[i] My issue is with people who do not give fair chance for other people to pass, and barge through anyway.[/i]
Maybe there shoudl be a ticket system like at the deli counter.
Everyone in the queue is assigned a number, the vehicle at the front has a laser display board and if you don't overtake whilst your number's showing the next vehicle along gets a shot?
It should be 'organic', surely?
In this interests of this request, I agree with molgrips*. You're all terrible - and dangerous - drivers. However, I'd be interested to know what would happen if Molgrips and I got in an overtaking "queue" together:
"After you"
"No, after you"
"No, I insist, after you"
*in the interests of truth, this statement may not be accurate
*hoping piemoster has had to go to lunch*
Nope still here
Mols - how many times has this been covered? You said yourself you were unable to overtake. So the M3 overtook you when you didn't make any attempt. It seems your statement above
covers what we've all been saying, so why are you still banging on about queue's & politeness.If you have given fair chance for someone in front to overtake and they don't, then fair enough.
[i]Damn, politics is complicated.[/i]
Yep, you wouldn't have thought it so important.. Where you put your ass.
[img] https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/7287130368/h86E7C659/ [/img]
still?
It's almost a shame posting something now... perhaps the last few pre 1,000 posts should be donated to the BIG CONTENDERS in this thread to set out their concluding arguments?
[s]1000! I win the Internetz![/s]
buggers!
1002
[edit] hoping solo had planned their edit 🙂
Well, that was constructive 🙂
No worse than what it was before.
If you have given fair chance for someone in front to overtake and they don't, then fair enough. My issue is with people who do not give fair chance for other people to pass, and barge through anyway.
I got little or no suggestion of anyone disagreeing with this from what I've read. However it is a very subjective argument and one person's "fair chance" is another's "you've blown it sunshine". Once an argument loses objectivity it's had it. That is why this is destined to run and run until someone puts it out of its misery or we run out of pictures of funny animals. Since the latter is highly unlikely we should all pray for the former
This guy appears to know about overtaking !
* feels dirty. goes to eat sultanas *
Yeah you're right, but after I tried to say exactly what I just said up there, everyone started berating me as some kind of incompetent driver. So then we had zoomypants = good, everyone else = pathetic.
That's what got me pissed off.
Are you the new TJ?
Waiting for the funny animals...before someone puts Mols out of his misery.
Sorry, I appear to have jumped the Queue.
😆 😆 😆
Wow this thread has now even gone political. In fact George Galloway has offered up this glowing praise of Molgrips:
"Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability"
Now THAT is an overtake!
Waiting for the funny animals...before someone puts Mols out of his misery.
Well, we can travel back in time for such as thing
http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/overtaking/page/13
Politics and overtaking in one
[img] http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQJ9u0avRyRrZjW__xU86ThUxafhFSUVlRn8vB9RiWTpT55HsAREg [/img]
Well, we can travel back in time for such as thing
No new funny animals...
Clubber - are you trying to morph this into a middle lane driver thread?
Kids today, it's all new new new
Need a "like" button for Clubbers post.
EDIT: oh, ok, Piemonster can have one too.
Yeah you're right, but after I tried to say exactly what I just said up there, everyone started berating me as some kind of incompetent driver. So then we had zoomypants = good, everyone else = pathetic.That's what got me pissed off.
(Nearly) everyone was trying to offer sensible and constructive advice. I don't recall anyone jumping to the over-simplistic conclusion above.
My fave bit was the shopping trolley analogies. I found those hilarious in their irrelevance, as analogies often are 😆
Yeah, you're right tortie. It's a bit like a seagull jumping off a cliff.
My fave bit was the shopping trolley analogies. I found those hilarious in their irrelevance, as analogies often are
Not irrelevant, you just don't agree with the analogy being drawn.
It's just like old times 😀
The fact you think the analogy is relevant is exactly why this has gone on for 30 pages*. Once the argument turns to the relevance of the (inevitable) analogies used to demonstrate the argument, it's a lost cause. I've been there many times.
*with some assistance from the gif-toting mob 🙂
molgrips, out of interest, what would happen if you just stopped replying to this thread. Would you be wrong forever after?
I've actually worked out who molgrips is....
Mark Webber
And surfmatt is vettel
[i]what would happen if you just stopped replying to this thread.[/i]
I think we're in the TJ 'I know it's getting me nowhere but I can't help myself' zone now...
Did you know a giraffe has less bones in its neck than a sparrow?
I think we're in the TJ 'I know it's getting me nowhere but I can't help myself' zone now...
It's not getting him anywhere because he's still waiting to overtake
[i]Did you know a giraffe has less bones in its neck than a sparrow?[/i]
No, how does this effect a Giraffe's ability to both decide and execute an overtaking manoeuvre ?
Did you know a giraffe has less bones in its neck than a sparrow?
FEWER
ffs.
^^^ Easy for a Giraffe, they can simply look over the top to see if it's clear!










