have no issues with pushing this back. There is no way I’d want to buy a second hand Ev at the moment.
they're not banning second hand cars
They should have pulled it forward. Force the issue.
Shit house.
Okay, okay, Putin might have screwed us, but there’s no way MBS would do that to us. It’s not like Russia, a state that relies on fossil fuel sales to pay off an unproductive domestic elite and embarks on quixotic megaprojects at the direction of its increasingly batty authoritarian leader.
Hhmmm ... No, Putin did not screw UK. They have their own system. It was Boris that tried to prove himself by calling for sanctions (with the support from the US administration and then EU) against Russia. Well, that has backfired now big time. Petrol was £1.60/litre at Shell yesterday. Few weeks ago I said the price would not go down but others said no it had stabilised - yeah right. Problem with the West is that they are still clinging on to the idea that they are the "sunrise" while in reality it is "sunset" that started since the end of colonial and right to conquest days. But they still try to write the rules of the game, still insist on ruling the world, Still trying to impose on others (nation states, competitors etc). Well, once the other parts of the world find ways to wriggle out of the tentacles of US Petrol currency, that will be the day where you will see two world systems (no more monopoly). i.e. No longer be controlled or dictated to by US Petrol dollar. Yes, most say that's impossible as the developing and 3rd world countries have weak foundation ... errmm .... remember we were once hunters and gatherers? In the meantime, I don't see much improvement or stability for another a decade. Yes, non developed countries will suffer first but once they find a way out, things will be very different. When? I don't know.
At £1.60/litre, let's hope it does not go up further but I suspect it will go up further ...
Before I write anything longer - just what do you think sanctions are supposed to do? It sounds like you’ve got the wrong end of the stick about how they work.
I have no issues with pushing this back. There is no way I’d want to buy a second hand Ev at the moment.
Jolly good, how about in 2030 (or now 2035)?
He's just pushed back one of the few good policies Boris had, based on the flawed belief that a wafer thin win in Uxbridge meant DM readers want to burn the planet down. Whatever he said in his speech this isn't to save the diehard Mondeo Men from the terrifying financial burdens and personal indignity of owning a used Nissan leaf...
What the heck am I supposed to do with these 5 extra bins I’ve bought to comply with the Seven Bin Law?
This announcement seems to address policies that either never existed (7 bins, care share etc), or else were not understood (everyone has to buy an EV in 2030).
This announcement seems to address policies that either never existed (7 bins, care share etc), or else were not understood (everyone has to buy an EV in 2030).
There will be a DM article decrying some half-baked conspiracy about the horrors of sorting your waste into more than one bin.
The whole thing was about keeping the wizened old gits, that were probably going to vote Tory anyway, on side for the impending shitstorm of an election...
He just doesn’t care, does he? We were world leaders on this stuff, with the growth and green jobs that went with that, and, not satisfied with trashing the economy now, this ****ing lightweight has squandered that too.
I think people forgot that at the end of the day Lil' Rishi is a Tory, quite a Right leaning one too. I found it telling that he sent Cruella out on the radio rounds yesterday morning. Why would you use a rabid home secretary to defend a leaked anti-environmental policy rather than your environment minister? The answer is simple, he knows who he can count on to stay on message and who is fine delivering the rhetoric.
For now I'm choosing to believe Labour's relative silence is intended to let Team Rishi keep digging their hole, while SKS sharpens up some pithy one liners and unpicks the household economic claims, but my worst fear is they let this one slide because they might not full oppose it(?)
The problem is 11 months ago Liz set the bar so high in her act of financial vandalism that Rish! has had to look for something other than tax cuts to look strong.
Stomping down on the crusty, lefty environmentalists with their madcap crazy policies raising inflation I can only assume was his intention, but it seems to have been based off the noisy minority in the bottom half of the internet. The dangers of climate inaction are just so widely accepted that this has appears to be going down badly, but as an act of political vandalism it should be being viewed in the same light as Liz and Kwasi's post-coital budget.
and all the problems that is likely to come with it
Not as much as you think. As someone who follows this stuff a bit, the situation will be pretty different in 2030. But even then there would still be loads of used ICEs. In 2040 there's be loads of 10nyear old used ICEs on the road.
Exactly, and 17 years is a long time in car development. The EVs selling in 2030 will be different to those in 2023 and if buying a used car in 2032 if may well make more sense for majority of people to buy an EV but if they don't want one ten fine buy an ICE although who know what the petrol prices vs home electric prices will be at that time.
The EVs selling in 2030 will be different to those in 2023
The EVs being sold now are different to the ones that are currently 7 years old/100k miles today. The new ones are the third generation, build on dedicated EV platforms and with much better battery management. Many of the old EVs you get know have degraded batteries, but the current models will not degrade anywhere near as fast if at all. I firmly believe that in 10 years' time these cars will be a much better proposition than ICEs of the same age. The only thing we have to sort out is cheap charging for people without driveways. It's not acceptable that they have to pay 10x as much as people with driveways.
The whole thing was about keeping the wizened old gits, that were possibly going to vote Reform, on side for the impending shitstorm of an election…
FTFY.
This is stuff designed to appeal to the worst kind of traditional Tory voter, the rabid type that thinks the Conservatives are generally a bit soft on everything. Of course, the flipside is that these policies and the general air of incompetence are moving 'moderate' voters who would normally call themselves Tories to other parties, which is why the Conservative polling under Rishi has not improved from the calamitous Truss moment, despite lots of exciting anti-refugee rhetoric.
I wonder where Sunak's bin-phobia has come from?
the noisy minority in the bottom half of the internet
This is a good point - are Tories making the mistake of doing research on the comments sections of social media?
A few heat pump installers raising concerns today.
How long before the increased boiler replacement grant is available - because everybody will now stop installs until then.
If the budget hasn't changed, but the grant increased, that's less heat pumps.
This is a good point – are Tories making the mistake of doing research on the comments sections of social media?
think there are just believing their own uxbridge ulez rhetoric, hoping it will win them mid beds.
I don't think people realise how quickly commercial businesses will jump away from being in the petrol forecourt business. It is a dirty business with lots of safety protocols through the delivery chain. Businesses will transition to electric forecourts and as the EV mix increases the fuel forecourts will drop off. By 2035 we will be driving extra miles to get to one of the few petrol stations in our area. It will be drip drip and then there will be an exodus. Diesel may actually be the better bet as trucks will need that for the foreseable.
We were world leaders on this stuff, with the growth and green jobs that went with that, and, not satisfied with trashing the economy now, this **** lightweight has squandered that too.
Thats the mad thing about this. It makes absolutely no sense economically
So one thing we do now know is that he's as ideologically blinded by mad right-wing rhetoric and economically illiterate as his predecessor.
Who'd have thought that was even possible?
Our new international reputation is bedding in nicely though:
https://twitter.com/implausibleblog/status/1704595777572515891
There is going to be frosty atmosphere when lil rishi meets the king next week. Charlie’s speech in France was heavy on the urgency of action rishis less so we are truly **** aren’t we 🤯
Time for Charlie to put his money where his mouth is. If I were him I'd unilaterally dissolve parliament and hold an election on the grounds that Sunak and the tories are a clear and present danger to the country. I'm sure all the headbangers would be wailing that it's unconstitutional but the other 90% of the country would just shrug and be relieved it's all over.
think there are just believing their own uxbridge ulez rhetoric, hoping it will win them mid beds.
Mad Lizzie was also, somewhat preposterously, sent out earlier in the week to voice the demands of Tufton Street and the far right loons who now own the Tory party.
I don't think it's any coincidence that Rishi has come out with all this nonsense within days of that
So one thing we do now know is that he’s as ideologically blinded by mad right-wing rhetoric and economically illiterate as his predecessor.
Because the Tories are totally beholden to their sponsors, donors and think-tanks - those unelected beaurocrats and SPADs that do ‘research’ and develop policy whilst getting their client media chums to spin their lies whilst diverting billions of tax-payer monies into their tax-havens and offshore accounts.
TBH I haven't got a problem with pushing back the 2030 ICE ban. As usual it will be working people who will bear the brunt and be out of pocket. It needs a massive push on charging infrastructure which doesn't look like it's coming any time soon (seems to be getting worse unless you have a Tesla) and EVs (currently) cost way too much for the average working family. Driving is in danger of becoming a luxury activity. I would have no problem with that if public transport was affordable and functional but it's a long way from that. We need a comprehensive plan to manage the transition to non-ICE vehicles and there simply isn't one.
As usual it will be working people who will bear the brunt and be out of pocket.
80% of car sales are second hand
Sunak is protecting the rich here
It needs a massive push on charging infrastructure which doesn’t look like it’s coming any time soon
sunak should have announced just that yesterday, instead he chose the easy daily mail pleasing option
EVs (currently) cost way too much for the average working family.
Right but you wouldn't be forced to buy one. Older ICEs would still be on the road.
We need a comprehensive plan to manage the transition to non-ICE vehicles and there simply isn’t one.
That I agree with. This government doesn't plan anything. They mistake the idea of small government/free markets for not doing anything at all.
sunak should have announced just that yesterday
His fossil fuel sponsors won't even allow him that easy win. He could announce an acceleration of the charging infrastructure investment over the next five years, and not even do much about it until an election he knows he's going to lose, in the same way that there's apparently a hospital building programme at some point.
EVs (currently) cost way too much for the average working family.
Most manufacturers are still targeting fleets and people with more to spend I think.
A mid-spec MG4 is cheaper than a base petrol VW Golf, though. Chinese and some Korean EVs are getting there.
Right but you wouldn’t be forced to buy one. Older ICEs would still be on the road.
But as someone above said, the petrol stations which support ICE cars will disappear very quickly once the balance tips towards EVs. There's not much use in having an old ICE car if you can't put fuel in it.
Anyway, back to the politics. Sunak probably thinks he'll now have the entire motoring community on side so will be interesting to see what Starmer does. He could be smart and announce sweeping plans to support working people with a generous scrappage scheme to subsidise the move to EVs, paid for by a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies, but something tells me he won't have the balls to do anything that bold.
Diesel may actually be the better bet as trucks will need that for the foreseable.
Just because commercial vehicles use it doesn't mean you'll be able to get hold of it for a private vehicle. A lot of operators, large and small, are preparing for having their own tanks in their own yards (lots already do) so as to have a guaranteed supply for their fleet. It also opens up bulk buying discounts greater than fuel cards can manage and even now waiting times at service stations for pumps to become free are an issue, especially for artics.
Pretty much confirms this is all about the election. So the headline ban on ICE cars is delayed, but targets with fines on manufacturers to sell EVs are unchanged.
The target is 80 per cent EV by 2030.
'Hours after Rishi Sunak on Wednesday delayed the introduction of the UK ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030 to 2035, ministers contacted industry figures to tell them that planned EV targets still stand, said people familiar with the discussions.'
In the FT - they won't let me share a link...
It is amusing that in an interview this morning he tried to defend everything as not being a part of both culture wars and short term politics.
He is almost a delusional as the lettuce
As usual it will be working people who will bear the brunt...I would have no problem...if public transport was affordable and functional
It's working people that bear the brunt of air pollution. There won't be affordable and functional buses as long as there's so many private cars in the way and so much spending on roads.
It’s working people that bear the brunt of air pollution
Precisely. There is a strong correlation between poor air quality and lower incomes.
There won’t be affordable and functional buses as long as there’s so many private cars in the way and so much spending on roads.
I don't disagree, but if working people see those richer than them driving around unaffected while they have to give up their cars then Sunak and the tories will have their support. Whilst we're all laughing and agreeing with each other about how mad the tories are, don't underestimate their ability to turn this issue into a decisive one. This could all still go very wrong.
The Tory party are basically UKIP to all intents & purposes - no more than a bunch of swivel eyed loons. I see the right hon mp for Victorian Britain has called Johnson a net zero zealot…how far to the right do you have to go to hold that opinion??
The Tory's are doing nothing more than playing populist politics with the Environment . They saw how ULEZ played out with the Uxbridge by-election, and realised they have their new Brexit; divisive, populist, party politics. That's all this is, ( and they don't give a flying @@£$ about the environment ) and please don't forget that. The world is literally burning, and flooding it's way to oblivion and only the most narrow minded individuals refuse to see that, but luckily for the Tory's, that's their target audience.
but if working people see those richer than them driving around unaffected while they have to give up their cars then Sunak and the tories will have their support.
Driving around unaffected?
We have a prime minister who travels everywhere by helicopter and private jet. His predecessor, when she was foreign secretary was renowned for chartering 300 seat jets to swan around the globe. So their disdain for the environment and contempt for the plebs is hardly news.
This is how out present and former PM view personal transportation
^^^ yeah but come on. A scheduled flight is public transport ffs!
[just to kick this one to death seeing posts that follow - govt ministers can and do work perfectly well on trains let alone scheduled flights and this was meant to be a joke - nicked from some celeb having their 1st class double luxury seat dismissed as 'public transport'.]
I posted this before but I think Sunak is the worst of this recent shower.
He just goes from bad to worse.
He's further right than all of his predecessors, maybe not financially right of the lettuce, but he is on every other measure.
He is a completely corrupt puppet, clinging to power and doing whatever the nutters in his party tell him to do.
An odious little ****.
How should someone with the security requirements of their role travel?
Even as a pleb with an almost non-existent level of clearance, I can’t discuss work whilst on a train or a plane. The PM can’t exactly sit in economy class on a scheduled flight talking matters of government business.
Don’t dispute this is a dick move by Sunak, but there are plenty of jobs that require specialist travel that isn’t always eco-friendly.
I posted this before but I think Sunak is the worst of this recent shower.
Mrs Binners, who works for a conservation charity, watched his press conference with growing anger and incredulity and her comment was "**** me! I didn't think it was possible but he's even worse than the previous two!"
She's absolutely bang on! There then followed a lot of swearing
Mrs Binners, who works for a conservation charity, watched his press conference with growing anger and incredulity and her comment was “**** me! I didn’t think it was possible but he’s even worse than the previous two!
When he finished and was inviting questions, his 3rd choice was ****ing GB News!
Says it all.
It is amusing that in an interview this morning he tried to defend everything as not being a part of both culture wars and short term politics.
He literally stood behind a sign saying 'Long term decisions for a brighter future' and spouted a load of short term electoral eye-grabbers. It's classic Doublethink.
Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
His isn't doublethink though. It is just political bs, he is saying things he think will help him sort term and **** the future
Whilst we’re all laughing and agreeing with each other about how mad the tories are, don’t underestimate their ability to turn this issue into a decisive one. This could all still go very wrong.
This is exactly what will happen. They've hit on Brexit 2.0. Instead of "Europe is banning straight bananas", it'll be "greenies, Labour and (((Soros))) want to force you to use 7 bins and make it illegal to drive your daughter to the hospital!!!".
Never underestimate just how stupid some people are (see Brexit). They did some of the usual vox pops on the news last night (I think its compulsory that it has to be from Stoke) and some simpleton was saying that 'they' (whoever 'they' are?) want to tax us to stop us eating meat.
So that completely made-up bullshit that he was spouting has stuck in some morons heads, which is exactly why he said it
This is exactly what will happen. They’ve hit on Brexit 2.0. Instead of “Europe is banning straight bananas”, it’ll be “greenies, Labour and (((Soros))) want to force you to use 7 bins and make it illegal to drive your daughter to the hospital!!!”.
I don't think it will work this time.
This latest move has split the Tory party even more than it was.
They will be like Rats in a Sack 2.0.
We have a prime minister who travels everywhere by helicopter and private jet.
I'm obviously not talking about billionaires and high millionaires. I'm talking about working people who can't afford an EV watching the ranger rover brigade driving around in their Teslas. As I have said many times, if net zero is going to be achieved, the majority need to support it. Start at the top, get rid of sports cars, limos, SUVs and high powered saloons. Then when all that is done you can ask joe public to get rid of their second hand petrol/diesel runabout. Working people are not going tolerate their lives being disrupted if they see richer people buying their way out of the same inconvenience.
Just because commercial vehicles use it doesn’t mean you’ll be able to get hold of it for a private vehicle. A lot of operators, large and small, are preparing for having their own tanks in their own yards (lots already do) so as to have a guaranteed supply for their fleet. It also opens up bulk buying discounts greater than fuel cards can manage and even now waiting times at service stations for pumps to become free are an issue, especially for artics.
Whilst that may be true plenty of lorries are on the road for several days, they'll still need fuel.
Working people are not going tolerate their lives being disrupted if they see richer people buying their way out of the same inconvenience.
but pushing back the deadline to 2035 only benefits the richest who buy their cars new anyway!
but pushing back the deadline to 2035 only benefits the richest who buy their cars new anyway!
So keep the 2030 deadline for expensive cars and extend it for the cheaper ones. That way the those at the lower end of the market have more time to adapt and wait for prices to come down.
Working people are not going tolerate their lives being disrupted if they see richer people buying their way out of the same inconvenience.
Lmao, what, like congestion charging and parking fines?
@dazh I don't think you really get this - poor people don't buy new cars. At all. Extending deadlines does nothing to change that fact regardless of how cheap the new car is (unless you can make one cheaper than second hand in which case crack on).
2030 ICE ban
General point of order, it was never a "2030 ICE Ban".
As things stood previously in 2030 you would no longer be able to buy a shiny new car or van that was only ICE powered, you would still be able to buy Fuel, purchase a used ICE vehicle, and if IIRC a new ICE/EV hybrids too.
So those with a real need to directly burn hydrocarbons in a car would still be able...
The Rhetoric has stuck though and everyone was talking about 2030 like it was some sort of cliff edge beyond which only those with Teslas and Polestars would be allowed to drive anywhere while the rest of us trudge about shaking our impotent fists at those wealthy Eco-bastards.
It's genius really 1- create a false panic somewhere in the medium-term future, 2- Heroically avert this imaginary disaster for the good of future plebs who probably wouldn't have been especially affected, 3- sit back and await the applause (slow clapping)...
The Rhetoric has stuck though and wilfully thick ignorant ****s were talking about 2030 like it was some sort of cliff edge beyond which only those with Teslas and Polestars would be allowed to drive anywhere while the rest of us trudge about shaking our impotent fists at those wealthy Eco-bastards.
fixed that
Working people will happily vote for their own impoverishment; all it takes is a politician dressing up the means to that impoverishment as giving crusties a bloody nose.
While we’re vaguely on the subject, can someone tell me what separating rubbish into recycling streams has to do with Net Zero?
Absolutely nothing whatsoever.
He's just conflating all the things gammons get incandescent about as part of his culture war, as the Tory party is so bankrupt of ideas it is literally all they've got left.
I'm just surprised he didn't blame pot holes and the small boats on 'Net Zero Zealots'. Maybe we've got that to come next week?
Absolutely nothing whatsoever.
He made this mistake before at one of the many gammon love meetings they had in the leadership election. He was asked about Net Zero and replied that his daughters were keen on recycling.
Parenthetically, can you imagine how awful it must be to be his daughter?. I went to the school where my dad taught and that was bad enough, and my dad didn’t wear jewel-encrusted sliders.
Waste gets brought into these discussions a lot because it's tangible and people who want to do something can have agency and take matters into their own hands. The problem with trying to get Net-Zero* across is that it's an 'invisible' non-tangible problem to solve. A tonne of CO2e is not an easy concept to imagine. What also doesn't help is that whilst we are seeing climate change events happening to us in the UK, the worst, catastrophic events will happen elsewhere first, especially in developing nations so it's easy for the climate change deniers/non-give-a-shit(heads) to kick it down the road.
The one thing i could give Johnson credit for is that he seemed to give a shit, even if he didn't know how to do it. It came to light that Sunak killed off any green initiatives whilst he was chancellor.
It's an impressive feat that i hate Sunak even more than Johnson
*Net Zero is a stupid term and gives the get-out-of-jail card with offsets, most of which are meaningless or ineffective
Also, recycling isn't the answer and politicians show their arse quite often with the mis-use of our own legislation
Recycling is third on the list after Prevention and Re-Use
While we’re vaguely on the subject, can someone tell me what separating rubbish into recycling streams has to do with Net Zero?
Carbon reductions are one of the benefits that accrue from increased recycling. Recycling waste reduces the carbon emissions associated with its management, but more so with separate collections as cleaner material is more easily retained within a circular economy as it increases the possible outlets for the material. With low or zero emission vehicles which we are increasingly seeing in collection fleets that benefit is even greater.
But in the context of the speech it is conflating environmental issues that may be unpopular with Net-Zero and positive climate action to make it seem bad
‘Long term decisions for a brighter future’
Referenced against average shelf life of a Conservative Minister, long term is about 6-12 months so give him a break!
It’s an impressive feat that i hate Sunak even more than Johnson
Same for me. Every time I hear him getting interviewed, he just gets worse and worse. He was awful on R4 this morning.
if the tories do better than expected in Mid Beds will he call a GE ?
Every time I hear him getting interviewed, he just gets worse and worse. He was awful on R4 this morning.
His voice is like nails down a blackboard for me. Actually... its his whole general tone and demeanor. It actually angers me listening to him, the way he talks down to everyone as if he's exasperatedly explaining something complicated to a class of particularly dense 4 year olds
Patronising doesn't even begin to describe it
You can tell that his sense of entitlement is an inner voice in his head saying "why do I have to even deal with these idiots? How dare these plebs even question what I do?!"
@mrhoppy - you're absolutely correct and that's a cracking description of the potential benefits.
I was being dismissive of the discussions around recycling because of the relative impact vs other interventions such as improved domestic insulation combined with non-combustion heat generation
Our local conservative MP for Stroud has gone extremely quiet today - usually has at least one social media post or local news story. Today nothing.
The Stroud extinction rebellion lot must be absolutely fuming as I can see massive grey clouds over that way.....
Nothing in the shop today but contempt for the conservative party from most, but as ever the gentry conservative zealots just go quiet.
It’s an impressive feat that i hate Sunak even more than Johnson
I actually found myself wondering if Johnson was that bad this morning.
Yes obviously he was objectively bad, but comparatively bad? Out of the last five PMs he's probably only 3rd worst
@dazh I don’t think you really get this – poor people don’t buy new cars.
Oh I do. I don't think you understand basic economics. In 2030 the demand for ICE cars will still exist, but the supply will be removed. What do you think that will do to prices in the used ICE car market? And we're not talking about 'poor people', we're talking about working people with decent incomes (like myself) who can't afford electric cars at current prices. So come 2030 we'll be left with a choice, buy an overpriced used ICE car, or buy an overpriced EV. Then after a coupel of years when EVs outnumber ICE, the petrol station infrastructure will start to disappear, making ICE cars pretty much useless, then forcing people to buy an overpriced EV*. If you think people will vote for that then you're deluded.
*No doubt you'll say the price of EVs will come down, but there's no guarantee of that, and do you really trust in the car industry to not fix prices at a higher level to take advantage of the transition to boost their profits?
you’ll say the price of EVs will come down
There was a report today (Guardian and/or BBC) that this is all ready happening. Lithium and battery prices are down 35% so far this year.
A postie colleague of mine came back into the office this afternoon and announced that Rishi's news was the best thing he'd heard in a long time. "He'll definitely get my vote now! I'm not voting for that stupid * Starmer, he'll take us down that eco road and we'll be properly screwed then. He's going to let all them **** immigrants in as well!"
I shouldn't need to say that this colleague is a Daily Fail reading, hard of thinking car nut but how many more like him are there out there?
I don’t think you understand basic economics. In 2030 the demand for ICE cars will still exist
Is the demand for ICE cars or just for cars? Cross-elasticity of demand between fossil fuel cars and other fuelled cars would be strongly positive, wouldn't it, as they're highly substitutable, surely?
His fossil fuel sponsors won’t even allow him that easy win. He could announce an acceleration of the charging infrastructure investment over the next five years, and not even do much about it until an election he knows he’s going to lose, in the same way that there’s apparently a hospital building programme at some point.
Just imagine how well the family recent investments in oil companies are doing. This is the second big u turn in favour of oil since they made their investments.
For those of you predicting charging petrol stations I don't think you have any idea of the cost of the onsite and offsite infrastructure for rapid chargers which has to be passed onto the consumer. For example a 22kw 3 phase AC charger, around 2k, 50kw DC rapid charger (which isn't really rapid), £27k. Put in 6 100kw chargers and you need onsite sub stations as well. Cabling into the site and grid connection also has to be massively increased to cope with a lot of fast connections at the same time.
Weve got to get the idea of quick charging as the norm out of our heads, sub stations are already running out of capacity. Economic charging is going to be slow and at home and probably offset by home generation through solar PV.
The trouble is then the people who just don't have the ability to home charge. We need to think about slow overnight charging close to where people live. Supermarket car parks being prime candidates but I know for a fact it's not on their agenda.
Our distribution grid is way behind where it needs to be and needs massive and rapid investment. The government know as well and have no intention of addressing the issues.
It's probably relevant to remember that if the ZEV mandate stays in place then 80% of cars sold will have to be EVs in 2030 in any case.
Stumpyjon hits the nail on the head. 2030 was never going to happen because the national grid and local transmission can’t yet cope with the power requirements. Substations need upgrading etc etc. All sunak has done is turn a post election failure into a pre election sales pitch that the many many voters are really pleased about
Jesus wept, I got a 3 for Standard Grade economics and even I know that argument is utter mince.