Forum search & shortcuts

EU Referendum - are...
 

[Closed] EU Referendum - are you in or out?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Mr Raab says that the UK will not be trapped in a customs union.. so hard brexit     it is...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45700833


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 12:04 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

And yet May says she won't rule out compromises.

Do ministers normally contradict leaders at conferences?  I don't usually pay attention.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 1:13 pm
Posts: 34538
Full Member
 

This conference is just a giant leadership contest to appeal to the head banging party members.

Hence why Raab, May, Mogg, even Hunt keep spouting ignorant sometimes offensive or xenophobic nonsense about Brexit, even if it only makes negotiations more difficult !


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 1:22 pm
 Leku
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Listening to the conference just now. Seemingly the Tories are the party of business and stability.

Cough Brexit Cough.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 1:41 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Do ministers normally contradict leaders at conferences?  I don’t usually pay attention.

Why would they stop now? Been happening most days for the last couple of years


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, this icky ‘festival’ thing. Are we making entry for British citizens only (in keeping) or are we going to drop the pretense and just put up a big ‘Whites Only’ sign?

It's way more complex ... given the number of non-white people who voted for Brexit and did so at least partly due to immigration.

I did mentioned earlier but I was living in France when the FN sweep was going 10yrs or so ago... and I know plenty of jews voted FN....who were pushing (at that time) a more anti-Arab than anti-Jew agenda...

Brexit stinks.

On one level there is no such thing.... there are people who voted to get rid of Polish workers taking their jobs and others who regarded them as stealing their benefits and others who voted to stop the mythical Turkish and others even more bizarrely who equated it with getting rid of people with darker skin... whilst others just wanted to set our own laws on bananas... or avoid conscription into a mythical EU army...

Most of these people would be at odds with each other... it's just they got sold the same solution and with the magic of social media tailored for them... It's lie a snake oil seller attending an arthritis convention one week with a set of claims, labels and advertising and the following week a diabetic convention... where the claims, labels and adverts all get switched.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 3:14 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

Most of these people would be at odds with each other

And for all the doubts i have regards another referendum, this is one of the mosting compelling reasons to have one. What exactly is the result meant to be. When you voted leave, did you mean screw you Cameron, did you mean join EFTA, did you mean no immigrants or maybe you really do want no planes or food.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

maybe you really do want no planes or food.

Why do you need planes? Are you some kind of weirdo who wants to leave the UK? Right your name is on the list as a traitor...

as for no food we survived in the wars didn’t we? Ok there were 20m fewer people and it was shit but we will be free....


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 4:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or avoid conscription into a mythical EU army…

does Macron know that it is mythical, maybe you should tell him ?

And Junkers, obviously.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/08/jean-claude-juncker-calls-for-eu-army-european-commission-miltary


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 5:06 pm
Posts: 10963
Full Member
 

However, his proposal was immediately rejected by the British government, which said that there was “no prospect” of the UK agreeing to the creation of an EU army.

Veto innit bruv. 3 year old "news" story too. But other than that yes the EU army is as real as Turkey's membership.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 5:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well at least an EU army might buy equipment from within the EU rather than the US or Russia boosting the chance of a contract for UK manufacturing.

the majority of the military machine seems to be about sustaining employment.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 5:28 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

lol @ turnerguy , maybe you should tell us your vision of brexit without unicorns and fairies instead .


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 5:53 pm
Posts: 31103
Full Member
 

UN badge, NATO badge, EU badge… whatever… mobilising combined forces drawn from multiple national army/navy/airforce is increasingly the norm, especially for peacekeeping or defensive roles. I fully expect more EU cooperation now, with us doing our grumpy thing to one side, and USA retreating, but all deployed staff will be employed by nation states still… I can't see the remaining EU countries wanting to go further than that.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Veto innit bruv. 3 year old “news” story too.

except that we won't be vetoing soon.

And Junkers speach after we announced Brexit :

"By 2025 we need a fully-fledged European defence union,” he said. “We need it. And Nato wants it."

Also more pushing for everyone to be in the Euro.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/sep/13/jean-claude-juncker-plays-down-brexit-in-eu-state-of-union-speech


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:17 pm
Posts: 31103
Full Member
 

except that we won’t be vetoing soon

Well, if you're against such things, then giving up the vetoe was a daft decision, wasn't it.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:19 pm
Posts: 10963
Full Member
 

Precisely Kelvin - if we were remaining then we keep the veto and retain control over the direction of Europe. If we leave then they can do what they choose but when we subsequently rejoin we almost certainly won't replicate our current arrangement.   Schengen, Euros and all that could come thanks to those who didn't want them when we had the capacity to stop them anyway.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You never want to give up the vetoe. Especially if you’ve no hands and want to scorn the French military...


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:24 pm
Posts: 6935
Full Member
 

The US are pissed off that the EU nations don't pull their weight in NATO and having a combined force that could share those tasks would be useful in terms of developing inter-operability, joint training etc - which is the whole point of the big exercises they hold every couple of years. Similar with supporting UN operations. Only the tin-foil hat brigade / seriously deluded and retarded Brexiteer could read anything more sinister into this - they are not asking nations to give up their sovereignty. You are also reducing the risk of one nation going 'rogue' on its neighbours, similar to NATO article 5 commitments. An EU 'block' on the Russian border might be kinda useful.  Given the current state of the UK MOD where we can barely muster one operational destroyer, we are going to end up looking like one man and his dog.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 6:30 pm
Posts: 78532
Full Member
 

There's a lot of talk about a theoretical "EU army."  Can someone explain to me why a combined EU armed forces is actually a bad thing?  And for that matter, why we'd want to opt out of such a thing rather than having it on our side?

So, this icky ‘festival’ thing

Sounds like a fete worse than death.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:20 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Can someone explain to me why a combined EU armed forces is actually a bad thing?

Ze Germans?

The French?

UK boys being under the control of some foreign power?

It's just another general distrust of the EU thing really, can't see a downside to closer collaboration and resourcing


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:24 pm
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

Probably some politics between EU and NATO too. Lots of chances for overlap/conflicting goals. Mostly just anti-EU knee-jerkism though.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:27 pm
Posts: 78532
Full Member
 

Oh, no, I get that.  I mean, is there any leaver justification beyond "ZOMG the EU is forming an army, let's get out quick"?  Or is it just non-sequitur rhetoric?


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:36 pm
Posts: 31103
Full Member
 

Some feel that anything organised at any level other than a national level (even when that relies on nations agreeing and coordinating) is a threat to their manhood nation. This type tend to get all stroppy about devolution as well.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:54 pm
Posts: 7126
Full Member
 

I think at one point the concern was that an EU army would undermine NATO.

However, Donald Trump seems to be doing that just fine on his own now.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 8:57 pm
Posts: 31103
Full Member
 

Once we're out of the EU, it'll be the other bodies we cooperate under… NATO, UN, WTO… that'll be under attack by the types that attack the EU now. Just follow the money back to US backers… and the data back to Russian stirrers… and you'll see the same forces attacking all those institutions. Hell, just listen to a few Trump speeches.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 9:01 pm
Posts: 1119
Full Member
 

C4 news a few minutes ago

Anna Soubry Vs JRM with Jon Snow at the Tory conference

Quite a heated discussion. Actually it covered more ground than any Brexit debate I have seen in 2.5 years! Well worth a watch


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 9:03 pm
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

If there weren't good arguments for the EU before then the performance of the govt since then has been pretty bloody convincing.

BTW I wonder if anyone saw this lovely set of graphs which were doing the rounds on twitter?

https://twitter.com/paulcoxon/status/1046361733131055104


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 10:14 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

With the Brexit Sec now saying the EU needs to get serious I wonder if the EU team had a special set of BS bingo cards made up - on expenses of course - for the tory party conference. If I was cruel I'd make sure I had the entire lot on a short video to play at the start of the next negotiation.


 
Posted : 01/10/2018 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wonder how the Tory plan to cut low skilled migration squares with the previous plans of creating a highly skilled work force?

I can very much see massive changes to the benefit system where if you want to claim you have to do the low skilled work. A bus will collect you at 3am to take you to the field... Or a move to you can only claim if you have paid in...


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 8:14 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Jesus wept. Headbangers, the lot of them. Just click on the thread and read the ejacualte spewing forth from the mouths of Brexiteers. And these are the people defended on numerous occasions by our STW contingent of Tory Shills & Quitlings.

https://twitter.com/tpgcolson/status/1046734191101018112?s=21


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 8:36 am
 kilo
Posts: 6934
Free Member
 

Good to see Arlene foster progressing the likelihood of a united Ireland and ignoring that the majority in NI voted against brexit

DUP leader Arlene Foster has said the Good Friday Agreement could be altered to accommodate a final Brexit deal.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Ms Foster said it was not a sacrosanct piece of legislation.

Ms Foster said it was deeply frustrating to hear Remain voters and what she termed "people in Europe" talk about Northern Ireland as though, she said, we cannot touch the Belfast Agreement.

Things evolve even in the EU context, she added. There had been a lot of misinterpretation, she said, holding up the Good Friday Agreement as a sacrosanct piece of legislation.

Ms Foster also praised what she called Boris Johnson's positive vision for Brexit and said she could work with him if he became prime minister.

Does anybody actually read the telegraph?


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 8:41 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Ms Foster also praised what she called Boris Johnson’s positive vision for Brexit and said she could work with him if he became prime minister

Probably the kep point. Little Miss Moral Authority has no issues with his serial adultery or any other issues.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ms Foster also praised what she called Boris Johnson’s positive vision for Brexit and said she could work with him if he became prime minister.

Did anyone mention to her that if any party secured enough votes to win an election that the DUP will be kicked back into touch to rant on the sidelines again?


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:09 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

Could Scotland chuck a spanner in the works?

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16951490.scots-battle-to-win-mps-right-to-halt-brexit-likely-to-succeed/


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:10 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Did anyone mention to her that if any party secured enough votes to win an election that the DUP will be kicked back into touch to rant on the sidelines again?

Her point seems to address that a change of leader will not result in them pulling support if its borris. This means tories can go for it and not have the high risk of an election and half a chance of seeing out the term.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:13 am
Posts: 12668
Free Member
 

I wonder how the Tory plan to cut low skilled migration squares with the previous plans of creating a highly skilled work force?

It is the opposite of what we should be doing.  Educate/train British people to do the better paid slightly more skilled jobs while using immigrants to do the crap jobs for lower money


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Educate/train British people to do the better paid slightly more skilled jobs

Shhh you don’t want an educated society that works cross cultures and borders in the global world. They are much harder to manipulate.

you want people who don’t quite understand what is going on then you can steal their money and run off to the sun...


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:27 am
Posts: 7121
Free Member
 

Announcing that the Tories will cut low skilled EU migrants is what the Brexiters / old people / thickies etc want to hear.  If only it had been possible to do this without leaving the EU..


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:33 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I wonder how the Tory plan to cut low skilled migration squares with the previous plans of creating a highly skilled work force?

I'm exactly the same way as they always have done by making an announcement and then doing nothing at all about it.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well as there is no system on paper or deployed in the home office to classify and vet immigrants doing nothing will result in no one coming here to work.

I think all the people in the UK arm of my employer are resigned to redundancy as the business cannot cope without free movement of people and goods. Mind you the management have been looking at India and China for years. Just waiting for the excuse


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:55 am
Posts: 34538
Full Member
 

Maybot has an amazing ability to reply to 5 different questions with the same meaningless answer , on R4 just now


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 9:55 am
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

The Tories have just gone full on UKIP.

The reality of Brexit is hitting home and they are desperate to keep their voters together by promising more. But they know very well they won't be able to deliver.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 10:24 am
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

No-one cares about delivering, no-one has since 2016. Neither labour nor tory. It's all about staying in power and getting over the line.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 10:34 am
Posts: 31103
Full Member
 

**** the politicians. **** all of them.

Sorry… this liberal luvvie puts it better than me…

https://twitter.com/danielh_g/status/1047055535223316481?s=21


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can very much see massive changes to the benefit system where if you want to claim you have to do the low skilled work. A bus will collect you at 3am to take you to the field… Or a move to you can only claim if you have paid in…

That's ok with me, I will be pissing myself with laughter at the side of the road watching, when the first Brexit voters get press ganged into working in the fields.

Bring it on.


 
Posted : 02/10/2018 11:31 am
Page 1141 / 1714