Forum search & shortcuts

Rishi! Sunak!
 

Rishi! Sunak!

Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

Well that's the whole point, in national UK terms the LibDems are far more important than the SNP. The LibDems received 3.7 million votes, which is why they get more airtime than the SNP who didn't get anywhere near that level of support.

Obviously you want to milk the first past the post electoral system for all it's worth but it doesn't justify treating the SNP with the same level of importance as the LibDems, let alone more important, as you wish to claim.


 
Posted : 18/05/2024 7:46 pm
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

Its just classic how the third largest party is ignored and gets a tiny fraction of the air time / media attention of smaller parties such as the lib dems or reform.

It is because they are only available to 7% of the UK population so pretty much irrelevant to anyone outside of that Scottish 7%.  The same as why we don't find Plaid Cymru relevant when talking about UK government.

They have less chance of being the UK  government (as it is technically impossible) than the Green Party which is saying something...


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 6:59 am
Posts: 44823
Full Member
 

What parochial attitudes you show.  The SNP have almost 3 times the seats of the lib dems.  This attitude you show here is one of the drivers for independence


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:03 am
Poopscoop, dyna-ti, dyna-ti and 1 people reacted
Posts: 2998
Full Member
 

But surely that's the point...the SNP are almost the definition of parochial


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:32 am
stumpyjon, nickc, nickc and 1 people reacted
Posts: 26900
Full Member
 

Surely a party that I cannot vote for is pointless wasting too much time thinking about, they only impact is how they affect the parties I can vote for.


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:36 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

What parochial attitudes you show.

Oh the ironing ! 😂

You know full well that the SNP unlike the LibDems has no support outside Scotland, and that despite your consent reference to first past the post that the LibDems have three times more support throughout the UK than the SNP.

And yet you want them to both receive the same level of media coverage. Instead of repeating the same spin over and over again perhaps you should explain why you believe that the average person living in England and Wales should be particularly interested in Scottish politics?

Btw there are more Labour MPs in London than there are SNP MPs in Scotland, do you think that the rest of the UK should be particularly interested in the views of Labour MPs from London?


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:37 am
stumpyjon and stumpyjon reacted
Posts: 5831
Full Member
 

Why would I care about an insular little party like the snp when I can't vote for them?
If we had a better form of voting then we would care even less


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:51 am
Posts: 2555
Free Member
 

Fek me if you think Scottish politics is under reported at a UK level, try finding out about Wales. Actually the same probably goes for any region. Unless a total shitstorm is going on, it doesn't get on the radar.


 
Posted : 19/05/2024 8:51 am
Poopscoop, stumpyjon, salad_dodger and 3 people reacted
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

i'm no more interested in Scottish politics than I am the politics of Denmark or Norway.

And the West Lothian question is still a thing so maybe SNP supporters should stop moaning? 🤷🏻‍♂️

This attitude you show here is one of the drivers for independence

Is this the politcal equivalent of taking your cricket set home if you don't get what you want? Sounds a bit like the brexiteers did before 2016.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 10:55 am
stumpyjon and stumpyjon reacted
Posts: 5054
Free Member
 

i’m no more interested in Scottish politics than I am the politics of Denmark or Norway.

So you don't care what's happening in the UK - interesting...


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 11:42 am
scotroutes, Pauly, Pauly and 1 people reacted
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

So you don’t care what’s happening in the UK

Most of the important stuff is decided in Westminster. I'm all for devolving as much as possible to regional and local govt, but that should be within a greater federated state. The SNP though just have their cake and eat it much like Johnson et al wanted for brexit so no I'm not really interested in that.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:01 pm
stumpyjon and stumpyjon reacted
Posts: 35124
Full Member
 

Utterly insane that children’s care is for profit

You occasional reminder that most NHS High Street services - Dentists, Pharmacists, GPs, Care Homes, Opticians, Audiologists are all run by for-profit organisations.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:11 pm
Posts: 5054
Free Member
 

I’m all for devolving as much as possible to regional and local govt, but that should be within a greater federated state.

Except you said you don't care about Scottish politics, so you have no interest in "devolving as much as possible" as you still want the centre to have full control.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:13 pm
Posts: 35124
Full Member
 

This attitude you show here is one of the drivers for independence

And yet the SNP care so much about independence their new leader has just scrapped the cabinet post specifically for it.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:15 pm
Posts: 5831
Full Member
 

@nickc difference is, i knew about those. I don't like that either


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:15 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

so you have no interest in “devolving as much as possible” as you still want the centre to have full control.

Devolving powers != Independence

TBH if Scotland wants to be independent that's fine by me, I just think it will be a really stupid thing to do for all the reasons we thought leaving the EU was a bad idea.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:27 pm
Posts: 35124
Full Member
 

@nickc difference is, i knew about those. I don’t like that either

Oh sure, I get that, I'm not making the case that for-profit is the best (or only) way these things should be organised, just that they are. I generally think most folks don't really give it much thought, and are (like you) surprised when they discover some-one's making money from it.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 12:30 pm
Posts: 666
Free Member
 

The difference between children’s care and those high street NHS services (ok, GPs not so much) is whether the service user gets to choose the service provider.

That difference is enough to justify the “utterly insane”. The children are the commodity in this business model.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 1:20 pm
Posts: 6921
Full Member
 

What's utterly insane is government funded bodies agreeing to pay those prices, like the NHS paying £2k to cover a shift with an agency nurse (and the agency taking half it).


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 1:50 pm
Posts: 35124
Full Member
 

Looked-after children services are often hamstrung by regulation and  local authorities though. Partly, charitable providers are being forced out the sector becasue of the onerous requirements of both local authority guidelines and organisations like the CQC and Care Commissioners in Scotland and Wales who are imposing stricter and stricter [and more and more costly] controls that organisations (apart from those who're are very well funded)  find it increasingly more difficult to meet and manage. The numbers of these children is increasing beyond local authorities capacity and capability to look after. The sector is a victim of previous scandals and austerity. The providers that do provide these services are few and far between, and while I'm not going to defend profit gouging, running these services [properly to the standards we want and expect] ain't cheap, neither.

On the one hand you can't expect charities to be able to either pay for the sorts of staff that can do these things, but on the other, relax the guidelines and potentially put [the most very vulnerable] people in society in harms way.

Unless govts regulate this sector and manage the issues that increase the need for them better, then this is the result.


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 2:34 pm
benos, kelvin, benos and 1 people reacted
Posts: 33256
Full Member
 

Unless govts regulate this sector and manage the issues that increase the need for them better, then this is the result.

Something like Surestart, better funding for education,  health service, addiction support.....


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 5:27 pm
Poopscoop, nickc, nickc and 1 people reacted
Posts: 44823
Full Member
 

and while I’m not going to defend profit gouging, running these services [properly to the standards we want and expect] ain’t cheap, neither.

This can be very true.  the child may need constant supervision in a solo setting ( worst case scenario).  that means two staff on duty 24 hours a day ( so one can have breaks / go for a pee)  that means more than 8 full time staff just for that one child plus holiday / sickness cover which is effectively another staff member.  Paid at minimum wage thats getting close to £250 000 pa in wages and other employment costs alone


 
Posted : 20/05/2024 5:32 pm
hightensionline, Poopscoop, kelvin and 5 people reacted
Posts: 5831
Full Member
 

https://www.theguardian.com/news/article/2024/may/21/uk-risks-descending-into-darkness-of-antisemitism-michael-gove-to-say

Gove really is a shit,  his party is largely responsible for the poisoning of British politics yet as usual it is everyone else's fault


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 9:13 am
hightensionline, tjagain, davros and 11 people reacted
Posts: 33256
Full Member
 

Gove really is a shit, his party is largely responsible for the poisoning of British politics yet as usual it is everyone else’s fault

I refer to my comment yesterday regarding lack of self awareness....


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 10:26 am
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

Come on, give them a break - they have only been at if for 14 years.  Shocking to think that younger people have not known anything else.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 10:34 am
Posts: 57421
Full Member
 

Gove reallly is a smarmy, self-serving little shit. Man who's party has constantly stoked division for its own ends now complaining about rising division.

This lot have pandered to racists, weaponised nasty petty nationalism and constantly stoked the right wing flames by 'othering' minority groups. Saner heads told them repeatedly that you can't just flirt with the far right when it suits you. Once you've let that particular genie out of the bottle, you can't just pop it back in again once its served its purpose.

And so its turned out. The Tory party has now become some mutant hybrid of UKIP and the BNP. All moderate voices have been purged or silenced and the people setting the mood are lunatics like Braverman and Badanoch. Whats still vile, though we've now become used to it, is that its these children of immigrants (including Sunak) now showing the very hardest of hearts and fuelling undisguised scapegoating and hatred towards 'The Other'


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 10:57 am
davros, spawnofyorkshire, toby and 9 people reacted
Posts: 33256
Full Member
 

Coming back nicely to the children's services point earlier, another aspect of the nasty racist culture war blows up in their faces - a fact that anyone connected to child protection could have told you since forever.

BBC News - Child abusers often family and other kids – police
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czkk41jxpx0o


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 11:50 am
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

This infected blood victim compensation scheme is going to cost (tens of) billions. I wonder how they're going to pay for it?


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 2:03 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Looked-after children services are often hamstrung by regulation and  local authorities though. Partly, charitable providers are being forced out the sector becasue of the onerous requirements of both local authority guidelines and organisations like the CQC and Care Commissioners in Scotland and Wales who are imposing stricter and stricter [and more and more costly] controls that organisations (apart from those who’re are very well funded)  find it increasingly more difficult to meet and manage.

Let's not forget that a lot of issues like that are down to lack of money, and that's the fault of central government.

If the public sector paid really well, people would be fighting each other to get jobs in it and we'd end up with a much more effective organisation.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 2:15 pm
pondo, Poopscoop, Dickyboy and 7 people reacted
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

This infected blood victim compensation scheme is going to cost (tens of) billions. I wonder how they’re going to pay for it?

they won't they'll kick the can down the road again then it's someone else's problem.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 2:24 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
 rone
Posts: 9788
Free Member
 

Let’s not forget that a lot of issues like that are down to lack of money, and that’s the fault of central government.

Absolutely - grant reductions of 30% to 22 (including a bit of Covid spending uptick.) District Councils are currency users and Central Government is a currency issuer. (So DCs have to raise money - like States in the US.)

Damage done for absolutely political reasons rather than real financial constraints at the Central Government side of things.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 2:30 pm
Dickyboy and Dickyboy reacted
Posts: 5741
Full Member
 

This infected blood victim compensation scheme is going to cost (tens of) billions. I wonder how they’re going to pay for it?

Tax cuts? & then make it a Labour problem


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 2:33 pm
kelvin and kelvin reacted
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

they won’t they’ll kick the can down the road again then it’s someone else’s problem.

Tax cuts? & then make it a Labour problem

Think you've both missed the point I'm making. 😏

Sunak has already said they'll pay whatever it costs and all the victims and their families will be able to claim. That could be 30,000 - 100,000 people all getting substantial amounts of 6 to 7 figures. Add that to the post office compensation scheme the govt is going to be paying tens of billions in compensation. Labour are supporting the payments so I ask again, where's the money coming from?


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 3:00 pm
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

Labour are supporting the payments so I ask again, where’s the money coming from?

Never you mind, we will find it.  You just remember the country cannot afford for people to have better services.

You would think it would be an easy sell wouldn't you - vote for me and the services will all be better funded but don't worry about where the money is coming from as you wouldn't understand it anyway and you shouldn't concern yourself with it.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 3:20 pm
rone, dazh, petefromearth and 3 people reacted
Posts: 33256
Full Member
 

And in more good news for the government

BBC News - Move to extend police protest powers ruled unlawful

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-69043611


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 3:49 pm
Posts: 6921
Full Member
 

So this crack pot government once again gets handed it's arse because it was too lazy and incompetant to follow the tried and tested rules for creating laws.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 8:33 pm
Posts: 8027
Full Member
 

Yes and no.

It was passed last year and I suspect will have suppressed peoples willingness to protest since then.

So whilst obviously passing a proper law would be more sensible given the difficulty of that and how little the tories care about spending taxpayers money having this in place for a year but then having to cough up compensation is the next best thing for them.


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 9:58 pm
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

As ever, a conflict with the courts is exactly what they want.

Plenty of people will still fall for it, millions will still vote tory  🤷


 
Posted : 21/05/2024 10:05 pm
Posts: 66126
Full Member
 

LeFtY lAwYeRs!on!E


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 12:48 am
Posts: 57421
Full Member
 

I see the ‘Party of Lawnorder’ has told the police to stop arresting people  😂


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 9:08 am
 rone
Posts: 9788
Free Member
 

Never you mind, we will find it.  You just remember the country cannot afford for people to have better services

Of course we will - it's an act of Parliament just only when it suits.

Water companies and dismal regulation doing their thing to cement the absolute failure of privatisation. I wonder what pragmatism would look like here... hmm.

Once again the government can pay or the public can pay.  But whilst muppets support the tax payer myth we will keep passing the buck to the consumer to deal with. Thames is goner.

Inflation down as expected - who knew it would eventually come down, but expect Fishi to go on a his scripted soap box about the success of his team.

Scary LOL at the utter economic failure of our system to serve its people, and people not really given an electoral choice to remove this economic mess.

https://twitter.com/RichardJMurphy/status/1792807000067252638?t=A9N1TSPFAtCUL5iTsDv_Qw&s=19


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 9:23 am
 rone
Posts: 9788
Free Member
 

I see the ‘Party of Lawnorder’ has told the police to stop arresting people  😂

I thought they already were at that point.


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 9:25 am
Posts: 57421
Full Member
 

No, we were previously at the point where they’d told the courts not to convict people, now they’ve decided to cut the supply off at source by stopping the initial arrest in the first place

In a way it’s genius! I look forward to them announcing that there is now no crime in the UK as nobody has been arrested for or convicted of any crimes at all


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 10:06 am
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

I remember when Patel was bragging that shoplifting was down - during the lockdown.

Did anyone hear Jeremy unt get his arse handed to him by the heavyweight Emma Barnett on R4 this morning?


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 10:23 am
Pauly, kelvin, Pauly and 1 people reacted
Posts: 31133
Full Member
 

What's next... telling ambulances not to take people to hospital because they're f...

..oh.


 
Posted : 22/05/2024 10:39 am
Page 228 / 233