Forum search & shortcuts

Poll: Which logo do...
 

[Closed] Poll: Which logo do you prefer ?

Posts: 8671
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2924420]

Trying to pick a logo for our website. Which logo do you prefer ?

[url= http://www.mtbarena.com/?p=250 ]Vote on our Logo[/url]


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 10:55 pm
 derp
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You seem to have missed off option 3: back to the drawing board 😉

...gun to my head, 2.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 10:57 pm
 ton
Posts: 24295
Full Member
 

two


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 10:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They are both terrible !! But I voted for #1


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 10:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

voted 2


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 10:59 pm
Posts: 77
Free Member
 

I have no idea. I'll have another look in the morning.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not a massive fan of either.. but I couldn't vote for the provincial 80s hiking shop looks of 1 so I voted 2 which is hopefully just ahead of it's time or something..


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both pants, stick with the cammo header 🙂


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
 

logo 2


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:03 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

?


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

From the two I prefer the second, but there's room for improvement.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:05 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

Both awful, stuck in the past. Can we see no. 3?


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

😯


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 8671
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looks like 2 is leading. Thanks for posting so far.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 6954
Full Member
 

2 is half decent.
#1 is pretty bad tbf - I'd be disappointed if I came up with that myself which is saying something.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 203
Free Member
 

Two. It reminds me of our local mountain rescue charity collection box.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Erm...the nineties are calling

...etc


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

top one, but they are both crap. IMHO etc


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What is MT13 Arena?


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the one the little boy did.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can i say neither?


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 66128
Full Member
 

Hate them both. But 1 at least has a little bit of retro cool about it (if you lose the little bikes!) so it gets my vote, though it does feel a bit like choosing between 2 vomit sandwiches.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

"like" both the same amount and I could not pick between them, not in a good way ...sorry.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 33995
Full Member
 

Sorry, but neither floats my boat. I have designed a fair few logos over the years, as well as entire books and their jackets, so I have graphics experience, and personally I'd stick with the masthead you're already using. Those just look a bit too much like the local free magazine went to work with a freeware paintbox programme. The colour palette is very reminiscent of early nineties web graphics, when 168 colours or whatever was all that was available. I'm afraid they just look a bit... amateur really. 🙁


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:23 pm
Posts: 8671
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Off to design more 🙁


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:30 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Why don't you ask the STW design community to knock one up for you tomorrow? That normally goes down well and they'll even do you a version in Word (and PowerPoint if you ask nicely).


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What CountZero sed, basically.

Both are too fussy, too obvious and just don't stand out enough. My philosophy with logos is that they should convey what they represent as simply as possible, and be memorable. You really don't need to tell a whole story with a logo, you just need something that will stick in someone's head.

Look at these:

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]

See?

Less is more.


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:36 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/09/13/expressive-web-typography-useful-examples-and-techniques/ ]some inspiration[/url]

if in doubt rip someone off


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:36 pm
Posts: 598
Full Member
 

sorry both are pants


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:36 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

if in doubt rip someone off

Which is 99% of logo design anyway. 🙂


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shut up DD you are rubbish and you smell so there. 😐


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:41 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/11/beautiful-hand-drawn-typography/ ]hand drawn stuff[/url]


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:42 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/02/bauhaus-ninety-years-of-inspiration/ ]bauhaus[/url] note the colour palettes


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:43 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I am rubbish at logo design, but I can't be awesome at everything. Swimming and logo design are two of my weaknesses. 😡


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:45 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/01/drawing-inspiration-from-creative-logos/ ]lots to copy here[/url]


 
Posted : 07/07/2011 11:53 pm
Posts: 8671
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Done a banner.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 12:09 am
Posts: 8671
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Right then, what about this ?

http://www.mtbarena.com/?p=260

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 12:42 am
Posts: 9
Full Member
 

That last one is better IMO!
Bit of a mis-match between the 3D of the chainring (?) and the flat text. Maybe try the text in the same 3D style?
I also tried to read it as mtbarena first.


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 12:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IMO I would make the chainring on the last one 2D but keep it silver, and try making the words read mtb ARENA or switch fonts between the two words to better distinguish between them...you're getting closer on that last one...sorry but the first two were just dreadful


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 4:00 am
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

redthunder - Member
Off to design more

Without meaning to be harsh, I think this might be part of the problem. I'd be inclined to try and twist the arm of a graphic designer friend to have a go at it.


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 7:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

im not keen on any so far. Try n keep it simple is all i can say


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 7:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they're both crap. sorry


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 8:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No offence meant but they are poor.

The second one is the better though because the first reads MT13

Get a designer to do them or just pick a strong font you like and use it black on white until you can get a designer to do you a logo.


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 8:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that last effort has got a bit more potential.. ignore what those guys have said about the conflict between the 2d and 3d.. it's actually quite a good thing and adds a bit of dynamism and catches the eyes attention a little.. not too shabby.. 🙂


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 8:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hate to say it, but I agree with Elfin.
Keep it simple. I see some bloody horrible logos that try to do too much, and number two is one of them. 6 colour too.


 
Posted : 08/07/2011 9:46 am
Page 1 / 2