Forum menu
Ghostbusters reboot
 

[Closed] Ghostbusters reboot

Posts: 78497
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#7685530]

The trailer's here.

And dare I say it... it looks like it might turn out to be Quite Good. (Aside from the godsawful orange stripes on the uniforms anyway.)


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:25 pm
Posts: 34536
Full Member
 

I'm not convinced

Reboot/remake/rehash needs to bring something a bit different, it all seems very predictable and familiar


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:31 pm
Posts: 12809
Free Member
 

3 White Brilliant but quirky Scientists and a Black 'street smart' recruit fight ghosts, whilst driving about in a converted hearse - I can understand why it's called Ghostbusters now and not Ghostbusters 3.

I'm sure it'll be a laugh, but the only original idea seems to be that they've made them all female.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:32 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

If they bring the same humour that Bridesmaids has it should be great. Bridesmaids was brilliant. So good to see women starring in films that isn't fluff or romcoms.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sure it'll be a laugh...

You might have set your expectations a bit high.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:36 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
 

Ray Parker Jr. has got to be pinching himself.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:36 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

Beat me to it.

Yup certainly shows some potential.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:36 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
 

If they bring the same humour that Bridesmaids has it should be great. Bridesmaids was brilliant. So good to see women starring in films that isn't fluff or romcoms.

Agreed, but an important element must be that it's funny. And that trailer doesn't look funny.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:37 pm
Posts: 17313
Free Member
 

they've made them all female.

Ooooh! That's going to be tricky if they have to "cross the streams"


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:37 pm
Posts: 3370
Full Member
 

not sure what to make of this. starts off inferring that the original ghostbusters happened, as in it was a thing, but then looks like it'll be a near rehash of the original storyline.

Either make no reference to the original, or have it as an up to date continuation of the guys ghostbusting legacy.

I'm sure it'll be fun nonetheless.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:42 pm
Posts: 236
Free Member
 

Is it just me or did the ghosts not look as good as they did in the originals? I get the feeling I've seen it all before, certainly didn't look like it's worth a trip to the moving picture house.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:45 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

Is it just me or did the ghosts not look as good as they did in the originals?

Well I thought the opposite.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:49 pm
 nuke
Posts: 5803
Full Member
 

Ghostbusters is one of my favourite films from childhood so Im going to set my expectations very low for this new film and hope it exceeds them

I heard the other day the fire station featured in the original film is currently being demolished ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shitfest. If they went through the film and decided those were the best bits for the trailer.......I'm oooot.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 4:57 pm
 Yak
Posts: 6941
Full Member
 

This sort of thing makes me feel old. There's just no need - the original is still great.

Harrrummmph, grump, pah....


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:01 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Shitfest. If they went through the film and decided those were the best bits for the trailer.......I'm oooot.

Yup. My thoughts exactly. Looks utterly, utterly, shite.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They seem to have forgotten the funny.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:09 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

nuke - where did you see that? It was threatened with demolition years ago but it was rescued.

I don't think I'll be going to see this new version, I like the original(s) too much! :0)


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:12 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
 

It's a shame they are demolishing the station. The following advertisement, based around that station, was made by VW for independent cinema. It is simply brilliant.

Make your own day, and watch it.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:20 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

[s]Like[/s]

Molgrips has reacted to your post.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:25 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

loddrik - Member

If they bring the same humour that Bridesmaids has it should be great. Bridesmaids was brilliant. So good to see women starring in films that isn't fluff or romcoms.

Can I recommend you try some films from outside of Hollywood?
A few off the top of my head...
Run Lola Run
Three Colours (trilogy)
Y Tu Mama Tambien
Talk to Her
Amelie


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another rehash/reboot/call it what you will.

There are funny women out there, but I cannot abide this "Apatow" style of humour that gets old really quickly. Can't quite explain it but it's awkward and drawn out until they've rung out every second that they can.

The original film was one of the funniest films of the 80's, Bill Murray was amazing and it still makes me laugh


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:29 pm
Posts: 20889
Free Member
 

Agreed, but an important element must be that it's funny. And that trailer doesn't look funny.

Exactly my thoughts. The only half amusing bit was the Dawn French lookalike doing the Linda Blair moment with her head.

I doubt I will go out of my way to watch this even when it comes to Freeview.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:40 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

The Beard - Member

Is it just me or did the ghosts not look as good as they did in the originals?

Yeah, the effects in the original 2 were amazing!

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:57 pm
 loum
Posts: 3625
Free Member
 

not sure what to make of this. starts off inferring that the original ghostbusters happened, as in it was a thing, but then looks like it'll be a near rehash of the original storyline.

Anyone seen Star Wars The Force Awakens....?


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 5:58 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

Anyone seen Star Wars The Force Awakens....?

Never heard of it.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 6:02 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I was in Boston when they were filming this. Saw Ecto1 and did a little shriek of delight!

Film looks average.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are funny women out there, but I cannot abide this "Apatow" style of humour that gets old really quickly. Can't quite explain it but it's awkward and drawn out until they've rung out every second that they can.
Its like Hollywood (or Kristen Wiig specifically) realised this is a popular type of humour, and just replaced every possible joke with it. Works well when applied at the appropriate moment, but you cant overuse it or it kills a film.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 6:14 pm
Posts: 1512
Free Member
 

Harold Ramis must be turning in his grave.

no, just no


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 6:15 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Have they got a guy playing the Sigourney Weaver part? *

* not that I'm suggesting that ladies can't love/bump uglies with ladies....


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 6:21 pm
Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

Straight to video...

(Certainly won't bother seeing this at the flicks)


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 7:59 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Drac - Moderator
Anyone seen Star Wars The Force Awakens....?

Never heard of it.

Keep it that way!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:01 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
 

Oh it looks alright you miseries!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:14 pm
Posts: 8332
Free Member
 

looks terrible


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:14 pm
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

There are funny women out there, but I cannot abide this "Apatow" style of humour that gets old really quickly. Can't quite explain it but it's awkward and drawn out until they've rung out every second that they can.

I've watched the trailer twice because of your comment and haven't got a clue what you're on about.

Thete are two or three scenes that could have been written specifically for Bill Murray but nothing at all that suggests a Judd Apatow influence.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:15 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

Why (apart from money obvs) does Ghostbusters need re-making?


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:28 pm
Posts: 3537
Free Member
 

Gutted it's not a zombie vampire cowboy **** yeah mashup in grit-o-vision, WTF are they thinking!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wow...

...Harold Ramis is dead? I missed that.

Film looks OK.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Harold Ramis must be turning in his grave.

He might make a cameo appearance.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:33 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

So long as it passes the Bechdel test.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There are funny women out there, but I cannot abide this "Apatow" style of humour that gets old really quickly. Can't quite explain it but it's awkward and drawn out until they've rung out every second that they can.
I've watched the trailer twice because of your comment and haven't got a clue what you're on about.

There are two or three scenes that could have been written specifically for Bill Murray but nothing at all that suggests a Judd Apatow influence.

I am alluding to the actresses and the comedy they're known for, particularly Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy, who both seem to go for the same type of comedy, which just isn't funny. There is many a scene in both their movie histories that should have ended long before they did, and the slew of films that obviously take their cues from Apatow films.

That was all


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:34 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

My Star Wars comment was a joke as its often a comment made on here. Sadly I now feel I need to be serious, who is Apatow, Wiig and McCarthy.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:39 pm
Posts: 78497
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Have they got a guy playing the Sigourney Weaver part? *

Chris Whatshisface (Thor) is essentially playing Janine AFAIK, if that's any help to you.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Huey Lewis is going to be happy. I like it. Looks blooming funny
Keep in mind that the originals were a guy fest with some smut and learing at the ladies (re watch and then flame me).

You go girl!


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:40 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Why (apart from money obvs) does Ghostbusters need re-making?

Because wimminz.

No invented misogyny can not be undone by replacing men with women.

But of course everyone's to scared to say that this will tank because of it.


 
Posted : 03/03/2016 8:40 pm
Page 1 / 3