Forum search & shortcuts

estates vs saloons
 

[Closed] estates vs saloons

Posts: 5197
Full Member
 

I keep a stove in there for chill out moments, sitting in the boot is ace!

Good place to get the kids sorted too!

Biggest downside of this car is that the rear glass doesn't open on its own, was a handy feature for lobbing stuff in. My 5 series had that before. Though this one has electric opening and closing which I'm growing to appreciate!


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 4:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Estates are my preference, more space, no boot lip, underfloor storage for wet stuff, dry place to get changed and performance is the same as the saloon mostly. Also with the seats folded down many councils allow you to use loading bays to park as classed as light commercial - really - I found this out parked in Kingston Upon Thames.


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 7:00 pm
Posts: 46139
Full Member
 

People carrier. Like all the advantages of an estate, but volume turned up to 11. 😉


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 7:13 pm
Posts: 4418
Full Member
 

Its 10 years since I had a saloon car and I don't miss it one bit, had estates before that right back to a Hillman Avenger.

Previous was a Mazda6 Estate & now a Volvo XC60 and the thought of struggling with a wheelchair in a saloon car doesn't appeal.

As others have alluded to I prefer the look of an estate but that might just be my taste?


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

saloons.... why?


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 7:28 pm
Posts: 4515
Full Member
 

Can't see the point of saloons. There's no downside to having an estate and it's just so much more useful.


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 7:59 pm
Posts: 1130
Free Member
 

I had estates or combi vans since 1994. I've never considered a saloon or hatchback, there're just too small. Bikes, tip, work, camping, holidays, kids, tip, did I mention the tip? They just make life soooo much easier in my opinion.


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you want to, or already do, transport up to 4 people with no luggage on a regular basis, then a saloon might be quite handy.


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 8:05 pm
Posts: 10637
Full Member
 

Saloons are both quieter and stiffer than estates. I'd still have an estate.


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 8:45 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

that I can sit in the boot with the lid up and put my shoes/boots on.

Split tailgate picnic bench FTW!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 10/10/2016 8:50 pm
Posts: 33988
Full Member
 

I picked up and drove a Ford B-Max last week, a car I'd never even heard of before! I've driven the S-Max and the C-Max, but this was an unknown quantity, and I must say I was really impressed.
Drove it from Bath down to Bridgwater via Chew lake, along nice twisty roads and it was loads of fun, basically a Fiesta van but with proper seats and windows, like a Meriva, but the thing I really liked was it had two sliding rear doors, with no 'B'-pillars, making it dead easy to load stuff when it's tricky to get the doors wide open.
The one I drove was the 1500 diesel, and it was just a really enjoyable car to drive, and practical with it.

[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 12:31 am
Posts: 2114
Full Member
 

Split tailgate picnic bench FTW!

Needs a table and cushions

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 8:40 am
 cpon
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People carrier. Like all the advantages of an estate, but volume turned up to 11.

You mean dad level turned up to 11.

Estates are much cooler than people carriers.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 10:28 am
Posts: 5197
Full Member
 

That split tailgate looks like an XC90? That's not an estate...

Any estates with a split tailgate?

Fixed that statement...

People carrier. Like all the advantages of an estate, [i]but you've given up on life[/i]

... Or when you've got more than 2/3 kids


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 10:51 am
Posts: 17449
Full Member
 

^^^ I was very tempted by an SMax this time, but we really don't have a need for the extra seats and with bikes on roof, sticking with estate made more sense.

I think if we had to cart more than our own 2 kids around regularly, people carrier would make a lot of sense


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The problem with roof racks is the bikes can fall off if something fails or isn't quite right, height barriers, muddy crap dripping all over the car, theft,
I've seen all the above happen over the years, I prefer a tarp with the bike inside the car personally.

I drive a saloon and used the bike roof racks for a while, until one come off on a bend leaving the forest, I probably didn't secure it correctly as it was dark and I was tired after a long ride and I was lucky that the pedal actual missed the roof so had no damage at all, due to this I bought a van for my bikes as when looking for roof damage I noticed that when fastening the bikes to the roof I'd been putting fine scratches all over the doors (come out with the T cut) and I'd also got used to having mud all down the back window and across the roof, basically I was trashing my car with the bikes on the roof.


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 11:14 am
Posts: 17449
Full Member
 

I was trashing my car with the bikes on the roof.

err, apart from some dirt on the roof and windows, it sounds like user error then .... 🙂

I have used Thule roof carriers for last 10 years, probably driven thousands of miles with bikes on roof, and apart for one bird strike, no issues...so far 🙂


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

err, apart from some dirt on the roof and windows, it sounds like user error then ....

I have used Thule roof carriers for last 10 years, probably driven thousands of miles with bikes on roof, and apart for one bird strike, no issues...so far

Certainly was, I hadn't given a thought to the little scratches I was causing when trying to secure the bikes.

And so was the bike that fell off, I can't have secured it right (cold, dark and I was tired).


 
Posted : 11/10/2016 11:24 am
Page 2 / 2