This is the meme that always sticks in my mind when this subject comes up:

[img] [/img]

It was particularly poignant when i saw it at the time. (the version i saw didn't have the 'massive balls' comment, which somewhat undermines this one)

[img] [/img]

It was particularly poignant when i saw it at the time.

It's a bit unfair really. The Nazis did a lot of experimentation on humans during the war in the name of science, but that shouldn't be how you define science.

I'm not a religious person by the way.

Exactly religion didn't shoot anyone and without science the gun wouldn't exist. An arse shot a schoolgirl.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Nice Simpsons quote

I find the defendant not guilty. As for Science versus Religion, I'm issuing a restraining order. Religion must stay 500 yards from Science at all times.

Nothing expresses a lack of intelligent opinion more clearly than copy and pasting someone elses "meme"......

.......and what about religious scientists, where do they fit into this scheme of self-congratulatory mocking?

[img] [/img]

More importantly what is the correct plural for tyrannosaurus Rex? Tyrannosauri Rex?

Nothing expresses a lack of intelligent opinion more clearly than copy and pasting someone elses "meme"......

.......and what about religious scientists, where do they fit into this scheme of self-congratulatory mocking?

Not sure if they're higher or lower on the list that those who copy memes for a bit of fun.

.......and what about religious scientists, where do they fit into this scheme of self-congratulatory mocking?

How is a picture of something which could be interpreted one of two ways in an optical illusion stylee "self-congratulatory mocking"?

I think the poster is trying to suggest that reality is completely a matter of individual interpretation.

... and there was me telling myself I wouldn't get involved in this one...

Religion shot a 9 year old girl

Oh don't talk crap. I didn't see the Pope issuing that particular command, did you?

Some nutter shot a 9 year old girl, that's what happened.

PS I like the OP, very funny 🙂

An arse shot a schoolgirl for religious reasons

Science clearly trumps religion as one is factual and one is not.
Neither has all the answers and both contain plenty of unknowns but only one has a method* for answering them.

* I guess you could argue faith is a method but really this means ignore the doubts/errors/inconsistencies and just believe.

Religion has a great answer for feeling better about your ultimate death.

I could use one of those, tbh,

Oh don't talk crap. I didn't see the Pope issuing that particular command, did you?

I did, however, hear the last-but-one Pope claim that an invisible fairy woman had bent the path of an assassins bullet enough so that he survived it.

Apart from omitting to give any credit to the team of medics who battled for 11 hours to save him, he didn't say that he'd asked his protector why she didn't prevent the bullet hitting him at all...

PS:

I didn't see the Pope issuing that particular command

Apparently it was some bloke called Alfred Lah. Whoever HE is...

Religion has a great answer for feeling better about your ultimate death.

That'll burn in hell?

I prefer that I'll be remembered by my family.

Ah it's Friday!!

Some will be eating fish, others will be bashing on STW - "religious" regularity 😉

Really must be time for a sticky.....

The OP was fun, the follow up was just stupid. Do stupid things like that just please those already in agreement, mean nothing to those who oppose, and push the undecided further away.

Cougar - Moderator

How is a picture of something which could be interpreted one of two ways in an optical illusion stylee "self-congratulatory mocking"?

I'm just predicting the wave of semi-abusive self-congratulatory posts (of which you Cougar have been a prime example of in the past) referring to God-botheres, sky-pixies, child-abusers etc by the "oh I'm so rational I'm a scientist" types.

Well I am a scientist, a "real working one", not a "keyboard warrior ex-science grad who couldn't cut it so went into IT/media/management one" and I find the anti-religion bias here strange & unpleasant when the mere whiff of any other cultural/racial/gender bashing brings out the pitchforks and banhammers.

Guess every "culture" has it's bogey group eh, seems that STW's is people of religious faith.

Happy Dawkinsmas to you all

Neither has all the answers and both contain plenty of unknowns

The difference being that science [u]knows[/u] it doesn't know, and will change it's views based purely on what's ovserved.

If tomorrow someone proved the existence of some kind of higher power, then that knowledge would simply be incorporated into science. Would the reverse be true?

to be fair jivehoneyjive and his ickeisms were mocked as well hilldodger

Science and religion aren't really competing for the same ground.

There's no such thing as "Dawkinsmas", either...

The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it. GBS.

Why does it have to be science & religion....? It is possible to have both.

[checks calender/]

you know, I'm sure this wasn't due for another couple of days...

We need to do Helmets, wheel size, death penalty, economics and speeding before another religion thread.

Why does it have to be science & religion....? It is possible to have both.

Of course.

We need to do Helmets, wheel size, death penalty, economics and speeding before another religion thread.

Nah the "making progress vs child killing maniac" driving thread was yesterday.

Anyway it was a funny first post.

Does science or religion have a view on tubeless tyres?

Being an atheist one always thinks I came to this belief because I am an intelligent human being.
Then one reads what other atheists write and one realises that I could be one brain cell above a stone and still come to the same conclusion. I think you'll find that for the vast majority of religious people it's a matter of faith not fact. That it is a moral guide and source of comfort and community. If that works for them and they don't try and tell me or anyone else that theirs is the only true way to live then that's all good.

Curiously (perhaps?) there are people who became Christians because of science.

Just found this playlist - might be interesting...

Ex-Atheists Convert to Christianity

hilldodger - Member
Well I am a scientist, a "real working one", not a "keyboard warrior ex-science grad who couldn't cut it so went into IT/media/management one" and I find the anti-religion bias here strange & unpleasant when the mere whiff of any other cultural/racial/gender bashing brings out the pitchforks and banhammers.

HD, certain things are sacred, just not the ones you might expect!!

Well they generally don't like extra layers of rubber so I guess they like tubeless.

Well they generally don't like extra layers of rubber so I guess they like tubeless.

I find the anti-religion bias here strange & unpleasant when the mere whiff of any other cultural/racial/gender bashing brings out the pitchforks and banhammers.

As others noted anything [ conspiracists for example] that is irrational and without evidence gets challenged on here as it is a largely rational place.
Religion falls into this pool as does racism and the other isms you mention.
This upsets the faithful but no one made them have faith in something that has no proof and we would, and do, ridicule any other version of this
Start a thread claiming something you cannot prove that has no evidence to support it [ except faith] and see how you get treated. Its not about religion its about this being an unwise position/strategy for the finding of truth.

Start a thread claiming something you cannot prove that has no evidence to support it

Show me one religion thread that was started that way...

Conspiracy theory conversations are different - they start by someone saying 'X is responsible for Y?' That claim can legitimately be challenged. That's not how the religion threads on here go. They start by someone saying 'look at all these stupid religious people aren't they stupid' and get rather nasty. That's what I object to.

Its not about religion its about this being an unwise position/strategy for the finding of truth.

It never occurs to you though that religion might not be about finding the truth about the physical universe. That's another thing that annoys me - you slag off something you really do not understand at all.

Show me one religion thread that was started that way...

Your right they all start with conclusive proof of the truth of god but we just like to bicker

It never occurs to you though that religion might not be about finding the truth about the physical universe.

No offence molly but you dont believe what you write and you do not believe in god so I fail ti understand why you bother doign this.
The fact you bother to express a view you do not support is far more annoying than what you accuse me* of ..though of course I only have faith to prove that point 😆

* I have studied theology at Uni if it helps

It never occurs to you though that religion might not be about finding the truth about the physical universe. That's another thing that annoys me - you slag off something you really do not understand at all.

Are you suggesting that religious people understand religion?

you dont believe what you write

Yes I do, of course I do.

You just don't understand what I write!

I'm just predicting the wave of semi-abusive self-congratulatory posts blah blah blah

So a) it hadn't actually happened at all, you just made it up, and b) the first (only?) post on this thread that could be construed as "semi-abusive" is, in fact, your own?

Good work.

I find the anti-religion bias here strange & unpleasant when the mere whiff of any other cultural/racial/gender bashing brings out the pitchforks and banhammers.

Yes, you're quite right, it's all one big conspiracy. We have regular meetings at STW Towers to discuss how we're next going to persecute poor little religion.

The problem with your straw man here is that all of those other things are genetic. One does not wake up one day and decide to be, say, gay, or French. You can't pool religion in with these (well you can, but you'd be wrong) as religion is a choice, a belief, an idea. I couldn't become a woman just by really believing that I could.

And ideas [i]should[/i] be challenged, discussed, shared. Religion isn't special in this regard, any more than what the ideal wheel size is or whether helmets should be worn.

What would you prefer? Censorship? Silencing the masses who express an opinion you don't like? Pretty sure there's a word for that...?

And ideas should be challenged, discussed, shared. Religion isn't special in this regard

Absolutely, but we in doing so we should not be arseholes as I'm sure you'll agree.

but we in doing so we should not be arseholes as I'm sure you'll agree.

I know, you say the same thing every half dozen posts or so on every religion thread. Which is admirable, but seemingly blind to whether that's actually happening or not.

Can we establish, formally, that we should treat each other with some respect? I'll put <mod> tags around it and everything. Then you can change the bloody record and we can get on with having interesting conversations again. (-: If people are being abusive, that's what the 'Report post' option is for.

This thread started with a couple of harmless jokes, was followed by a few people taking it seriously and attempting to discuss the theme raised, and then half a page at least of people complaining about how the thread might go or how previous threads have gone, derailing (again) any hope we might have had of actually having a sensible discussion.

And now I'm bloody well doing it. Argh!

[img] [/img]

I'm beginning to believe in reincarnation. I have the strangest feeling I've been here before....

Science clearly trumps religion as one is factual and one is not.

Many a dying person asks for a scientist to comfort them in their final hours...

Yes I do, of course I do.

You just don't understand what I write!

now I'm bloody well doing it. Argh!

Many a dying person asks for a scientist to comfort them in their final hours...

Many a dying person asks for the help of science to cure them.

We could keep this up all day.

chiefgrooveguru - Member
Many a dying person asks for a scientist to comfort them in their final hours...

Yeah for more drugs/a cure

One interesting thing for me is this. STW somewhat unsurprisingly is comprised of people from atheist and religious viewpoints. Regardless of their perspectives, most people here have so often come together to support, advise and just be there for others has regularly reinforced my faith in people*.

Science or religion, science and religion not sure I care really. Just be decent and humane and I am happy.

*Will not deny I've been disappointed in occasion too..,

so you believe their is a non physical world and a God then ?

No. I've never argued for that.

Listen up now I'm going to explain.

Some people like the idea that there is a benevolent all powerful being who loves them. So they believe it. It doesn't really make a difference if they are right or not. And belief in said being does not necessarily mean that person believes in the creation story in the bible. It also does not mean that person is stupid.

Do you see what I mean?

Science clearly trumps religion as one is factual and one is not.

Facts are not necessarily important to everyone. This is what some of you are failing to understand.

So we should willingly decieve our children before they are intelligent enough to make their own choices? We should allow them to believe in stories which have no basis in evidence or rationality, yet are presented as facts?

After all, facts may not be important to them.

So we should willingly decieve our children before they are intelligent enough to make their own choices?

What? That doesn't follow on from anything I've said!

[s]Listen up now I'm going to explain[/s]I am going to express a view i dont personally agree with then deny doing do it to keep the argument going .

Start a thread claiming something you cannot prove that has no evidence to support it

Facts are not necessarily important to everyone. This is what some of you are failing to understand

I will save Flashy the trouble
[img] [/img]

Religious people don't start STW religion threads, do they?

No, they are not that daft 😉

If you're wired up to believe in god then you do, I'm not wired up like that so I don't. It's virtually impossible to move from one camp to the other and completely pointless to try and convince either side the other is right.
I'm increasingly coming around to the idea that all that really matters is how people behave.

Science is about theory which are tested and agreed with until a better comes along.

I really want to be there with Dawkins when, for just 1 day, god appears in a way which is indisputable. That'll test his claim to be a scientist.

Evening all

A quote by Felix Baumgartner... you know the fella with the massive balls... who has been held up a science's poster boy our OP.

"I believe in God and I truly believe that there is a plan that he has for everybody. And I also believe that he has a plan for me. It looks like I am becoming an astronaut,"

You can find the quote here on this Science web site ....

http://phys.org/news/2012-10-austrian-space-diver-stranger-danger.html

But what I want to know is, why didn't old Felix raise his arm and shout

" DROPPING "

As he stepped off

Peace

Out

Many a dying person asks for a scientist to comfort them in their final hours...

Working in an environment where I see many patients who have no further treatment options available to them prepare themselves for death, I can comfortably say that those who request spiritual comfort are very much in the minority.

/thread.

Do these threads ever get anywhere or are they just intended as an amusing diversion?

Joolsburger hits the nail on the head.

JCL -

/thread.

I used to be anti-religion, used to go along with the whole "religion has been the cause of more deaths..." thing, but my point of view has changed. I'm still not religious, I still don't believe in a god, but I've grown to have a kind of grudging admiration for people who DO believe - by and large, it seems that these are people who take all the sh!t that life throws at them and it seems that to them it's just part of a larger plan they're not privy to - the whole reason my thinking changed was that I got envious. Imagine having all the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune thrown at you, and knowing that it's part of god's plan - man, in desperate times that must be a heck of a comfort, a feller could get envious.

So maybe that opened my mind a little. There'd still stuff about religion that makes me uncomfortable, the idea that a lack of belief will bar your entry to heaven no matter how otherwise godly you've lived your life, but if like me you don't particularly have faith, what's to fear from that? What I HAVE found is that, generally speaking, the devoutly religious people I've met have largely been more friendly, more giving, generally nicer people than the non-religious people I've met - it's not exclusive, I have a "Christian" friend who's all over the BNP and UKIP on Facebook, and how they reconcile their Christian beliefs with pseudo-political fringe groups who espouse exclusion and bigotry I have no idea, but broadly speaking, religious people in my experience are really nice people.

So Mrs Pondo and I go to church every now and then, even though we don't believe, and it's mostly a nice experience. We have a nice sing-song, the sermon is inevitably thought-provoking and well delivered (although I suspect we're quite lucky in that respect with where we live), and the only thing that ever annoys about it are the thoughtless eedjits who let their kids run riot while they're playing with their phones making facebook posts about how bored they are being forced to sit in church in order to be able to get married there. But the message is always positive - be nice to people, help those who need it, be selfless, be aware that you are luckier and more privileged than 99% of the entire human race. For me there's a real disconnect with Prof Dawkin's message of religious fear/hatred.

Couple of other points. Belief's a funny thing - this post is particularly apt, focusing as it does on Religion Vs Science. I don't think the two things are mutually exclusive, they're both really taken as a matter of faith. I fully accept that science is more rigidly based on experimentation and proof, but even so some things that are "proven" become less proven as time goes by and scientific method changes and improves. But I think religion changes over time too - time was when to be jewish in England was a seriously dangerous thing to be, but hopefully that's not so much the case now.

Following on from that, people cite religion as a dangerous thing because there are messages in the bible/koran/torah etc that can be interpreted as violent or discriminatory. For that I think you have to take a broader view - religious people are by and large not violent or discriminatory, which I think is a reflection of the broader message of religious text; do unto others, thou shalt not kill, all that good stuff. These people who do evil things in the name of religion, I don't think it's fair to blame religion, I honestly think they've interpreted it wrong.

I'll leave you with better thoughts than mine - saw the excellent Mark Steel last week and he related the fact that Sikh temples will feed anyone who turns up for free, no matter what, no questions asked, and mused that the Dawkins view of religion, that it's all negative, all borderline evil, might not necessarily reflect religious behaviour in all its forms.

The science only changes if it contradicts new evidence. Whereas religion(s) change scriptures to be less barbaric and exclusionary.

I haven't got a lot of time for religion or people of "faith". It's a mental illness. A societal schizophrenia.

You know, I do so tire of Richard Dawkins being held up as a posterboy spokesman for everyone who isn't religious, like we all replace 'Jesus' with 'Dawkins'. You'll be hard pressed to find anyone on STW who holds him up as the modern-day 'leader' of atheism (not least because it's hard to form a club of people who are united by an absence of something, but also because he identifies himslef as agnostic). The only time his name crops up on these threads seems to be when the theists need a straw man to attack.

It might come as a shock to some, but we neither want nor require a figurehead. We're doing ok as it is, thanks.

I haven't got a lot of time for religion or people of "faith". It's a mental illness. A societal schizophrenia.

Edit just to reiterate that I don't simply believe that thinking yourself religious makes you a "good" person, as I've met just as many devout idiots as I have atheist idiots.

The only time his name crops up on these threads seems to be when the theists need a straw man to attack.

in my experience the religious will generally have time for you if you need them and not label you as mentally ill for having a different belief pattern to them.

Sure, because your experience is based in the relatively progressive West. Whilst I don't think claiming that people are mentally ill is a particularly pleasant or respectful thing to do, on balance I'd take the UK's 'being offended' any day over somewhere like Iran where Apostasy is a criminal act carrying the death penalty.

Will this thread still be going on the sabbath?

C'mon cougs, make the sticky. You know you all want it - Matthew 5:14-15, if you need any more encouragement, 😉

Sure, because your experience is based in the relatively progressive West. Whilst I don't think claiming that people are mentally ill is a particularly pleasant or respectful thing to do, on balance I'd take the UK's 'being offended' any day over somewhere like Iran where Apostasy is a criminal act carrying the death penalty.

I was an atheist before I saw this...

Wow...hair spray really does work. I kind of doubted how effective it is but I'm bald so never use the stuff. I'm just happy there is one product that really does work as advertised. Thanks science!

I don't get the science "versus" religion. They are 2 different things, they aren't fighting with each other, they're not mutually exclusive. You might as well say tea versus cake.

Will this thread still be going on the sabbath?

My attitude to religion is one of ambivalence, I consider myself a pantheistic humanist, various friends go to church and I'm perfectly fine with that. However it's when you get the condescending attitude from some that I find my hackles rising.
I remember years ago my mum telling me about a conversation with a couple, distant relatives from the New Forest, who asked if my brother and I went to church, to which she replied no, it was up to us to decide for ourselves whether we wanted to or not, whereupon they sort of looked down their noses and said, "oh, we feel so sorry for you!"
Bloody sanctimonious bible-pushers!
'Faith' isn't a commodity that you can peddle door-to-door, like encyclopaedia, no matter what some might believe; it's something that some find inside themselves that gives them some sort of comfort, and I'm fine with that.
I don't deride it, I just don't need it myself, but I resent others telling me what I 'need' in order to live my life to its fullest.
What I need to live my life to the fullest is a lottery win so I can pay off my mortgage, all my other debts, retire and travel.
Currently praying I get a win next week... 😉