Forum menu
That was wierd...
[b]The Prime Minister, Rt Hon. Gordon Brown MP's, statement to the House of Commons on the matter of the illness of Ms Jade Goody.[/b]
These are difficult and uncertain times for this nation, and the people of Britain rightly expect that my government should devote its full resources to addressing the various matters of genuine national concern that confront us. British troops are deployed overseas, British jobs are being lost as the full impact of a global economic slow-down begins to be felt, my government has engaged in almost unprecedneted state support of the banking sector and has as a result borrowed money considerably in excess of gross domestic product, work by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation suggests that our goal of eliminating child poverty is becoming more expensive. In all, it is possible that the challenges facing this country and my government are insurmountable. It is possible that the solutions to several of them are well beyond the power of government to accomplish. I do not propose to comment in detail upon the illness of Ms Jade Goody. Her condition was not caused by anything within government's control, and I understand that it is unlikely to be affected by government action at this stage.
[url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7897020.stm ]Or not...[/url]
Smashing, there goes a man with his finger on the pulse...
Soon Dave will be on the Air saying how is reaction to Jade was not enough, and that he should take action to limit the amount of sympathy, and even backdate the lack of sympathy to the start of the current daytime TV crisis
Is he going to say somthing about every ill person?i bet there are more deserving people who have done things who get no mention?
jade goody should have been put down well before she got cancer. she's dieing, it's sad for her family.
doesn't bother me in the slightest.
Didnt some Indians put a death curse on her or sumfink?
Brown is a such a c0ck, makes me want to vomit whenever I see him.
Well, he was asked to comment, so what was he supposed to say? I'm sure if he'd have said "frankly, I don't give a sh1t" it wouldn't have gone down very well.
[i]Mr Brown said: "It's very sad and tragic that such a young woman has this cancer. It's very sad indeed that the treatment has not been successful."
He added: "Her determination to help her family is something that we have got to applaud and I wish her family well." [/i]
He's hardly leaping on a publicity bandwagon is he? He's such said what a lot of people would say.
It's not his fault that someone in the media used an oppurtunity to grill him to ask about something so trivial.
jade goody should have been put down well before she got cancer
Nice. How incredibly sensitive and caring of you...
Would you like to elaborate on why you fell she should have been 'put down' ,as you put it (I'm assuming you mean she should have been executed, like a dog or something)?
Here we go again... 😯 🙄
[i]It's not his fault that someone in the media used an oppurtunity to grill him to ask about something so trivial. [/i]
Agreed. I think the fact that he had to comment says more about the state of our political culture than it does about him. Who was the first PM who would have been forced to comment on such trivia? Difficult to imagine Gladstone doing it...
certainly
i've met her twice and on both occasions taken a severe disliking too her. of course i don;t want her actually put down.
if jade good y or her family happen to read these comments, they should have the sense to see that they are a symptom of her 'celebrity' status.
Well I have no interest in her and dislike the society we have that makes her a celebrity. As such the only reason I know about her is because even the main stream press have stories about her so, if it wasn't for this, I wouldn't have heard of her and so wouldn't know about her cancer. However, as I have heard about this my sympathy is with her and her family.
This may shock you, but I am going to praise Jade Goody.
She was let down by the education system and let down badly. She's thick. She knows this. But, she has decided to use her celebrity to make as much money as she can to ensure that her son(s?) are/is not let down in the same way. That HAS to be a good aspiration. Brave girl.
Ok. But it's not a very nice thing to say.
If Jade's 'celebrity' status helps to raise awareness about cancer, then maybe she will leave this Earth as someone who's short life actually made a little bit of difference. Although I'm sure that her friends and family would much prefer that she remained as an annoying person of little consequence to most.
Just give her a bit of dignity. She ain't deliberately hurt anyone, or caused people to suffer.
Well said, Flashy.
shes being treated next at the royal marsden where i work, well next door
there is a crowd of very bored looking photogropers out there all day long waiting to catch a glimpse of her
its all very sad
sad that she has cancer
sad that we know who she is
sad that some journalist? asked the PM about her
i agree rb, her cancer has allegedly caused a rise in the rate of cervical smear testing amongst teenage girls which is great. i'm not a teenage girl though.
if i met her again i'm sure i would be full of sympathy, but she would get exactly the same sympathy as joe bloggs next door's brother or whatever
the press asking the question was just fishing for a blunder to make headlines
She wasn't the most likeable z-list celebrity and I've often wondered how any degree of celebrity status could be bestowed on somebody with little admirable quality.
My sympathies do however go to her family and children for the loss of a loved one.
well hopefully if the cervical cancer jab take up is good 90% of all cervical cancers will be prevented in a few years
that is assuming fuctards like catholic schools and the morons who object to mmr dont screw it up for everyone else
she's dieing
anyway i'm off to pedants corner for that one, where's that plasticine
[i]Ok. But it's not a very nice thing to say.[/i]
FFS, do you heckle comedians with that line????!
[i]She was let down by the education system and let down badly. She's thick. [/i]
Which is it?
EDIT: sorry, I'm not really joining this discussion. So don't reply. I have no f*cking interest in anyone or anything to do with big brother and turn the TV off/over whenever those I recognise as being that appear. (and most other 'celebrities' for that matter)
I am not sure of the exact word I am looking for here but strange, perverse, odd etc all come to mind with regards to this whole Jade Goody issue.
She is basically dying in the same way she seems to have lived her life after big brother - in the media spotlight. She was famous for being thick. Then she was famous for loosing weight? Then she became a famous racist. Now she's famous for being terminally ill. Soon she'll be famous for dying.
I personally feel nothing for her other than morbid curiosity.
assuming fuctards like catholic schools and the morons who object to mmr dont screw it up
What do catholic schools have to say on this?
[i]The former Big Brother contestant's plight was "very sad and tragic",[/i]
Nothing new there then.
Anyway what was Brown supposed to say? He was asked the question, hardly his fault.
yes, but it would eat significantly into the £million she's hoping to leave to her boys, so out of kindness to them I'll pass up this time.
Seriously - sad for her and her family and friends who'll be left behind. If people didn't want to buy OK to see the pics there wouldn't be that much cash being offered, but as it is on offer she'd be daft not to take it. A matter for politicians and journalists to be discussing? Probably not though.
I wonder what her kids will value more, the money that she left them or the chance to watch mummies last moments on youtube. Warms the cockles I tell you.
[i]What do catholic schools have to say on this?[/i]
[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/sep/25/faithschools.catholicism ]linky[/url]
Well said CFH. (That's twice in two days. Scary).
It's hard to say whether Big Dummy or michaelwainwright come out of this thread looking worse.
Thanks for that andym.
I assume you consider that commenting on the illness of individuals is a good use of government time, and that soliciting such comments is a good use of a free press.
I do not, and that was my only point. I bear Jade Goody no more ill will than I bear most people I don't know.
🙂
We live in a country where it is possible to have a "job" that is being a "celebrity", the rights / wrongs of that are a whole other topic. As such, Jade is doing her "job" now to ensure her sons have some money left to them for the future, so good on her really. As a by-product, as mentioned above, uptake on smear tests has gone up hugely since this has all been in the news, which can only be a good thing.
as said above though bigdummy, he's got to comment on it if asked about it surely? Not his fault.
I don't understand the point of this thread BigDummy. So Gordon Brown presumably expressed an opinion in his personal capacity, when asked to do so. However, in his capacity as Prime Minister he doesn't feel that he should comment on the subject during a statement to the House of Commons.
What's wrong with that - it seems like a perfectly fair and reasonable position for him to take ?
Gordon Brown certainly deserves a great deal of criticism for his handling of the prime ministership, but desperately searching to cane him for every word he utters is frankly pathetic.
.
BTW, I know absolutely nothing about Jade Goody, but I can't imagine calling for [i]any[/i] human being to be 'put down', even if they were racist. And I have nothing but sympathy for a very young woman who has been told that she will soon die and never see her children grow up.
And yes DezB, I would certainly heckle a "comedian" with the line, [i]"it's not a very nice thing to say"[/i] if they made a highly offensive hate based comment - shame on you for keeping your mouth shut when people make offensive hate based comments.
Just to show it does happen, I totally agree with GG.
i want Jade Goody put down as much as various members of this forum want lots of people owned with Bombers and Jeremy Clarkson thinks all truck drivers are murderers. This is an internet forum, full of lively discussion, opinions and sometimes, yes, even on the internet, satire. She was an object of comedic derision when she was healthy and will remain as such during her illness and after her death.
i disliked her intensely when i met her but i would not [i]wish[/i] death on anyone, if you can't see the obvious over exaggeration in my comment then you are taking yourself and this forum far too seriously.
Over 4000 people will die of AIDS today in sub Saharan Africa, why does Jade Goody deserve any more of my, or indeed the nation's emotional wealth than every single last one of them. I said exactly the same thing when Mike Reid died and will continue to do the same for anyone whom i have met and disliked as much.
Gus and others, apologies for the confusion clearly caused. My "statement to the house" is (as I thought obvious) a work of fiction. It is what I would rather the Prime Minister said on subjects of this sort. It isn't a caning of Brown either, particularly. the Prime Minister (indeed any minister) shouldn't have to take any interest, at all. Neither should he get hauled into "Big Brother is racist" rows, "Withnail and I is relatively good" rows, "Peaches Geldof should work harder at her marriage" discussions or indeed required to comment publicly on anything of the sort.
It's not that it "doesn't matter", it's simply that government cannot sensibly have anything to add. In the context of a press conference, a lot of questions do not get answered, and a lot of questions get brushed off with "I'm not going to comment on that at this time". Someone has decided that the PM should give the response he's given, and he's taken a question from someone who was (probably) identified as likely to ask it.
That he was asked it at all says a lot about the quality of the press' use of the prime minister's press conference. That he chose to answer it says a lot about how the government chooses to communicate with us.
The actual position taken, which is pretty much the same as CaptainFlasheart's, is unobjectionable, agreed. Similar sentiments are expressed about Jordan and others.
My bad, I've started a thread about something that riled me, linked to a subject which is excessively emotive, and I've done it in a confusing way. I will save the point I was trying to make until Lilly Allen gets married and the PM sends official congratulations, andthen we won't end up sneering a dying woman in the process.
Sorry all.
Jon
....Then she became a famous racist....
Racist? She'd probably struggle to spell the word let alone be one.
She is a simple bivalve, a manner with which to produce CO2 from otherwise perfectly good air.
Racist? Yes I'm sure you are right. Its how the Nazis started you know, calling people 'popadom'.
My bad
I've got more issue with you saying that, than anything else you've posted. 'My [i]mistake[/i]', please.
if you can't see the obvious over exaggeration in my comment then you are taking yourself and this forum far too seriously.
I'm sorry, I din't see any 'obvious exaggeration'; I just saw something objectionable.
Personally, I sympathise as much with [i]any[/i] Human being suffering. I think the Jade Goody situation makes people feel sorry for [i]anyone[/i] suffering from cancer, rather than just one individual. We sympathise with the situation as much as the person.
Rudeboy, I guess I meant [i]mea culpa[/i].
😉
something objectionable
You're objectionable
RudeBoy - Member
sofatester - Member
For 10k i will kill him for you.I'll do it for £9k.
well i'll be damned, i'm calling the police right now, you are obviously a REAL contract killer
I've just finished writing her obituary, never a happy job when the subject is still alive.
To those who are puzzled by her celeb status, it's exactly because she has no remarkable talents and admits that she's thick as two short planks that the public have taken to her.
She bullied somebody in Big Brother but was only about as racist as many of the posters on this forum.
The usual line that gets trotted out is that young girls see her as a role model because she "made something of herself" - which would be depressing if you then concluded that young people thought being in heat magazine was the only way to succeed from a disadvantaged background.
But I think that's a red herring anyway, I suspect young girls only want to be celebs in the same way that boys want to play for Man United - ie. by the time they're 17 or 18 they've realised it aint gonna happen.
I think people just like Jade because she's obviously down-to-earth, has a likeable personality and was genuinely mortified after that racism thing.
Remember: Don't hate the player, hate the game.
You're objectionable
That's fair enough.
well i'll be damned, i'm calling the police right now, you are obviously a REAL contract killer
Yeah, 'cos using that is soooo going to make your comment look better!
I've accepted that you made it without meaning it. It just looked bad initially, that's all.
Yeah well I'm sorry that it was lost on me BigDummy. I did consider checking out the House of Commons statement because it did seem a little strange that he felt it necessary to comment at all about JG, but decided to accept that it was genuine.
So your criticism is simply that Gordon Brown should not have been asked any questions on the subject at all ? Well I agree with your disappointment with the kind of questions the press asks the PM, but I'm not sure just how much the PM is responsible for that. Yes he could have refused to answer the questions, but he would have received far more stick for that, imo - the PM won't show his 'human side', he coldly ignores questions about the tragic case of .... etc etc.
If you want to blame anyone, I suggest that you blame tabloid readers who demand to read bollox in their newspapers, rather than real politics.
And also the people who are obsessed enough about the Jade Goody story, that they start threads on the subject on internet forums .........
I don't think I am going to accept that people who fret aimlessly about trivialisation of public discourse necessarily trivialise public discourse.
🙂
But I am going to shut up.
Rudeboy, why do you keep switching between yourself and Grizzlygus to post on here? This thread is so obvious that you are one and the same!!
No offence intended by the question, just wondering.....