[Closed] Intimate Waxing

I've been waxed, she didn't do the nads as she said it was seriously painful, but the rest was fine

It's bloody weird to me and just doesn't compute. Guess I'm old fashioned. I also think men shouldn't have their nails done or use sunbeds though. I also find being completely clean shaven to be odd too. Hang on, I'm the weird one 😯

That must be about the most amusing look of all. Bald as a coot around the whole area and a pair of massive hairy bollox right in the middle of the show.

Not so much Brazilian as Amish.

its about power and making women both subservient and childlike

Except the OP is a man, removing hair at the request of his wife? 😕

Personally I don't think it's got anything to do with subservience, any more than shaving armpits or beards has. Just preference and fashion really.

My nuts look like Gandalf, (and occasionally bellow 'You shall not pass!') So they have to be kept in check with some judicious trimming, no razor or wax though

Why do you want to look like prepubescent children?

To provide a nice canvas for a tattoo?

You're tattooing your arse and balls 😯

Personally I don't think it's got anything to do with subservience

It's all due to the hegemony of the cis-centric patrimony jackboot treading down on the underclass, maaaaaan!

(Or, just maybe, it's more fun when everything's neat and tidy in the fun department! Doesn't need to all go, just around the business district. 😈 )

Could I just add that a arse waxing would abate a clagnut issue. That's got to be a win in the bedroom. I can see how Mrs C would enjoy that.

And presumably young rugby players have no idea what they are singing about when they start the The Mayors Daughter song (And the hairs on her dicky di do hang down to her knees.....etc).

Funny thread, enjoyed reading this.

But isn't waxing a bit early 00's?

A best friend of mine (oh yes, a woman) plucks her "area" with tweezers.. just a trim not a full on 10yr old. She's said there is a sensation equal measure of pleasure and pain.

Try tweezers, OP.

And I applaud the OP's willing to please.

I find the hairless look really unattractive and what's more, life is way to short to be spending time constantly shaving or waxing to avoid stubble.

council - because thats what adults look like? I don't fancy prepubescent children and this fad for removing pubes is exactly that - its about power and making women both subservient and childlike

To be honest, that comment is small-minded, judgemental and rather insulting to the huge proportion of the population, male and female, who remove hair from any part of their body, whether it's genitals, legs, armpits, backs or face!

It has nothing whatsoever to do with being attracted to a younger or prepubescent body! Pubic hair is NOT the defining factor in sexual taste that defines whether you're a paedophile or not!

I think your attitude probably says a lot more about your sexual hang-ups than anything else...

A lot of men and women with healthy, active sex lives prefer hair-free partners as it makes certain sex acts FAR more enjoyable. I prefer to be hair free as it's more comfortable. Women prefer to be hair free as it increases sensitivity and feels nicer.

its about power and making women both subservient and childlike

there's some massive virtue signallers on this forum...

As pointed out it was a request from the OPs wife, and I've been with a couple of women that like it as well.

My ex used to wax purely for hygene reasons and the fact she swam a lot - she felt more comfortable like that.

So OP, do we have a decision?

A pal's GF reportedly said she prefers doing BJs on him when he is freshly trimmed. So, of course, he makes every effort to ensure he is box fresh

My ex used to wax purely for hygene reasons

It's purely a fashion choice and nothing whatsoever to do with hygiene.
Hygiene is about washing and not about hair.

Yep, as mentioned above you are [i]more[/i] likely to develop various STDs and fanny fungi if your crotch looks like it was made by Mattel.

Yep, as mentioned above you are more likely to develop various STDs and fanny fungi if your crotch looks like it was made by Mattel.

Or is it that those people who can be arsed to give their groins a bit of a spit and polish are doing so because they are hoping their goods and chattels will be in action with person/persons unknown in the not too distant future whilst those 20 plus years into a monogamous relationship might as well let the weeds grow over for all the action they are likely to see.

It's purely a fashion choice and nothing whatsoever to do with hygiene.

My OH says it 'feels' fresher, cleaner and more comfortable, so I suppose that could be classed as 'hygiene reasons'.

She doesn't parade it around in public, so I wouldn't say it's a fashion thing.

So OP, do we have a decision?

The jury is still out... I'm a little curious, and the benefits seem to be mounting up but I'm not sure I can face more of that pain!

Having said that, I've never seen my OH laugh so much (at my reaction, not my genitals), so I don't think she'll give up asking!

Yep, as mentioned above you are more likely to develop various STDs

As above, the incidence of STDs are due to increased sexual activity. Those that aren't getting any (like TJ) don't feel the need to prune their pubes.

Me and Mrs Dingo tried shaving us about 20 years ago,I found it very offputting as I'm used to women having pubic hair,and children not.It took 2 weeks for the very itchy stubble to grow out,and we both thought it was a waste of time.Now that we're older (62 and 52) we still do what we have always done,wash beforehand and enjoy the proceedings.Hygiene has nothing to do with it,as soap and water suffices,I think it is a reflection of the porn people now grow up with.

[quote=mefty ]
To provide a nice canvas for a tattoo?

[img] [/img]

Or is it that those people who can be arsed to give their groins a bit of a spit and polish are doing so because they are hoping their goods and chattels will be in action with person/persons unknown in the not too distant future

So you're telling us that having taken your clothes off, you're then being refused sex because you haven't shaved off your pubes? That's never happened to me, and anyone with such a weird hang-up isn't someone I'd be wanting to have a relationship with.

So you're telling us that having taken your clothes off, you're then being refused sex because you haven't shaved off your pubes? That's never happened to me, and anyone with such a weird hang-up isn't someone I'd be wanting to have a relationship with.

Not me. I'm in the 20yr plus relationship gang - refused sex is just par for the course irrespective of pube status. But I'd be amazed if you were to take a snap shot at 3am on a Saturday morning of all the people having unprotected sex with a new partner if the pubeless percentage was not significantly higher than the national average. Not least because most would be under 30 and pubeless is just considered standard to that age group (so I am told, no first hand experience since I too was under 30) in the way furry is normal to the current 40 plus age group.

Mrs Feet has a butterfly tattoo just below her bellybutton. When she lets her ladygarden grow it looks like it has been startled from a bush.

Not least because most would be under 30 and pubeless is just considered standard to that age group (so I am told, no first hand experience since I too was under 30) in the way furry is normal to the current 40 plus age group.

You may be right, but I have no intention of doing a google search! I'm pretty sure though that any decent study would be correcting for that sort of thing.

but I have no intention of doing a google search

I destroyed my virtual reputation and did 😀

[b]The study didn’t prove a clear cause and effect between pubic hair grooming and STIs, only that the two are connected[/b]. Nevertheless, causation is “plausible” according to authors E Charles Osterberg and his colleagues, “because the act of grooming with razors or shavers causes epidermal microtears, which may permit epithelial penetrance by bacterial or viral STIs”. (Translation: if you’re grooming your pubic hair, you might end up cutting yourself which could make you more vulnerable to getting an STI.)

But there are other possible explanations. Some people might have chosen to remove their pubic hair after discovering that they have an STI.[b] It’s also possible that people who groom their pubic hair have different sex lives from those who don’t – either having more frequent sex or engaging in more risky sexual behaviors. Weekly sexual activity was more common among those who groomed their pubic hair than those who didn’t.[/b]

Seems like a bit of bobbins research then if they can't disassociate the two.

Seems like a bit of bobbins research then if they can't disassociate the two.

This is true. We might as well postulate that shavers have lower than average intelligence, which means they're less likely to use protection...

I reckon we could also conclude that shaving your pubes increases your chances

I can categorically tell you that when "dating" (read that as getting laid) women actively state they prefer clean shaven or well trimmed.

Whilst I'm sure most of us are secret manscapers to some degree, however a lass asking me to wax would definitely be a red card offence, unless she were a multi-millionaire and/or had a dad who owned a large brewery.

Surely to be a hipster it should be a small brewery?

Or is it that those people who can be arsed to give their groins a bit of a spit and polish are doing so because they are hoping their goods and chattels will be in action with person/persons unknown in the not too distant future whilst those 20 plus years into a monogamous relationship might as well let the weeds grow over for all the action they are likely to see

You are making a huge assumption that hair-free automatically equals clean and hygienic.
If hair is un hygienic why not shave your head?

You are making a huge assumption that hair-free automatically equals clean and hygienic.
If hair is un hygienic why not shave your head?

Just looks less hairy to me. Then again I equate sparkly with clean. If you're going to run your nads through one of those bowling ball polishers after shaving them then you might be on to something. If not, then you're just going to look like an action man toy or a sufferer of dick alapetia.

You are making a huge assumption that hair-free automatically equals clean and hygienic.

I'm not, I've not even considered if pubes effect hygiene. Does it? No idea myself. I'm just saying those that tidy up are more sexually active than those that don't in the belief that it looks better. And that has just as much a chance of effecting incidence of STDs as anything else.

If hair is un hygienic why not shave your head?

Interesting analogy. I do shave my head as a matter of fact. No idea if it is more hygienic or not but I do it in the vain attempt to make myself look better. Possibly closer to the pube shavers than I had previously recognised.

I like hairy men! I much prefer Mr Pea's hairy winter legs than his summer shaved roadie legs.

I like hairy men! I much prefer Mr Pea's hairy winter legs than his summer shaved roadie legs.

As a triathlete in the late 90's when racing in budgie smugglers was a thing we all shaved high. I remember getting out of the pool and into the shower with one well know triathlete. He pulled off his trunks down his super smooth legs to reveal a perfect super hairy version of his trunks in thick matted black hair underneath. Knowing where to stop shaving was always tricky!

Ironically shaving the pubic area was once associated with being 'clean' as it reduced the chances of lice. However 'Merkins' were apparently introduced to cover up the genital scarring caused by STDs.

I don't have a problem with body hair on women - I think it's unrealistic to expect someone to be completely devoid of all body hair - hopefully they've got better things to do with their life and disposable income.

A number of female friends don't shave their legs in winter and a few have admitted to not shaving their armpits - often due to skin irritation with antiperspirants etc But they do feel under pressure to conform to perceived social 'norms'.

Years ago a lady doctor friend once told me that there was a correlation between pubic grooming and social-ecomonic class in her GP catchment area:

Lower class women would be neatly shaved
Middle class women would be trimmed
Wealthly horse-y type landowners would be completely bushy & unkempt

Despite shaving my face for 35+ years I still cut myself and get ingrowing hairs - I wouldn't trust myself to shave 'Steven and the Twins' on a regular basis ... I did this before I had the snip and it wasn't pretty. Don't see any problem with trimming/grooming though. Surely it's no different from having a haircut or trimming unwanted nose or ear hair.

how much of it is 'the optical inch'

http://www.newshub.co.nz/entertainment/how-manscaping-gives-men-that-extra-optical-inch-2009090809

After all, who wouldn't want to double the size of wee jonny?

[quote=theotherjonv ]After all, who wouldn't want to double the size of wee jonny?

With the extra inch? Speak for yourself...

how much of it is 'the optical inch'

Every little helps!! 😀

She's not shut up about it, I suspect I'm going to have to let her "let rip"... I'm starting to think I might have a sado-masochist for a life partner...

She's female - of course she's a sado-masochist......

OP - first off, don't use waxing strips at home! That's not what they're designed for and it will hurt. A lot. Fair chance you'll take a layer or two of skin off too...

Go to a pro who specialises in male intimate waxing - loads about. They'll use hot wax rather than strips.

I've done it on and off for a few years now, initially because I was getting a lot of chaffing and rashes when cycling regardless of what shorts / chamois cream combo I used so thought I'd give the smooth look a try. Definite sensitivity benefits in the bedroom too!

Go to a pro who specialises in male intimate waxing

Ears, nose, back but no crack for me.

As such, the Mrs took her epilator to my back last night... No one likes a hairy back.

On the shoulders it hurt but was ok but down by the kidney area ... OMG !!

Still she got to the parts I cant reach on my own with the beard trimmer and I'm now all smooth and lovely 😉

I can see the job centre advert now...

"Do you like to be up shit creek without a follicle?

Want to spend your days gazing at the stars?

Apply to: Hair Today, Gurn Tomorrow.."

I've done it on and off for a few years now, initially because I was getting a lot of chaffing and rashes when cycling regardless of what shorts / chamois cream combo I used so thought I'd give the smooth look a try. Definite sensitivity benefits in the bedroom too!

Well, it's taken 4 pages - and whilst I'm happy to have caused a little amusement and ridicule along the way, we finally have a sensible answer! Thanks Dash!

One of the main reasons for my curiosity was the issue of cycling comfort... Trimmed/shaven is far more comfortable for me than full-on caveman, and whilst I don't suffer from chafing, the skin can become a little sore in certain places when stubble is at a certain length.

So, jiggy-jiggy reasons aside (for now), are there any drawbacks (sorry, dreadful choice of words) from a cycling point of view?

as noted before the ladies of BC have been ordered to go 'au naturel' because even done properly it causes damage to the skin / epidermis and can lead to irritation and infections. Don't see why that would be different for men.

Full jungle FTW.

Ladies of BC

Edit; ah; British Cycling. Sauce? 😆 😛

are there any drawbacks (sorry, dreadful choice of words) from a cycling point of view?

You might catch a nasty chill if you join in on World Naked Bike Ride day?

[quote=v8ninety ]Edit; ah; British Cycling. Sauce?

http://bfy.tw/CwSL

Source:

https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/knowledge/skills/article/izn20160510-Set-up-Women%E2%80%99s-saddle-issues-0

British Cycling.

I'm not doing it at work, but if you Google 'British Cycling womens pubic hair olympics', you'll find out

Crikey; ironic given roadie's predisposition towards hairlessness 😆

womens pubic hair olympics

Sounds a lot more watchable than football.

[b]ANYTHING[/b] is a lot more watchable instead of football!

I'm surprised the management haven't shared this thread on the singletrack fb feed yet 🙂

For those going completely (or almost completely) bald down there - or contemplating doing so - how hairy are your legs? Do you leave your legs hairy and so end up with the reverse triathlete effect of hairy legs and a bald bit in the middle? I'm not the most hirsute (no back hair), but have a normal hairy chest which extends down over my stomach, so would end up with a weird bald patch in between chest and legs. So where do you stop shaving - does the chest hair have to go too?

Deffo got to be done. Cycling with full hair around my arse and balls feels like everything gets a lot sweatier. Tend to clipper the main forest and shave the meat and veg. Hair removal cream for the crack every so often.

Reckon a wax would feel great after the initial pain. Hair removal cream works well but doesnt take the hair as short as a fresh razer. It ends up feeling like a day or two after shaving but without the Razer burn or itchiness. Not very good in properly dense areas though...

tjagain - Member
council - because thats what adults look like? I don't fancy prepubescent children and this fad for removing pubes is exactly that - its about power and making women both subservient and childlike . its a fashion fad and an unhealthy one driven by american porn

I still think it's a total waste of time, this constant effort to remove something that performs a function. I appreciate that some people are turned off by hair, but to some of us, spending excessive time on grooming is a turn-off.

What function does it perform vicky? The scientific community are divided on the purpose of pubic hair, many think it's just a hangover from our ancestoral past when we were completely covered in thicker hair...

I've considered the other opinions - sweat transportation, friction reduction etc - and they don't really match my experiences of before and after hair removal.

If its purpose was to reduce friction, why don't we have it between our fingers and toes? Or the back of our knees?

If its purpose was to reduce friction, why don't we have it between our fingers and toes? Or the back of our knees?

So it's just me that has it there then?? 😈

You're just lazy and not getting any Vicky.

You need to be more like Bob.
Bob doesn't have any "down there"..
Bob gets lots of lurrrrrrrrrve....

[img] [/img]

Since I had the snip and shaved my balls for the occasion, I've grown to like being trimmed down there. But that's two minutes with a trimmer for a short back and sides rather than a wax. No way I'd wax - sounds way too painful. From a cycling perspective it's definitely more comfy to be trimmed instead of having a thick forest that chafes a bit more.
Got a mate that tells a great story about his lass at the time wanting him to be more trimmed 'downstairs'. She persuaded him to use Veet. He mis-read the instructions and left in on too long 😳 😯 😳 😯
Took his skin weeks to recover. So avoid that too!

I remember cycling in my more hirsute youth, I don't want to go into too much detail, but the pedalling action had the effect of folding Little Council back on himself into the tangle where he'd become inextricably imprisoned in a knotted thatch of wiry hair...

Damn it, I've just gone into too much detail again...

Interestingly (tho not very) no other boys here have ever waxed, I've only skimmed the thread but am I the only one?

Lots of opinion though

Not the only one.

There are about one-and-half more Giant!

Very hairy throwback here, got very paranoid about it as a lad and would avoid swimming, I'd keep my t-shirt on at the beach etc....

Started getting my back and shoulders waxed in my late 20s (which coincided nicely with gym results appearing) and never looked back re. female attention, now obviously some of that will be increased confidence but some of it is the look....muscular bloke, confident in own skin and proudly wearing hairy chest and legs seemed to bring out something primal in the ladies, similar to the way most blokes prefer the natural curves of women to the skeletal catwalk model shape.

To keep things from looking silly with a bare back, shoulders and arms i trim with scissors down below but shaving or waxing!?....no way, having the less sensitive bits done is bad enough!

Very hairy throwback here, got very paranoid about it as a lad and would avoid swimming, I'd keep my t-shirt on at the beach etc....

Started getting my back and shoulders waxed in my late 20s (which coincided nicely with gym results appearing) and never looked back re. female attention, now obviously some of that will be increased confidence but some of it is the look....muscular bloke, confident in own skin and proudly wearing hairy chest and legs seemed to bring out something primal in the ladies, similar to the way most blokes prefer the natural curves of women to the skeletal catwalk model shape.

To keep things from looking silly with a bare back, shoulders and arms i trim with scissors down below but shaving or waxing!?....no way, having the less sensitive bits done is bad enough!

[img] [/img]

Jesus Christ your search histories...

(I hope you had to search.)

Nothing to add on waxing. Waning on the other hand...

Until reading this thread I really hadn't appreciated how much of a tangled mess I'd amassed in my 49 yrs, after a ten minute stint with my nail scissors in my hotel room last night I woke this morning to an extra two inches I'd never seen , adding that to the hair hopefully not getting trapped between my roll of fat and my Lycra could be a win win, now I'm just going to see how long it takes Mrs S to notice !!

What's first, Christmas or your birthday?

😀 wait4me ,50 on 1st August I can guarantee she still won't know by the 2nd