I'm gonna sue ...
 

[Closed] I'm gonna sue you for a lifetime supply of chocolate...

Posts: 6926
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Because they were no wafers in my KitKat... WTF is this country coming to?

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/woman-gets-waferless-kitkat-demands-083724210.html

The loss I have suffered is of monetary and emotional significance


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 10:36 am
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

I'm gonna sue you for a lifetime supply of chocolate...

No need, Charlie.
Just give him back his everlasting gobstopper.
It's the final test.


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 10:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Getting a solid bar of chocolate without the wafer or biscuit in was always the dream. She hit the chocolate jackpot and she's complaining - how joyless is her life that she didn't go round the house telling her great victory to anyone that would listen?


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 10:44 am
Posts: 28592
Free Member
 

Or:

[url= http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/02/owner-photobomb-horse-demands-share-2000-selfie-prize ]Who says horse owners are irrational harpies?[/url]


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 10:44 am
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

The girl is clearly insane.
A waferless kitkat is a thing of joy and a surprise to be treasured.
I must write to Nestle and ask them to send me all their wafer free rejects, which I would dispose of*.
*[i]free of charge[/i]


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 10:48 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Let her sue, she needs to know the difference between right and wrong...
And be charged for the privilege.
😛


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 11:01 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

"Law student".

So this is going to pop up when her prospective future employers Google her name.

Is that incredibly stupid or a stroke of genius?


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 11:11 am
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Must be a publicity stunt by her. To the rest of us normal people she appears to be unreasonable and an knob (swear filter would edit what I wanted to say) but to a law firm she is probably just the kind of person they want - able to make a molehill into a mountain for more compensation for their client and fees for them. Just think of 25% of a lifetime supply of kit kats for the firm.

Good proof reading on the article also "But when she opened the bars to find them [b]waterless[/b],"


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 11:27 am
Posts: 17828
Full Member
 

Law Student.....sounds like she's done a module on 'duty of care' and wants to show everyone how clever she is.

Moron.

PS - Fingerless Kitkats are things to be savoured.


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 11:52 am
Posts: 78225
Full Member
 

If I were Nestlé I'd send her a free pack of chocolate-less wafers to set the balance right.

(There's precedence here; I remember years ago some assclown whining to That's Life about an Aero with no bubbles in it. Rowntree (I think it was then) responded by sending them a pack of air.)


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 11:55 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I had a stick of Kit Kat once. It was half just chocolate and half filled with wafer. I ate it.
Nobody knew this until now. Isn't the Internet fantastic?
Everything that nobody gives an absolute shit about can now be found out by people from all over the world.


 
Posted : 02/02/2016 12:27 pm