Forum menu
Is that pro rata, or just a meaningless statement you made up?
No it's absolute numbers. No one has an accurate count of how many times people go swimming outside for obvious reasons - although some estimates are surprisingly high.
Blimey you lot* are a bunch of paranoid scaredy-cats!!
Chuck a wetsuit on (ideally a tri/swim specific one) and get in there! If its safe to sail or windsurf on then its safe to swim in [b]as long as you wear a wetsuit[/b]. The temperature of the water changes very little from winter to summer.
*except those who agree with me
chatting to a roady the other day on club ride who trains for his ultra triathlons and whatnot in the peak district resevoirs.
pretty sure he said he swims in all of them i.e. damflask, ladybower, stines etc.etc... a nice bit of variation. swims all year round too. even during all the snow we had.
scares me. tough as **** eh? and he was late 50's early 60's too.
badass! wouldnt catch me doing it.
From this it seems that the sea would be dangerous beyond belief for any kind of swimming? Waves, rips etc.
Think most of the signs are just because the water authorities don't want to be responsible for 2 many drownings.
Yes I know swimming in the sea can be dangerous but so is riding to work, or crossing the street, we just need to be aware of the real risks not the made up ones.
If you're interested in natural swimming, there's an interesting book by Roger Deakin "Waterlog".
Basically he set out to swim through the British Isles.
Looks like swimming is divided into 2 camps like mtb - trailcentre v natural trails
Well the sea is pretty dangerous if you are in the wrong place. I suppose reservoirs would only be safe if you knew it was ok.
The thing is with the sea though is that one tends not to set out for the other side very often.
[url= http://www.amazon.co.uk/Wild-Swimming-Hidden-Waterfalls-Britain/dp/0955203678 ]Wild Swimming: 150 Hidden Dips in the Rivers, Lakes and Waterfalls of Britain[/url]
Mate of mine has this book which he dips into now and again.
Lost a mate to this in a rervoir we had all swimmed in as kids ...who knows why or exact cause but i dont swim in them anymore.
It sounds like most of you guys are dripping wet without even getting into the water.
I will pass that on to his family ๐
Note that I have swum in rivers and lakes many times.
I have a phobia about swimming in water where I cant see what is underneath me ๐ฅ just think it could be down there waiting for you and the big pike could come up and take a chunk outta you.
CK is that real?
EDIT: surely not, that close to the bank.
That wasn't directed at you Junkyard you posted while I was typing. It is tragic when people are hurt doing stuff like that but to try and wrap everyone up in cotton wool is a far worse fate for us all, a few people getting hurt doing daft things is a small price to pay. People need to be left to their own devices and not scaremongered by the H&S crowd.
Is it really wrapping us in cotton wool? Do you really KNOW if it's dangerous or not? Just because people THINK it's fine, doesn't mean it is. Take driving without seatbelts for instance, or having a few pints and driving home.
molgrips - yup, it's real, it's in ladybower res (2 of them). They're the overflow ducts that dump some mental quantity of water if it starts to rain heavily. Don't fall down them, they don't have a safety mesh as far as I know (to prevent blockages that could breach the dam) and they drop out at the bottom of the dam!
[url= http://tinyurl.com/33mdo7s ]There they are at lower water levels[/url]
Drac - Member
Berm Bandits School Days
LOL you could well be right Drac, but its that long ago I can't remember ๐
However, I suspect you would be surprised about how wrong you can be all in one post, and I think you may also have misunderstood where I'm coming from. My issue is with thoughtless and selfish stupidity ****ing up the use of a resource for everyone else, regretably it happens all too often, and the people least effected are the weekend heroes who go there just once or very occasionally, ignore the warnings, create an issue and then leave the aftermath for everyone else.
Most recent in my experience being the example given above, when my local reservoir came close to a total shut down to leisure users, and Thetford Forest where stupid and similar ignorance has led to some of the best trails in the forest being permanently closed (i.e. a harvester run along the entire length of trails). So it would be true to say that the "I can do whatever I like whenever I like on other peoples property" kind of attitude does indeed boil my piss...... for purely selfish reasons of course
joemarshall - MemberIs that pro rata, or just a meaningless statement you made up?
No it's absolute numbers. No one has an accurate count of how many times people go swimming outside for obvious reasons - although some estimates are surprisingly high
[url= http://www.rospa.com/leisuresafety/statistics/accidental-drownings-2005.aspx ]Absolute Numbers ?[/url]
That wasn't directed at you Junkyard
Ok point taken
The best advice would be don't swim alone.
Is that pro rata, or just a meaningless statement you made up?No it's absolute numbers. No one has an accurate count of how many times people go swimming outside for obvious reasons - although some estimates are surprisingly high
Absolute Numbers ?
That's interesting - if you look at the stats breakdown and just take the drownings of people intentionally swimming as opposed to getting drunk and falling in, or falling in for other reasons (from the ROSPA 2002 figures) you get:
Rivers (freshwater) 4
Lakes, reservoirs & canal 3
The sea 7
Estuaries & tidal rivers 4
Swimming pools 7
http://www.river-swimming.co.uk/stats.htm
which isn't that bad really.
Joe
I knew somebody whose mom wrapped him up in cotton wool, and it killed him.
Who'd a thunk it, huh?
That's interesting
Yep I noticed that too, if you take the figures, ignore the obvious facts, change them, interprete them to suit your own argument they then actually fit with that argument. Amazing really who would have thought it? ๐ฏ
Yep I noticed that too, if you take the figures, ignore the obvious facts, change them, interprete them to suit your own argument they then actually fit with that argument. Amazing really who would have thought it?
Well, they certainly don't suggest that people who choose to go swimming in reservoirs whilst not drunk, and don't dive in are in any particular risk. Which if reservoirs were as dangerous as several people above are suggesting, would surely be the case no?
Even in the original figures you posted, without the breakdown relating to what people were doing to get there (i.e. did they go swimming, or fall in or whatever), 10 people died in reservoirs, against 7 in swimming pools.
It doesn't mean that you shouldn't treat water with respect, but idiots saying that anyone swimming in basically any open water is in serious danger of their life (or even in much more danger than someone going in a boat on open water) don't help anyone. It's just the same as the idiots who say that people shouldn't cycle on the road.
Joe
Around five people a year suffer death by lightening strike and I dare say there are a few more people wondering around in storms than there are swimming in reservoirs.
but idiots saying that anyone swimming in basically any open water is in serious danger of their life
Which is very specifically [u][b]not[/b][/u] what I said, Joe.
I also think what you and the website you are quoting are very conveniently overlooking is the overall numbers of people swimming in reservoirs as opposed to the sea, or swimming pools. Not 100% certain, and can't be arsed to look but quietly confident that you will find that the vast majority of swimmers do the latter, whilst very few by comparision do the former. That alone makes the stats very different. It would also be wrong to presume that people who ignore saftey warnings do not also drink to excess. In my experience at my local reservoir leaping in and swimming is almost always related to being pished.
PS: An apology to joe marshall
Yep I noticed that too, if you take the figures, ignore the obvious facts, change them, interprete them to suit your own argument they then actually fit with that argument. Amazing really who would have thought it?
In retrospect that sounded very snotty to you personally, and I didn't mean it that way. What I meant was that the website is an interest group who are trying to prove that the ROSPA stats are wrong, so you have to take that into account when using that info. Sorry ๐ณ
So in summary then, reservoirs are the safest inland waters to go swimming in, including swimming pools?
It's simple. Swimming is safe.
Panicking kills you. Hypothermia kills you. Alcohol and water do not mix.
It helps if you teach your kids to swim properly. If they know they can swim a kilometre nonstop, they can swim even more, and are unlikely to panic. Naturally you should be able to do the same ๐
The sea is a good place to swim, especially in biggish waves. The Oz beach lifesaving culture creates some very strong and confident swimmers. We could have the same here now wetsuits are readily available and cheap.
We used to go out to the Barrier reef in small boats without life jackets - instead we took snorkels and flippers - you can't swim home in a life jacket, but you can, and it has been done, with a snorkel and flippers. We figured sharks and salt water crocs were more of a risk than drowning, and we weren't greatly concerned about them.
Swimming is all well and good as long as you don't get cramp or hypothermia, or have a heart attack or something. I believe that's where most of the problems occur in still inland water.
molgrips - Member
Swimming is all well and good as long as you don't get cramp...
So long as you don't panic, you can usually handle cramp.
Alcohol and water do not mix.
I think my old chemistry teacher would disagree....
zokes - Member
Alcohol and water do not mix.
I think my old chemistry teacher would disagree....
Probably should have said that having an alcohol content of 50% is ok ๐
Swimming is all well and good as long as you don't get cramp or hypothermia, or have a heart attack or something. I believe that's where most of the problems occur in still inland water.
I think part of why I'm very confident in flat water, is that I know that I can swim a km with legs or arms only, so even with cramp, I'd get out.
Hypothermia is a pain, and you do have to avoid it, but to be honest you'd be surprised at how long you can swim in pretty cold water without getting it, as long as you keep swimming. You do have to be slightly careful, and pay attention to your body. And also be aware that the really high risk point is when you get out into the cold and wind and stop swimming, at which point it is a good idea to get into any dry clothes you have handy and do a little dance until you're warm again!
The only time I've had any cold water worries, was filming [url=
youtube vid[/url] - because it was white water, there were a fair few pauses to stand on rocks and check the line on the next section, or just to get my breath back, so I did end up getting a bit chilly, and having to get out on a little beach and jog on the spot for 30 seconds, half way along. That river was dam release coming from the bottom of a big lake in the mountains, so it was jolly cold, although the weather outside was 25-30 degrees so it didn't matter much.
Joe
I must admit I'm not personally concerned about my abilities swimming, I would probably cross (and have crossed) open water, but I don't do it lightly. Same as I don't do other dangerous things lightly.
It IS dangerous (as is flinging yourself down a big steep hill) but it is doable if you take care. Thing is, if you get into trouble on land you just lie down for a bit - not possible on water.
[url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/10394503.stm ]Not stupid at all[/url]
Here you have the nub of the problem
I see the lads parents urging young people not to swim in open water.
How about urging young people to learn to swim properly instead?
reservoirs are different to lakes
if you swim in them it's an exercise in darwinism
triathlons etc are held in them but they are being restricted due to popularising access and swimming
propaganda for the nay sayers to shoot down
http://unitedutilities.co.uk/reservoirsafety.htm
Reservoirs? Easy. [url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/matt_outandabout/4721478277/ ]Sea, west coast of Scotland on the other hand is lethal.[/url]
coffeeking - Membermolgrips - yup, it's real, it's in ladybower res (2 of them). They're the overflow ducts that dump some mental quantity of water if it starts to rain heavily. Don't fall down them, they don't have a safety mesh as far as I know (to prevent blockages that could breach the dam) and they drop out at the bottom of the dam!
woah.....I'd love to go down one of those in a wooden barrel.
[quote> http://unitedutilities.co.uk/reservoirsafety.htm
br />
"The temperatures in reservoirs rarely get above freezing, even in summer."
BS
Jeezo some folk on here have a very strange attitude to safety. Be aware, know he risks and take sensible decisions. The only thing that would stop me swimming if I wanted to would be if they ask you not to so as not to contaminate the water.
How do some of you ever manage to cross a road let alone ride your bikes!
Jeezo some folk on here have a very strange attitude to safety
Not at all TJ, the simple fact is that you can't put a sign up that says don't swim in here unless your are entirely competent and are prepared to accept the risks in so doing are yours and yours alone. So you will tend to find the safety bods take things to a common denominator.
So why is it a problem when you guys then go ahead and ignore that?
Best example I can give is my local reservoir, which has a visitor centre and a water sports area, but signs up everywhere else stating though shalt not Swim, boat, allow dogs to swim, jump off bridges etc. The reason? Well lots of people think its because they charge for access to the visitor centre and don't want the place to be used FOC. Thus they then ignore all the signs. In fact its becuase the water company cleared all under water obstacles in the sanctioned area when the reservoir was built. Everywhere else they are still there, and often only just below the surface. Seriously dangerous, yet totally ignored by the wussacks that jump in/swim/boat outside the designated areas. (We do manage to contribute a few to the greater good of Darwenism on a fairly regular basis!)
So the fact is that the no swimming issue is often for good cause, and even if you and your ilk are good enough to avoid the risk or prepared to accept it, (which I very much doubt frankly), all you are doing is encouraging others who aren't, to do likewise. Much like the clip I posted above.
We won't agree on it, so park it there.
So the fact is that the no swimming issue is often for good cause, and even if you and your ilk are good enough to avoid the risk or prepared to accept it, (which I very much doubt frankly), all you are doing is encouraging others who aren't, to do likewise.
I agree with the issue about encouraging others - I disagree that I'm not good enough to avoid the risk. The link somebody posted to a water company website, the video on there showing how dangerous it was had people drinking and then getting cold in the water. Given I stay sober and wear a wetsuit (unless it's warm enough I'm sure I don't need one), I don't see how this applies to me. I'm pretty convinced I can avoid underwater obstructions.
My usual swimming spot has "no swimming" notices nowadays - AFAIK largely due to people killing themselves in there. Given that all the deaths have involved alcohol I don't see how this applies to me, so ignore the signs.

