Forum menu
You can buy my Siggy 24-70mm for a couple of hundred quid, been thinking about buying something posh like a 24-105L for a while
Nice example, sharp and in good nick with constant f2.8 throughout the range
Personally I would never buy a superzoom as 18-200mm, also its only for 1.6x sensors? If you have any plans in the future to upgrade to full frame, would stick to EF lenses.
If you want sharpness, stick to prime lenses, maybe L range if you get a full frame body and a lot of spare cash 🙂
Now Peter is sorted, and we are on a bit of a lens love-in, has any body got (or know of) a Canon 100-400 thats for sale?
I've been looking for a while and haven't found one.
Cheers
I have a 100-400 and to be totally honest, it isnt worth the money, i would now buy a sigma 120-400 as it is as sharp as the Canon but about half the price, the only thing is my Canon 1.4 converter wouldn't work on it.
I also have the 70-200 2.8L IS and that is an outstanding lens in every sense!
The 70-300 IS USM is aparently an 'L' in disguise.
[url] http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/200-canon-ef-70-300mm-f4-56-usm-is-test-report--review?start=1 [/url]