Forum menu
Gordon Brown
 

[Closed] Gordon Brown

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#412728]

Why is he so hated by some? He has been a poor prime minister no doubt - but he seems to engender hatred far beyond what would seem reasonable and more than any reaction to any prime minister I can remember other than Thatcher.

So - can anyone explain to me why so much vitriol?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

Because people have forgotten just how awful the last govt. was.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Racism?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:53 pm
 G
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stupidty?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably because he hasn't got any redeeming qualities - like Tony Blair's stupid smile/grin


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because he has wasted billions upon billions of taxpayers money, via unelected quangos who destroy public services, awarding corrupt contracts to their crony friends in industry, while voting for an illegal war, anhilating personal freedoms via a bogus war on terror, and taking full credit for deregulating a fiat banking system, which has systemic failure built in, yet failing to take any kind of responsibility for its subsequent and fully predictable failure?

That's my starters for 10.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well its a long story TJ but I would start with overseeing an economic downturn not seen for 50 yrs. A lot of people have lost a lot thanks to his economic policies - that tends to foster negative feeling. Plus despite all of Nu-Labour's cries of cleaning up Govt they are just as guilty as the last lot of sleaze & financial irregularities.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Simon Ralli, all of those comments could be also levelled at Tony Blair, and yet because he was able to grin like a monkey, it somehow endeared him more to the British public.

[img] [/img]

....... what a ****


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 8:59 pm
 G
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think you'll find that Bank deregulation was under Mrs Thatcher just before the economy overheated at the end of the 80's, number of things done that led to previously unheard of issues arising including shockingly he economy overheating, and before you get there its like Pandoras box once you've opend it it can't be closed.
Regarding corrupt cronies thats a bit rich, given the documented history of Dennis, Mark and Carole Thatcher, and I beleive yet to be proven unlike the various things that the Thatcher family have got and still do get up to.
The bogus war on terror? The one that was supported by the chinless wonder and the self same one that the Tories are a wee bit quiet about for that very reason?
No responsiblity would be not trying to shore up the system. Personally I'd let the bastards go down myself, but I'm sure some economics waller will be along shortly to tell me how wrong that would be.

And I don't vote for him before we get to that bit. Just take a look at it evenhandedly.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mass Media and someone to blame.

Personally I think everyone who's been in no-10 etc has messed up or done something dum.

I think its tradition in the U.K.

There are things Gordo had done great and $hite-you can't satisfy eveyone.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:05 pm
Posts: 28
Free Member
 

A wonderful combination of arrogance, lying and being an utter disaster seems not to have endeared him to the British public.

I have no idea why.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another helmet thread


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:24 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

because he was placed into the job at least we can blame ourselves for voting Blair and his smoke and mirrors. We have had no chance to reply to the Brown goverment


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:27 pm
 GJP
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have always put it down to the fact that he was never elected by the British public and as a result he has always been on the back foot so to speak.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A wonderful combination of arrogance, lying and being an utter disaster seems not to have endeared him to the British public.

Can you think of a PM in the last 30 years that that statement wouldn't apply to?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Someone needs to blamed because they are incapable of admitting blame themselves.

We can blame everyone else before we blame ourselves, Politicians are the natural target as we can vote them out of power, but we must remember that we voted them in(this goes for whatever party) and we certainly weren't concerned about the unsustainable credit fueled boom when the going was good.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:32 pm
 Moda
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Forget blaming other parties for this countrys crisis they have been in power far long enough to correct previously incorrect regulations and coupled with the banks greed they have created today..... You cant pin any blame on Maggie and she had bigger balls than Gordon ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am afraid the deregulation of banks and the seeds of the problems are exactly Thatchers fault.

I still say he seems to attract more hatred than either Blair or Major without being noticeably worse as PM


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:34 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

I see that there are still people in the UK who believe that we have a presidential election.
Anyway wasn't Major an undemocratic PM then?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe its because he's not a "pretty straight sort of guy"?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ask Clarkson.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyway wasn't Major an undemocratic PM then?

From Thatcher getting kicked out in late 90 to the April 92 general election - I guess he was


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

If the public, and not the labour party, had voted him in then I think it would lessen the hatred and some areas would put up and shut up. However, he wasn't elected by us and, to make matters worse, he bottled out of calling an election late last year, if the press are to be believed.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:53 pm
 WTF
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because nobody voted for him to be there ?
Plus when the proverbial hits the fan you need a scapegoat.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

WTF - Member

Because nobody voted for him to be there ?

Just like every PM then?


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the public, and not the labour party, had voted him in then I think it would lessen the hatred and some areas would put up and shut up. However, he wasn't elected by us

We vote for a political party. As mentioned before we don't have presidential elections.

Forget blaming other parties for this countrys crisis they have been in power far long enough to correct previously incorrect regulations and coupled with the banks greed they have created today..... You cant pin any blame on Maggie and she had bigger balls than Gordon

I think you need to look at the the political ideology of the current Government and look at how close it matches the previous Governments, then you will understand what voters they were aiming at and why the economic ideology of a "light regulatory touch" was not changed and carried over from the Thatcher/Major period.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 94
Full Member
 

1) he feels ike we owe him....2.5% off VAT WFT??
2) the smugness
3) that jaw jut thing he does in between words when speaking.
4) He regulary posts what tyres treads

Enough said! TBH cameron is a sumg G*T too but would rather up up with him for 4 years than Brown of all of them only Vince Cable seems to be in any way credible!


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thatcher may have deregulated the banking system but did GB in any way do anything to curtail that? No. Thatcher's legacy is only part of the problem.

As for cronies? Labours got plenty - Mandy for starters..


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

[i]We vote for a political party. As mentioned before we don't have presidential elections. [/i]

That maybe so but IMO it 'feels' more US-like and presidential these days and, given this perception, people will associate a political party with its figure head rather than associate with a party as a whole.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I didn't intend to have a he did this he did that debate - its more about trying to understand why he is so hated when he is no worse and probably better as a PM than the last two?

I think Wookster is the nearest - it seems like its a personal thing rather than political


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LOL @ all the punters who appear to be suggesting that Gordon Brown's low popularity is all down to the British public having some high-falutin principles about 'democracy' ! !

Is that the same public of which at the last general election more than a third couldn't be bothered to get off their ar5es and vote ? And in last year's local elections about two thirds of the electorate couldn't be bothered to get off their big fat ar5ses !

And anyone who didn't realise at the time of the 2005 general election, that sometime during the life of Tony Blair's government Gordon Brown would become Prime Minister, clearly wasn't paying attention.

It was pretty clear that if Labour won in 2005, Blair would hand over to Brown.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think what may bug folk is the fact that Lab promised so much & for a while they delivered - it was a nationwide love-in. But to be so brutally let down (economic collapse) & lied to (Irag/WMD), well its just too much to take isnt it? Its the total lack of respect for the populace I think. Look at the HTR debacle - hardly anyone except BAA wants another terminal/runway yet the Govt seem determined to go ahead. They just dont seem to give a fek.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the English media hates a Scotsman running the country 8)


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Wookster is the nearest - it seems like its a personal thing rather than political

That's correct, many people hold him personally responsible, the evil snake that caused them being cast out of credit/housing boom eden.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:13 pm
 Solo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A few here MikeWSmith, El-Bent, are SPOT ON !!!, imo.

Of course, absolute power, corrupts absoltely. This is the flaw of democratically elected Gov, be it Lab or Con.

But this is only half the story, isn't it ??.

It is only my opinion, but the UK public should own-up to not taking enough interest in current affairs. Surely, under the democratic system, we are the "master of our own destiny" ???.

Someone voted these twits into No10 (if thats what you believe), either by voting for them, or by not voting at all, etc.

In 11 years, alot of poor decisions have been made. And that isn't a dig at NuLabour, the opposition carry some minor responsibility too. And, I believe that had they remained in power (winning the 97 election) then things would have not been much better.

But getting back to the U.K. voter. Lets face it, there are alot of people who "don't do politics/current affairs" and, most importantly, who do not vote !!!.

I believe that this is at the heart of the problems the UK has suffered with for the last 30+ years. People today don't seem to care enough to pay attention to what the knobs in London are saying. And given the amount of spin coming out of Westminster, I can see why.

However, I believe that each and every member of the U.K. public should consider it their DUTY to learn about what the parties are saying/lying/promising, and VOTE !!.

Its just my opinion, but if WE aint happy with the way things are, then its WE that should all take the time to find out whos promising what and to get off our ASSES and VOTE.

Too many people haven't a clue about current affairs and do not vote.

No, GB shouldn't be PM now, only after the house of cards has fallen, do we see what he really has done to us. I do not doubt his compassion for the poor or disadvantaged, or his concern for those less well off. BUT the way he has tried to go about re-dressing the "balance", hasn't worked.

Where he has lead us to, isn't good. Obviously he didn't do it on purpose, but we're here anyway, and I believe that he is not capable of bringing us out of the mess he permitted to occur.

We need a new PM. Q is, can that new PM, whomever he/she is "make the difference" that 21C U.k. needs

Solo.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:15 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

[i]We vote for a political party. As mentioned before we don't have presidential elections. [/i]

Sorry, but that's bollocks. The whole political system is based on personalities, with the biggest ones being the party political leaders. Try and imagine a political party, just after a general election, chosing a PM that wasn't the one presented to the public... Impossible, right?

(And FWIW our US cousins don't vote for a president, either...)

To TJ, the OP: the hatred of Brown is probably more to do with the length of the current government more than anything else. I don't remember Blair being any more loved at the end of his "reign", and certainly Major was just as hated.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 813
Full Member
 

Is it not just as simple as it's all went tits up whilst he is at the helm and as such he is getting all the flak for it.the fact that he was not personnally voted in gives people the moral high ground in that they did not vote for him. IMO


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mogrim - I really don't remember Major being hated in the same way at all - laughed at usually or despised.

It just seems to me that there is more hatred of Brown than he merits.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:51 pm
 Solo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ.

[i]"It just seems to me that there is more hatred of Brown than he merits"[/i]

To quote:

"deserve has nothing to do with it".

Solo.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He takes all the credit for the "good" years, announces the end of "Boom and bust", yet claims the current recession is "nothing to do with him".

Funny that, given he's been in charge of the purse strings for the past ten years. Nothing to do with him, ohhhhhh no...

EDIT: Major was funny. "More peas?" ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 10:59 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Apparently Brown was 'deeply saddened' by Jade Goody's death. Deeply saddened. That sounds quite serious to me. That's how I'd describe my feelings if my Grandfather died.

I don't believe that. So he's a liar.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 11:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funny that, given he's been in charge of the purse strings for the past ten years. Nothing to do with him, ohhhhhh no...

Yep, I hear that the Americans are also furious with Gordon Brown for screwing up [i]their[/i] economy.

In fact the yanks are looking forward to the forthcoming G20 summit where they expect all the countries present to issue a joint statement expressing their outrage at how Gordon Brown's shafted of their economies.

Strangely enough, when it became apparent just how serious the economic situation was last autumn, Gordon Brown received a massive boast in the opinion polls ๐Ÿ˜•


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 11:11 pm
 Moda
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think you need to look at the the political ideology of the current Government and look at how close it matches the previous Governments, then you will understand what voters they were aiming at and why the economic ideology of a "light regulatory touch" was not changed and carried over from the Thatcher/Major period.

Forget ideology the fact is they have had long enough to change regulations - get in the real world not the ideological one ....


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 11:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]Yep, I hear that the Americans are also furious with Gordon Brown for screwing up their economy[/b]

It may be a global thing, however the UK (according to the IMF et al) is particularly vunerable. Plus, Brown's managed to blow a national surplus (2000ish? Economic lag after the previous Government), into the uber IOU that we now have...


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 11:22 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

[i]Mogrim - I really don't remember Major being hated in the same way at all - laughed at usually or despised.

It just seems to me that there is more hatred of Brown than he merits. [/i]

I certainly remember hating Major - really hating him, his slimy grey countenance, his dodgy friends... (And the you'll have to explain the difference between "hated" and "despised" to me ๐Ÿ™‚

Most politicians end up hated more than they really merit - but they don't help things by taking all the credit when the going's good, and blaming anyone but themselves when things go wrong. And that's pretty much par for the course for all politicians, regardless of party (or indeed nationality) in my experience.


 
Posted : 22/03/2009 11:26 pm
Page 1 / 2