Long and thin or sh...
 

[Closed] Long and thin or short and fat - which do you prefer?

Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm talking roofboxes, obviously. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Gotta buy one for hols to France (baby's pram takes up the car boot).

I guess a long thin one might be better if I was ever to want to take a bike with me *ahem*.

For a Mazda 3, btw.

Cheers peeps!


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 10:04 am
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

Long and thin here, still room for 2 bikes.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 10:05 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

No need for one, I have a big car! ๐Ÿ˜‰

If I did have one, though, long and thin would win. More aero and room for skis...


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 10:08 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I have a big car

They all appear suddenly small when kitted out with "essential" baby equipment.

room for skis...

I'm not that bourgeois.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 10:34 am
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

I have a very big car..... But when you have children you can never have enough room.

I agree with sc-xc, I've got long and thin and room for a couple of bikes.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 10:37 am
Posts: 91159
Free Member
 

I have a small pram ๐Ÿ™‚

What makes life much easier with kids is not having too much crap to cart about.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We went long and fat for our Mazda 3.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 311
Full Member
 

I borrowed a long and fat one from some friends a couple of years ago when I had a Focus could fit lots of stuff in it, was a bit big though, looked OK on their car but absolutely huge on mine.....they did have a Grande Espace though......


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 2:10 pm
Posts: 91159
Free Member
 

Those of you with long fat ones (fnarr) - d'you reckon you could get a dismantled bike in one?


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 2:12 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hmm. I'm trying to establish whether I'd expect to use it along with a bike carrier. If I've got to despoil the car (yes, even a Mazda) with roof bars, I might as well use them for bike transporting.

If I do want both, then long and medium seems to be the trick (according to roofbox).


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 2:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Those of you with long fat ones (fnarr) - d'you reckon you could get a dismantled bike in one?

At a push I reckon yes - I am sure our roof box is bigger overall than my bike bag. The only issue would be if something was just that tiny bit too big to allow the box to close (ie pedals). The bike bag is flexible enough to allow a bit of flexibility.

Word of warning OMITN - Our roof box has been on for two years and (as it is the style that clamps on around the roof lip and under the top of the doors), over time it has started to damage the rubber seals at the door tops. But we were unable to remove ours as we have absolutely nowhere to store it so it has been on permanently for all that time.


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a long and thin one (about half car width) - plenty of space in it, whilst leaving room for bikes or surfboards or kayaks next to it.

Other thing to consider as mentioned above, is the space you need to store it in when its not on the car.

Also, I can fit mine on my own, but I think if you have a full width one you might need help lifting it - they're quite heavy (especially if you're lazy like me and leave it partially packed!) and you wouldn't want to drop it!


 
Posted : 15/07/2011 6:12 pm