Facebook & Behe...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Facebook & Beheadings - is it me?

61 Posts
37 Users
0 Reactions
390 Views
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

So, Facebook have decided that sharing videos of beheadings is perfectly acceptable so long as you are doing so to show you disgust at them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24608499

But, they still won't allow say, a photo of a nice pair of tits (is the nipple is exposed) or your gentlemanly bits.

And use the C word and if someone reports you the mods will be all over you like a bad case of herpes.

Now, I'm not sure whether I agree or not with their stance on beheadings per se but to allow something as gruesome as that but not allow the use of certain language or nuddy photos just strikes me as difficult to justify morally.

Should it be a free for all or nothing at all?

Where do you draw the line.

Cheers

Danny B


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 6:03 am
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I guess it's up to them, but I can think of few things I'd less like to see than someone having their head cut off. I'd like to think that it will result in a backlash, but given the narcissistic nature of Facebook users generally, it's more likely to result in selfie decapitations.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 6:07 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Not you seems a very odd policy.

Cheers

Piggy Face


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 6:14 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I think the 'Christian Right' in the US has huge influence.

They hope that by showing fundamentalists of a different religious persuasion being inhumane their own cause will be somehow strengthened.

But as noted above seeing a nipple or cussing is not Christian and is therefore to be banned.

I think they must read different Bibles to the ones I've seen.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 6:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"I think the 'Christian Right' in the US has huge influence."

Any evidence of their influence over Facebook?


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 7:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"I think the 'Christian Right' in the US has huge influence."

Any evidence of their influence over Facebook?

three quarters of all people in the US consider themselves to be Christian.

I doubt FB sits down with the church to discuss values, however it would be odd if not offending Christians wasn't high on the list of priorities.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 7:04 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I complained about a Christian right group that was very very homophobic and IMHO was clearly inciting hatred toward the gay community and within seconds I got a response saying the group broke no rules.

There are a number of them out there and they seem somewhat immune to what I at least interpret facebook guidelines to mean.

Have a search for Christians against [inset word here - abortion, homosexuality, gays - whatever) and see what is allowed under the banner of Christianity.

Cheers

Danny B


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 7:09 am
Posts: 9156
Full Member
 

Makes me pretty uncomfortable - if they want to censor nudity or bad language, well, that's kind of fair enough by me, if that's what they want to do. But it seems a screaming great paradox to then allow graphiic videos of people being murdered. I mean, who are they trying to protect from boobies? Presumably young people, right? But FB then endorses the right of under eighteens to watch beheadings? And not just made-up, TV or film beheadings - it's all a bit grim, for my money, and you can't help but think there is at least the merest hint of an agenda behind it all.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you can't help but think there is at least the merest hint of an agenda behind it all.

+1

Got to keep the masses onside.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Decapitation vs boobies. Hmmmm.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:20 am
Posts: 5209
Full Member
 

Pretty much what Pondo said. If they don't want boobies on there then that's fair enough, but their approach does seem rather arbitrary, and you can't help but think there's more going on behind the scenes.

I'm considering going Facebookless again, it's an easy way of keeping in touch with people but it's not like there aren't other ways.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:20 am
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Bet the policy has been rescinded by the end of next week. No publicity is bad publicity etc etc as far as facebook goes.

By publicising the policy in their rules which permits the video to be published then facebook have given carte blanche to uploaders of controversial content like this. I can't see it


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:26 am
Posts: 5481
Free Member
 

I saw some dude pushing over a cosplay guy dressed as the Predator, onto a 5 year old kid. Then saw some guy that stole a motorbike get his fingers lopped off with an axe in two strikes.

I also typed in something in my status about the American presidency and it suggested I add Barack Obama as a friend.

Facebook's a wrong 'un. Plain and simple.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No publicity is bad publicity etc etc as far as facebook goes.

I disagree. Facebook doesn't really promote itself to gain members. However, it could certainly lose members/shareholders/advertisers if it makes a bad and widely publicised move.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:32 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Oh, those Christian funda[b]mentalists[/b].

Reminds me of the very early days of the 'net. Me & a mate were working at a Uni where access was new and completely open. We challenged each other to find the most vile pics and email them across.
I found a pic of a woman being over friendly with a dobermann pinscher and a fella having some malteser like items laid on his chest by a kindly lady.
Both were on the same Christian site, under the banner "THIS IS WHAT THE INTERNET WILL SHOW YOU!!". Hilarious.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 8:41 am
Posts: 4368
Full Member
 

What if there was a video posted of a topless woman being decapitated, would that be ok? Or would they blur out the nips? 😕


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 9:15 am
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

Holy shit.

Now I'm usually open to both sides of a debate but **** me. You cannot have snuff videos on Facebook. That is an absolute disgrace. Never mind kids, it's just wrong for anyone.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

What the actual....?

I'm not on FB, but I do have to wonder what sort of outfit won't let you show boobies, but will let you show a beheading. Something very wrong there.

Boobies don't kill people, beheadings do. I seen it in a documentary on BBC2


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

peter file - so the answer is "no", then?


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:22 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]Boobies don't kill people[/i]

I'm prepared to volunteer if anyone's running studies in this area.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

What's Google+ policy on showing violent murders?


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

peter file - so the answer is "no", then?

Are you actually suggesting FB pays no attention to the moral code governing 75% of its US users?

I think we're getting confused about terminology here. If you're referring to "evidence" as being some hard copy, conclusive proof of something, then save for getting your hands on some confidential minutes or emails from board level in FB, I'd imagine that sort of thing would be pretty hard to come by.

I'm talking about evidence in its wider sense, that the actions of a company can demonstrate influence (or lack of) from third parties (whether users, potential users, advertisers, shareholders, governments, cultures, religion etc).

Anyway, since when did lack of evidence stand in the way of a healthy discussion around religion 🙂


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:31 am
Posts: 4923
Full Member
 

Beheadings are ok but nudity might corrupt vulnerable people. ...you really could not make it up!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:31 am
Posts: 65992
Full Member
 

Nice comment from George RR Martin on this sort of thing:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Boobies don't kill people

I believe there was a case in America where a woman used her much-larger-than-average breasts to suffocate a man.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also on that note I might start anonymously reporting people using the C word on Facebook just to cause some ballache.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:35 am
Posts: 91097
Free Member
 

Are you actually suggesting FB pays no attention to the moral code governing 75% of its US users?

Let me just clear something up. 75% of Americans may be Christian, but 75% are not fundamentalist right wing Christians. They are a lunatic fringe in much of the country, they just shout the loudest.

There is no single moral code uniting 75% of the country. Important to remember that.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:39 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

That there is some proper ****ed up policy making

CFH invoking GLC 😯


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 56830
Full Member
 

I've heard that if you're determined enough, you can find pictures of norks on the interweb


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

from the BBC story:

[b]Advisers concerned[/b]

Facebook originally pulled decapitation videos after the Family Online Safety Institute - a member of its Safety Advisory Board - complained that they "crossed a line".

The charity's leader Stephen Balkam told the BBC he was surprised by the latest development.

"I would have expected a heads-up on this," he said.

Having a laugh or what?!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Let me just clear something up. 75% of Americans may be Christian, but 75% are not fundamentalist right wing Christians.

oh aye, i'll not disagree there. But the point is, when the church speaks in the US, people listen. If you're a US business/spokesperson/politician and you want to appeal to as many people in the US as possible, pissing of the Christian church or Christian values is not a good idea.

Just so I'm clear, i'm talking about the banning of boobies here, not showing beheadings!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most beheadings on facebook carried out by muslim extremists...check
The Jews hate the muslims....check
They like showing them in a bad light .....check
Mark Zuckerberg is a Jew


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:46 am
Posts: 9156
Full Member
 

I've heard that if you're determined enough, you can find pictures of norks on the interweb

This post is worthless without proof.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 11:47 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

I'll watch most things on the internet and most will be forgotten, but the beheading of one fella with a knife will haunt me for eternity. The only thing I've regretted seeing on the internet.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:08 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

Apart from your Mum.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'll watch most things on the internet and most will be forgotten, but the beheading of one fella with a knife will haunt me for eternity.

Yup, you name it, I've seen it, and probably didn't bat an eye. I watched just one beheading, it was one too many.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:14 pm
Posts: 4607
Free Member
 

Northwind wins for best contribution to this thread.

I like your quote. 8)


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Preston: Craig Slee Jailed for Putting Taliban Beheadings on Facebook
Craig Slee, 32, of Preston, was jailed at Preston Crown Court for five years for four offences under the 2006 Terrorism Act, including encouraging terrorism and dissemination of terrorist publications.
[b]Det Chief Supet Tony Mole[/b]: "The power of the Internet and social networking sites is vast and extends worldwide, so while Slee may not have been planning any sort of attack, he could easily have influenced someone else with the propaganda he was uploading."

Same material, same media, same method of sharing, same potential audience. The difference is in intent. Does intent really have sod all to do with anything when the video is the core message?


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:18 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I note from the4 f/book PR droid that you can only show such videos if it clear that you find them abhorrent.

I wonder therefore if I were to post a video of me and Mrs D having a bit of rumpy pumpy but noted that I disgust myself when doing it that's ok.

Share so long as you are not enjoying!!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Boobies don't kill people, beheadings do. I seen it in a documentary on BBC2

😆


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most beheadings on facebook carried out by muslim extremists...check
The Jews hate the muslims....check
They like showing them in a bad light .....check
Mark Zuckerberg is a Jew

Next you'll be telling me America panders to Israel (and turns a blind eye to its breaking of the Geneva convention) like it's the only US-friendly bastion of Judaism in an otherwise Islamic part of the world.

🙄


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wait, so Israel are running Facebook now? Is that who Zuckerberg sold it to?


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 1:11 pm
Posts: 65992
Full Member
 

SaxonRider - Member

I like your quote.

It may be the last thing he ever writes that's worth reading 🙂


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 1:15 pm
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

It makes me sick just reading about some of the stuff people post online

This article did make me despair when i read it the other day
http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/16/4841522/bestgore-corrupting-public-morals-mark-marek-luka-magnotta

I went to uni with one lad who was proud of owning a snuff movie, he was also an avid viewer of rotten.com and would probably be one of the eedjuts posting this beheading stuff on facebook now to his friends*
.
.
.
.
*i severely doubt he has any real friends


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:04 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I'm not on FB, but I do have to wonder what sort of outfit won't let you show boobies, but will let you show a beheading. Something very wrong there.

Apparently paper clips are allowed, so you can join......


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wait, so Israel are running Facebook now? Is that who Zuckerberg sold it to?

Sorry - humour it was written with doesn't come across when re-reading. 😳

Yes - I do think America does pander to Israel, is what I was getting at. So Zuckerboy and his global, influential corporation taking the same line wouldn't be entirely inappropriate, is where I was going.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:40 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]After being contacted by a member of the local community, the South Australia Police (Sapol) force has also registered a complaint with Facebook about a video showing the decapitation of a woman.[/i]

[i]"Facebook advised us that they had reviewed the video and found, 'It did not violate our community standard on graphic violence'. [/i]

Jesus Wept! What does violate their standards?

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24622920 ]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24622920[/url]


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Boobies!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Footflaps, I'm on it!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The most horrific vid I saw on FB, and something that will stay with me forever was the burning alive of suspected witches in the Congo..
I guess I should have been prepared for shocking images, as the title of the link hinted at atrocity being committed by Christian missionaries, but there was no real indication of the utter horror that I witnessed..

I feel very sick talking about it even now three years later
I could never even have imagined scenes so brutal and disturbing


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

narcissistic nature of Facebook users generally

And folk who post this sort of comment on a forum for complete strangers to read are not weird at all. 😉


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 65992
Full Member
 

The worst thing I've ever seen on facebook was reached by following a link that said ZOMFG WORST THING YOU WILL EVER SEE NSFL. So that came as quite a shock.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Technology just seems to bring out the worst in humanity, whether that be weapons development or filming and distributing images of murder/torture/abuse. It's very sad.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 4923
Full Member
 

Just seen a clip of the video on channel 4 with a warning and the clip stopped short of the actual beheading. ..still horrible.
I find myself agreeing with David Cameron which is a first!


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 6:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never understood why someone would choose to watch a video with that type of content. Watching someone being beheaded as a result of a "criminal conviction" or as an act of "terror" isn't something I want to see.

I don't have that voyeuristic nature to be interested in watching someone else suffer. Too much empathy.

I do agree with the OP though the imbalance in values or "morals" FB seem to apply are ridiculous.


 
Posted : 22/10/2013 7:26 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Seems that their policy has changed *again*.

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24635498 ]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24635498[/url]


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 8:34 am
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

After a long drive and lots of radio coverage yesterday I decide to put the below as my Facebook update (without the pink stars which have been added to please the STW mods!):

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 9:13 am
Posts: 9156
Full Member
 

'Major corporation in "considering their policies" shocker after public outrage' - well, that makes a refreshing change. 🙂

Now, if we can just get the banks, the government and the fuel companies to do the same...


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 9:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@ JEngledow, any movement on it from FB?


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 11:02 am
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

@ JEngledow, any movement on it from FB?

Nothing from FB (but that's probably because no-one has complained about it), but quite a lot from friends!


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a novel idea to get around this.

Don't go on Facebook! Live life instead 🙂


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 2:47 pm
Posts: 33532
Full Member
 

oh aye, i'll not disagree there. But the point is, when the church speaks in the US, people listen. If you're a US business/spokesperson/politician and you want to appeal to as many people in the US as possible, pissing of the Christian church or Christian values is not a good idea.

Unless it's these people, in which case it's the absolute right of everyone to be pissed off at them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church
http://www.godhatesfags.com
There are some deeply hateful people about.
littlemisspanda - Member
I've got a novel idea to get around this.

Don't go on Facebook! Live life instead


Oh, I do; I spend much more time on here than on Fb... 😉


 
Posted : 23/10/2013 4:10 pm