Forum menu
[i]I got an email accusing me of bullying and a ban after linking three of the OP's own threads to demonstrate his own behaviour and attitudes were perhaps the source of his problems.[/i]
Edukator.
You make a good point, its a little inconsistent on here recently.
Whatever you do, dont' make referrence to wooden cooking untensils, the mods come down very heavily on that sort of thing.
I won't deny I've posted things that upon refelction.
I'd have rather re-written or not posted at all.
However, I do not blow it all off as other forumusers might with a total disregard for the feelings of others, and employing the Edinburgh defence.
Instead I try to use my mistakes to curb that sort of thing from me.
It would seem that some here are very worked up and bitter about something and in light of recent moderator behaviour I'd not suggest anyone disagree with them here.
I find this all very pityful, I guess some leopards just never change their spots.
Instead, just let the drivel continue.
๐
EDIT:
Oh !, is that the time...
๐
www.bullyonline.org lists many characteristics of internet bullying. IMO, these ring a bell:
The serial bully:
โข is a convincing, practised liar and when called to account, will make up anything spontaneously to fit their needs
โข has a Jekyll and Hyde nature
โข relies on mimicry, repetition and regurgitation
โข holds deep prejudices
โข is also quick to belittle, undermine, denigrate and discredit anyone who calls, attempts to call, or might call the bully to account
โข often has an overwhelming, unhealthy and narcissistic attention-seeking need
โข is spiritually dead
โข often misses the semantic meaning of language, misinterprets what is said, sometimes wrongly thinking that comments of a satirical, ironic or general negative nature apply to him or herself
โข is constantly imposing on others a false reality made up of distortion and fabrication
โข sometimes displays a seemingly limitless demonic energy
i still feel bad about writing +1 instead of claire.... i hope you've explained to her that you two were all broked up and not back together again at the time of writing the invite?
when you get a ban you never agree with the mods. However if the mods did not send folk to the naughty step I shudder to think what this place would be like.
I think they have difficult job, as forum chat reveals, we all draw the line somewhere different be it a poster or a mod.
relies on mimicry, repetition and regurgitation
you have posted that before haven't you ๐
No, TSY, not you, unless you have another pseudo and really drive a black Audi. That OP now makes a positive contribution to the bike forum rather than ranting about his ex on the chat side.
Edit: and yes Phil, sometimes there is no intent to what is seen a bullying. Some people do seem to lack self-awareness, me included it would seem.
JY - ๐
when you get a ban you never agree with the mods.
I generally do agree with them.
Someone complains, finds a way of taking offence, has their own peculiar way of looking at the world and the mods have to make a judgement call...
It's going to be easier to ban the protagonist than deal with the issues of the assumed victim.
Plus sometimes I definitely just break the rules. And rules is rules.
i'm still waiting for an eplanation from Single_tracker on:
This thread is pretty pathetic, indeed even sad. Its no mystery what Phil and Yeti are doing and I'm just surprised the mods have let it run.
They are complicite or ignorant to what these two are doing.
Its types like you two that mean I rarely come here and post.
well, single_tracker, if you're reading this then please do explain.... reviewing the thread i'm struggling to see how my contribution is negative. singling out myself (and yeti... but to be fair, yetis deserves it for being healthier than me) as a negative influence on this thread and the forum feels like i'm being bullied.
I was on the end of being bullied at the beginning of secondary school. Nothing major though and it got sorted quickly. It doesn't help when one is incredibly handsome and a bit of a shortarse. Bully's invariably bully to compensate for a lack of something or other in their own lives.
I have no issue with teh bans I have had
At great risk of derailing this thread
Teamhurtmore
I suggest you look at your contributions on this thread
http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/anyone-else-not-want-kids
Where you made no contribution to the thread bar personal attacks on me
Just reflect on your behaviour and why you feel it necessary to attack me continuously.
Did the girls save you by screaming not the face?
I'm guessing Single_tracker will disappear and someone else will get a 'P' in fron of their name Phil.
Deadly....so now you take it out on people like me by picking on my tattoos and saying mrsconsequence is ugly, possibly non-existent? so now you're bullying me as well as Single_tracker?
*feels bullied*
EDIT - if thats the case yeti then thats somebody using a second log in to specifically bully me (and you). i know you're not bothered but as someone who tries to contribute positively towards the forum its kinda hurtful.
TJ by page three a number of posters are having a go at you for what you said and THM is still not on the thread
Ah page 4 we get
7teamhurtmore - Member
Extraordinary that people feel entitled to cast value judgements on others' decisions on whether or not to have children. Sadly no surprise at (certain) individuals concerned. Will they ever learn or will the moderators ever stop such behaviour? Or is tolerance implying that such behaviour is condoned?
same page lower down
Stoatsbrother - Member
TJ As I posted, I respect people who take that decision, and think they don't have to justify themselves.You had a go at parents long before Janesy posted his/her stupid remark. But then the Edinburgh defence...
Every thread, every thread...
muggomagic - Member
The thing is TJ if you had a kid they might think you were wise and knowledgable. Just for a few years anyway.
granted it degeneartes into a bun fight between the two of you from there but Page three DD says
deadlydarcy - Member
What a weird and frankly rude thing to say.
I'm guessing that that could be applied to at least one of your statements every day TeeJ. For once, in one * thread, is there any chance you'd just shut the * up. Jeezus wept.
and
deadlydarcy - Member
Because of course, high and mighty is a description that could never be applied to yourself TeeJ. Don't be a hypocrite on top of everything else.
You attacked me on the helmet threads then accused me of saying personal things about you [ yes I[everyone] know you will deny it you always do]. ..TJ occasionally it is you and I fail to see why you hate THM so much and why you feel the need to do this it reminds me of al and you except this time you are al.
many posters say this to you TJ are we ll wrong?
I accept you dont generally mean to do it but that does not mean you dont.
Your never ending spat with THM is boring now i am sure if you stopped he would as well. PLEASE
It's just that they don't post very often (as they like to point out everytime they post) Phil, but found this thread, You and me in particular, offensive enought to contribute something.
Almost like they have personal issues with us. Maybe it's Jamie? We didn't invite him round to your house the other week. But then the posting style is a bit different to his...
just wondering how STW towers will be policing the single login, IP checks are going to be tricky as there are several mr and mrs combos (or mr&mr, miss&miss and shortly mrs&mrs) who I assume will use the same PC at times.Mark - Can you reinstate MrsYeti... hard to believe, maybe, but it actually is my Mrs.
By reacting when it becomes apparent/obvious. That's how we see folk with "lifetime" bans re-appearing.D0NK - Member
just wondering how STW towers will be policing the single login,
Junkyard - just read it. His only contribution is to make personal attacks on me. Why do I dislike him - because of his continual personal attacks on me.
Hopwever I am not going to discuss this with you - its clear to most fair minded folk who read that thread what he is doing.
Stoatsbrother missed a post I was answering thus thought I had done something I had not and had a go at me. teamhurtmore then took his opportunity seeing a couple of folk have a go at me to make unfounded personal attacks as he frequently does.
i do genuinely feel like i'm being bullied by certain forum members.
Personal attacks, eh... .
Its no mystery what [s]Phil and Yeti[/s] all of you lot are doing.
(I hardly ever post on here and I'd like to take this opportunity to point that out, but don't think I don't know ๐ )
Stop being such a ****ing douche Phil!
yeah but that involves trawling the forums (or other users doing it for you) the monday lunchtime deadline sounded like they had "a Plan"By reacting when it becomes apparent/obvious
JY - don't get drawn in (even though your observations are correct)! Point 5 proved exactly!
Of course with all those points, I have should have added, "if the cap fits wear it" ๐
Teamhurtmore
You have had posts deleted for accusing me of being a bully.
If the cap fits wear it indeed.
Any fair minded person can see what you are doing and its very unpleasant.
Snidey posts clearly intended to be attacks on me as above - but carefully put to try to stay within the rules. You really are very nasty indeed.
Why you feel it nessasary to make baseless personal attacks as in the thread I linked to I do not understand.
TJ, your posts are coming across as personal attacks on THM.
please dont view this as a personal attack on you.
I'm sorry, but this has gone on long enough.
BINNERS!
If you are going to post 'amusing' pictures, then at least use high quality images, with minimal artifacts and least 800 pixels wide.
STW, where the bullies get bullied.
Then cry foul/go running to the mods/cry. ๐
If you are going to post 'amusing' pictures, then at least use decent quality images, and least 800 pixels wide.
I think I'm qualified to say that non of those pictures could be considered decent in any way, shape or form.
so you're bullying me now too DS? i'd report you but as the mods have let single_trackers posts say on this thread its obvious they dont care.
Phil - I accept that - but what am I to do? he continually makes nasty snidey attacks on me - I have asked him to stop, I have tried ignoring him - he continues to do so.
Just read the thread I linked for one of many examples.
What I find really galling is he accuses me repeatedly of being a bully while atempting to bully me
Donk - My view is that they know that a 'Premier' log in is the 2nd log in of a more frequent poster and are giving that person a chance to decide which log-in they want to keep.
TJ - I made general points. You chose to jump on them (again) - your call!! If you choose to think that my post was directed at you or any other individual, then so be it. But JY was correct in his observations.
if you stopped he would as well. PLEASE
That has always been the case.
so you're bullying me now too DS?
Some call it bullying others call it gentle caressing. What can I do?
"STW, where the bullies get bullied."
Or
Where sane,cool,fun and nice individuals turn into stupid, nerdy, boring, goons
Keep a lid on it... would you act or re-act like you do here in "real life"... I think/hope not.
DS - you could start by a) not being a bully and b) not intimidating me with your 'i have jsut ridden 453km on edmondo as a gentle warm up to breakfast, see my ride here' tweets.
thank you x
DS - you could start by a) not being a bully and b) not intimidating me with your 'i have jsut ridden 453km on edmondo as a gentle warm up to breakfast, see my ride here' tweets.
Sorry, there appears to be a problem with the Twitter updates if you're not getting the 40bpm heartrate updates too.
*runs off to check settings*
Teamhurtmore - stop lying.
I stopped completely interacting with you and you continued to do make unpleaseant personal attacks on
On the thread I linked to I had not interacted with you at all but you still found it necessary to attack me as your only contribution
I did think twice about mentioning it at all on this thread but its such a clear example.
I did not make any value judgement, I did not slag off parents in any way - i did nothing to justify your attacks on me at all
teamhurtmore - MemberExtraordinary that people feel entitled to cast value judgements on others' decisions on whether or not to have children. Sadly no surprise at (certain) individuals concerned. Will they ever learn or will the moderators ever stop such behaviour? Or is tolerance implying that such behaviour is condoned?
teamhurtmore - MemberPage 2:
TandemJeremy - Member
... having children is irresponsible and the most un green thing you can do just about... Having kids is the easy decision to take...Will you ever stop? Have some sensitivity just once.
{edit - druidh - fair point! But consistently applied?]
Quote cut to deliberately alter the meaning - what I said was
I enjoy being able to do what I want to do when I want to do it, I do not wish to have anyone dependent on me, [b]I believe[/b] the world is overpopulated and having children is irresponsible and the most un green thing you can do just about.
teamhurtmore - MemberThe so-called Edinburgh defence isn't even funny this time. Calling parents irresponsible is making a clear value judgement. Try being polite and sensitive just once. Or try telling those who want to be parents but can't that its ok, you are not being irresponsible like the rest of them.
Note also
muddydwarf - MemberI don't see that TJ has said anything untowards here, can you all please back off and let an interesting thread run?
Sorry, there appears to be a problem with the Twitter updates if you're not getting the 40bpm heartrate updates too.
*runs off to check settings*
lol i am getting this too, and iDaves. its all very intimidating. figured you two were in competition to see who could get their hearts to stop first!




