Forum menu
iDave diet and...
 

[Closed] iDave diet and...

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Edinburgh defence in pictorial form? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so if something annoys me, its Ok if there is a smiley? nob eds ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

phil.w, very interesting, where is that taken from?

The iDave diet was 'put out there' as a means of helping people lose weight quickly, safely, without the hunger pangs or energy slumps caused by other ways of eating/diets. It seems to be pretty effective at getting someone down to around 12% body fat and increasing energy levels and general well-being. Like any diet or indeed exercise program, the complexity of the human body and in particular individual variations in our biochemistry mean that it isn't the 'perfect' solution. But it's a bloody good one. I believe I have enough professional and personal experience to make a call on what I feel is best for me as a recreational athlete and also as a coach who advises elite athletes - and if others find it works for them too, then thats lovely.

I may find something more effective next year, I may not. In the meantime, I feel it's a healthy and easy to follow (and very cheap) way of eating food (and drinking red wine).

Conventional wisdom holds that a high GI diet increases metabolic disease risk by causing repeated glucose and insulin spikes.

I'd have said that 'conventional wisdom' is saying that fatty foods cause metabolic disease?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not as cheap as the cheapest meal though... is it? *insert smiley*

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15752918


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that's quite poetic TSY, I might have one of those on Saturday


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

iDave i dont think you're remotely qualified enough to comment the iDave diet... please leave it to the experts to discuss ffs.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

phil.w, very interesting, where is that taken from?

The link I gave.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

idave - came through on my RSS feed from [url= http://triathlete-europe.competitor.com/2011/11/16/sports-science-update-revisiting-the-glycemic-index/ ]triathlete europe[/url]. They regularly have some good articles, but like all magazines just scratch the surface of the subject.

Another good resource I have been pointed to recently is the [url= http://www.ausport.gov.au/ais/nutrition ]Australian Institute of Sport[/url] website.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I want one, but I don't buy cheap as **** bread. I don't think it'll work with wholemeal ๐Ÿ™

Regarding the diet... do those that have benifited the most of a leaning towards poorer food choices pre the diet? I'm guessing my diet has always been closer to hilldodgers than to say Molly's. As even when following the iDiet principles I still don't reach for a can of coke or a chocolate bar for my fast carbs.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:47 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I'm back to normal weight and I haven't really changed my diet much. Just less beer during the week.

I heard that toast sandwich thing this morning on the Beeb and thought to myself "Jeezus, the iDietSubscribers will be frothing". ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So are you no longer DD?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 7:44 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I'll always be DD TSY.

This year, I'm 40DD.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 7:51 pm
Posts: 4418
Full Member
 

Solo - Member

A wholegrain isn't a processed grain is it
What is your wholemeal bread made from exactly ?.
Do you know how many batches of vermin contaminated wholegrain flour, don't get spotted.
Like its not easy seeing rat pooh in wholemeal flour.
Kinda tend to detect rat hair and pooh in white flour more easily, dont' we.
Go ask the "farming today" folk.
They told me all about it.

Go on humour me about how much your "farming today" folk actually know about flour milling.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 7:54 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Nutrition scientists are now finding that the effect of foods on blood glucose levels may have more to do with individual biochemistry than with the foods themselves

Very interesting...

Re phil.w's c&p.. not sure it's sound analysis, is it? If only certain groups were susceptible to obesity caused by high GI diet, then comparing the population at large would not reveal a strong link, surely?

A better question would be what percentage of overweight people have a high GI diet?

Also, there's a large amount of adaptation going on, so people who have been eating high GI for a while may have adapted which would be yet another variable because the adapations could have different consequences.

Re the timing of eating - anyone who's been jet-lagged can tell you a bit about that.
One day we will be able to stick a chip in our brain stems and monitor our metabolisms, and then you'll get a customised readout of exactly what causes what in your body and with your lifestyle, and a perfect diet for whatever your goals are.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 9:15 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Refined Carbohydrate sensitivity - some people may not be able to deal with a small or modest glucose surge without it turning into fat.

Another school of thought.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 9:44 pm
Page 2 / 2