with a basic (simplistic perhaps) fact.

It doesn't make me angry I only put it on here because I felt some might find the set the dogs on them comment quite amusing.

I think when the 'activists' got on their stage they failed to deliver the hit. That should have had more impact. Maybe they were star-struck..?


 
Posted : 25/09/2012 1:59 pm