'Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious'
or
'The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants'
t®ibal©hief, I'm waiting. I couldn't care less if you want to post something on an internet forum calling me retarded, silly names like that don't bother me. However please do have the decency to explain the logic behind your statement. I'm curious.
Me too. I've been to a lot of countries and never heard that point of view. Precisely the opposite, in fact.
I wouldn't buy an Israeli bike.
I think you will find its only when you debate with people who don't understand what racism is that " buy British" could be accused of being racist.
It clearly isn't racist on many levels - but here the ignorance of what racism actually is runs so deep and the unfailing acceptance of the daily wail standpoint is so prevalent.......
Mean while - out in the real world
[i]It clearly isn't racist on many levels [/i]
I'd go further and say that it isn't racist on any level. In fact, I reckon about 98% of what is touted as "racism" these days isn't anything of the sort.
kennyp, you talk sense mate. 😀
Thank you ton.
'Buying British' isnt racist, and as someone who believes in less of the current brand of global freemarket consumerism, it probably is a good thing that we should support more local industry over foreign ones*.
I think its also a good thing that things are actually made where they are designed too, from expertise and an enviromental points.
.
Just to muddy the water, I'd describe myself as an unapologetic nationalist (Scottish, though not always in a party political sense)but I'd be willing to bet I'm one of the least xenophobic folk on here.
.
.
*Unless it means I have to buy some lugged, brazed steel, flexy boat anchor of a bike, in which case I'm aff tae buy Chinese Aluminium, or Taiwanese carbon, **** principles! 🙂
PP wrote:
"FWIW I used to ride a (modern) Truimph motorbike. I loved it and was very proud it was made in the UK."
But then, for the last few years Triumph have made very, very good bikes- you could justify buying one even if it were japanese or korean or whatever else. And that's something to be proud of, not just british manufacturing but class leading british manufacturing, at the right price to boot.
What annoys me isn't "buy british", it's "Buy overpriced and british" or "Buy inferior and british"- and there's a lot of that around frankly. Quite a lot of it comes with a Hope sticker on it. I don't call that patriotic, I call it stupid...
And just possibly, if not racist then at least bigoted- there are people who assume that british is best, my grandad bought a Rover instead of "far eastern rubbish" for instance, which of course turned out to be an unreliable, tinworm infested piece of ****. But because it was british he assumed it was better than some foreign jonny's effort, and even after it dissolved he was still convinced it must be good as it was british, and a japanese car would have been even worse.
But, where there's a worthy UK product, why not?
What is inferior or overpriced about Hope?
The light range for one. The Hope 1 is laughably underpowered and overpriced yet people keep buying it, because it's Hope. The old quick releases for another. And the rear hubs, IMO (I like the front hubs but the rear is expensive, and only light because of the alloy freehub)
Ah fair enough to that Northwind altho I disagree about the rear hubs.