Forum menu
eBay seller threate...
 

[Closed] eBay seller threatening to sue for libel?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, apart from shipping the thing you bought in the time agreed, what would you require from a seller in order to give positive feedback?

Well, maybe a bit of communication, marking things as 'Dispatched' maybe?

We have 3 possibilities, Neg, Poss, Neutral
If we agree that a neg is for poor service not dispatching on time or not as described etc. - we're left with positive and neutral, if doing the bare minimum isn't neutral, what would you use it for?


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 11:44 am
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

Jota - neutral for getting stuff to you inside time frame is just being an arse IMHO


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jota - neutral for getting stuff to you inside time frame is just being an arse IMHO

As I said, I don't bother anymore
What exactly is wrong with neutral feedback?


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What exactly is wrong with neutral feedback?

To me, neutral feedback suggests there has been an issue somewhere along the line. Pos feedback is the norm - neutral is for situations where, for instance, the item didn't turn up and you had to email the seller and it eventually turned up OK a few weeks later...


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 6409
Free Member
 

You got the goods you ordered in the timeframe specified - what's the issue?

Problem with neutrals is ebays horrendous selling limits imposed for sellers who don't meet certain targets

Or the fact that you can get upto a 25% reduction in fees with good feedback

Leaving a neutral could cost someone £100's a month as no fee reduction for a transaction you had no issues with


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 9138
Full Member
 

I think it's that eBay will not release funds to sellers unless they get mega-elite-uber-awesome feedback on everything. So basically, honest feedback about the quality of a service, or of goods, goes out the window.

I've had some really good sellers on eBay that have posted quickly and kept me informed all the way through the process. They deserved good feedback. I've also had people that have posted late, not told me anything and done the bare minimum possible to fulfil an order. That's fine, but it's not 5 star service or a positive buying experience, so it won't get five stars.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be honest, I don't give feedback until I get some for my sales

So your feedback rating is completely null and void because any feedback left by buyers was given to stop you withholding their feeback.

I on the other hand, leave immediate feedback on confirmed payment, and every single one of my buyres is then free to leave honest feedback without fear of reprisals. They did, 100% positive.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You got the goods you ordered in the timeframe specified - what's the issue?

There is no issue, the deal was adequate, no more, no less, ie neutral


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with jota180 on this.

Neutral = no problem. But seller didn't warrant a 'wow, that was good/fast/well communicated/nicely packed/etc'.

Those that think otherwise (which apperently includes eBay) could do with going to nightschool to improve their education.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:15 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

To me, neutral feedback suggests there has been an issue somewhere along the line.

That's what I would have assumed too in the context of Ebay and I have no intention of going to nightschool.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

How would it be good - they drive round your house with it,give you a cake and a reach round?
I think you are out of kilter with the ratings system rather than us or Ebay.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd agree with Jota180 that neutral feedback should be accepted as what it is. I.e. everything was as expected, no more, no less.

But ebay is broken in that it punishes "acceptable" rather than rewarding exceptional. Therefore it isn't worth the hassle to give someone neutral feedback as although they delivered a neutral service it seems harsh to penalise them for not doing anything wrong.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would it be good - they drive round your house with it,give you a cake and a reach round?

funny, I thought I mentioned above the sort of thing that would get a good but to save you scrolling up ....

Well, maybe a bit of communication, marking things as 'Dispatched' maybe?


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldnt worry mate, i have been through this and the buyer always wins.

i'd advise you to open communications with ebay, they will have copies of all correspondence if you have gone via ebay.

we sold a pram few years ago it was in very good condition, the buyer changed her mind when she saw it and wanted her money back.

i fought it via ebay and opened a complaint, she won in the end, ebay paid her back then came to me for the money.


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldnt worry mate, i have been through this and the buyer always wins.

i'd advise you to open communications with ebay, they will have copies of all correspondence if you have gone via ebay.

we sold a pram few years ago it was in very good condition, the buyer changed her mind when she saw it and wanted her money back.

i fought it via ebay and opened a complaint, she won in the end, ebay paid her back then came to me for the money.

Different story though possibly if they would have taken it and then said they didn't want it because it was dmamaged. How do you prove it was damaged when collected rather than damaged after it was taken? Tricky one that


 
Posted : 26/09/2012 8:22 pm
Page 2 / 2