Forum menu
Privatising the For...
 

[Closed] Privatising the Forestry Commission

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In two years time it's going to be interesting to look back and see if TJ (et al) is just a wailing lefty and little really changes or if he's really right and we really see massive changes. I suspect that he'll be partly right but a lot of the cressers doom stuff will be wrong - eg a comfortable middle ground.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for TJ
early night for backhander 😉


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 34536
Full Member
 

face it the torries will be jizzing themselves at the chance of selling off something as non-essential as the FC
i wonder what affect it would have on trail centres and insurance in particular.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 647
Free Member
 

what insurance?

over the whole forest estate, i'd imagine risk from built trails is swamped by other stuff.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]i wonder what affect it would have on trail centres and insurance in particular.[/i]

Should be fine, the new £10 a ride fee will have it factored in.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 1:19 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

trail centres and insurance in particular.

ask the Llandegla crew, site owned and operated by Till Hill and trail expansion?

ask Drumlanrig, etc etc


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Modern history has shown us that right-field, neo-con, pro-big business, anti-state, pro-cuts governments allways produce more mess for the most people. The most relatively succesful societies(i.e. where people are happier, healthier and wealthier) are those with liberal, left-field, pro-tax, pro welfare consensus governments. I am old enough and have lived in enough countries to have seen the differences 🙂


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And you're coming out with straw man arguments all over the shop

Bit rich for you to say that when you're making sneery ad hominem attacks.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 2:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

bravohotel9er

Its you that doesn't "get it"

We have a leaner public sector than competitor nations such as Germany, Holland Italy etc, we spend less on public services, we have a lower tax take. If these countrioe who tax an dspend more than us are not prposing massive cuts then why do we have to

cuts [u][b]on the scale proposed[/b] [/u]and intended are simply not needed A sensible efficiency drive together with a rise in income tax and cancellation of vanity projects such as Trident will suffice.

You have bought into a neocon moral panic and have been conned.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am old enough and have lived in enough countries to have seen the differences

Yes, i'd agree, but unfortunately the quarter wits here would rather pocket the money and stuff the rest.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Modern history has shown us that right-field, neo-con, pro-big business, anti-state, pro-cuts governments allways produce more mess for the most people. The most relatively succesful societies(i.e. where people are happier, healthier and wealthier) are those with liberal, left-field, pro-tax, pro welfare consensus governments. I am old enough and have lived in enough countries to have seen the differences

I take it you didn't live in the USSR? Cuba? North Korea?


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I suspect its more countries like Norway, Germany and Holland that are referred to. You know countries with a higher standard of living than ours and more happy people despite or because of the higher taxes and public spending.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:01 pm
Posts: 26891
Full Member
 

I take it you didn't live in the USSR? Cuba? North Korea?

i havent, but i did go to sweden recently, it was very nice indeed.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funny, I thought that germany were capitalists


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Backhander - can you read?

BluePalomino

...those with liberal, left-field, pro-tax, pro welfare consensus governments

About as good a description of post war Germany as possible.


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member
I suspect its more countries like Norway, Germany and Holland that are referred to. You know countries with a higher standard of living than ours and [b]more happy people[/b] despite or because of the higher taxes and public spending.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

Norway: 39th
Germany: 50th
Netherlands: 54th
UK: 66th


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very good Druidh!


 
Posted : 16/08/2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I take it you didn't live in the USSR? Cuba? North Korea?

Pretty stupid argument. None of those three regimes can be described as "liberal, left-field, pro-tax, pro welfare consensus governments", what with them being dictatorships/authoritarian one-party states.


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 12:20 am
Page 2 / 2