drinkdriving, on a [s]motorway[/s] the hard shoulder of a motorway, in a golfcart.
v
drinkdriving, on a motorway, in a [s]golfcart[/s] car.
There's a difference in my eyes. Neither is acceptable, though.
Jeez, hopefully a high profile player will turn out to be a serial killer. Then the argument about who is the naughtiest can finally be settled and we can get back to the rugby.
Austin Healey kills kittens. Regularly.
There. Is that better?
😉
Re the Ireland v Scotland prediction, Ireland will just be too strong, IMO. Scotland are really developing, and are possibly going to be a very good team next year, but they're still not quite there for me. Too many weak links, whereas Ireland certainly seem to be playing better as a team.
Of course Mongos behaviour was reprehensible and no better than others discussed here - but it sure as hell was funny.
OH FFS!
I agree with TJ.
😳
😆
Don't start that, you'll break the internet.
There. Is that better?
Much better, thank you. 🙂
You're probably right about Ireland Scotland, I think the Glasgow Ospreys result at the weekend is giving me false hope 😉
[img] 
[/img]
🙂
See - yo have broken it now!
Who is the most likely to be a serial killer? I suspect Philips
I am off to Dublin for the Scotland match, it was a suprise victory the last time we were in Dublin so fingers crossed for the same again. At the very least i am hoping for a decent match maybe even another couple of Scottish tries...maybe or is that too much to ask?
Think Ireland probably by 10-14.
Wales to beat Italy by about 20
England v France all depends on France but would not be suprised to see England leading at HT and for France to win by 7ish at FT
While we're on the predictions, who's going to be in the Heineken Cup final?
Sat 7 April Quarter final: Edinburgh v Toulouse,
Sat 7 Quarter final: Leinster v Cardiff Blues
Sun 8 Quarter final: Munster v Ulster
Sun 8 Quarter final: Saracens v Clermont Auvergne
Max Evans.
His cousin is Chris Evans, you know.
Edinburgh
Leinster
Munster
Clermont
I think the semis would then be
Munster v Edinburgh
Leinster v Clermont
Cant see past an all Ireland final
Who is the most likely to be a serial killer? I suspect Philips
Ewan Murray. In the name of the lord, obviously.
Got my tickets for the Edinburgh 1/4 final. they could well win that but I think yo are right beyond that. Leinster have been the class act of the HC but not unbeatable
De Luca in S Lamont on the wing, looks better balanced out back now
Scotland :
Stuart Hogg, Lee Jones, Nick De Luca, Graeme Morrison, Sean Lamont, Greig Laidlaw, Mike Blair, Allan Jacobsen, Ross Ford, Geoff Cross, Richie Gray, Jim Hamilton, John Barclay, Ross Rennie, David Denton.
Replacements : Scott Lawson, Euan Murray, Al Kellock, Richie Vernon, Chris Cusiter, Ruaridh Jackson, Max Evans.
4th match - [i]nearly[/i] right in selection. Weir should be on the bench not Jackson. Welsh should be a replacement prop if not in the squad.
Robinson remains a plonker
Good team, should be a good game. Have fun.
Thanks for the heads-up on the "semis", I hadn't seen the way the draw works out. That was enough for me, and just pressed buy on a final ticket 🙂
4th match - nearly right in selection. Weir should be on the bench not Jackson. Welsh should be a replacement prop if not in the squad.Robinson remains a plonker
Agree and agree.
Although I'm not ready to turn on AR yet.
Why not Bruce?
he refuses to play talented youngsters until his had is forced, we have hardly won a competitive game under him plummeting down the world rankings
He is hold us back - any improvement this year is despite him not because of him.
this is exactly what the did selecting for England.
We will not improve while he is in change
Some of his selections have driven me insane (Jackson instead of Weir for example) but not to the same extent they seem to infuriate everyone else. I was actually happy to see Morrison in the squad last time and I'm happy this time as well. His form dipped but it came back and I think he deserved a spot in the squad. Give him the ball and you are guaranteed to make ground.
Tactically I think he is sound. At the moment it's stupid mistakes that are costing us dearly. He can't put the ball down over the line for them, it's up to the players to get themselves into a mental state that will stop them from fluffing passes and dropping balls.
I also want to see what happens after Steadman and Townsend are replaced (assuming Townsend will be replaced, I think he will). He inherited them and I don't know what the relationship with them is.
On a different note, I can't wait to see Hogg going up against Kearney 🙂
Edit to add: Oh, and quite apart from all that, who do we get to replace him?
Here's a cracking try to lighten the mood. (OK it's slightly off topic but it's my favourite of the season so far.)
Edit to add: Oh, and quite apart from all that, who do we get to replace him?
Plenty of candidates. As Scotland coach will never be a top job we have a choice of second raters or people who failed elsewhere or up and coming coaches who want to make a name for themselves with a few exceptions. So lets go for the up and comng guys
My choices right now would be Todd Blackadder or John Kirwen - or Stuart Lancaster if he does not get the England job
That is a goodie
Queenland Reds scored a cracking try week 1 of the Super15 season. Think it was last play to win the match...will have a look for it
Queenland Reds scored a cracking try week 1 of the Super15 season. Think it was last play to win the match...will have a look for it
Yeah it was exciting although it was really just a very quick bloke breaking away and running a long way to score.
There was a cracking try from the Hurricanes (I think) where brilliant passing along the line inside the 22 made a try that most NH teams would have botched.
I'll see your super 15 touch rugby and raise you jonny may, not that i'm biased.
TJ I agree that AR isn't the best, but you can't blame him for the final pass/knock ons etc that are stopping Scotland from scoring this year
TimP - but you can blame him for the fact we have not put our best team out and that the players are not mentally in the right place.
We have gone to 11th in the world under him, one one game in each of the last 2 six nations and had our worst ever WC result
Results are worse than they shold be given the group of players, his decisons have contributed to the losses
teh buck stops with him
Tandemabramovic!
If only 🙂
But they are playing better rugby and creating chances that they weren't even last year. For several years the empty promises from Scotland that this was their year, and for the first time this year they have looked like a team worthy of a top half finish. From what I have heard AR has never been popular wherever he has coached but there has been no player uprising as though they might believe in him and what he is trying to do?
I think that's an important point. It feels like the players are behind him and not just making the right noises in interviews. To me it seems like their frustration is directed more at themselves than anywhere else.
Not my interpretation - I think the players are fed up with him and his dopey selections from wht I have seen said. his treatment of parks was scandalous
Scott hastings gives Robinson short shrift in the hootsmon
😆 good to see Herr zokes being as dull and po faced as his posts, what a arse.
Bowe leaving the Ospeys 🙁 the exodus continues.
Lewis Moody has called it a day, never really convinced he was that good, enthusiastic would be my way of describing him 😀 heard some one refer to his as thus "he would be a great player if he learnt the rules"
[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/17263447 ]Cap'n Hovis sits it out. [/url]
Good for Tipuric, who IMO would get a start in a number of other sides as a specialist 7.
Desperate Dan's down to start as well, so fingers crossed his knee comes through it.
Check this try out
Lovely play! 🙂
Brilliant , looked like a forward pass though
THE try. The greatest.
Bbc4 now, murderball.
Well, I think we've established the mental age of your argument if you think that. Dwarf tossing on the other hand, now that is funny!
Ahem. If you think you're tossing me anywhere without buying me dinner first you've got another thing coming... 😆
I really don't like the precedent this sets. Surely if you're going to prosecute and convict for causing actual harm then every time a player throws a punch, whether it connects properly or not, he should be charged with assault? What about high tackles, taking the player out in the air, and spear tackles?
It isn't the first time a rugby player has been jailed for breaking someones jaw on the pitch.
Well ok, but I still fail to see why breaking a jaw results in a charge of GBH and 6 months in jail while the assault on Ashton by Tuilagi didn't result in any criminal charges. Especially seeing as the jaw breaking occurred on the pitch that wasn't seen as mitigating circumstances as far as I can tell.
Saying that, I think that eye gouging should result in criminal charges whether it results in serious injury or not. Don't know, maybe that's hypocritical on my part.
Go look at the Gavin Quinnel story 🙁
I remember that. That's part of the reason I think it should be treated differently. That and the fact that it's just plain scumbaggery.
Because a broken jaw from an assault isn't the same as a bit of handbags at dawn.
I know of a case in minor league rugby in Plymouth where a top flight kickboxer assaulted an oppostion player with some kickboxing punches leading to a broken jaw, the kickboxer got 6 months. There was an off duty copper walking past the game who saw it happen. The result of the assault determines the legal action.
I wouldn't have described the Tuilagi Ashton fracas as handbags. Three unanswered punches, any one of which could have resulted in a broken jaw/eyesocket/cheekbone. This kind of thing happens week in week out at all levels.
Why is it only when the "lucky" punches are landed does it result in a prosecution that is treated as seriously as if it had happened in the street?
IMO if you prosecute one you have to prosecute all.
I would be more than happy to prosecute all punching in rugby - its not acceptable and it would soon remove it from the game
Its a case of law isn't it, if the assult results in a serious injury then it's a serious assult, if there isn't a serious injury then there isn't a serious assult.
Think of it like murder, if I stab you and you live, I get done for attempted murder, if you die, its murder. The result of the action determines the prosecution and sentence.
Perhaps Tuilagi pulled his punches, it may have looked vicious but the result says it wasn't. More importantly Ashton didn't want to make anything of it and now they are friends.
Teej, I don't like the punching but it's a fact of the game that things get heated, it normally sorts itself out.
Personally, I believe England will beat France this weekend. We'll nullify thier backs in defense and play through thier indecisive 10/12 channel or over the top of thier back line.
17-9 England.
Back to the 6N
France team announced:
C Poitrenaud (Toulouse), V Clerc (Toulouse), A Rougerie (Clermont Auvergne), W Fofana (Clermont Auvergne), J Malzieu (Clermont Auvergne); L Beauxis (Toulouse), J Dupuy (Stade Francais); JB Poux (Toulouse), D Szarzewski (Stade Francais), N Mas (Perpignan), P Pape (Stade Francais), Y Maestri (Toulouse), T Dusautoir (Toulouse), J Bonnaire (Clermont Auvergne), I Harinordoquy (Biarritz)
Replacements: W Servat (Toulouse), V Debaty (Clermont Auvergne), L Nallet (Racing Metro), L Picamoles (Toulouse), F Trinh-Duc (Montpellier), M Parra (Clermont Auvergne), M Mermoz (Perpignan)
You're right, a punch that results in stitches above the eye probably isn't GBH. However, it is more than enough for ABH.
Teej, I don't like the punching but it's a fact of the game that things get heated, it normally sorts itself out.
I don't see how you can say GBH is deserved in one sentence and say assault is a fact of the game in another. Either nobody hits anybody or we carry on hitting each other but no one gets charged no matter the consequences.
Hi BruceWee,
I listened to this when it was on yesterday and it was quite interesting. Dealt with the court of arbitration in sport, and why and when they get involved in "field of play" matters. Not directly relevant, and doesn't talk directly about rugby, but worthwhile if you're interested in law and sport.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01cw5nd/Law_in_Action_Sport_and_the_Law/
My personal opinion on the above is that GBH always deserves prosecution, but if you extended that to assault (which is basically the "missed punches" cases) you would over complicate the issue particularlly in rugby. Technically, some tackles would be termed "assault" on the street - and I would hate for rugby to get caught in a mess like that.
While I'm on my Radio4 promotion 😉 , try this programme at 13:45 today too. When you get past the presenter, its actually a very good series. Ther's been a lot of Rugby specials, talking about the development of the game in the Valley's to the Formation of the GAA and the history of Croke Park. All sorts.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01cw7kv
Edit: link to the whole series : http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01bf42n/episodes/player
Kryton - I will be suprised if France do not score tries and although I believe England are improving I don't see them having the firepower to outscore France
going to the other end of the scale theres was an interview on bbc with shaun edewards recently, he was saying rugby is getting a bit soft and menitoned Vincent Clerc and 'that warburton' tackle. (he thought it was a yellow)
he said Vincent Clerc was playing up in [b]another[/b] match where he was rolling round like an italian footballer just to get a penalty/card given to the opposing player.
anyway he was bassically saying he hopes rugby does not go the way football has.
I would be more than happy to prosecute all punching in rugby - its not acceptable and it would soon remove it from the game
Why not use a bit of common sense instead of going from one extreme to the other, as you generally do TJ?
To prosecute all punching is either some liberal dream or simple trolling and sounds to me like TJ was bullied when younger. 🙂
I didn't say assault is a fact of the game, I said
.it's a fact of the game that things get heated
The problem with this
is that lots of legal actions in the game of rugby could be termed assault off the pitch. If I chased you across the moors and tackled you resulting in a broken ankle then thats probably an assault right? But if it happens in the game it's just an unfortunate tackle. If we start prosecuting for each transgression the game will grind to a halt.Either nobody hits anybody or we carry on hitting each other but no one gets charged no matter the consequences.
I totally get where you are coming from in your original post, but the mistake was saying this
Because the prosecution probably only arose because it resulted in a broken jaw. To me thats the line thats crossed, I think we just carry on as normal unless it results in a serious injury,then prosecute. Which is actually the way things have been for some time.Surely if you're going to prosecute and convict for causing actual harm then every time a player throws a punch, whether it connects properly or not, he should be charged with assault?
My point isn't really that I want all punches thrown to result in assault charges, more the ridiculousness of only convicting when there is injury.
Rugby is a rough game. Every time you step on the pitch you accept that it could result in broken bones and other injuries. In extreme cases death or paralysis.
When I was playing I didn't normally start scuffles but I also wasn't going to back down from them, even if it was with a 6'6" 16st second row. Being 5'6" and 10st this doesn't give me much chance if I go around pulling punches. So, I use my many years of karate training and hit as hard as I can. Big people don't necessarily have stronger jaws than small people so it's entirely possible something could get broken.
Since I was getting myself into these situations I accepted the fact that I could get seriously injured within the rules or outside the rules.
For me, if an injury occurs that you would expect in the normal course of a game, like a broken jaw, then it should stay on the field.
An off the ball punch is not in the normal course of the game.For me, if an injury occurs that you would expect in the normal course of a game, like a broken jaw, then it should stay on the field.
It's a man's game, played by men. MTFU.
Well charge all off the ball punches or charge none.
Don't punish people because they pick someone with a glass jaw to hit.
Don't punish people because they pick someone with a glass jaw to hit.
This is a science and logic fail. Bone density/strength in healthy adult males is not particularly variable, glass jaw is a boxing term meaning easy to knock out. To break someones jaw requires a particular level of violence and skill, if you choose to use that skill (as you appear to have admitted
) then you deserve to get prosecuted. In fact if you choose to take the risk of walloping someone thne you take the risk of it goign wrong and you might go to jail. But if it doesn't result in serious injury then a prosecution is unlikely., I use my many years of karate training and hit as hard as I can.
TandemJeremy - Member
Kryton - I will be suprised if France do not score tries and although I believe England are improving I don't see them having the firepower to outscore France
Although they are displaying some mental frailty. I believe if we get into them early we'll expose that and our defense is good enough to nullify their backs.
Get them guessing with some kicks through (as long as the chase is good, run at thier 10/12 channel and I think theres a chance.
Above all we have to play the game in thier half and keep thier confidence subdued.
Rugby is a rough game. Every time you step on the pitch you accept that it could result in broken bones and other injuries. In extreme cases death or paralysis.
Exactly!!
I my bones broken through both violent play and falling badly. Either way you are deliberately putting yourself in a position where you could be hurt simply by running out on a Saturday. I had my zygomatic arch broken by a punch and the most annoying thing was it was the end of the season and I missed all the free beer! The way I saw it was I had played to the limit for a long time and was due a decent slap. No hard feelings and all that
OK, glass jaw was the wrong term.
Doesn't change the fact that you can never tell what effect striking another person is going to have. Over the years, both playing rugby and doing karate competitions, I've had and seen many different injuries caused by seemingly innocuous impacts. And seen the most horrific collisions and attacks result in no damage whatsoever.
The idea that you can know what damage you are going to cause, whether you pull your punches or not, is just plain wrong.
Rugby.
Good job Servat's not starting.
IMHO the best hooker in the tournament by a mile, and makes kryton's "get at them Early" a real possibility. He made a massive difference coming on against Ireland, their maul's really started to roll and their scrum started to dominate (they were already on top in the LO.)
He will come on, and improve France. England need to be ahead by enough, but it is possble to really rattle them Especially in midfield.
Gotta hope Harinordoquy and Dusatoir don't have the sort of games thy always seem to against England. They were massive in Auckland.
The idea that you can know what damage you are going to cause, whether you pull your punches or not, is just plain wrong.
I'm not saying you can know, I am saying that if you wallop someone you take the risk that it might end badly, if as you say no-one shoudl be prosecuted what happens if one punch ends up with a death?
That would be tragic. Unlikely though since single punches almost never result in death without some other factor coming into play like falling backwards and hitting your head on a kerb. Or if the punch was in addition to other head trauma that had already occurred. Otherwise boxers would be dropping dead on a regular basis.
If it did happen then it would just have to be one of those things that happens on the field of play. Or, if you were prosecuting all punches as assaults, then it would be dealt with by the courts.
Or if you draw the line at assaults that result in serious injury...
My point is that that is as much bad luck as anything else.
Besides that, in the context of a rugby game, is a broken jaw a serious injury?
It is in the case of an assault.
Punching someone in the face full stop is serious in the case of an assault.
What d you guys think about flood being released? so the 10s will be Farrell and Hodgeson with hodgeson on the bench I guess
I had to laugh at this:
http://www1.skysports.com/rugby-union/news/12321/7577066/O-Connor-blasts-England
Flood - a man that walked away from the responsibility of a last minute drop goal win 2 weeks ago in the premiership
Youngs - Has got slower, less penetrative and show dubious decision making recently.
And you'd want them in the team over Farrell and Dixon? Ok, I'd agree Dixon should stand with is foot on the ball and there was one box, straight out but everything else was quicker and more urgent than anyhting youngs had produced in the last 4 months.
I also wonder whether Ashton will keep his place, he's borderline at best IMO, Stevens too.
My 2p with both my hats on;
REF; Throw a punch and connect with face/head is a red card. Body is minimum yellow. Kick is a straight red.
PLAYER; In my last ever game I had started playing for my old school side. They played at local district level and even at 39 my mate and I who had also played Prem 1 up here could direct most traffic from 10 and 8 respectively. We were playing a fairly horrible side which consisted of at least 12 poobags. Fingers in eyes,blindside hits in rucks and mauls etc,even throwing yourself to the ground to try and get somebody sent of. But all at the sort of never-ever-played the-game-properly standard that you get from these type of players. I am chasing a through ball when I realise the worst ofender is running at an angle to connect with me. He does,breaking a tooth with the elbow he swung into my face.My reaction was instant and I punched him, knocking him out for 5-10 mins.And at that point decide never to play again.
Couple of months later I start hearing stories that the police had turned up at the rugby club with a team pic from the web.11 months later I am interviewed by the police as he had made a complaint. Another month and I have an assault charge, leading to a telling off from a senior policeman but no record 18 months after it happened. By that time the worry (I am a teacher) had long since kicked in and I suffered from depression for nearly a year and generally made my own families life hell before I got help. So the traditional set-to can have fairly dramatic consequences IMO.
If you want to use a warped luck argument, then the punch thrower deserves at least as much of your "just bad luck" as the fella with the broken jaw.
I'm happy for him to serve time, that's just his bad luck.
But enough please, Rugby thread not fighting thread.
That Leicester coaches word were purely confidence boosters for his dropped players. Thats his job. Shouldn't read to much into it.
Not in the eyes of the law, it has to result in harm that has to
"be more than merely transient and trifling."
The point is if you get walloped and there is no injury then its not the end of the world, but if there is an injury then its bad news and needs to be punished. OK the Ashton example maybe should have resulted in a prosecution, but I think Ashton didn't want that so it would have been pointless to proceed.
Look I'm bored, you seem to think it's black and white, I think it grey. If we bring black and white into the game it will grind to halt, and is incompatible with the law which is grey as it is. I think the line drawn at serious injury is a good one, given that if people are wilfully injuring others in or out of the game it should be dealt with, but if you have been assaulted in agame and not really hurt then just man up. It's pretty reasonable really.
edit
If you want to use a warped luck argument, then the punch thrower deserves at least as much of your "just bad luck" as the fella with the broken jaw.
I'm happy for him to serve time, that's just his bad luck.
This is actually a pretty good precis of the way it is..
Look I'm bored
Me too, let's just agree to disagree and get back to rugby.
Edit: Sorry to here that, duckman. Sounds like a really horrible experience
Yup happy days.