Community

Forum menu
If an aeroplane lan...
 

[Closed] If an aeroplane landed on a conveyor belt...

Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.theengineer.co.uk/1011845.article?cmpid=TE01

See the second comment down...
Its being taken seriously.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 4:52 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Erm...no, it's clearly not.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 4:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

theoretically it is fine though. practically it seems ridiculous. not going to happen. I don't think they meant it as a practical solution though since they said

Lateral thinking suggests


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 5:10 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I know. Ii just saw the words "conveyor belt" and though of the legendary thread.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 5:31 pm
Posts: 17829
Full Member
Posts: 23491
Full Member
 

Could they not save time as well as money by landing on the baggage carousel?


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 5:56 pm
Posts: 8093
Free Member
 

No reason why it wouldn't work, though I do wonder whether an electrical system could ever deliver the phenomenal braking power modern aircraft brakes develop. It's a normal occurrence to see brake temperatures nudging 450C about 20 minutes after landing - having said that, if this could be captured and not pumped into the atmosphere by the brake fans it might be useful.

Bit of number crunching suggests that each brake unit would need to be able to capture about 2MW during the landing roll. Taxi out? Well, the APU can only supply 90kW and is at 30-40% load just running the normal electrical system, so assuming even 45kW available it's not going to be quick. Again, back of the envelope maths suggests 30 seconds continuous acceleration will get you to about 11 mph, which is going to royally piss off* the queue behind you at places like Amsterdam, where normal taxi speeds are about 35 mph.

So it's a nice idea, but I'll eat my shoes if it ever comes to fruition.

[i]* I know this because I once pootled along at 15 knots and was ordered by ATC to pull onto a parallel taxiway to let the plane behind overtake. Highly embarrassing.[/i]


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:04 pm
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

Someone told me that Concorde used a tonne of fuel just to get to the start of the runway! crazy.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:05 pm
Posts: 9589
Full Member
 

flaperon - that is so interesting.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:13 pm
Posts: 8093
Free Member
 

The sarcasm is overwhelming there.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:35 pm
Posts: 9589
Full Member
 

flaperon - certainly no sarcasm from me. I love aircraft and having grown up under Manchester airport flightpath, I was lucky enough to see so many different types over the years.
Envy you your job as I was never clever anough to apply to be a pilot.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:38 pm
Posts: 8093
Free Member
 

D'oh - sorry, been a long and very tough day (up at 2am)...


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 7:09 pm
Posts: 9589
Full Member
 

๐Ÿ™ That's the problem with working shifts.


 
Posted : 02/03/2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 9066
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/03/2012 12:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a normal occurrence to see brake temperatures nudging 450C about 20 minutes after landing

gives me a good excuse to post this ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 03/03/2012 1:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Someone told me that Concorde used a tonne of fuel just to get to the start of the runway! crazy.

I've never worked on a Concorde, but for some of our bigger aircraft we work on 900kg taxi fuel. So 1000kg is believable...


 
Posted : 03/03/2012 9:09 am
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

Aircraft carriers with conveyer belts instead of catapults

excellent


 
Posted : 03/03/2012 9:19 am