Forum menu
EU Referendum - are...
 

[Closed] EU Referendum - are you in or out?

Posts: 44724
Full Member
 

Pretty much Cougar.

The EU might throw May a few bones so she can claim a deal but I doubt it.

Its all going exactly as I said it would. Remember " row of the summer"? "Easiest trade deal ever"? " they need us more than we need them"

If anyone can be bothered going back thru the thread everything I have predicted will happen has happened. and we ain't even left yet - the worst damage is yet to come


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:44 pm
Posts: 15555
Full Member
 

I've suspected for a long time that there will be no practical change in anything other than name. We'll just have to pay out a shed load of money, effectively setthe economy back a decade or two and we won't have a seat/influence on the top table anymore.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No. Keep trying

Corbyn is a non-playing captain of leave 😉 an irrelevance so far, but could well be called on to deliver his dream 😉


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:46 pm
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

That the same Corbyn who looks more committed to remain every week?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So TJ when is the -4% recession going to happen? One of your early predictions


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

and there was me thinking he was a conviction politician

What do you reckon the will say when they quash his nationalisation plans?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:49 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Before the collapse of the euronzone?
Was that a starter for 10 or a bonus question.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] ?quality=90&resize=620,413[/img]


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:51 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 


What do you reckon the will say when they quash his nationalisation plans?

The same things they didnt when Osborne did it?

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/28/network-rail-piublic-sector-dont-call-it-nationalisation

Im surprised at you THM, propagating brexie lies
https://theconversation.com/amp/fact-check-do-new-eu-rules-make-it-impossible-to-renationalise-railways-61180


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cougar You will be relieved to know that a more sensible and accurate presentation of events is widely available

Look behind the two issues and the proposed solutions and you see the very clear evidence of what happens when grown up negotiators get together. Both the misnamed divorce bill and the NI solution were perfect examples of what we will end up with. Compromises that are structured to allow both sides to claim small wins while keeping some wiggle room. Both sides supported these proposals but unfortunately the subtle nuances were a step too far for both the DUP and remoaners

But don’t worry there is more to come and soon. Then we will Be discussion trade and another set of compromises to ensure access to each other’s markets


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was working outdoors all day today, did anything change? Last I heard the DUP were insisting that they would defend the people of Northern Ireland's right to be part of as crap a deal as the rest of the UK even when a better deal was offered to them and a majority of people in the province voted to remain in the EU.

What news?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 9:57 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

Oh and this one too
THM

http://renewal.org.uk/blog/eu-law-is-no-barrier-to-labours-economic-programme


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:01 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

But don’t worry there is more to come and soon. Then we will Be discussion trade and another set of compromises to ensure access to each other’s markets

Did you just correct the spelling and remove biggly from a Trump tweet?
The range of the bespoke (tm) solution is exactly as you said Cougar. There are too many variables to rule out either extreme. The UK side is at the mercy of a number of groups os parliament who are completely opposed to each other and have multiple red lines. From the eu negotiations they have theirs and it also needs agreement from the members which could involve parliamentary votes from them.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:05 pm
Posts: 91159
Free Member
 

Anyone watching BBC4? Programme about invasions of the British Isles. Except they keep going on about it being immigration. Almost as if they have a point to make!


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:07 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

THM, are you saying that was the plan all along , or did they think about it at 4pm yesterday ? 🙄


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:08 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

It's great molgrips, very nice to her someone actually explain how we are a product of continuous waves of migration.

Truly apt for the flawed isolationist fantasy of Brexit

Anyway excellent thread showing how Europeans view brexishambles

https://twitter.com/NinaDSchick/status/937993277223075840


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kimbers - nice article and link thanks. But flawed. We have case evidence of a European socialist governments plans for nationalisation as an alternative to austerity being rejected by the European Commission in the past few years.

Chris - like kimbers you might be overlooking who was involved with and who agreed to yesterday’s proposal. But that aside of course this is being made up as we go along. There is no precedent and the outcomes are dependent on on-going negotiations


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:18 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Brexit is more about a destructive reshaping of our economy than it is about reclaiming sovereignty, whatever that means.

I would not be surprised to see May fall from power imminently, especially if the DUP refuse to play nice.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:19 pm
Posts: 2997
Full Member
 

I rarely bother engaging with thm, as he comes across as such an unpleasant individual , but this

and there was me thinking he was a conviction politician

What do you reckon the will say when they quash his nationalisation plans?

Is just utter garbage...there's nothing to stop nationalisation in the EU.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Didnt see the programme didn't need to, I know we are one of the most invaded countries in the world.
In fact I would challenge anyone to name half a dozen more mongrel countries than the UK?

The usuals on here will carry with the wordy ****athon but for the nation in general this is increasingly looking like a dead duck.

I would suggest the only question now is whether or not we should charge the spannners who got is in this situation with treason.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:22 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

So it seems that Davis wasn't involved in the draft, May had shut him out...

Well that's what Davis' mates are briefing.

Davis, desperate to wash hands of brexishambles


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thsnkd fir the complement. Given that there is real evidence that contradicts your point, I will refrain from psssing the complement back.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:26 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

Or linking to said evidence?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So it seems that Davis wasn't involved in the draft, May had shut him out...

You are not suggesting that there are some intelligent people working in the background are you kimbers ? Didn’t tell you know who, he will get terribly upset that another falsehood is debunked.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:29 pm
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

What do you reckon the will say when they quash his nationalisation plans?

Cost quashes that.

Both sides supported these proposals but unfortunately the subtle nuances were a step too far for both the DUP and remoaners

Indeed. Like that Ian Duncan Smith. Another remoaner getting all frothy. Doesn’t he understand the nuances?

Actually I suspect what ever else is true about them the DUP are very good at nuances.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cmon it’s quite recent....


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You guys seem obsessed with the nutters. Why not focus on the smart guys who are actually negotiating, especially behind the scenes?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:34 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

THM is it your patronage or patronisation that in receiving right now, not sure what the correct word is


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:34 pm
Posts: 2997
Full Member
 

5 seconds in Google proves thm wrong..."does eu prevent nationalisation"...basically there are ways to do it within the EU as shown by the number of states that have nationlised railways.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:34 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

Cougar You will be relieved to know that a more sensible and accurate presentation of events is widely available

Oh, good. What other possible outcome have I missed? (Genuine question, what's option 4?)


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:39 pm
Posts: 3073
Full Member
 

So, if Northern Ireland will get exactly the same rules as the rest of the UK, can we have same sex marriage & abortion please?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:41 pm
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

The endless 'points scoring' on here has replaced any possibility of grown-up discussion.
There may be some intelligent focussed people working away behind the scenes and making progress; on the other hand that may be an illusion.
I'm off to stick pins into the Iain Drunken Smith voodoo doll.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The one that is currently being negotiated

As said many hundreds of pages ago - one that lies between two of the existing off the shelf options.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:50 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

A friend just posted this on Facebook.

[i]'MPs are debating universal credit at the moment. As the Press Association reports, the Conservative MP Heidi Allen was left in tears after hearing the “destitution” faced by people as a result of government welfare reforms. Allen struggled to speak following a speech by the Labour MP Frank Field, in which he described persuading a man not to commit suicide and how an organisation separately helped a child “crying through hunger”. Field, chairman of the Commons work and pensions committee, said the father of the child also said he had had a “lucky week” after neighbours invited him to a funeral “so they could finish off the food” once the other guests had been fed.

Rising to speak after Field, Allen said:

I don’t know where to start after that. I’m humbled by the words from my honourable, good friend from Birkenhead. No government is perfect, no benefits system is perfect, no debate, no motion is perfect, but by God we work together and make this better.

Intervening to give Allen a chance to compose herself, Field said:
I’m just amazed for the first time I’ve been able to report those events publicly without weeping. I’m so affected by them, I’m affected as she is. That’s the debate we’re really having - how do we represent here the desperateness of many of our constituents when many of us feel we can’t offer them hope.'[/i]

We send £350m to [the EU | pay for Brexit]* - why not feed our ****ing children instead?

* delete where applicable


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:50 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

dont get me wrong THM, i am delighted the UK is a lot closer to staying in the EU as it was a few months ago .


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 10:57 pm
Posts: 44724
Full Member
 

Cougar - Moderator

Cougar You will be relieved to know that a more sensible and accurate presentation of events is widely available

Oh, good. What other possible outcome have I missed? (Genuine question, what's option 4?)

I'll bet you cougar you don't get one. You might get a link to pie in the sky tory wishlists but thats about it.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well that’s a relief for you


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:01 pm
Posts: 5776
Full Member
 

So the options are

1 stay in the EU
2 Hard Brexit leaving with no deal and moving to WTO status
3 Soft Brexit (this could be a Swiss model, a Norwegian model, or some other undefined bespoke deal somewhere in between)

In other words, exactly what has been said from day 1


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:02 pm
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

Should have put 3 options on the ballot paper


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cougs. Not a bad reference piece to help you


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:06 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

I don't believe we qualify for WTO status. We need to accept... I can't remember exactly now, sorry, I'm very tired. Single Market / Customs Union I think. And to get that we need to accept the other three.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It absolutely isn’t Chris. We are closer to a WTO exit than it was. The die is cast, we won’t be remaining in the EU under any circumstances.

As far as May is concerned agreeing a 2 year transition / implementation period is the most pragmatic way to solve the money argument. You can see ner logic in delaying A50 then adding 2 years to get to the end of the current “framework” period = job done.

As for “damage to the UK” have a listen to this, 0.25% pa to GDP under the WTO deal option even assuming we make no new deal / benefit from a more global focus. Had that been the projection HMT / Osbourne shared the resukt would have been an even bigger win for Leave.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:09 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

Cougs. Not a bad reference piece to help you

I don't want an 87 page document which is nearly a year old. I'd like you to answer the question in your own words, summarise what you're trying to say about where we are right now and what our options are. A couple of sentences will suffice. What's option 4, what have I missed? Not being an arse, serious question.

I'll bet you cougar you don't get one. You might get a link to pie in the sky tory wishlists but thats about it.

How very prescient.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:09 pm
Posts: 17999
Full Member
 

Should have put 3 options on the ballot paper

Ah but we wouldn't have got a simple majority that way. I use the word simple advisedly.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You already have it. If you can’t be bothered to read the context that’s you loss. It would have been prescient of me to realise you were simply being what you deny, not looking to genuinely understand.

I will leave you in the incapable hands of the IB. Enjoy the wallow.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:17 pm
Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

As for “damage to the UK” have a listen to this, 0.25% pa to GDP under the WTO deal option even assuming we make no new deal / benefit from a more global focus. Had that been the projection HMT / Osbourne shared the resukt would have been an even bigger win for Leave.

Wishful thinking - nothing more, nothing less. No subsrancet in that film, just one mans optimism. Hardly proof of anything.......

I wish, for a change, a Brexiteer could come up with some actual facts. But, sigh, here we are 18 months & still FA all progress.

If I could leave this rather unhappy & divided little island I would.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't believe we qualify for WTO status.

?????


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@mrlebowski he was quoting The World Bank

Those who voted leave are optimistic about the future outside the EU. Thats why we voted out. It helps to explain the resiliance of the UK economy, 52% of us are delighted and a decent chunk of the 48% have accept d the result and are getting on with making the best of it.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:31 pm
Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

[url= https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/01/economist-explains-4 ]WTO & Brexit - The Econimist[/url]

"The WTO will even shape the Brexit negotiations themselves. The government is desperate to ensure that Britain’s big exporters do not suffer from Brexit. It has explicitly assured Nissan, a carmaker, that it will not suffer. But WTO rules can make such sectoral deals hard. If Britain were to agree bilaterally with the EU not to apply tariffs on cars, the WTO’s “most-favoured nation” principle might force it to offer tariff-free access to other countries as well. Channelling government money to boost exports is also something of which the WTO would disapprove. The WTO option may seem like an easy way out for post-Brexit Britain, but that road is in reality covered with bumps. "

WTO easy? Sounds far, far, har harder.....than "Oh, we'll just switch over....."

Lies, obfuscation & double talk all over again....

Sigh..

Edit: Source Jamba - helps to be able to check these things you know..


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:31 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

You already have it. If you can’t be bothered to read the context that’s you loss.

Well, no, I don't, so I've clearly missed something somewhere. Pretend I'm stupid. What's option 4, what have I missed? spell it out for me.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:39 pm
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

52% of us are delighted and a decent chunk of the 48% have accept d the result

Hmmm. The facts are against you there Jamba. Sorry and all.

Unless you mean 52% of Brexies are delighted and 48% of Brexies are putting up with it. Not sure about those figures but they’re probably about right.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 31036
Full Member
 

Few of the most excitable Brexiit fans seem to understand what the WTO does, or how it operates, or the power plays already under way to squeeze us by the big nonEU countries and blocks. Only the EU is backing our proposals as regards a separate status with WTO.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

It helps to explain the resiliance of the UK economy, 52% of us are delighted and a decent chunk of the 48% have accept d the result and are getting on with making the best of it.

Recent surveys show that the 52% are not all delighted, in fact many of the representatives of the 52% in parliament keep banging on about how crap it all it, then there is Nige no payments but I want my pension - the caricature of brexit itself.
The WTO option terrifies most sensible people and business leaders. It sends the UK off to be comparable with NK and Syria in terms of trade.

Again the options are
Stay the same (probably without a rebate)
Something between above and below - The Bespoke Deal Option
Full Hard Brexit to isolationism

Anyone who claims to know more than that is lying to themselves first and foremost.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Currency devaluation already exceeds impact of WTO tariffs on car exports. Interestingly Dyson debunked the FT piece about multiple charging as components are imported and finished car exported. He said thats not how it worked and he should know as a manufacturer.

We export £10bn in cars and import £40bn from the EU. Its a no brainer for them to agree and if they don’t they are the losers.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:46 pm
Posts: 66093
Full Member
 

jambalaya - Member

52% of us are delighted

Best Jambalaya statement since that time he thought northern ireland was an island.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:47 pm
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

Jamba doesn't understand what the WTO does, or how it operates

Is this of help? From the leaveHQ.com "Leave Alliance" no less (whoever they are).

http://leavehq.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=128


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:47 pm
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

Jamba - their economy is rather more than 4 times the size of ours so it’s a bigger hit to us.
But you know this.


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:48 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

“The German Car Industry Will Save Us.”

😆


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:48 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

You guys seem obsessed with the nutters. Why not focus on the smart guys who are actually negotiating, especially behind the scenes?

You can hardly blame us. How exactly are we supposed to focus on the behind the scenes people that we don't know anything about?

As for “damage to the UK” have a listen to this, 0.25% pa to GDP under the WTO deal option..,

If the future is so rosey why were the government so cagey about releasing those impact reports even after they were repeatedly ordered to do so? And even then redacting them heavily. If they were full of good news then why were they so concerned about fellow MPs seeing them?


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:50 pm
Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

If the future is so rosey why were the government so cagey about releasing those impact reports even after they were repeatedly ordered to do so? And even then redacting them heavily. If they were full of good news then why were they so concerned about fellow MPs seeing them?

+1.

Can a Brexiteer explain this please???

I shan't hold my breath..


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:54 pm
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

You can hardly blame us. How exactly are we supposed to focus on the behind the scenes people that we don't know anything about?

THM reguarly peaks behind the curtain, so he knows whats really going on

honestly theyre like really clever grown up geniuses

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/12/2017 11:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kelvin I understand very well how WTO works. It’s setup to make things easy and it works very well as can be seen by the volume / proportion of trade carried out on that basis. What is more we can unilaterally lower tariffs if we wish, there are many which aren’t worth the bother and cost of collecting. Which brings me neatly to the following

Did you know that despite Switzerland having a free trade agreement with the EU companies chose to use WTO for 50% of qualifying trade as paying the low tariff is cheaper than complying with EU documentation requirements. The average EU WTO Common External Tariff is 1.5%


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:10 am
Posts: 7960
Full Member
 

THM reguarly peaks behind the curtain, so he knows whats really going on

It would be reassuring to have such an expert insider aside from the fact they have shown themselves repeatedly unable to understand mere mortals comments on this thread.

Those who voted leave are optimistic about the future outside the EU.

Really? Every single one? Since I would be willing to bet a handful will have changed their minds (either way).
Your announcement therefore seems a tad too optimistic.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:12 am
Posts: 44724
Full Member
 

One EU ambassador told the Guardian the failure to reach a deal on Northern Ireland was a microcosm of a wider problem. “At root the problem is that [May] seems incapable of making a decision and is afraid of her own shadow,” the source said.

“We cannot go on like this, with no idea what the UK wants. She just has to have the conversation with her own cabinet, and if that upsets someone, or someone resigns, so be it. She has to say what kind of trading relationship she is seeking. We cannot do it for her, and she cannot defer forever.”


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:13 am
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

Kelvin I understand very well how WTO works.

Oh, cool. I don't really beyond what I've picked up from the Internet, if I'm honest. Could you explain it to me?


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She has to say what kind of trading relationship she is seeking.

Eureka! An EU official finally recognising what comes first or at least should do. Little steps


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:20 am
Posts: 31036
Full Member
 

The average EU WTO Common External Tariff is 1.5%

Tell that to a farmer.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:23 am
Posts: 31036
Full Member
 

Hang on… you've argued before that the EU is overly protectionist as regards its TRQs… now you're arguing third counties face really low tariffs when selling into the EU? Cake and eat it?


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:29 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

What is more we can unilaterally lower tariffs if we wish, there are many which aren’t worth the bother and cost of collecting. Which brings me neatly to the following

But you are using these tariffs to pay for stuff, if they are so low what are you going to raise?
The average

Is a really really stupid and pointless statistical number that in no way shows the real impact of anything. If I buy 1bn worth of goods with a tariff of 15% and 1 quid of goods with a tariff of 0.001% the bill is very different to 1.5% 1bn and 1 quid.

Eureka! [s]An EU official[/s] finally recognising what comes first [s]or at least should do. Little steps[/s]
you see with a little handy misquoting this now becomes a joke about chickens and eggs. Why do you insist in picking out the only line that agrees with you and missing the bit that gives you the context to what was said?


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:31 am
Posts: 78318
Full Member
 

Eureka! An EU official finally recognising what comes first or at least should do. Little steps

Did you miss my question, THM? Read up.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:35 am
Posts: 44724
Full Member
 

you see with a little handy misquoting this now becomes a joke about chickens and eggs. Why do you insist in picking out the only line that agrees with you and missing the bit that gives you the context to what was said?

Are you new here?


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:41 am
Posts: 9193
Full Member
 

52% of us are delighted and a decent chunk of the 48% have accept d the result and are getting on with making the best of it.

What is it we're making the best of? Sorry to bring up Welsh steel fears/NHS nurse shortages/Grimsby fishing exemption plea, etc.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:45 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

lol TJ - sometimes it's worth pointing it out, personally I'd be embarrassed if it was me but he could be having a little celebration at his trolling ability (which is also fairly bad)

What is it we're making the best of? Sorry to bring up Welsh steel fears/NHS nurse shortages/Grimsby fishing exemption plea, etc.

Harking back to WW1 really, those most isolated from the impacts make judgements that will have some very serious consequences for others.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 12:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Welsh steel... Grimsby fishing

Both of which positively flourished during our time in the EEC/EC/EU


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 1:39 am
Posts: 34482
Full Member
Posts: 34482
Full Member
 

and see also

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/10/dont-blame-the-eu-for-the-decline-in-some-british-fishing-ports/

apparently UK is 2nd largest fleet in EU, but 5th biggest employer, thanks to modern ships, profits in the UK fishing industry growing year on year and are the highest across the EU, as are profit margins. The level of investment in the industry, is also growing and is the highest across the EU.

its almost as if the decline of the british fishing industry has more to do with changes in technology than in the EU

just wait till the sea is full of robot trawlers, isnt that the future Hammond has for us all?

wonder if theyll still get this 25m investment in the port from the EU?

http://humberbusiness.com/news/european-funding-boost-for-the-seafood/story-525-detail/story


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 1:49 am
Posts: 5296
Free Member
 

Didn't that awful first Star Wars movie start with a trade war, hmmmm?


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 7:19 am
Posts: 17999
Full Member
 

52% of us are delighted and a decent chunk of the 48% have accept d the result and are getting on with making the best of it.

#fakenews


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 10:22 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

It does seem odd that if Brexit is going to be so awesome, then the impact assessments would have been readily available. Apparently what is available is heavily redacted and subject to heavy security procedures in order for MPs to view.

Also, +1 for fixing the disaster that is universal credit. But that’s for another thread.


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 10:28 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Commitee meeting:

[i]Benn: So the govt has not undertaken any impact assessments on individual sectors of leaving the EU?

Davis: No.[/i]

Jesus H Christ what have they been doing?

[edit] some more detail:

[i]Benn: Has the Government done impact assessments on leaving the EU for individual sectors?
Davis: not in sectors..theres no systematic impact assessments Benn: Automotive?
Davis: No
Benn: Aerospace?
Davis: No. No on all of them[/i]


 
Posted : 06/12/2017 10:31 am
Page 490 / 964