Forum search & shortcuts

Nappies, disposable...
 

[Closed] Nappies, disposable or reusable?

Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Think about how they make disposable things.. not just nappies, but anything - say a waxed paper cup.

Someone in say Sweden gets into a truck and drives out to the woods where they plant a load of saplings.. then for the next 50 or so years people drive about checking on them, spraying pesticides and what not, then someone else comes along in a massive machine and fells it, drives it to a pulp mill where a big machine uses loads of leccy to make it into a paper material which is then shipped somewhere else to make paper, from where it's shipped somewhere else again to make a cup. Meanwhile, somewhere in the middle east someone's sucking oil out of the ground, sending it to a refinery where someome makes finer chemcicals out of it and someone else gets into a truck, drives it to a port and puts it on a ship. Then it's shipped around the world to the cup factory, the cup's coated, packed up and driven to another port where it gets shipped to our shores and driven to a warehouse. Then it gets unpacked and re-packed into a smaller box (made from cardboard from trees from say.. norway.. where someone felled the tree and ....) then it gets driven to a retailer, then driven to your office.. using diesel extracted from the ground in the middle east and refined using lots of power and so on and so on.

All so that you can grab one, take two swigs of cold water then toss it in the bin - without even thinking about it.

WHEREUPON someone has to come round and collect it along with the rest of your rubbish in a big truck powered by more diesel, and drive it somewhere discrete where they bury it in the ground.

Later that afternoon, you grab another, two swigs, toss it away. Then the next day, and the next.. meanwhile oil is being pumped, trees planted, felled, driven all over the place.. and so on.

Crazy isn't it?


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 3:44 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

Crazy isn't it?

Good for the economy though 😉

[retires to a safe distance]


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 3:47 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

And that, jon1973, is precisely why we are all so f*cked 🙂


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stopping all this cycling in bad weather is probably a good way to save on all that detergent/power/pollution when washing kit

Me? - I don't like polar bears so I'm not bothered


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My brother did some business recently with a big landfill company.

The majority of landfill is sealed and actually doesnt rot at all. This firm regularly re-open landfills which are up to 30 years old...even the newspapers haven't rotted after 30 years so all this worry over nappies is a load of old shit, literally.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 61
Full Member
 

Are you sure it doesn't rot at all? I'd check with your brother's business colleagues on that one if I were you? That company isn't doing a good job if that is the case? They're not designed to be hermetically sealed, just controlled so that the gases released are controlled and contaminants don't leach into the groundwater. Not rotting at all is very different to rotting slowly. If it rots slowly that is even more of an argument for throwing less into a site.

Unfortunately the quickest way to break down rubbish would be to warm it up and get it wet. Surprisingly the prospect of warm wet rotting rubbish is not that popular?


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.geofabrics.com/gcomp-landfill.cfm ]Like this...[/url]


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, they're sealed to the point you can graze cattle on top!

The only decomposition is anaerobic and they siphon off the methane that's produced.

I imagine in 2000 years time there will be a neat pile of bio-degradable nappies and an archeologist will burn his lips on a McDonalds apple pie


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:15 pm
Posts: 61
Full Member
 

Like I say, that is not the same as 'not rotting at all' and even more of an argument for reducing the amount of waste to landfill.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I imagine in 2000 years time there will be a neat pile of bio-degradable nappies and an archeologist will burn his lips on a McDonalds apple pie

And they both taste about the same...


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 3644
Full Member
 

Er, P&G also make Ariel, Fairy, Daz, Lenor and Bold (among others).

Point being that they should be pretty impartial between which one was "best" - apart from what's in it for the shareholders.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:19 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

They must make far more from Pampers tho Rich? I mean it's what, £4-6 for a week's supply of pampers isn't it? Not really sure 😉 Against £5 or whatever for 4-6 weeks' worth of powder...


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They must make far more from Pampers tho Rich? I mean it's what, £4-6 for a week's supply of pampers isn't it? Not really sure Against £5 or whatever for 4-6 weeks' worth of powder...

Depends - the margins might be much greater on the powder...


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:36 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Unlikely there's much margin on either of those super high volume high competition product lines imo.. but then I know naff all about grocery retail 🙂


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 4:57 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5276
Full Member
 

"Nappies, disposable or reusable?"

i grew out of them 22 odd years ago sorry.
reckon you probably should have by now too?


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:02 pm
 trb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've always been confused on the biodegradable nappy front.

My boys pampers is non-biodegrable, goes into landfill and sits there doing nothing much for 100 years

My mates boys biodegradable nappy, goes into landfill, degrades, creates methane, which escapes into the atmosphere and does it's bit as a greenhouse gas.

Which is best?

nb, one of the funniest things I've seen in the last couple of years was a bloke who tried to compost "biodegradable" nappies at home. The sight of him racking through a years worth of old nappies to remove the non-degradable tags and stretchy bits was something to see. It appeared that they were only 70% biodegradable!


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:04 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Trb, the probem is there isnt' enough physical space for all the crap we throw away. It's been a big problem for many many years. A lot of councils are really struggling.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

.the probem is there isnt' enough physical space for all the crap we throw away..

have you tried India?


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trb, the probem is there isnt' enough physical space for all the crap we throw away. It's been a big problem for many many years. A lot of councils are really struggling.

Agreed - but as nappies only account for 4% of it, I wouldn't worry. It's the other 96% we should be worrying about. That and the useless recycling programmes some councils have (Harrogate Council, I am talking to you).


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 3644
Full Member
 

Unlikely there's much margin on either of those super high volume high competition product lines imo.. but then I know naff all about grocery retail

Join the club. All I know is I'm gonna be in a world of sh1t 😀


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:20 pm
Posts: 61
Full Member
 

trb. Both will decompose eventually only one will take a lot longer about it. Added to that the more biodegradable option will have been produced largely from renewable sources (taking up CO2) and less petrochemical products. But yeah turns out they're not 100% biodegradable and specifically don't recommend home composting! I'd not like to find that out a year down the line.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:26 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

There simply must be physical space for all the stuff we throw away, it all came from somewhere. If there is a pile here then there is a great big hole the same size somewhere else.

On a seperate note, my twins did 9 craps yesterday and it went to landfill at 8:30am this morning


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:28 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Yeah but MF, we need to reduce our rubnbish across the board. No point at all ignoring something you can change just because something else is worse.

At our house, the disposables we do use are about 40-50% of our total throwaway rubbish, and that's with using 1 a day sometimes two.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:34 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

There simply must be physical space for all the stuff we throw away, it all came from somewhere

That's pretty daft. So you are saying we should take all our plastic bottles and shove them down a deep hole in the middle east? Take all our paper waste, make it into big tall sticks and stick it in the ground in Sweden? Take all our metal and leave it in quarries in Russia?

Smart lad!


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah but MF, we need to reduce our rubnbish across the board. No point at all ignoring something you can change just because something else is worse.

Agreed - we do recycle what we can in our area (glass, card etc). But Harrogate Council don't do plastic for some inexplicable reason (nearest place is 18 miles away). We also make firebricks from old newspapers.

I have said several times on this thread that we initially looked at re-usables, but given the (arguable) negligible benefits we decided we would take what was the easier option for us on that one.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 5:42 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Yes mate, I have read that several times.. but this is now a discussion about disposability in general not about you 🙂


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

we plan to use (mostly) washable. In fact a friend has just given me a load free. result.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ermmm, actually it is a discussion about me 😉 and disposables it is, think they will fit in with our lifestyle and besides, I have ordered them now, all in £135 for a set that should see us through from "birth to potty".
If it works out then it is a bargain, if it doesn't it isn't a huge loss (am sure they will get some use).


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 6:58 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

£135 for a set of disposables? Do you mean re-usables?


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 7:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oh, ermmm, yea (damn, too late to edit it as well) I was just checking you were reading carefully? (most people clearly ignore most posts in a thread and someone has to go and read mine!!!)
Yes, with the £25 back from the council it comes in at £145 (late night maths let me down) for a set of reusables, [url= http://www.thatcuteage.com/p2242-Bambino-Mio-Birth-to-Potty-Cotton-Nappy-Set ]these ones as it happens...[/url]


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 7:40 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Ooh they are foldable squares.. brave 🙂 At least the wraps look well cut tho. Good luck.. tbh I think the squares will be easier to dry - the elastic in our tots buts bunches them up a bit which I think makes it a bit slower.


 
Posted : 22/02/2010 7:47 pm
Page 3 / 3